Formula 1 Discussion - And favourite driver?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
In the end as long as it isn't Hamilton lucking his way into a fast car I'm fine. In before FIA/FOM threaten ferrari into taking hamildouche.
The swap is Hamilton and Russel, it's going to be a purely status-based one: Virgin Hamilton the waterboy and Chad Russel the Winner.

Nah, all jokes aside, I don't see it either. Maaaaybe Mick and Zhou? But Mick didn't perform that hotly up till now to warrant such a bump and Zhou's support by chinese companies is way too important to make this swap.
I'm raking my brain and I got nothing.

Though I wouldn't mind Vettel in Merc replacing Hamilton tbh. Get a last shot at the title next year, once Merc get their shit together, that'd be fun.
 
I'd wait until half-way point to determine the actual value of Zhou as a driver. He wasn't a slouch in F2 and it's gonna take at least half a year until he's got some sort of a grip with the car.
 
They're now going full "the engineers fucked over the golden child who's the greatest ever, how dare they?". Hey Hamilton and Toto you know who wasn't lapped by Vestappen at Imola? Russell. But sure its all the designers' fault, even though Hamilton even says it's not the worst car he's ever had.

SmartSelect_20220426-153335_Brave.jpg SmartSelect_20220426-153347_Brave.jpg SmartSelect_20220426-153402_Brave.jpg SmartSelect_20220426-153413_Brave.jpg SmartSelect_20220426-153439_Brave.jpg SmartSelect_20220426-153505_Brave.jpg SmartSelect_20220426-153538_Brave.jpg SmartSelect_20220426-153545_Brave.jpg
 
They're now going full "the engineers fucked over the golden child who's the greatest ever, how dare they?". Hey Hamilton and Toto you know who wasn't lapped by Vestappen at Imola? Russell. But sure its all the designers' fault, even though Hamilton even says it's not the worst car he's ever had.

View attachment 3219108View attachment 3219109View attachment 3219110View attachment 3219111View attachment 3219112View attachment 3219114View attachment 3219115View attachment 3219116

meme allstar to the rescue.png
It's outright shameless how many excuses the make based on a supposedly bad car, while the waterboy is doing just fine. I mean, sure, he's not getting any podiums either, but he's still keeping that car well within the top 10.
 
I hate King Nigger's fans more than I hate him or Toto, by far. At least I get some enjoyment out of both those clowns when their schemes blow up in their faces and they make a great pair of "villains", but the fans are just downright insufferable.

I kinda hate that I think this, but at this point I'm starting to feel that Daniel is holding McLaren and Lando back. It feels bad cause I like the dude and I thinks he's overall a good driver, but he just doesn't seem to have it in him the past couple of years. I fear his lack of performance may be negatively impacting development of the car.

At this point I'd take a trade for Gasly, Alonso or Bottas. Hell, after the last few races I think maybe even Tsunoda (I just had a brainfart but honestly I don't know...). Don't think it will happen though.

Shame about Leclerc, I don't want Max to just cruise to another championship even though I don't mind if he wins. But P3 for Lando more than made up the disappointment for me, after McLaren's abysmal season start.
 
If Hamilton and Russel were trading places every weekend I'd be more inclined to believe this "The car is really finicky you guys" argument. But as it is George is consistently outperforming Lewis, and the people carrying water for hambone aren't fooling anyone.
 
Shame about Leclerc, I don't want Max to just cruise to another championship even though I don't mind if he wins. But P3 for Lando more than made up the disappointment for me, after McLaren's abysmal season start.
There is a theory going around that Mclaren made better progress then the other Merc teams because they use their own rear suspension and not the one that is build by Mercedes and supplied to Williams and Aston. So maybe the problem is "just" the rear suspension. Of course fixing this issue might take more time especially since the Merc itself has a complete different design theory then the rest of the field. Also funny sidenote: Red Bull brought a new rear suspension to Imola and suddenly the propoising was cured. So maybe that's the key to get the car working in general. Hopefully Ferrari will bring somethingh similar to cure there propoising even though they don't loose performance because of it
 
Have I got something for you guys, a transcript of both Lewis' and Russell's radio calls from the race.

link
archive

I may be biased due to having to put up with ordering department and bosses who never tell you anything, but I prefer Russell's radio. It also seems like he's trying to get everything out of the race what's possible.

My picks:
1650998007707.png
Has time to comment on someone else's tyres

1650996923966.png
3 laps after Russell started with the talk to go to slicks it's still to wet for Lewis. Wonder how it would have went if he had a window.

1650997121691.png
Get told pit stop got messed up, replies OK.

1650997343012.png 1650997386025.png
Toto did praise Russell just no one bothered to play it, and a bit of ego management with Lewis.
 

Attachments

  • 1650997369699.png
    1650997369699.png
    9.9 KB · Views: 37
If Hamilton and Russel were trading places every weekend I'd be more inclined to believe this "The car is really finicky you guys" argument. But as it is George is consistently outperforming Lewis, and the people carrying water for hambone aren't fooling anyone.

It's become clear that Hamilton, at this point in his career, expects to be front-running in dominant machinery and anything less will result in him half-assing it in the midfield and whinging. Russell, on the other hand, just got handed the opportunity of a lifetime and even a middling Merc is way better than the trash-tier Williams he had last year. He's used to driving the wheels off shitty cars, and so he does exactly that.

It's a shame what has become of Hamilton. He wasn't always a spoiled rich asshole that constantly & inexplicably plays the race card like he is now. The parallels to LeBron are enormous, and I don't think it's an accident. He desperately wants to be LeBron, even though LeBron ruined his own brand by becoming a bitter, toxic, ungrateful whiner that expects to call all the shots and have others take the blame for his shortcomings. Sound familiar?
 
There is a theory going around that Mclaren made better progress then the other Merc teams because they use their own rear suspension and not the one that is build by Mercedes and supplied to Williams and Aston. So maybe the problem is "just" the rear suspension. Of course fixing this issue might take more time especially since the Merc itself has a complete different design theory then the rest of the field. Also funny sidenote: Red Bull brought a new rear suspension to Imola and suddenly the propoising was cured. So maybe that's the key to get the car working in general. Hopefully Ferrari will bring somethingh similar to cure there propoising even though they don't loose performance because of it
Interesting. I knew the McLaren suspension design is different (inverted basically) from most of the field and already believed it to be the main reason they have less porpoising. But was unaware the Merc supplied the suspension to others. That combined with the apparently underpowered engine would explain the horrible performance of the Merc powered cars.
 
Interesting. I knew the McLaren suspension design is different (inverted basically) from most of the field and already believed it to be the main reason they have less porpoising. But was unaware the Merc supplied the suspension to others. That combined with the apparently underpowered engine would explain the horrible performance of the Merc powered cars.
I think it's part of the deals Mercedes offers. Customers can buy more then just the engine you can also buy the gearbox and other stuff that is basically part of the engine. It also saves the customers time to design and build those parts as they simply get what fits the engine. I think Ferrari does the same
 
I kinda hate that I think this, but at this point I'm starting to feel that Daniel is holding McLaren and Lando back. It feels bad cause I like the dude and I thinks he's overall a good driver, but he just doesn't seem to have it in him the past couple of years. I fear his lack of performance may be negatively impacting development of the car.
Somewhere in the last couple of pages, there was mention of a rumoured driver swap and I speculated it may have something to do with reserve drivers. Looks like Piastri is a reserve driver for both Alpine and McLaren. I wonder if the rumour is more along the lines of McLaren wanting Piastri exclusively.

It'd make sense for Piastri to be part of McLaren's succession planning, as.... well, I don't want to say Ricciardo is past it, but in the modern era there seems to be a pattern of F1 drivers that peak in their mid-late 20s before their performance gradually tapers off. Kimi and Seb are the most obvious examples; I think Daniel is also in this category.

Maybe Daniel will shuffle off to a lower-tier team once his contract expires, with Piastri taking his place? Although tbh if Daniel does leave McLaren in the next couple of seasons, I'd much prefer to see him retire from F1 altogether and either try a different racing category or become an F1 commentator. I'd love to see him teaming up with Alonso or Barichello at the 2024 Bathurst 1000... but I digress.

Hambone is definitely past it; he's just had DSP-tier luck over the past 3-4 seasons and now his luck has run out.
Hey Hamilton and Toto you know who wasn't lapped by Vestappen at Imola? Russell. But sure its all the designers' fault, even though Hamilton even says it's not the worst car he's ever had.
Hambone says this now, but I wouldn't be surprised if he has his own Alain Prost "truck" moment before the season is out. Whether it'd be enough for Toto to fire Hambone, especially given current year sensibilities, is another story.
 
Last edited:
Alpine would be insane to take that deal no matter what McLaren are offering.
Jack Doohan joined the Alpine Academy at the beginning of this year, so letting Piastri go may not be as insane for Alpine as it sounds. Though it still seems insane to me that Jack left the RB Academy to go to Alpine, but that's another discussion entirely.
 

F1 REVEALS ITS PLAN FOR MAJOR 2026 CHASSIS RULE CHANGES​

8 hours ago By Edd Straw

The FIA has revealed its preliminary objectives for Formula 1’s 2026 chassis regulations, which will be introduced alongside the next-generation power unit following a meeting of the F1 Commission.

The so-called ‘four pillars’ for the power units, which will no longer feature the MGU-K with the hybrid power output increased to 350kW, were announced last December.

These are “maintaining the spectacle”, “environmental sustainability, “financial sustainability” and making F1 “attractive to new power unit manufacturers”.

The FIA set out a number of key targets to deliver on those power unit targets “relating to performance parameters, sustainability and financial regulations”.

But there will also be significant changes to the cars, which will build on what has been achieved with the major technical regulation changes in 2022.

The FIA says it laid out “key targets relating to performance parameters, sustainability and financial regulations” to the F1 commission, which offered “positive feedback”.

Its statement listed the following six targets:

1) Significantly reduced drag to improve sustainability and efficiency and complement the power unit characteristics.

2) Maintain and improve on recent lessons learned about close racing and cars being able to follow each other.

3) Reduce car dimensions.

4) Reduce or contain car mass.

5) Sustainability. Continue path towards the standardisation or simplification of strategically-selected components for cost-cutting purposes. Expand the usage of sustainable materials or technologies and focus on recyclability.

6) Continued innovation in terms of car safety, moving towards active and connected safety systems.

The FIA also confirmed agreement “in principle” to the number of sprint events on the 2023 calendar being increased to six in a meeting of the F1 Commission in London today.

F1 originally planned to run six sprint events this year, but this idea was shelved as agreement could not be reached over the impact of these on the cost cap.

Red Bull is understood to have been the most vocal opponent of the increase to six sprints in 2022, leading to F1 reverting to holding three sprint events with the financial allowances – an extra $150,000 per sprint event.

On top of that, there’s also the provision for $100,000 per car in case of damage sustained in the sprint, with the scope to apply for more in excess of that in the case of a major crash.

The cost cap implications are one of the question marks still to be definitively resolved before this plan can be finalised – although it is now close to certain that the six sprints will go ahead next year.

The FIA statement said teams were “supportive” of the increase to six sprint events, adding that “while supporting the principle of an increased number of sprint events, the FIA is still evaluating the impact of this proposal on its trackside operations and personnel, and will provide its feedback to the commission”.

The Commission is also known to have discussed problems with the cost cap, in particular in reaction to inflation pressures.

While there is a system of what is called ‘indexation’ in the cost cap that does account for inflation, it’s not felt to be adequately responsive to account for the recent rapid increases in inflation. In particular, this has had an impact on freight costs.

The financial working group has been tasked with creating proposals for tackling this more effectively amid pressure from in particular the big teams.

Speaking at Imola last weekend, F1’s managing director motorsports, Ross Brawn, said he was confident that the financial regulations will be changed to solve this problem.

“The inflationary increase needs to be reviewed because when those rules were developed, inflation was relatively low and predictable and now it’s high and unpredictable,” said Brawn.

“And if you look at the inflation rates that apply to industrial enterprises, like a Formula 1 team; you’ve got power, you’ve got raw materials, you’ve got all the things which are proving to be quite expensive at the moment. So I think there is a solution coming on that.”

Helmet-mounted cameras, as trialled in 2021 and used in the early races this year, will also be made mandatory next year. This proposal was “unanimously approved”.

The F1 Commission also agreed to trial a reduction in slick tyre allocation from 13 to 11 sets at two events next season.

This is “to evaluate the impact of the reduction in tyre allocation on track running, with the overall intention to move to more sustainable use of tyres in the future”.
 
I just skimmed that text, so I maybe just missed it, but they didn't mention removing DRS, did they?
It's basically the racing equivalent of fool's gold. It offers cheap action that seems like things are happening, but it's actually just a mere simulacrum of the truth. No wonder FIA is holding on to it, this fool's gold translates into fool's money to FIA.
 
Reading all that and if they remove DRS it sounds like they are basically trying to mimic indy car. Honestly it would be smart to do indy car has a lot of things that are better. Having a limited amount of push to pass is way better then having cars that can just pass each other every lap woth DRS. The other big problem with Formula 1 is the same problem with racing in general you are going to work in the grey area of the rule book. You can either make spec cars like indy cars which isnt that exciting or you can try and cap spending on development which i guess is the better move to make each year different. If they do that there will probably be no one beating Hamiltons records.
 
If they do that there will probably be no one beating Hamiltons records.
The merc dominated turbo hybrid era was the longest period of rules stability in the history of the sport. That is the only reason Hamilton holds all those records. Schumacher took his championships across multiple eras, Hamilton won one, tooled around mid pack from 2009 to 2013, then got handed the best car with rules preventing others even developing in that area (power unit) for multiple seasons.
 
Last edited:
The merc dominated turbo hybrid era was the longest period of rules stability in the history of the sport. That is the only reason Hamilton holds all those records. Schumacher took his championships across multiple eras, Hamilton won one, tooled around mid pack from 2009 to 2013, then got handed the best car with rules preventing others even developing in that area (power unit) for multiple seasons.
And not to mention, Schumacher went to Ferrari when the team sucked, made it a winning team and later shaped Mercedes into the unbeatable behemoth of the sport it was until last year and might once more become. Hamilton was handed the golden key to the unbeatable car made by a team shaped by larger men than Hamilton can ever hope to be.
Once Hamilton ends his career, he'll be -at best- someone whose face will represent Mercedes, while his input into the team, its teamwork or its engineering will boil down to "Hire more dem black men, knowattaymsayin"
 
Would F1 ever go the active aero route? Like dynamically adjusting surfaces that provide just the right amount of downforce on tap? And then tucking it away on straights?
Schumacher went to Ferrari when the team sucked, made it a winning team and later shaped Mercedes into the unbeatable behemoth
Care to elaborate the lore on this? I only vaguely remember Schumacher when I was a kid back when he was the driver to beat.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom