Fire Emblem series

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Curious, I have seen many hate on Lyn for this reason and the community went on a path of praising Hector for the longest time. Lyn was always seen as IS pandering to old fans, while Hector was a true G. Then again, half the community seems to hate boobs and rears as it ruins their serious tactics rpg.

Everyone seems to trash Eliwood though as he is a generic lord.

Lyn being a good unit is a very old opinion just like how people thought Marcus was bad, it was a commonly held opinion that Lyn was a real contender and units like Lowen sucked for dumb reasons like "you already have too many cavaliers, Sain and Kent are better, Lowen can't double ever because he tanky.". Lyn being able to double and crit things looks really useful if you don't care about movement stats, or bulk, or enemy phasing in a game like FE7 where javelins can slaughter half the map. Lyn also being a lord also compulsively forced some people to raise her which somehow makes her a good unit for some reason.

Lyn is a much loved character by much older fans who I've seen plenty of times try to say how interesting her character is and put down Hector and especially Eliwood. Eliwood isn't exactly the most complicated lord, but he does have that typical anime MC determination through all the issues he faces. I mean the man sees his father die after turning half the world upside down looking for him and kills his waifu by complete accident. Hector being a dum dum is a common-ish opinion for first timers as Hector needs Hector mode to have the full extent of his backstory. Lyn being the first lord you meet and a cute grill makes people ignore how overall pointless Lyn really is in the grander scheme of FE7, even if FE7 as a whole isn't that great to begin with as a plot.

Basically if you look back Lyn is the beginning of how the Fire Emblem community is today with the whole waifu shit, just no one seemed to believe that until Heroes showed just how popular Lyn was.
 
Lyn being a good unit is a very old opinion just like how people thought Marcus was bad, it was a commonly held opinion that Lyn was a real contender and units like Lowen sucked for dumb reasons like "you already have too many cavaliers, Sain and Kent are better, Lowen can't double ever because he tanky.". Lyn being able to double and crit things looks really useful if you don't care about movement stats, or bulk, or enemy phasing in a game like FE7 where javelins can slaughter half the map. Lyn also being a lord also compulsively forced some people to raise her which somehow makes her a good unit for some reason.

Lyn is a much loved character by much older fans who I've seen plenty of times try to say how interesting her character is and put down Hector and especially Eliwood. Eliwood isn't exactly the most complicated lord, but he does have that typical anime MC determination through all the issues he faces. I mean the man sees his father die after turning half the world upside down looking for him and kills his waifu by complete accident. Hector being a dum dum is a common-ish opinion for first timers as Hector needs Hector mode to have the full extent of his backstory. Lyn being the first lord you meet and a cute grill makes people ignore how overall pointless Lyn really is in the grander scheme of FE7, even if FE7 as a whole isn't that great to begin with as a plot.

Basically if you look back Lyn is the beginning of how the Fire Emblem community is today with the whole waifu shit, just no one seemed to believe that until Heroes showed just how popular Lyn was.
IDK?
Following the FE community can be such a hassle. I just renter Fates breaking the camel’s back and creating a huge divide over waifu culture being in FE. It was mainly played as post-Awakening vs pre, but the key issue always seemed to be story and waifus. This then went in a million directions to create further divides leading to the FE 4 purists, The GBA squad (mainly just 7 and 8 ), the Radiant fans, and modern Awakening and Fates fans. I just remember Echoes being a sort of neutral ground all could agree was good. During this, Lyn was shunned by fans for being overused as she was bait placed in Heroes all the time as the classic female, not to mention her out of place role in Warriors. By 2018, it seemed to be the community citing Hector as the best character, along with Ephriam.

To me, it seems Fire Emblem’s community is split and about being against Waifu culture. They seemed to have settled down now with 3H, but this was a major issue for the longest time.
 
Well, it doesn't really help that you can marry your characters off and 3H mitigamitigated this by only focusing on one proposal.
 
IDK?
Following the FE community can be such a hassle. I just renter Fates breaking the camel’s back and creating a huge divide over waifu culture being in FE. It was mainly played as post-Awakening vs pre, but the key issue always seemed to be story and waifus. This then went in a million directions to create further divides leading to the FE 4 purists, The GBA squad (mainly just 7 and 8 ), the Radiant fans, and modern Awakening and Fates fans. I just remember Echoes being a sort of neutral ground all could agree was good. During this, Lyn was shunned by fans for being overused as she was bait placed in Heroes all the time as the classic female, not to mention her out of place role in Warriors. By 2018, it seemed to be the community citing Hector as the best character, along with Ephriam.

To me, it seems Fire Emblem’s community is split and about being against Waifu culture. They seemed to have settled down now with 3H, but this was a major issue for the longest time.

Echoes is a fairly criticized game now, normally due to how insane Rudolph's plan is and how super dated it feels especially the map design. It is basically Gaiden, a game from the early 90s, with some minor to moderate fixes and adjustments. You still have retarded ship maps, desert maps, swamp maps, basically every map in Celicas route is shit alongside really stupid avoid tiles. Celica in general is a controversial character due to how her route ends with a lot of arguments back and forth about if she is good or not. Eirika also gets similar treatment. For whatever reason female MCs are some of the most controversial due to Miccy Sue saying Ike bad, Lyn simps vs everyone else, Celica/Eirika being tricked and that makes them bad characters, and Edelgard being midget hitler.

Lyn still has some diehard fans who will bend over backwards for her just it isn't as common place due to the "100 reasons why Edelgard/Dimitri bad" discussions or why this one piece of dialogue says Edelgard is playing 5D chess with mole people.

The whole waifu culture thing is mostly due to the change in anime over the last 20 or so years. Old days FE used more 90s anime tropes and styles and modern FE uses post 2000s anime tropes and styles. A lot of older FE fans especially aren't anime fans that just so happen to be able to ignore dumb hair colors in favor of the drama of say FE4 and 5 for example. Waifus were a thing, just not like they are today and people are too ignorant of anime's development to be able to tell the difference. Lyn's fanbase and rise to popularity is just the most obvious and first mainstream example of this.
 
Last edited:
Echoes is a fairly criticized game now, normally due to how insane Rudolph's plan is and how super dated it feels especially the map design. It is basically Gaiden, a game from the early 90s, with some minor to moderate fixes and adjustments. You still have retarded ship maps, desert maps, swamp maps, basically every map in Celicas route is shit alongside really stupid avoid tiles. Celica in general is a controversial character due to how her route ends with a lot of arguments back and forth about if she is good or not. Eirika also gets similar treatment. For whatever reason female MCs are some of the most controversial due to Miccy Sue saying Ike bad, Lyn simps vs everyone else, Celica/Eirika being tricked and that makes them bad characters, and Edelgard being midget hitler.
One could say that Celica doesn't have a lot of life experience, being a priestess and all. But it stops being justifiable after it becomes clear that Mila's tits are gone and she has no concept of "stranger danger."
 
-4ZURE-First
AzuraAquafina second
HeyYou Third

As a courtesy since this is long.

I hate it when many respond at once. Need to write a long wall of text that they're often tempted to only read part of because it's really fucking long. So I apologize for it being long but take it as an earnest attempt to respond as completely as I think necessary, so please do read it. I read yours. And because I have to respond to how a character feels, apparently, which is harder than just stating the feeling. But some housekeeping first, this was not even remotely the subject that this all began as. Nor am I even arguing against the subjectivity on display but apparently this is not clear at all.

I say "yeah whatever, people may not like her for being pushy or whatever but I am talking about a specific complaint" and the response I get is entirely in ignorance of this concession. And one litigant, the one who goes into actual detail, clearly has a flawed understanding of the character imo. Saying my peace on that is not failing to accept other opinions.
I am the only one who actually quotes her or anything concrete. Everyone else, pardon me, seems to rely more on their particular vibe of the character, which is really nebulous and will be based on a lot of woo if never checked. But this is treated to be only as valid as "my opinion" as if I ever argued about the truly subjective criteria. In my experience this is a dishonest arrangement so I probably approach with that framing. Don't take it personally.

I say this because you guys have a consistent pattern of showing your hands the more you talk. That's gonna be the theme here. I don't think anything concrete you guys say holds up and it comes across like you were holding out on me until now (imo). I am forced to be kind of a dickhead now, because I am being accused of not respecting others opinions by sharing my own and finding some fault with other opinions, and I think the people saying this were far from honest about their own opinions.


Incel was used earlier on in the thread. Probably not by you, but it was a term brought up, so my ending was just saying that you do not have to fall under that category for liking a character. Simp was just the opposite, so I used it.


Sleeping around is just an easy term for going from people to people, partner to partner. Maybe not the best term, but then it seems unfitting for either as they are just in a dating game to my knowledge. I really do not mind this aspect of either character, it is how they act and react to it that can get on my nerves. If they want to go on multiple dates and juggle multiple partners, whatever, but Dorothea’s sad game just does not work for me. I prefer the more comedic and owned up mentality presented by Sylvain.



I can see a misunderstanding in the character for myself. Though somethings can be up in the air for interpretation. The Caspar thing was still weird.

Also many characters are more than just tragic moments. Bernedetta had to spend her life with her abusive father, being kept away from other people. Not only was she beaten, but she had little people to confine in. Edelgard was tortured during her life, watched all siblings die, and was unable to have a proper ending with the boy she cared for. Dimitri had practically everything taken from him from parents, to the girl he fell in love with, to multiple friends, to even one of his own father figures since he choose to run away. Now he is left with a resentful friend and the responsibility of a genocide lead by his people on his shoulders. Point is, Dorothea is far from the only one with a tragic life, many have big moments that lead into long term issues that will eat away at them.

I also think people lack understanding of Sylvain in this situation as people on this thread have chocked up his backstory to pointless fodder. It is way more than that, and Miklan fits with the rest of Sylvain’s character as a whole. It is clear that Sylvain lives in a rather abusive household, where the abuse is one of an emotional toll on Miklan. Once Sylvain came into existence, Miklan was cast aside as the ‘mistake’ child for not bearing a crest. It is clear that Sylvain was seen as the ‘favorite’ due to the crest, but that came with heavy drawbacks. One of which being Miklan’s resentment, leading him to stage multiple events in which he would attempt to get his brother killed. In a sense, Sylvain has as much a rough upbringing as Bernedetta, living in a house where one member has no care for their livelihood. It also does not help that Sylvain’s parents only seem to care about the crest part. Just like Ingrid, it seems Sylvain will be brought into an arranged marriage dictated by the parents, as well as having his whole life be nothing more than a duty. He is the king whether he wants to be or not, and as such he must be decently obedient towards the role. Add in his friend group being...less than stellar with Dimitri and Felix likely doing little to help him mentality due to their own troubles, and it is easy to see the man he became. He sees himself as unvalued, a prize not too dissimilar to Dorothea. He is a ticket into nobility as his parents and brother have reinforced that he is nothing more than a mere crest, everything in his life has been in service of the crest politics. Dorothea actually works as sort of the perfect reinforcement of his beliefs, she is marrying rich to marry rich, maybe she is doing it to survive, but it is still a shallow reason. Both characters are uniquely interesting, I will give you that. I believe them to be two halves of a perfect hole. Dorothea shows the struggles of a poor women in a society run by a corrupt nobility system, while Sylvain shows a member of the nobility birthed into a system that does not favor the individual, a point the game brings up multiple times through Ingrid and Lorenz. Both use dating as some sort of game, a means to likely elevate some frustration and resentment. Sylvain can be nicer and either do what he is told, get rid of all responsibilities and be seen as a criminal like his brother, or the option he does take which is use others to vent. Similarly, Dorothea can easily not be with nobles. There are plenty of commoners who she can live a decent life with, or she can follow her mentor (Manuela’s) example and live on her own, get a job that does not require one’s dwindling beauty to be a focal point, but she instead chooses nobles likely out of some form of fighting back or getting what she believes is hers. Both have terrible lives filled with abuse, assassination attempts, likely little to no one to turn to, stuck in a position in the political cog where they are left unhappy.

As for the friend part, both had likely little to no support. Dorothea had Manuela and her theatre troupe. It seems the theatre treated her well and so did Manuela, outside of the times where her drinking got in the way. For Sylvain, Ingrid was likely the only real leverage he got, possibly Dimitri. Felix clearly became an isolationist after Rodrigue’s death, so he would be of no support. Dimitri is also a problematic figure as Sylvain does seem scared of him. I doubt Dimitri was abusive, but he would likely be a terrible person to console in knowing his boar-ish personality trapped within.

In saying this, both are on decently equal terms when it comes to the bad past game and their responsibility for behaving now. If one likes Sylvain or Dorothea over the other, then it likely comes down to personality and how the game decides to handle the character. I prefer Sylvain, while I can now have a better appreciation for Dorothea, I find the chill approach taken with the boy to be far more enjoyable. His ownership of his flawed character and “living my best life“ attitude is just far more appealing than the downer at times and potentially overbearing personality that Dorothea can exude. If you find Dorothea better, than great. I can acknowledge that I may have missed out, but I just cannot view her the same way.

I’ll just end this by saying thank you for the new understanding. I did not pick up on many things, so I am glad discussions like this can add to the game.
"Sleeping around is just an easy term for..." No it's not. It's pretty specific actually. I am sorry about this but I really did have a problem with that part of your textwall.

I do like that I convinced you of something however it does feel like I can correct many misevaluations yet never touch the conclusion. Probably because it's just a vibe. Her calling Caspar little bro in one support as a goof is apparently just as likely to be predatory and that's just Opinion. Dorothea being honest about her dating and the intention of it is a "sad game" (it is meant to be a little sad) but Sylvain admitting to his closer friends is he is lying to girls to sleep with them is "owning up to it." Again, this is Opinion. I can never say an Opinion is silly or else I just am not accepting other Opinions.

And you're correct, I never brought up incels or simps but I guess I should have. Probably could have skipped some steps.

Characters like Tharja, Sylvain, and Dorothea all pander to a specific crowd that is willing to look past their flaws. Tharja panders to the emo goth/yandere crowd, Sylvain panders to the hopeless flirt crowd, and Dorothea panders to guys that probably shell out too much money on some grill on the internet or girls that had rough upbringings and probably take it out on others. Their flaws are sometimes written in comedic effect because the contrary would remove the paper bag over their pandered audience's head. If they recognize that these characters are flawed human beings that exist in their own vacuum rather than a literary fleshlight then said character is likely to be subjected to neckbeards sperging.

Of course, these characters are not without merit. Dorothea represents the hedonistic decay of the nobility and the unjust struggle of the commoner while Sylvain represents the shortcomings of the Crest caste system even among the nobility. And believe or not Tharja isn't that bad of a character in a few of her supports although that's not a debate I'm willing to subject myself to.

Despite all of this, people including myself still find Dorothea bitchy or overbearing or whatever negative adjective you want to throw in the pot. Sometimes it's because of actual incels that couldn't get their dick wet and other times it's because of simple matters of subjectivity. You can call how people negatively view her as selective autism, but I would say at worst these are mild biases especially compared to something like calling Ingrid the CEO of racism or whatever shitpost is being used to flanderize her.


Or, you know, people can have opinions. Which seems to be something you're having a hard time grasping here.
Very telling except.
"and Dorothea panders to guys that probably shell out too much money on some grill on the internet or girls that had rough upbringings and probably take it out on others."

I expect to learn you were just being glib here but I can only respond to it on its face. This entire discussion was about how sexual politics inform how charitably or uncharitably characters are treated, and you seemed to agree that this is a factor. Well erroneously comparing Dorothea to I guess a twitch.tv titty streamer is exactly that and I see no reason to not point this out. Do not feign surprise or offense. This is just not a mild bias. Like the other guy you've just fallen into the pattern of behavior I've been describing.

And no, wanting to marry well and rejecting unwanted flirtations are not synonmous with twitch thots, nor are examples of a bad nature. This is incredibly biased to my eyes. And it's certainly not just an opinion quite frankly. You tried to make a concrete claim.

This description you gave is just salt. Her taking it out on others amounts to telling some flirtatious guys to not bother her because she won't reciprocate. The idea that this is uber-mean, embodying her character and why people must like her, is bizarrely entitled and maybe there's a reason you guys keep expecting me to say the incel word. I mean, those guys probably would equate wanting to get married and live a good life with the kind of wasteful, parasocial parasitism a twitch thot engages in.

And it doesn't even make sense. A twitch thot cultivates men they're not interested in for gain, you have a problem with Dorothea shooing away men she doesn't want. It's very disingenuous to do this. You can't equate her to a predatory slut and then complain about her not behaving like one.

You've said many times you don't like her because you find her bitchy and self centered but the fact your immediate understanding of her appeal is like the appeal of a twitch thot...hate to say it... exactly what I was talking about from the start. She's interpreted badly in comparison to Tharja and Sylvain because she trespasses onto some insecurity for some people. That really is what I think your statement amounts to. I really do think you interpret her as bitchy for minor offense, and self centeted because her mysterious past is often the focus of supports, while ignoring the niceness she does display because of this. You equate her to actual shallow and vapid bimbos so you assign those traits more weight, selectively.


You say people can have different opinions and I need to grasp that. Putting aside that I have it seems whatever resistance I did demonstrate was well-founded.

So kindly stop pretending I ever argued you could not find Dorothea bitchy or pushy. I never did, nor did I say that's an unjustified reason to not care for her. It's just not what morons bitch and moan about.

If the person arguing about a character says things that are untrue to justify a contrived perspective on the character or to avoid the issue I brought up to begin with then this is not a matter of opinion. Doubly so when the corrections do not change the conclusion. Clearly the conclusion is more important than the evidence then. Which I do think you've done.



Believe it or not, there are many people with many opinions in this world. Some dipshits out there probably do say she's a stupid whore who's trying to marry up, I believe that. But in my circle full of people who love Fire Emblem, people who don't like her use actual evidence and shit beyond "she won't touch my PP". I don't like using the argument that "they're not really arguing what they're claiming" because that's a rabbit hole that you can go down whenever you want when someone disagrees with you. They dislike her as a character for their own reasons and that's valid. I dislike Edelgard (as a person, not a character) for my own reasons and I wouldn't ever want to be called a sexist who just doesn't like strong female characters.

And yes, Fire Emblem supports do have contrived misunderstandings. But people usually criticize that as bad writing or use it as an explanation for why they don't like a character, which is what people are doing here. The simple fact is that Ferdinand clearly doesn't know what her problem with him is, and she leads him on over something that was entirely concocted in her head. If Sylvain is an asshole for the mind games he pulls, one could easily say that about Dorothea. The funny thing is, I like her. I'm just trying to respect the arguments people give for why they don't like her because god knows Three Houses discussion is full of people who don't do that.
"People tend to say X"
"believe it or not there are many opinions in this world..."
But not what I was talking about, so spare me the diversion and the sanctimony.
I am aware you're making arguments you do not necessarily believe in but I can only treat you as if you do. Apologies in advance.
I really do not think you're responding to what I say. But I don't think it's fruitless to engage with you so I will.

Summary:
She's also the nicest to Ferdinand, so if her being mean bothers people, should the reverse not do something?
She's also not leading him on. He insists on finding out after she says to not ask about it.
It's not bad writing for her to not divulge her wretched orphanhood to someone she just met and has reason to think she'll dislike.
And Sylvain is not bad for playing games but for actually lying and trying to cajole people into satisfying him against their self interest.

Her being mean to Ferdinand, which is little more than her saying she doesn't actually like him rather than just be peevish as he flirts with, is so minor. After all she's also one of the nicest characters to Ferdinand but of course the discussion only goes one way because she merely says she does not like him. If people care more about that then so be it but it's not an opinion I need to care about nor was it what I was even referencing. I was quite specific about what I was responding to. I don't actually care about how people weight factors, but I do care if they are clearly not acknowledging one factor. And the difference is subtle so I'll always remind people of the other factors.

You seem to think I am accusing your friends of hiding their real hatred for her, but I am clearly not. At most I am saying is people might judge a character more harshly based on how they first perceive them, because the above is the kind of excuse-making people do come up with when they don't want to be direct with what they dislike. Lysithea is one of the most popular characters and she's bitchy to everyone for reasons they could never know as well. This just is not the most likely explanation and it's not the explanation commonly given in my experience, I can't speak to whatever circle of friends you have but I don't think there's any special authority in citing your circle of friends as if it constitutes a real rebuttal to what I am specifically talking about. Particularly as I have only just heard about them.

And is it bad writing for Dorothea to not want to talk about her past with someone she barely knows? Seems like every support is bad then because they all follow this kind of format where something unknown is unveiled. And is the idea that Nobles are often two-faced "entirely concocted in her head?" Ferdinand's role in that is, sure, but it was bigger than just him. It's not a stretch to assume Ferdinand is full of himself like a typical Noble, lots of people think that. I've heard this argument before, it's really reliant on simplifying the dynamic. For one, Dorothea does not lead Ferdinand on at all. She tells him to not even waste his time about it, but he insists (to his credit, which is why I find it weird people think this support uniquely mistreats him). Which is what you did claim. I do have a problem with people so sure of their approach but state things utterly inaccurately. And beyond being inaccurate also state things in ways which are a discredit to a character. That feels like an intentional lie, even if it necessarily isn't. And to be clear I don't think it is, but it is something I guess your friends got past you.

"What people are doing here." Are they? Was it the subject? No. The other person making something like the claim you are seems to agree with the claim I started out making after all. This is minor but I need to stress this is far away from what the argument was originally.

And lastly, Sylvain is not an asshole for "playing games" or "not being 100% honest about his issues" with girls he doesn't know. He's bad because he is outright lying to persuade them to do something against their interest for his own gratification. Dorothea saying she hates Ferdinand but not wanting to reveal why because it's personal to her is not the same. Honestly, the fact this needs to be explained, the fact you even tried to equivocate these two things, is pretty absurd. Maybe it's because you're making an argument you don't really believe in but then I wonder why you care to make it? You do care about convincing me of something, but I have nominally conceded to the idea that people can find her too pushy or brash.
 
Last edited:
Bro it's a video game
Okay, you don't have a response. So be it. You barely had one at first so you're going with a cheeky duck-out.
But now I am using a spoiler to hide those words and just make it a few bullet points so I guess good on you.

But I highly doubt the convergence of "it's wrong to say people jump to uncharitable conclusions about a character, btw she's just like a twitch thot" and "it's bad writing for her to think nobles are two-faced and not reveal why she's grown to think that to a Noble she barely knows" is particularly potent.
 
Last edited:
Okay, you don't have a response. So be it. You barely had one at first so you're going with a cheeky duck-out.
No, I'm saying nothing I have said (or the other two said to be honest) is particularly obnoxious or antagonistic and yet you're getting incredibly defensive over it for some reason. I'm not getting into a page long, paragraphs long argument over an opinion on a video game character, especially when I don't even fucking hold the opinion I'm arguing. You say that you're okay with people having different opinions, but then you claim you're the only one giving concrete arguments and everyone else is just going off of a "vibe". From a very valid and concrete perspective, telling Ferdinand that he has to guess why she hates him instead of being forthright is obnoxious behavior. And then withholding that information after he makes her food all by himself to prove good faith is also obnoxious. If you think that's objectively misinterpreting her and thus, they're not being fair to Dorothea, nothing I will say can convince you. Especially because this is basically telephone, and I'm relaying arguments I've heard before to the best of my ability or outright trying to formulate them myself.
 
No, I'm saying nothing I have said (or the other two said to be honest) is particularly obnoxious or antagonistic and yet you're getting incredibly defensive over it for some reason. I'm not getting into a page long, paragraphs long argument over an opinion on a video game character, especially when I don't even fucking hold the opinion I'm arguing. You say that you're okay with people having different opinions, but then you claim you're the only one giving concrete arguments and everyone else is just going off of a "vibe". From a very valid and concrete perspective, telling Ferdinand that he has to guess why she hates him instead of being forthright is obnoxious behavior. And then withholding that information after he makes her food all by himself to prove good faith is also obnoxious. If you think that's objectively misinterpreting her and thus, they're not being fair to Dorothea, nothing I will say can convince you. Especially because this is basically telephone, and I'm relaying arguments I've heard before to the best of my ability or outright trying to formulate them myself.
I took great pains to be conciliatory and point out I knew you were playing devil's advocate. I was rewarded with some pithy nonsense.
I also edited my post to summarize the same points for you but again, this is not reacted to in good faith imo.

And, dude, a lot of of what you said is wrong and I did just tell you why. You say you like her, should be useful to you to know that there's no standard on which you can say she is leading Ferdinand on, for example. Because it does sound like your friends convinced you of that.
And no, her not wanting to tell Ferdinand she thinks he's two faced because of how she thinks he treated her as a hobo is not "objectively obnoxious." She is not obligated to share details like that. And believe it not "food" does not entitle him to know. She does esteem him more highly after that regardless, so the implication she is just not giving him a break is silly. That is not a concrete statement. Concrete would be akin to quotations, not how something made you feel. Particularly when it's a convention of this franchise for people to hold out on personal details until the end for the sake of giving these interactions a structure. This is just selectivity.

I am okay with different opinions because you can react to things however you like, but when it's not what I even was talking about or a subjective take pretending to be objective or is being one-sided I am allowed to share my *opinion* on why it's wrong or not the subject.
 
Last edited:
I took great pains to be conciliatory and point out I knew you were playing devil's advocate. I was rewarded with some pithy nonsense.
And, dude, a lot of of what you said is wrong and I did just tell you why. You say you like her, should be useful to you to know that there's no standard on which you can say she is leading Ferdinand on, for example. And no, her not wanting to tell Ferdinand she thinks he's two faced because of how she thinks he treated her as a hobo is not "objectively obnoxious." She is not obligated to share details like that. And believe it not "food" does not entitle him to know. She does esteem him more highly after that regardless, so the preumption she is just not giving him a break is silly. That is not a concrete statement. Concrete would be akin to quotations, not how something made you feel.
I am okay with different opinions because you can react to things however you like, but when it's not what I even was talking about or a subjective take pretending to be objective or is being one-sided I am allowed to share my *opinion* on why it's wrong or not the subject.
That's the shit I mean. I didn't say it was objectively obnoxious. I said, from a valid perspective, it's obnoxious. Of course what she did can be interpreted, and of course she has supports where she's absolutely just a nice person with no interpretation needed. No one you responded to has ever claimed this is objective. No one has claimed you can't share your opinion. If you don't mind, I don't care to argue this further because I don't hold the opinion she's a mean character and it would take far more brain power and effort than I care to give to find multi-paragraphs worth of evidence against an opinion I myself hold.
 
That's the shit I mean. I didn't say it was objectively obnoxious. I said, from a valid perspective, it's obnoxious. Of course what she did can be interpreted, and of course she has supports where she's absolutely just a nice person with no interpretation needed. No one you responded to has ever claimed this is objective. No one has claimed you can't share your opinion. If you don't mind, I don't care to argue this further because I don't hold the opinion she's a mean character and it would take far more brain power and effort than I care to give to find multi-paragraphs worth of evidence against an opinion I myself hold.
Calling something concrete is saying it's objective. But if we disagree on that then we disagree. Clearly was not what you meant so I retract that without issue. I have said I can see why people would find her pushy or whatever other adjective people want to throw on so the idea I don't think you could never find something annoying is bull.
And people have absolutely intimated what you claim they haven't. They've certainly tried to make the argument. This is why I think it's just absurd to not even glance at what I wrote post-summarizing. You did care about this debate before.
 
Calling something concrete is saying it's objective.
No, it doesn't. It means well formed or non-abstract. You were claiming that these arguments are based on "feelings", and I was saying that these people are forming their opinions off of concrete scenes and dialogue. That's fucking it.

And I would love to see where people implied you can't have opinions. Because I just reread the posts on the last page and they quite clearly stated the opposite.
 
No, it doesn't. It means well formed or non-abstract. You were claiming that these arguments are based on "feelings", and I was saying that these people are forming their opinions off of concrete scenes and dialogue. That's fucking it.

And I would love to see where people implied you can't have opinions. Because I just reread the posts on the last page and they quite clearly stated the opposite.
Forming their opinions off of how dialogue made them feel. Not concrete. Concrete would be literally just what the text says. Text of Dorothea saying she thought her Noble suitors would discard her when done is a concrete statement because it's what she says. Saying you find this admirable or self-pitying would not be.

You said "No one you responded to has ever claimed this is objective. " This meaning her bad behavior. People have absolutely tried to make their case. I deliberately used the word intimate (as in to suggest) and argue to say they're just sharing their pov but they think it's supported and worth insisting long after I said "whatever, fine" to it so it's something I can reply to. It's trying to be an objective statement when this is done. There's no other way to interpret presenting an argument or insisting on a take but as a belief it is correct.

One guy did actually think Dorothea was pushy by forcing Ingrid into a play. Which she was not doing at all. This is what I am talking about. And I feel bad constantly bringing it up (people make mistakes) but I guess I have to.
 
Last edited:
Forming their opinions off of how dialogue made them feel. Not concrete. Concrete would be literally just what the text says. Text of Dorothea saying she thought her Noble suitors would discard her when done is a concrete statement because it's what she says. Saying you find this admirable or self-pitying would not be.

You said "No one you responded to has ever claimed this is objective. " This meaning her bad behavior. People have absolutely tried to make their case. I deliberately used the word intimate (as in to suggest) and argue to say they're just sharing their pov but they think it's supported and worth insisting long after I said "whatever, fine" to it so it's something I can reply to. It's trying to be an objective statement when this is done. There's no other way to interpret presenting an argument or insisting on a take but as a belief it is correct.

One guy did actually think Dorothea was pushy by forcing Ingrid into a play. Which she was not doing at all. This is what I am talking about. And I feel bad constantly bringing it up but I guess I have to.
This is exactly what they were talking about on the last page.
 
To move on

I am sure this will be an uncontroversial opinion
0CA2D941-43E3-4ADA-A93D-51FBA2912319.jpeg


You know it to be true. Only Ingrid can be with Edgy Boi, F@#k Boi, Sasuke, cinnamon roll, Duscar, the black guy, Human Shrek, nerd boi, and dragon daddy. She literally took every male off some fan girl’s thirst list.
 
This is exactly what they were talking about on the last page.
Almost as if this has just been a rut.
This all started because I said characters get held to different standards. Citing how Dorothea is criticized by a minority of fans, who in turn do not criticize Sylvain the same way despite his being worse (you apparently thought they both "play games" and are the same, I think you were just imprecise in your meaning but it did seem like it was you talking and not your friends). I also compared how she is treated compared to someone like Tharja. Tharja is just awful by any reasonable stretch but because she falls into comfortable stereotypes and flatters the player by lusting after the MC she gets a pass. Dorothea does not fall into a comfortable stereotype as you agree. And while there's nothing wrong with suspicion of her, after a while it's clear it's unfounded even if you may dislike her for other reasons. This was it.

Then I was told, "well Dorothea is pushy and self centered." I said I don't agree. Then I get this business about how it's just opinion. But not everything about this is opinion. Saying she is doing things she manifestly does not to support this conclusion stops being opinion.

And in other cases someone, while arguing there is more to the story than what I initially said, in fact embodies the pattern I was describing. Or so I think. Has not replied yet.


To move on

I am sure this will be an uncontroversial opinion
View attachment 1397350

You know it to be true. Only Ingrid can be with Edgy Boi, F@#k Boi, Sasuke, cinnamon roll, Duscar, the black guy, Human Shrek, nerd boi, and dragon daddy. She literally took every male off some fan girl’s thirst list.
Look dude, you know where I stand. I think you don't get her. That's all. And I know I am wasting my time to dare point that out. I read what you write but the same courtesy being extended is too much to ask. I get it.
 
Look dude, you know where I stand. I think you don't get her. That's all. And I know I am wasting my time to dare point that out. I read what you write but the same courtesy being extended is too much to ask. I get it.
It seemed like you pretty much ended it with me, so I did not feel a need to. What else do you want me to say?
 
It seemed like you pretty much ended it with me, so I did not feel a need to. What else do you want me to say?
I would ask why I can correct many misevaluations but never change the conclusion but at this point I'd rather just say Mercedes gets the best dick! Wrong again!
 
Saying she is doing things she manifestly does not to support this conclusion stops being opinion.
She manifestly did not tell Ferdinand why she disliked him for two levels of the support. What is opinion is whether she was right to do so or not. That's it. She did something concrete, it's up to the viewer to decide what they think. You're not going to change their mind because that's the point of media, to interpret and decide for yourself. Anyways, I'm done. You can respond, but this is just going in circles.

Hope they remake Genealogy between Three Houses and whatever game they release next.
 
Back
Top Bottom