Fire Emblem series

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Dorothea's and Sylvain's situations are completely different and both have very good reasons why they do what they do. Dorothea is disliked by a certain portion of the fanbase not because they're incels, but because she is overbearing to a bunch of people in supports, females included. When people have a problem with her treatment of men, it's almost always because of how she treats Ferdinand, in my experience.
Then why don't they ever say "she's overbearing"? They cry about her wanting to marry up, always. IDK I feel like this is denial, but done in good faith.
After all, my overall post was also contrasting Dorothea with Tharja. Who is a creep and a cretin but because she's the most dedicated to sleeping with you the MC she became a big titty goth gf in the fandom's eyes. I do think there's an unwritten form of sexual politics to waifufagging. Which makes it harder to change the story to "Dorothea is overbearing", which I don't actually see as a ridiculous reason to not care for her but that's also not the situation at hand even.

I say that because she's not simply disfavored by these fans, she's actively disliked by this minority. The idea this is because she's pushy is absurd. Especially when she's overbearing only half the time. To me this just does not fit. Punishment does not fit the crime. It would be like if the CCP arrested a dissident for a traffic ticket and kept him locked up for life. We'd all know what the real crime he's being punished for is.

For a less exceptional comparison, this is like pretending the people who dislike Ingrid don't overreact to her "racism" when they explicitly say as much, and it was controversial as we all know, but instead arguing it's because she's boring or something. Girls who are a little more pushy or a little less exciting are nothing new and neither justifies the energy a minority of people invest in disliking these two.

And her mistreatment of Ferdinand is so mild when all she does is say she dislikes him rather than be passive aggressive. Yes she was entirely wrong but she shouldn't be right about everyone. It's also good that Ferdinand gets to not be the butt of a joke in a support chain so I don't know what the issue is. They do plenty to show he's an upstanding person and that she would actually look out for him if he needed it. People are acting like FE supports don't have contrived misunderstandings more than half the time. It's also a popular pairing.
I also never said "incel" (it's not like being wary of her at first is unreasonable) but hey if the shoe fits. Incels do act like women having any standards/expectations is a criminal activity much of the time and would likely think Sylvain is a "chad". Some are just in a rut but get drawn into a depressive environment that keeps them miserable.
 
Last edited:
Shinon would totally get lambasted if the tellius games released today, but Soren im not so sure, since he is "UwU Ike's boyfriend", so either they treat Soren's racism like the CCP treats Tiannanmen Square, or they bury him and ship Ike with Ranulf instead.
 
Shinon would totally get lambasted if the tellius games released today, but Soren im not so sure, since he is "UwU Ike's boyfriend", so either they treat Soren's racism like the CCP treats Tiannanmen Square, or they bury him and ship Ike with Ranulf instead.
Yes, thank you for posting this. People often look for "excuses" to justify kneejerk and initial emotional reactions. Just how the game goes. Ingrid is white bread girl so her racism is bad. Soren is a sex god so his racism is probably just looked at like a quirk.
 
Shinon would totally get lambasted if the tellius games released today, but Soren im not so sure, since he is "UwU Ike's boyfriend", so either they treat Soren's racism like the CCP treats Tiannanmen Square, or they bury him and ship Ike with Ranulf instead.

Considering you need to play NG+ and get Ike's memory flashback for the Ike and Soren conversation that tries to cement their relationship before the final boss in RD. I assume most people will just ship with Ranulf due to Ike's totally gay bromance with him in RD and bury Soren in a ditch. Soren was also going to give Elincia to Literally Hitler(tm) Ashnard at the start of PoR and he insults Mordechai and Lethe quite aggressively when they first meet, so we got to kill him.

Soren's issue is he starts off a total prick immediately and the whole SorenXIke thing won't really be seen unless you played Heroes to get those vibes or you get bitched at by SorenXIke shippers. It'll then span into a huge argument about how Ike shouldn't be with Soren because Soren is mini hitler and Ranulf is a better boyfriend because he is nicer and Ike will end racism by having gay sex with a laguz. Actually I now want this to happen because it'd be great to watch the shouting matches.

I do also expect people to ignore that Lethe is also a racist in her own way because she is in the oppressed race, though I'm not sure if people will forget about Jill's radical views on laguz in the early stages of PoR. Which is sad because Jill's entire arc with her Lethe or Mist supports was really well done, and where that all goes in Radiant Dawn just made it better.
 
I just want a FE game where I can be thrown into the meatgrinder without worrying too much over big tiddy goth girls and cultural postering. Speaking of which, how hard is Warriors? I know what genre it is, but I never really looked into after I got Hyrule Warriors on 3ds
 
I just want a FE game where I can be thrown into the meatgrinder without worrying too much over big tiddy goth girls and cultural postering. Speaking of which, how hard is Warriors? I know what genre it is, but I never really looked into after I got Hyrule Warriors on 3ds
I am no hard core gamer, but Warriors titles are typically very difficult the further you go along. The only problem is that things can take hours to get that way. I definitely suggest it. The controversy surrounding it back in 2017 was ridiculous as people expected way to much, I remember one asking for upwards of 100 characters, when they should have thought smaller. They also compared a new Warriors series to Hyrule after 4 years of content updates to say 20+ characters is bad, when Hyrule had 13 at launch? What I am saying is, try it out. I personally think the overall combat is much smoother than Hyrule and the characters all feel capable unlike Hyrule which had tons of oddly controlled aspects. The game is more basic in how it is played, but the strategy carried over from FE really adds to gameplay and makes the game a blast that feels more well developed.
 
Then why don't they ever say "she's overbearing"? They cry about her wanting to marry up, always. IDK I feel like this is denial, but done in good faith.
After all, my overall post was also contrasting Dorothea with Tharja. Who is a creep and a cretin but because she's the most dedicated to sleeping with you the MC she became a big titty goth gf in the fandom's eyes. I do think there's an unwritten form of sexual politics to waifufagging. Which makes it harder to change the story to "Dorothea is overbearing", which I don't actually see as a ridiculous reason to not care for her but that's also not the situation at hand even.

I say that because she's not simply disfavored by these fans, she's actively disliked by this minority. The idea this is because she's pushy is absurd. Especially when she's overbearing only half the time. To me this just does not fit. Punishment does not fit the crime. It would be like if the CCP arrested a dissident for a traffic ticket and kept him locked up for life. We'd all know what the real crime he's being punished for is.

For a less exceptional comparison, this is like pretending the people who dislike Ingrid don't overreact to her "racism" when they explicitly say as much, and it was controversial as we all know, but instead arguing it's because she's boring or something. Girls who are a little more pushy or a little less exciting are nothing new and neither justifies the energy a minority of people invest in disliking these two.

And her mistreatment of Ferdinand is so mild when all she does is say she dislikes him rather than be passive aggressive. Yes she was entirely wrong but she shouldn't be right about everyone. It's also good that Ferdinand gets to not be the butt of a joke in a support chain so I don't know what the issue is. They do plenty to show he's an upstanding person and that she would actually look out for him if he needed it. People are acting like FE supports don't have contrived misunderstandings more than half the time. It's also a popular pairing.
I also never said "incel" (it's not like being wary of her at first is unreasonable) but hey if the shoe fits. Incels do act like women having any standards/expectations is a criminal activity much of the time and would likely think Sylvain is a "chad". Some are just in a rut but get drawn into a depressive environment that keeps them miserable.
There's a difference between analyzing a character and having a preference. I'm going to use Ferdinand's support as a frame of reference here. Saying young Dorothea is a voyeurist and that young Ferdinand was just politely looking away is factual wrong. But interpreting Dorothea as being too petty or bitchy to Ferdinand despite her upbringing, or really just petty or bitchy in general, is just a matter of opinion. I think it's a very reasonable opinion that even I share it to an extent.

Of course, you could argue that there is a sexist double standard over how a flawed female character is assessed as opposed to one who is mildly written. I don't think this website is progressive or 'feminist' enough to have a nuanced discussion over it so I'm just going to leave it at that.

I think Dorothea is an ok written character while Sylvain is shoddily written and, similar to Raphael, a bit bloated. But despite my sperging over those two, I have very mild opinions of them.

Shinon would totally get lambasted if the tellius games released today, but Soren im not so sure, since he is "UwU Ike's boyfriend", so either they treat Soren's racism like the CCP treats Tiannanmen Square, or they bury him and ship Ike with Ranulf instead.
I remember someone said this before, but the fanbase will pick and choose from canon how they view a character. Some form of 'selective autism' as they call it.
 
There's a difference between analyzing a character and having a preference. I'm going to use Ferdinand's support as a frame of reference here. Saying young Dorothea is a voyeurist and that young Ferdinand was just politely looking away is factual wrong. But interpreting Dorothea as being too petty or bitchy to Ferdinand despite her upbringing, or really just petty or bitchy in general, is just a matter of opinion. I think it's a very reasonable opinion that even I share it to an extent.

Of course, you could argue that there is a sexist double standard over how a flawed female character is assessed as opposed to one who is mildly written. I don't think this website is progressive or 'feminist' enough to have a nuanced discussion over it so I'm just going to leave it at that.

I think Dorothea is an ok written character while Sylvain is shoddily written and, similar to Raphael, a bit bloated. But despite my sperging over those two, I have very mild opinions of them.


I remember someone said this before, but the fanbase will pick and choose from canon how they view a character. Some form of 'selective autism' as they call it.
Remember, this all started just as an exercise in comparing characters who were easy to compare. And I am not saying people could not find her too pushy or whatever. Or that it would be wrong just that... well it's not what one hears. Obviously some people would prefer a girl who might be more pliant, though even that's a can of worms since you can never actually possess these characters so it should matter if there's a point to their behavior that ties into their motivation imo,
The whole point of Tharja and Sylvain was that they are "worse" but because it's not in a way these fans take personally it's ignored (selective autism). Which I think you agreed with. It's not saying El Doro can do no wrong or is perfect, after all she is wrong about Ferdinand and in many ways does not belong at the Monastery.

Though I would say finding Dorothea bitchy without acknowledging she softens is the "selective autism" you're talking about, to some extent. And I'd say she's pretty well written, at least by FE standards, minus a few missed opportunities here and there. Missed Opportunities matter but they're also in some ways a credit. Really simple or stale characters rarely have many.
 
Last edited:
I am no hard core gamer, but Warriors titles are typically very difficult the further you go along. The only problem is that things can take hours to get that way. I definitely suggest it. The controversy surrounding it back in 2017 was ridiculous as people expected way to much, I remember one asking for upwards of 100 characters, when they should have thought smaller. They also compared a new Warriors series to Hyrule after 4 years of content updates to say 20+ characters is bad, when Hyrule had 13 at launch? What I am saying is, try it out. I personally think the overall combat is much smoother than Hyrule and the characters all feel capable unlike Hyrule which had tons of oddly controlled aspects. The game is more basic in how it is played, but the strategy carried over from FE really adds to gameplay and makes the game a blast that feels more well developed.
Well, Hyrule was only hard if you don't grind your levels (which is an issue) and when there's too much shit going on all over the place. But hopefully the strategy goes beyond using chokepoints as temporary speed bumps.
 
There's a difference between analyzing a character and having a preference. I'm going to use Ferdinand's support as a frame of reference here. Saying young Dorothea is a voyeurist and that young Ferdinand was just politely looking away is factual wrong. But interpreting Dorothea as being too petty or bitchy to Ferdinand despite her upbringing, or really just petty or bitchy in general, is just a matter of opinion. I think it's a very reasonable opinion that even I share it to an extent.

Of course, you could argue that there is a sexist double standard over how a flawed female character is assessed as opposed to one who is mildly written. I don't think this website is progressive or 'feminist' enough to have a nuanced discussion over it so I'm just going to leave it at that.

I think Dorothea is an ok written character while Sylvain is shoddily written and, similar to Raphael, a bit bloated. But despite my sperging over those two, I have very mild opinions of them.


I remember someone said this before, but the fanbase will pick and choose from canon how they view a character. Some form of 'selective autism' as they call it.
Yeah that was me who called it selective autism awhile back. It is really bad with translators who show extreme bias towards or against a character.
 
Obviously some people would prefer a girl who might be more pliant, though even that's a can of worms since you can never actually possess these characters so it should matter if there's a point to their behavior that ties into their motivation imo,
When you realize you like Sylvain because you find his personality a point of attraction on female characters
88FDA365-9078-4481-9EF0-3DAF6090DCE1.jpeg




The whole point of Tharja and Sylvain was that they are "worse" but because it's not in a way these fans take personally it's ignored (selective autism). Which I think you agreed with. It's not saying El Doro can do no wrong or is perfect, after all she is wrong about Ferdinand and in many ways does not belong at the Monastery.
I think the issue here is that the ways in which some look at characters is different to you, or we are not communicating correctly. Being a better person does not translate into a better character. I think Edelgard and Dimitri being placed above Claude is evidence of that. Dorothea may be better than Sylvain, but she is not as engaging as a character. The two are written very differently and as such leave different impressions. Sylvain seems more comedic while Dorothea seems more tragic. I cannot get into Dorothea as I cannot find much sympathy for her in comparison to other characters. Maybe it is the mystery angle creeping in to much to not give me a full picture, or just the lack of interest for me amongst Black Eagles’ supports, but the character is not stand out. I think a perfect way to describe the two can be summed up with one similarity. For both characters, rumors spread about them, and when discussed I find Sylvain to be the better of the two. Dorothea sleeps around and goes on multiple dates with the nights, but when the knights speak poorly of her for such behavior, I am supposed to feel sympathy. Sure, maybe they are going too far in talking about her special relations with nobles, but the point is, she partakes in such behavior yet hates the criticism. Sylvain on the other hand tells Dedue to let the rumors continue and seems unaffected. He owns up to his behavior, and in a way, I find him more respectable for that.

There can be a ton of other factors such as supports or just general personality. I do not mind more sad or doomer characters, but Dorothea just does not hit any of the notes characters like Marianne or even Bernedetta can hit. There is tragedy there, but I cannot get a sense of it as much as other characters, especially when one travels into the therapy house the Blue Lions have built. Sylvain in contrast is fairly upbeat, which grants a more easy attraction to viewers like me. Supports also play a role in perception. Dorothea’s seem to revolve around her a lot of the time, whereas Sylvain’s seem to be about fixing the one he is supporting. I have a hard time with Dorothea supports as ones like Caspar’s make her sort of off putting and world revolves around me. Her need to get Caspar to enter a weird sibling relationship with her was..bizarre to say the least

IDK? We are comparing two very different characters it seems that are connected by one action. I believe one can hate the other without being a generalized incel or simp of some kind.
 
When you realize you like Sylvain because you find his personality a point of attraction on female characters
View attachment 1393614




I think the issue here is that the ways in which some look at characters is different to you, or we are not communicating correctly. Being a better person does not translate into a better character. I think Edelgard and Dimitri being placed above Claude is evidence of that. Dorothea may be better than Sylvain, but she is not as engaging as a character. The two are written very differently and as such leave different impressions. Sylvain seems more comedic while Dorothea seems more tragic. I cannot get into Dorothea as I cannot find much sympathy for her in comparison to other characters. Maybe it is the mystery angle creeping in to much to not give me a full picture, or just the lack of interest for me amongst Black Eagles’ supports, but the character is not stand out. I think a perfect way to describe the two can be summed up with one similarity. For both characters, rumors spread about them, and when discussed I find Sylvain to be the better of the two. Dorothea sleeps around and goes on multiple dates with the nights, but when the knights speak poorly of her for such behavior, I am supposed to feel sympathy. Sure, maybe they are going too far in talking about her special relations with nobles, but the point is, she partakes in such behavior yet hates the criticism. Sylvain on the other hand tells Dedue to let the rumors continue and seems unaffected. He owns up to his behavior, and in a way, I find him more respectable for that.

There can be a ton of other factors such as supports or just general personality. I do not mind more sad or doomer characters, but Dorothea just does not hit any of the notes characters like Marianne or even Bernedetta can hit. There is tragedy there, but I cannot get a sense of it as much as other characters, especially when one travels into the therapy house the Blue Lions have built. Sylvain in contrast is fairly upbeat, which grants a more easy attraction to viewers like me. Supports also play a role in perception. Dorothea’s seem to revolve around her a lot of the time, whereas Sylvain’s seem to be about fixing the one he is supporting. I have a hard time with Dorothea supports as ones like Caspar’s make her sort of off putting and world revolves around me. Her need to get Caspar to enter a weird sibling relationship with her was..bizarre to say the least

IDK? We are comparing two very different characters it seems that are connected by one action. I believe one can hate the other without being a generalized incel or simp of some kind.
Here and there people can have special or particular reasons but I am responding to what I am told. it's all I can know. And you guys are using the terms simp and incel tbh.
Also, I gotta stop at Dorothea "sleeping around". You just proved my point. The only way you can interpret her courtship game is sexual and use it to attack her. Despite her supports with your boy Sylvain, among others, basically have her telling him she's not interested in some guy who just wants to sleep with her. These are all her, except the last which is said to her and about her.

" Anyway, I'm not just playing games with these boys. This is for my future. "

" I see. Regardless, I'm not staking my life on you. So you'd better go and fall in love with someone else. Good-bye, Sylvain. "

" He didn't know who I was, and when he flirted with me, my feelings were something beyond fury. I was dumbfounded. In truth, I felt that way about all of the nobles who flocked around me, yet would just as easily have tossed me away should it better suit them. "

" I sang, people cheered and applauded, and when I walked off stage, I'd find the same thing every night. A mountain of presents and marriage proposals. But none of those people knew me. All they knew was the singer they saw on stage. All they wanted was my looks and my voice. None of them even tried to get to know the real me. "

"Ever since, I've been dating different terribly well-to-do men, searching for a good one... So far there's been no reason for a second date. "

" Back then, the Imperial capital was swarming with disgusting nobles, all of them vying for your attention- for the love of the Dorothea. Many were willing to compromise with an inferior substitute. If they couldn't have you, perhaps someone else was capable of singing just as sweetly. "

Just a few which show it's not in her character or consistent with her motivations to just be sleeping around. She reacts very badly to the idea that Ferdinand is just being nice to get into her pants after all. And the Knight rumors got to her because she's insecure about being an upjumped orphan. Does not want that known. Maybe it's meant to be evocative of more scurrilous rumors but dumbed down to a T for Teen rating but still, that's the actual text.

Every single time it ends up being just not getting the character. Third or fourth time now. I think it's not unfair to speculate you view her uncharitably due to sexual politics tbh.
Everything else is highly subjective. She has supports and plenty of moments where she looks out for others, you can say it's not enough for you but idc. You can say you found Marianne and Bernadetta more tragic but she's one of the only tragic backstories that I cared about because it was actually a bad life rather than just a single bad moment or drawback which is how many tragic backstories operate. It makes the way she's been trained to view the world far more earned and understandable since it's an adaptation to reinforced expectations. And she was not trying to make Caspar into a surrogate brother sincerely, it's clearly just a light moment. Neither her C nor A carry on that idea. This is just Forcing Ingrid Into the Play 2.0.
 
Last edited:
Olivia was fun. I don't like the whole "lol I'm so nervous but look at my underboob teehee" thing tho

I wish Anna had more to do in the games other than clone shopkeeper.

And yes Karen Strassman is the best voice actress
 
And you guys are using the terms simp and incel tbh.
Incel was used earlier on in the thread. Probably not by you, but it was a term brought up, so my ending was just saying that you do not have to fall under that category for liking a character. Simp was just the opposite, so I used it.

Also, I gotta stop at Dorothea "sleeping around". You just proved my point. The only way you can interpret her courtship game is sexual and use it to attack her.
Sleeping around is just an easy term for going from people to people, partner to partner. Maybe not the best term, but then it seems unfitting for either as they are just in a dating game to my knowledge. I really do not mind this aspect of either character, it is how they act and react to it that can get on my nerves. If they want to go on multiple dates and juggle multiple partners, whatever, but Dorothea’s sad game just does not work for me. I prefer the more comedic and owned up mentality presented by Sylvain.


Every single time it ends up being just not getting the character. Third time now. I think it's not unfair to speculate you view her uncharitably due to sexual politics tbh.
Everything else is highly subjective. She has supports and plenty of moments where she looks out for others, you can say it's not enough for you but idc. You can say you found Marianne and Bernadetta more tragic but she's one of the only tragic backstories that I cared about because it was actually a bad life rather than just a single bad moment or drawback which is how many tragic backstories operate. It makes the way she's been trained to view the world far more earned and understandable since it's an adaptation to reinforced expectations. And she was not trying to make Caspar into a surrogate brother sincerely, it's clearly just a light moment. Neither her C nor A carry on that idea. This is just Forcing Ingrid Into the Play 2.0.
I can see a misunderstanding in the character for myself. Though somethings can be up in the air for interpretation. The Caspar thing was still weird.

Also many characters are more than just tragic moments. Bernedetta had to spend her life with her abusive father, being kept away from other people. Not only was she beaten, but she had little people to confine in. Edelgard was tortured during her life, watched all siblings die, and was unable to have a proper ending with the boy she cared for. Dimitri had practically everything taken from him from parents, to the girl he fell in love with, to multiple friends, to even one of his own father figures since he choose to run away. Now he is left with a resentful friend and the responsibility of a genocide lead by his people on his shoulders. Point is, Dorothea is far from the only one with a tragic life, many have big moments that lead into long term issues that will eat away at them.

I also think people lack understanding of Sylvain in this situation as people on this thread have chocked up his backstory to pointless fodder. It is way more than that, and Miklan fits with the rest of Sylvain’s character as a whole. It is clear that Sylvain lives in a rather abusive household, where the abuse is one of an emotional toll on Miklan. Once Sylvain came into existence, Miklan was cast aside as the ‘mistake’ child for not bearing a crest. It is clear that Sylvain was seen as the ‘favorite’ due to the crest, but that came with heavy drawbacks. One of which being Miklan’s resentment, leading him to stage multiple events in which he would attempt to get his brother killed. In a sense, Sylvain has as much a rough upbringing as Bernedetta, living in a house where one member has no care for their livelihood. It also does not help that Sylvain’s parents only seem to care about the crest part. Just like Ingrid, it seems Sylvain will be brought into an arranged marriage dictated by the parents, as well as having his whole life be nothing more than a duty. He is the king whether he wants to be or not, and as such he must be decently obedient towards the role. Add in his friend group being...less than stellar with Dimitri and Felix likely doing little to help him mentality due to their own troubles, and it is easy to see the man he became. He sees himself as unvalued, a prize not too dissimilar to Dorothea. He is a ticket into nobility as his parents and brother have reinforced that he is nothing more than a mere crest, everything in his life has been in service of the crest politics. Dorothea actually works as sort of the perfect reinforcement of his beliefs, she is marrying rich to marry rich, maybe she is doing it to survive, but it is still a shallow reason. Both characters are uniquely interesting, I will give you that. I believe them to be two halves of a perfect hole. Dorothea shows the struggles of a poor women in a society run by a corrupt nobility system, while Sylvain shows a member of the nobility birthed into a system that does not favor the individual, a point the game brings up multiple times through Ingrid and Lorenz. Both use dating as some sort of game, a means to likely elevate some frustration and resentment. Sylvain can be nicer and either do what he is told, get rid of all responsibilities and be seen as a criminal like his brother, or the option he does take which is use others to vent. Similarly, Dorothea can easily not be with nobles. There are plenty of commoners who she can live a decent life with, or she can follow her mentor (Manuela’s) example and live on her own, get a job that does not require one’s dwindling beauty to be a focal point, but she instead chooses nobles likely out of some form of fighting back or getting what she believes is hers. Both have terrible lives filled with abuse, assassination attempts, likely little to no one to turn to, stuck in a position in the political cog where they are left unhappy.

As for the friend part, both had likely little to no support. Dorothea had Manuela and her theatre troupe. It seems the theatre treated her well and so did Manuela, outside of the times where her drinking got in the way. For Sylvain, Ingrid was likely the only real leverage he got, possibly Dimitri. Felix clearly became an isolationist after Rodrigue’s death, so he would be of no support. Dimitri is also a problematic figure as Sylvain does seem scared of him. I doubt Dimitri was abusive, but he would likely be a terrible person to console in knowing his boar-ish personality trapped within.

In saying this, both are on decently equal terms when it comes to the bad past game and their responsibility for behaving now. If one likes Sylvain or Dorothea over the other, then it likely comes down to personality and how the game decides to handle the character. I prefer Sylvain, while I can now have a better appreciation for Dorothea, I find the chill approach taken with the boy to be far more enjoyable. His ownership of his flawed character and “living my best life“ attitude is just far more appealing than the downer at times and potentially overbearing personality that Dorothea can exude. If you find Dorothea better, than great. I can acknowledge that I may have missed out, but I just cannot view her the same way.

I’ll just end this by saying thank you for the new understanding. I did not pick up on many things, so I am glad discussions like this can add to the game.
 
Then why don't they ever say "she's overbearing"? They cry about her wanting to marry up, always. IDK I feel like this is denial, but done in good faith.
After all, my overall post was also contrasting Dorothea with Tharja. Who is a creep and a cretin but because she's the most dedicated to sleeping with you the MC she became a big titty goth gf in the fandom's eyes. I do think there's an unwritten form of sexual politics to waifufagging. Which makes it harder to change the story to "Dorothea is overbearing", which I don't actually see as a ridiculous reason to not care for her but that's also not the situation at hand even.

I say that because she's not simply disfavored by these fans, she's actively disliked by this minority. The idea this is because she's pushy is absurd. Especially when she's overbearing only half the time. To me this just does not fit. Punishment does not fit the crime. It would be like if the CCP arrested a dissident for a traffic ticket and kept him locked up for life. We'd all know what the real crime he's being punished for is.

For a less exceptional comparison, this is like pretending the people who dislike Ingrid don't overreact to her "racism" when they explicitly say as much, and it was controversial as we all know, but instead arguing it's because she's boring or something. Girls who are a little more pushy or a little less exciting are nothing new and neither justifies the energy a minority of people invest in disliking these two.

And her mistreatment of Ferdinand is so mild when all she does is say she dislikes him rather than be passive aggressive. Yes she was entirely wrong but she shouldn't be right about everyone. It's also good that Ferdinand gets to not be the butt of a joke in a support chain so I don't know what the issue is. They do plenty to show he's an upstanding person and that she would actually look out for him if he needed it. People are acting like FE supports don't have contrived misunderstandings more than half the time. It's also a popular pairing.
I also never said "incel" (it's not like being wary of her at first is unreasonable) but hey if the shoe fits. Incels do act like women having any standards/expectations is a criminal activity much of the time and would likely think Sylvain is a "chad". Some are just in a rut but get drawn into a depressive environment that keeps them miserable.
Believe it or not, there are many people with many opinions in this world. Some dipshits out there probably do say she's a stupid whore who's trying to marry up, I believe that. But in my circle full of people who love Fire Emblem, people who don't like her use actual evidence and shit beyond "she won't touch my PP". I don't like using the argument that "they're not really arguing what they're claiming" because that's a rabbit hole that you can go down whenever you want when someone disagrees with you. They dislike her as a character for their own reasons and that's valid. I dislike Edelgard (as a person, not a character) for my own reasons and I wouldn't ever want to be called a sexist who just doesn't like strong female characters.

And yes, Fire Emblem supports do have contrived misunderstandings. But people usually criticize that as bad writing or use it as an explanation for why they don't like a character, which is what people are doing here. The simple fact is that Ferdinand clearly doesn't know what her problem with him is, and she leads him on over something that was entirely concocted in her head. If Sylvain is an asshole for the mind games he pulls, one could easily say that about Dorothea. The funny thing is, I like her. I'm just trying to respect the arguments people give for why they don't like her because god knows Three Houses discussion is full of people who don't do that.
 
Remember, this all started just as an exercise in comparing characters who were easy to compare. And I am not saying people could not find her too pushy or whatever. Or that it would be wrong just that... well it's not what one hears. Obviously some people would prefer a girl who might be more pliant, though even that's a can of worms since you can never actually possess these characters so it should matter if there's a point to their behavior that ties into their motivation imo,
The whole point of Tharja and Sylvain was that they are "worse" but because it's not in a way these fans take personally it's ignored (selective autism). Which I think you agreed with. It's not saying El Doro can do no wrong or is perfect, after all she is wrong about Ferdinand and in many ways does not belong at the Monastery.
Characters like Tharja, Sylvain, and Dorothea all pander to a specific crowd that is willing to look past their flaws. Tharja panders to the emo goth/yandere crowd, Sylvain panders to the hopeless flirt crowd, and Dorothea panders to guys that probably shell out too much money on some grill on the internet or girls that had rough upbringings and probably take it out on others. Their flaws are sometimes written in comedic effect because the contrary would remove the paper bag over their pandered audience's head. If they recognize that these characters are flawed human beings that exist in their own vacuum rather than a literary fleshlight then said character is likely to be subjected to neckbeards sperging.

Of course, these characters are not without merit. Dorothea represents the hedonistic decay of the nobility and the unjust struggle of the commoner while Sylvain represents the shortcomings of the Crest caste system even among the nobility. And believe or not Tharja isn't that bad of a character in a few of her supports although that's not a debate I'm willing to subject myself to.

Despite all of this, people including myself still find Dorothea bitchy or overbearing or whatever negative adjective you want to throw in the pot. Sometimes it's because of actual incels that couldn't get their dick wet and other times it's because of simple matters of subjectivity. You can call how people negatively view her as selective autism, but I would say at worst these are mild biases especially compared to something like calling Ingrid the CEO of racism or whatever shitpost is being used to flanderize her.

Though I would say finding Dorothea bitchy without acknowledging she softens is the "selective autism" you're talking about, to some extent.
Or, you know, people can have opinions. Which seems to be something you're having a hard time grasping here.
 
Characters like Tharja, Sylvain, and Dorothea all pander to a specific crowd that is willing to look past their flaws.
You could probably add a ton of characters to that list. Dimitri and Edelgard are prime examples
 
You might as well say that anyone with enough cleavage qualifies, at this rate.

"Lyn is the best lord in FE7 due to her very intense and interesting backstory and not because she has tits, thighs, and is cute. Hector is a dum dum boy and Eliwood is just good noble man. Also Lyn is a very very good unit, she can double anything for 4 damage each!"
 
"Lyn is the best lord in FE7 due to her very intense and interesting backstory and not because she has tits, thighs, and is cute. Hector is a dum dum boy and Eliwood is just good noble man. Also Lyn is a very very good unit, she can double anything for 4 damage each!"
Curious, I have seen many hate on Lyn for this reason and the community went on a path of praising Hector for the longest time. Lyn was always seen as IS pandering to old fans, while Hector was a true G. Then again, half the community seems to hate boobs and rears as it ruins their serious tactics rpg.

Everyone seems to trash Eliwood though as he is a generic lord.

You might as well say that anyone with enough cleavage qualifies, at this rate.
That really makes me question as Edelgard is the most loved character as of now according to Heroes, and Lucina is likely a third. If all it takes is figure, these girls must have more to them.
 
Back
Top Bottom