Fire Emblem series

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
It's a fun series. I like the waifus but that's also probably polluted the fanbase. Not the greatest mind for strategy so I'm basically a johnny come lately to it all.
What are some good entries that are reasonably easy to emulate?

In addition to the GBA titles mentioned, Path of Radiance (Gamecube, the one with Ike in it) is a great title. It is a little dated looking, the GBA sprites aged much better then gamecube 3d models, but imo it has a better plot and cast then the english GBA games while still being on the easy side. I'd say the GBA games are much easier to find and emulate, but if you can find a good rom and run Dolphin I'd give Path of Radiance a try.
 
I do wonder how characters like Edelgard and Rhea would be received if they were dudes. Or even how Cyril would be received if he was a grill.
The best examples are how characters like Dorothea and Tharja are treated. We don't have to speculate how Dorothea would be treated if she was a guy. We have Sylvain. In fact Sylvain is objectively a worse person without regard to gender but he's just misunderstood (but if everyone agrees he is misunderstood is he really?). And Tharja is a horrible person who abuses her own child but because it's played comically and she desperately wants to gargle main character semen she is extremely popular.
 
Pretty much the GBA games. I would not recommend playing Binding Blade first as it's pretty rough around the edges and you need to patch it unless you know Japanese. Both FE7 and FE8 are pretty good games to get into the series.

The waifuism in Fire Emblem is pretty cringe, granted, that's almost a given for a lot of fanbases. The way the fanbase treats the male and female avatars is mildly amusing considering they're the same character.

I do wonder how characters like Edelgard and Rhea would be received if they were dudes. Or even how Cyril would be received if he was a grill.
Male!Edelgard would probably be much less popular as people would look at his actions and goals and conclude that he is a villain with a disturbing obsession with Byleth. Rhea would probably be treated about the same as she is now assuming Edelgard was also genderbent, since some people will no longer be blinded by Edelstanning but others will amplify their hatred due to being even more resembling of the EEEEEVIL Christian patriarchy.
 
The best examples are how characters like Dorothea and Tharja are treated. We don't have to speculate how Dorothea would be treated if she was a guy. We have Sylvain. In fact Sylvain is objectively a worse person without regard to gender but he's just misunderstood (but if everyone agrees he is misunderstood is he really?). And Tharja is a horrible person who abuses her own child but because it's played comically and she desperately wants to gargle main character semen she is extremely popular.
I don't really see how these two characters are comparable though. Dorothea at least flirts as a means of escaping obscurity and poverty while Sylvain is a privileged philanderer. Granted, I only read a handful of Dorothea's supports so I may be missing something here.

I feel like people who say Sylvain is misunderstood is just rationalizing his shitty behavior because he's conventionally attractive. His reasoning behind his treatment of women doesn't make him compelling or sympathetic especially when little is shown of women actively pursuing him and that realistically some women would pursue non-crest nobles just for the money or connections anyway. Sure, you could say this is intentional and that he's actually projecting his insecurities, but it's still pretty weak sauce when his philandering is played for laughs anyway. And don't get me started on fucking Miklan.

Male!Edelgard would probably be much less popular as people would look at his actions and goals and conclude that he is a villain with a disturbing obsession with Byleth. Rhea would probably be treated about the same as she is now assuming Edelgard was also genderbent, since some people will no longer be blinded by Edelstanning but others will amplify their hatred due to being even more resembling of the EEEEEVIL Christian patriarchy.
Something tells me that part of the Rhea-bashing comes from religious baggage. Considering they used waifuism to humanize Edelgard, I'm pretty sure they would just use husbandoism as a substitute. It worked for Dimitri at least.
 
I don't really see how these two characters are comparable though. Dorothea at least flirts as a means of escaping obscurity and poverty while Sylvain is a privileged philanderer. Granted, I only read a handful of Dorothea's supports so I may be missing something here.

I feel like people who say Sylvain is misunderstood is just rationalizing his shitty behavior because he's conventionally attractive. His reasoning behind his treatment of women doesn't make him compelling or sympathetic especially when little is shown of women actively pursuing him and that realistically some women would pursue non-crest nobles just for the money or connections anyway. Sure, you could say this is intentional and that he's actually projecting his insecurities, but it's still pretty weak sauce when his philandering is played for laughs anyway. And don't get me started on fucking Miklan.
I think you're exactly right, the point is there are guys who think what Dorothea does is unreasonable (because I guess it hurts their feelings she'd never pick them) but they're totally mum on Sylvain despite guys like Sylvain being a far bigger obstacle in their lives probably. Basicaly they're only principled on matters of the heart when a girl displeases them. Waifufaggotry is a double edged sword. Girls tend to get piled on more for upsetting particular fans but also can get a pass for despicable behavior if they flatter particular fans (like Tharja). It's not so bad because Dorothea is decently popular which is nice but it's notable.


Male!Edelgard would probably be much less popular as people would look at his actions and goals and conclude that he is a villain with a disturbing obsession with Byleth. Rhea would probably be treated about the same as she is now assuming Edelgard was also genderbent, since some people will no longer be blinded by Edelstanning but others will amplify their hatred due to being even more resembling of the EEEEEVIL Christian patriarchy.
I somewhat disagree. Male Edelgard would be overall less popular but would also have less vehement haters and white knights. So also less controversial. Rhea would be absolutely not popular without her Mommy Energy.
 
I somewhat disagree. Male Edelgard would be overall less popular but would also have less vehement haters and white knights. So also less controversial. Rhea would be absolutely not popular without her Mommy Energy.
I totally agree on Rhea, but i still think Edelgard would get a pass since her story is pretty similar to Arvis from FE4, who is really liked among fans of his game.
 
I totally agree on Rhea, but i still think Edelgard would get a pass since her story is pretty similar to Arvis from FE4, who is really liked among fans of his game.
It would all depend on execution. Arvis has, essentially, Bad Boy cred. And that matters. Being a girl, the girl lord, was a major point in the games marketing too. And I remember Edelgard's initial popularity being like a tidal wave. Which I know also rankled people who liked Dimitri a lot since he was neglected as the "generic lord". But a lot of people dislike Edelgard because they don't like how the game lionizes her aggression or they see her as a hypocrite in some way. And I think this was inevitable or highly probably with the branching story structure. Obviously an Edelgard focused story would drum up the righteousness of her cause but the anti-edelgard stories would have to make her the unjustified villain. The issues facing her feel structural to me, and having a very serious adult female voice bring her to life might make the situation more tense but I think it would still exist.

I could see a Male Edelgard working out however because much of Edelgard's alloted time is spent making her more "waifu" when it could be spent on her as a serious character. It's like what Azura above said about Sylvain being played comically and how that makes his solemn self-pity feel inorganic. When you don't have a lot of time because your game is modular it might pay to be more focused.
 
If there's anything I've learned from trying the games in Japanese it's that they're all badly translated. Not like FF9 which is about as good in English as it is in Japanese or the Resident Evil games where the English versions are straight-up superior. It feels like the translators were writing fanfiction a lot of the time.

It's a different type of bad translation than games like Ocarina of Time. OoT suffered from awkwardly literal translation that caused the dialogue to lose most of its charm, and the poetic feel was lost making it feel less Lord of the Rings-like and more... video-gamey for lack of a better term. The English FE games in contrast feel almost like completely different games than the Japanese ones. At least the ones I've tried so far.
 
Last edited:
Honestly, Edelgard is just boring to listen to. She has a point about the Crests when it comes to Sylvain's brother and the church being corrupt. But considering how she's the one starting shit in the background, how are we supposed to sympathize with her?
 
I feel like people who say Sylvain is misunderstood is just rationalizing his shitty behavior because he's conventionally attractive. His reasoning behind his treatment of women doesn't make him compelling or sympathetic especially when little is shown of women actively pursuing him and that realistically some women would pursue non-crest nobles just for the money or connections anyway. Sure, you could say this is intentional and that he's actually projecting his insecurities, but it's still pretty weak sauce when his philandering is played for laughs anyway. And don't get me started on fucking Miklan.
I actually like Sylvain, so I’ll try to explain why.

I think a big part of Sylvain’s appeal comes from interactions from the rest of the cast. While we see Sylvain act cruelly to women in his supports, the women in question are never women we meet. We have no idea what the full context between their relationship with Sylvain is, and seeing as Sylvain has admitted to a few being clingy (and we somewhat see that in the Dimitri support) one cannot fully say he is the bad guy.

When we see Sylvain with the main cast members, he is honestly depicted as a great guy. Baring Byleth and probably Lorenz, Sylvain seems to actually care about those around him or comes around to it fairly quickly. Sylvain was the guy who got Dimitri to try to put himself out there, the guy who holds no ill will towards Dedue and gouges for the people of Duscar, the guy who helped Annette with her magic problems, the guy who got Marianne to lighten up, the guy who did everything to try to make Leonie feel more valued as a women, the guy who carried Manuela back to her room after a night of drinking, etc.. Even some of his other, more unintentional acts has positive effects on his classmates, such as causing Lysethia to feel more respected as it was clear that Sylvain did not see her as a child, or his deeper understanding of Mercedes and Dorothea.

Sylvain is a genuine guy and a complete bro to those around him. The game tells us that Sylvain’s whole ‘cheater character‘ seems to be an act, or atleast an act in a similar vein to Felix’s ”I hate everyone and only care about my training” persona. It is clear that Sylvain is deeply loyal to those around him.

To explain the cheater side and justify it a bit more, I believe Lorenz makes for a good comparison as he is similar to Sylvain. In Lorenz’s supports we learn that he is in for a more arranged marriage, or at least one that is completely for the benefit of his people. Lorenz is not marrying for love, he explains that he is willing to throw away all his happiness. In contrast, Sylvain wants a partner, but it seems his fate is to be married off. I think his sleeping around is just a way to feel something, but never get too attached as he knows he can never actually love someone and have them end up together. It seems he pulls a lot of one-night stands, and while some women will get attached, I think the goal is to be able to break it off nicely. I think Sylvain is seen more sympathetic in his more terrible actions as we know the break up was going to come anyway, and he is placed in a bad position where his crest dictates the rest of his life, meaning his has to leave behind his own feelings. If anything his flirting seems to be more rebellious or trying to have some level of fun in life.

Sylvain is sort of weird, but many see him good because we have tons to suggest it. A lot of his words also hold weight, like when he told Dorothea he would go after her as an elderly woman, seeing as he has gone after older women already (Ingrid’s grandma). He is also kind to the main cast members we grow connections to, so we like his interactions as they depict him as kind and smarter than he seems.


The issue with Dorothea is that she rarely has a Sylvain kindness moment with the rest of the cast. Actually, the only ones she seems decently kind to are from the start are female. I think a big turn off for her was her Ferdinand support, because the justification for all the baggage Ferdinand had to go through was so flimsy it hurts. He saw her naked and looked away, seriously, she treats him like garbage throughout the entire game because he turned away and left her alone when she decided to get naked in public. Her other supports do not help much either as she comes off more like a bother in most. She refuses to leave Felix alone for no reason, forcing him to chat with her (about what?), she seems like she is forcing Hubert into marriage by using loyalty to Edelgard against him. She just seems overbearing at times and her thirst for characters can be a bit much. I guess it just comes down to personal feelings. I think Dorothea is worse because they try way to hard to push her marriage idea and it seems like she cares little for many around her.

Her personality shift in part 2 is also weird and detracts from the character. She goes from flirty and upbeat to complete downer, whereas Sylvain seems to continue being the fun loving one of the Blue Lions. Personally Sylvain just seems more fun and friend like than Dorothea, he has a more fun sense in him and has a lot more moments that make me believe that he cares for his friends than Dorothea ever has. We see more emotions from him, such as being hurt by Felix and Ingrid, whereas Dorothea seems less well rounded and more defined by the marriage goal.
 
It would all depend on execution. Arvis has, essentially, Bad Boy cred. And that matters. Being a girl, the girl lord, was a major point in the games marketing too. And I remember Edelgard's initial popularity being like a tidal wave. Which I know also rankled people who liked Dimitri a lot since he was neglected as the "generic lord". But a lot of people dislike Edelgard because they don't like how the game lionizes her aggression or they see her as a hypocrite in some way. And I think this was inevitable or highly probably with the branching story structure. Obviously an Edelgard focused story would drum up the righteousness of her cause but the anti-edelgard stories would have to make her the unjustified villain. The issues facing her feel structural to me, and having a very serious adult female voice bring her to life might make the situation more tense but I think it would still exist.

I could see a Male Edelgard working out however because much of Edelgard's alloted time is spent making her more "waifu" when it could be spent on her as a serious character. It's like what Azura above said about Sylvain being played comically and how that makes his solemn self-pity feel inorganic. When you don't have a lot of time because your game is modular it might pay to be more focused.
It's more like Arvis represents idealism shrouded in pragmatism and how good intentions can cause great catastrophe. The end result of Edelgard's waifuism causes parts of the audience to be romantically/lustfully infatuated with her. Compared to Arvis, well, there's nothing really infatuating about murdering an innocent man and using your sister-wife as salt in the wounds. I don't particularly like how Arvis is humanized, but it's a lot less egregious to waifuism. Of course, the waifuism issue is easily applicable to the other main lords plus Rhea.

While we see Sylvain act cruelly to women in his supports, the women in question are never women we meet. We have no idea what the full context between their relationship with Sylvain is,
The game tells us that Sylvain’s whole ‘cheater character‘ seems to be an act
Isn't this contradicted in his Byleth C support? We see him with a girl he's dating and said girl finds out he's been dating other girls. It doesn't help that this line of dialogue is in there:
Sylvain said:
Anyway, I don't know why she's so upset about me dating other girls. She didn't care before she found out, so why does she care now?

To explain the cheater side and justify it a bit more, I believe Lorenz makes for a good comparison as he is similar to Sylvain. In Lorenz’s supports we learn that he is in for a more arranged marriage, or at least one that is completely for the benefit of his people. Lorenz is not marrying for love, he explains that he is willing to throw away all his happiness. In contrast, Sylvain wants a partner, but it seems his fate is to be married off. I think his sleeping around is just a way to feel something, but never get too attached as he knows he can never actually love someone and have them end up together. It seems he pulls a lot of one-night stands, and while some women will get attached, I think the goal is to be able to break it off nicely. I think Sylvain is seen more sympathetic in his more terrible actions as we know the break up was going to come anyway, and he is placed in a bad position where his crest dictates the rest of his life, meaning his has to leave behind his own feelings. If anything his flirting seems to be more rebellious or trying to have some level of fun in life.
It's one thing to have a casual relationship in a medieval setting, it's an entirely different thing when you're leading people on. Again, Byleth's C support. Lorenz at least is pretty straightforward and doesn't leave a lot to fill in the gaps for interpretation.

It's fine if you like Sylvain and all, but for me, him being a nice guy on top of him being douchy towards women makes his character a little incoherent. It's not good enough for the writers that he's a nice guy who's hopelessly a flirt. He needs to be given a somber backstory as a means to promote that crests are bad. And just for shits and giggles, we can have that be a reason as to why he inconsistently treats women like shit.

The issue with Dorothea is that she rarely has a Sylvain kindness moment with the rest of the cast. Actually, the only ones she seems decently kind to are from the start are female. I think a big turn off for her was her Ferdinand support, because the justification for all the baggage Ferdinand had to go through was so flimsy it hurts. He saw her naked and looked away, seriously, she treats him like garbage throughout the entire game because he turned away and left her alone when she decided to get naked in public.
Except that Dorothea completely misinterpreted the situation as him being disgusted by her, thus, reinforcing her dislike of nobles. Ferdinand ran-off because he thought that he was hallucinating a water nymph not necessarily because of some sort of politeness or decency. You might want to re-read their support because this reads more like a bad game of telephone.

There's also the implication that Dorothea may have had to face sexual harassment from the men she's entertained, so being more friendly towards women wouldn't seem off or whatever it is you're implying here.

Her other supports do not help much either as she comes off more like a bother in most. She refuses to leave Felix alone for no reason, forcing him to chat with her (about what?), she seems like she is forcing Hubert into marriage by using loyalty to Edelgard against him. She just seems overbearing at times and her thirst for characters can be a bit much. I guess it just comes down to personal feelings. I think Dorothea is worse because they try way to hard to push her marriage idea and it seems like she cares little for many around her.
Dorothea going after noblemen is rooted in the near inevitability of poverty and obscurity. That's part of the reason why she's even in the Officers Academy. She grew up with nobles scoffing at her than having them admire her beauty once she became an opera singer. It's reasonable to assume that her distrust of nobles and her treatment of others is a character flaw fueled by a rough upbringing.

Her personality shift in part 2 is also weird and detracts from the character. She goes from flirty and upbeat to complete downer, whereas Sylvain seems to continue being the fun loving one of the Blue Lions. Personally Sylvain just seems more fun and friend like than Dorothea, he has a more fun sense in him and has a lot more moments that make me believe that he cares for his friends than Dorothea ever has. We see more emotions from him, such as being hurt by Felix and Ingrid, whereas Dorothea seems less well rounded and more defined by the marriage goal.
What were your expectations for this character? Dorothea adopting a more somber attitude is pretty sensible considering she's been through five years of war. I would say that Sylvain remaining rather static is a bit inorganic. Compared to Dorethea, Sylvain is expected to be on the front lines and to command the soldiers under his house during times of war. You'd think that sort of experience would snap him to be a little more serious. I can at least get a flirty character like Inigo as his optimism can be framed as him uplifting others during an apocalyptic event.

I think there are issues with the way Dorothea is written. For example, her presence in the Officers Academy is pretty contrived considering it's much more practical to pick up nobles as an entertainer rather than risk scaring up a face in the heat of battle. Or if she really hated nobles that much she could just hang out in a merchants guild and not have to deal with the snobbiness, or at least not as much. I don't like Dorothea that much, but I don't think she's nearly as bad as some make her out to be.
 
Isn't this contradicted in his Byleth C support? We see him with a girl he's dating and said girl finds out he's been dating other girls. It doesn't help that this line of dialogue is in there:
Forgot, so thank you, and yes Byleth is the one support that looks at his character disfavorably, which is why I placed it in with Lorenz. Byleth seems to bring up the worst in most of the cast as just something about his/her presence seems to trigger something in the characters. Leonie being a fine example of a character that is decently likeable, then has a Byleth freakout. Bernadette also had the weird complete character turn around in the Byleth S support, Lorenz was more creepy in his weird invitations, Hubert is more hostile, even Dorothea seems off and sort of pulls a “I am a terrible person and you are looking into my soul thing.”

To comment, what Sylvain did was completely unjustifiable in Byleth’s supports. He was a complete jerk and his wanting to murder Byleth for having it easy is way out of line. I guess I sort of just brush it off though as the supports with other characters mean more to me. Characters like Hubert, Leonie, Lorenz, Bernadette, Edelgard, and Sylvain all seem to act differently around Byleth than with others, and I just find it best to separate it as a one time instance. Maybe not the best way of looking at characters, but if what 11/12 supports have them behaved, then should I fault the one?

It's one thing to have a casual relationship in a medieval setting, it's an entirely different thing when you're leading people on. Again, Byleth's C support. Lorenz at least is pretty straightforward and doesn't leave a lot to fill in the gaps for interpretation.
Agreed, though how many instances of Sylvain’s flirting even came up? I only remember Manuela, Lorenz and Byleth’s supports having them. Diving even deeper then that, it seems like Bylet’s was the only one to show a girl get hurt by him, otherwise he is just getting into getting into “one-night-stands” or doing basic flirting for a phone number. Maybe a bit jerkish, but hardly any real damage. It is like seeing how many girls’ numbers you can get.

once again, Byleth just seems to be the exception.

It's fine if you like Sylvain and all, but for me, him being a nice guy on top of him being douchy towards women makes his character a little incoherent. It's not good enough for the writers that he's a nice guy who's hopelessly a flirt. He needs to be given a somber backstory as a means to promote that crests are bad. And just for shits and giggles, we can have that be a reason as to why he inconsistently treats women like shit.
The thing is, he only seems mean to npc women, and only in Byleth’s support. All of the game’s main cast women seem to be fine around him and he seems genuinely kind. Like I said before, He carried Manuela to her room, helped Annette with an equation, tried to make Leonie feel more valued as a women, helped Marianne cheer up a bit (which she actually appreciates as she brings it up in Ashe’s A support), and he seems to be the one who truly understands and shows sympathy towards Dorothea and Mercedes. He is nice to all women he has supports with. The only exception for this is Byleth for whatever reason, but seeing as characters undergo personality changes for Byleth, like Edelgard turning into a weird waifu, I typically just kind of ignore it and judge the other actions.

I think the inconsistent writing in this game just comes from Byleth. Sylvain makes sense when not taking in Byleth’s support. I feel the point of Byleth’s support was to show how the crests have messed up his perception of the world, but both Mercedes and Dorothea do that without him being cruel. Mercedes and him are in a similar situation, so they bond over how the crest they have dictates their lives, while Dorothea gets his insecuritit’s about only being valued for something one is born with. With Byleth, it is out of nowhere resentment in a vein attempt to make an already well thought out character deep.

Except that Dorothea completely misinterpreted the situation as him being disgusted by her, thus, reinforcing her dislike of nobles. Ferdinand ran-off because he thought that he was hallucinating a water nymph not necessarily because of some sort of politeness or decency. You might want to re-read their support because this reads more like a bad game of telephone.
I get that she misread, but that doesn’t make the situation better on her end. She is literally showering publicly and gets offended when someone turns away at her being naked. That seems like a completely justifiable action to take in that scenario. I see what you are saying in that Ferdinand had a different motive, but still, this seems like a very self-made issue. I wouldn’t even be that mad about it, but even outside supports she treats Ferdinand bad, and she also withholds any reasoning from him for 5 years. At this point, it is just a petty grudge. He shows nothing but respect and hard work, yet she kicks him down with no chance to even know or amend what he did wrong. You get annoyed by Sylvain leading people on, but that is essentially the Dorothea x Ferdinand support.

To finish up..
Dorothea adopting a more somber attitude is pretty sensible considering she's been through five years of war. I would say that Sylvain remaining rather static is a bit inorganic.
Real talk, everyone remains static through the time skip. The only exceptions are Dorothea and Dimitri, and Dimitri arguably changed prior to it as his snap came at El’s reveal. Every other character is essentially the same with maybe some minor differences like Ferdinand worrying about his lost title. Dorothea is so bizarre post-Time Skip as they never alluded to any sense of dread, making her doomer personality random. It’s like they had no idea where to take her. What makes it worse is that the supports don’t even reflect the change, she is upbeat with Caspar and others, and seems ready to fight and unchanged in pre-battle dialogue, yet monastery and battle quotes have her entirely different.

I don't like Dorothea that much, but I don't think she's nearly as bad as some make her out to be.
I...actually agree. While I rant on her, I think she can be good and has potential, I just don’t think the game went about it the best.
Dorothea going after noblemen is rooted in the near inevitability of poverty and obscurity. That's part of the reason why she's even in the Officers Academy. She grew up with nobles scoffing at her than having them admire her beauty once she became an opera singer. It's reasonable to assume that her distrust of nobles and her treatment of others is a character flaw fueled by a rough upbringing.
This is probably the biggest wasted potential. It feels like her noble hatred is more inconsistent than Sylvain’s sexism. She only seems to hate men, making the whole Noble thing rather odd. It is also strange that her experiences do not come up much with Edelgard or Hubert, you know, the people fighting the nobility. Edelgard literally asks everyone about the unfairness of nobility, but the one with a genuine issue is instead relegated to singing songs for her lesbian queen. The Black Eagles writing is rough in general, which is likely why Dorothea does not get the same love as Sylvain. Each house had a theme, but Black Eagles seems off. The Blue Lions were supposed to be the character driven house, the Golden Dear the lore/world building house, and Black Eagles should have been a debate of El’s ideals. Dorothea and Bernadetta work perfectly as justification, yet her and Hubert’s supports just forget the interesting part of the characters exist. Ferdinand seems to be the only conversation piece for El as he challenges her ideals. The other characters should have done what Ferdinand did in his A support, but they do not. Lindhart should have aided Ferdinand in being against as his Crest research conflicts and he sees the dangers of El’s plan for crests. In addition I cannot even think of what Caspar and Petra could have done to add to the debate as they seem unimportant. I think this element damages Dorothea as there is no set theme in the house for characters to work off of, or atleast no commitment.

I can try to explain further if you like, but this post is too long. Ultimately, I think Sylvain just got the better deal. He feels far more integrated into his house than Dorothea, leaving a bigger lasting impression. They are similar, but one feels more well utilized and purposeful than the other.
 
Forgot, so thank you, and yes Byleth is the one support that looks at his character disfavorably, which is why I placed it in with Lorenz. Byleth seems to bring up the worst in most of the cast as just something about his/her presence seems to trigger something in the characters. Leonie being a fine example of a character that is decently likeable, then has a Byleth freakout. Bernadette also had the weird complete character turn around in the Byleth S support, Lorenz was more creepy in his weird invitations, Hubert is more hostile, even Dorothea seems off and sort of pulls a “I am a terrible person and you are looking into my soul thing.”

To comment, what Sylvain did was completely unjustifiable in Byleth’s supports. He was a complete jerk and his wanting to murder Byleth for having it easy is way out of line. I guess I sort of just brush it off though as the supports with other characters mean more to me. Characters like Hubert, Leonie, Lorenz, Bernadette, Edelgard, and Sylvain all seem to act differently around Byleth than with others, and I just find it best to separate it as a one time instance. Maybe not the best way of looking at characters, but if what 11/12 supports have them behaved, then should I fault the one?


Agreed, though how many instances of Sylvain’s flirting even came up? I only remember Manuela, Lorenz and Byleth’s supports having them. Diving even deeper then that, it seems like Bylet’s was the only one to show a girl get hurt by him, otherwise he is just getting into getting into “one-night-stands” or doing basic flirting for a phone number. Maybe a bit jerkish, but hardly any real damage. It is like seeing how many girls’ numbers you can get.

once again, Byleth just seems to be the exception.


The thing is, he only seems mean to npc women, and only in Byleth’s support. All of the game’s main cast women seem to be fine around him and he seems genuinely kind. Like I said before, He carried Manuela to her room, helped Annette with an equation, tried to make Leonie feel more valued as a women, helped Marianne cheer up a bit (which she actually appreciates as she brings it up in Ashe’s A support), and he seems to be the one who truly understands and shows sympathy towards Dorothea and Mercedes. He is nice to all women he has supports with. The only exception for this is Byleth for whatever reason, but seeing as characters undergo personality changes for Byleth, like Edelgard turning into a weird waifu, I typically just kind of ignore it and judge the other actions.

I think the inconsistent writing in this game just comes from Byleth. Sylvain makes sense when not taking in Byleth’s support. I feel the point of Byleth’s support was to show how the crests have messed up his perception of the world, but both Mercedes and Dorothea do that without him being cruel. Mercedes and him are in a similar situation, so they bond over how the crest they have dictates their lives, while Dorothea gets his insecuritit’s about only being valued for something one is born with. With Byleth, it is out of nowhere resentment in a vein attempt to make an already well thought out character deep.


I get that she misread, but that doesn’t make the situation better on her end. She is literally showering publicly and gets offended when someone turns away at her being naked. That seems like a completely justifiable action to take in that scenario. I see what you are saying in that Ferdinand had a different motive, but still, this seems like a very self-made issue. I wouldn’t even be that mad about it, but even outside supports she treats Ferdinand bad, and she also withholds any reasoning from him for 5 years. At this point, it is just a petty grudge. He shows nothing but respect and hard work, yet she kicks him down with no chance to even know or amend what he did wrong. You get annoyed by Sylvain leading people on, but that is essentially the Dorothea x Ferdinand support.

To finish up..

Real talk, everyone remains static through the time skip. The only exceptions are Dorothea and Dimitri, and Dimitri arguably changed prior to it as his snap came at El’s reveal. Every other character is essentially the same with maybe some minor differences like Ferdinand worrying about his lost title. Dorothea is so bizarre post-Time Skip as they never alluded to any sense of dread, making her doomer personality random. It’s like they had no idea where to take her. What makes it worse is that the supports don’t even reflect the change, she is upbeat with Caspar and others, and seems ready to fight and unchanged in pre-battle dialogue, yet monastery and battle quotes have her entirely different.


I...actually agree. While I rant on her, I think she can be good and has potential, I just don’t think the game went about it the best.

This is probably the biggest wasted potential. It feels like her noble hatred is more inconsistent than Sylvain’s sexism. She only seems to hate men, making the whole Noble thing rather odd. It is also strange that her experiences do not come up much with Edelgard or Hubert, you know, the people fighting the nobility. Edelgard literally asks everyone about the unfairness of nobility, but the one with a genuine issue is instead relegated to singing songs for her lesbian queen. The Black Eagles writing is rough in general, which is likely why Dorothea does not get the same love as Sylvain. Each house had a theme, but Black Eagles seems off. The Blue Lions were supposed to be the character driven house, the Golden Dear the lore/world building house, and Black Eagles should have been a debate of El’s ideals. Dorothea and Bernadetta work perfectly as justification, yet her and Hubert’s supports just forget the interesting part of the characters exist. Ferdinand seems to be the only conversation piece for El as he challenges her ideals. The other characters should have done what Ferdinand did in his A support, but they do not. Lindhart should have aided Ferdinand in being against as his Crest research conflicts and he sees the dangers of El’s plan for crests. In addition I cannot even think of what Caspar and Petra could have done to add to the debate as they seem unimportant. I think this element damages Dorothea as there is no set theme in the house for characters to work off of, or atleast no commitment.

I can try to explain further if you like, but this post is too long. Ultimately, I think Sylvain just got the better deal. He feels far more integrated into his house than Dorothea, leaving a bigger lasting impression. They are similar, but one feels more well utilized and purposeful than the other.
I don't actually like criticizing Sylvain because he's a totally good character and his flaws are flaws the entire game suffers from but the issue was comparing these two and I think Sylvain collapses when it comes to motivation and justification in said comparison. I also think you hit on why Sylvain is a good character. It's not because of his "misunderstood" nature but because he is clearly a nice guy to his friends. Particularly his old childhood friends who all have their issues with him but he basically just ignores this and continues smiling.

All that said...

I find it weird to criticize Dorothea for hating Nobles too much but then faulting her for not hating all of them equally. She doesn't hate Hubert, Caspar, Hanneman and so on and they're male. I also think you are misunderstanding her issue with Ferdinand. It's not just that he was rude to her as a child, it's what he's now so flattering and flirtatious with her that she's a desirable adult. This is why she calls him A Bee. She makes it clear she's seen this pattern before. Nobles who previously didn't care if she lived or died suddenly pretending she is someone they "love" because they just want to sleep with her.
This is why she "seems to dislike males" which amounts to 3 males: Lorenz, Ferdinand, and Sylvain for largely the same reason. She thinks they're playing with people's affections. With Sylvain she's right, with Lorenz she's not wrong but not right either, with Ferdinand she is wrong. And there's really no reason why this should be a problem. It ties into her motivation as a character and it combats a stereotypical reading of her character to have her bat away Noble suitors because she thinks they just want to bed her. This is more or less the exact same "deep" outlook Sylvain has and it's communicated without being explicitly stated and far more justified in her experiences.
And also, like a lot of people find Ferdinand obnoxious at first. He's very sure of himself and that rubs people the wrong way. It would especially rub someone who thinks Nobles treat their lessers like shit. And with the additional content their support gets it's clear she does care about him despite all that. I always saw this as evidence she's actually a very caring person even if the face she puts on preoccupies how you see her. Which I think we can agree is the correct view in hindsight.

And her flirty personality in Part 1, which would also break whenever civilians had to die in a mission (it was foreshadowed, you're just wrong about that), was pretty much an act. She says it outright in Byleth B and shows it in Byleth C with her tone toward the Knight she'd been dating. Gonna be honest with you, I don't think you know Dorothea's character very well so a lot of your complaints that they could have done it better (which you can always say) fall flat to me. I think you're probably more familiar with the Blue Lions.

I would argue the biggest issue with Dorothea's character is more the order in which information is given. If they had established her kindness toward orphans right away and then gone into her Dating Scheme it would be a totally different ball game. And there were ways to expand her motivation which I guess time and her role as a secondary character would not allow (maybe she's decided to go to school because she also wants to be with people her age and have real friends, part of why she wants a Noble husband in particular is to right the wrong her father did to her mother, etc etc). I've always thought these but one could make similar complaints or observations about many characters too. It's just that some of them, like Sylvain, it's okay to pass off headcanon as canon and people will entertain it.

Lastly Dorothea is probably more popular than Sylvain tbh. It's just a lot of vocal fans are girls who like the husbandos. So the idea Sylvain gets away with it for X reasons is I think flawed. But the complaint Dorothea receives is that it's "wrong" for her to want to marry well which invective used to justify that. Minor subjective arguments about how you felt about this support or that support are not the reason. The point is, if this argument were seriously stated rather than cynically, the same people would also hate Sylvain but they rarely do. There's no wiggle room. If Dorothea being a poor doesn't justify wanting to marry well, then Sylvain pumping and dumping poors is also bad and exploitative.
 
Last edited:
I find it weird to criticize Dorothea for hating Nobles too much but then faulting her for not hating all of them equally.
It is just inconsistent. The same point was brought up about Sylvain. He seems like he hates women, but then is fine to pretty much the entire cast. Honestly, Dorothea is all right, I just find it weird to bring up her hating nobles then not do anything with it outside of characters that she would likely have issues with regardless. She seems indifferent or hateful towards Sylvain, Lorenz, and Ferdinand. None of them even need to be Nobles to justify anything, Sylvain is just an annoyance in the beginning but they both learn to understand that they want more than beautiful and rich. Ferdinand is explained. Lorenz is Lorenz, he is just naturally off putting.

They could have really gone deeper into her hatred and made a point in favor of Edelgard, but as it stands it seems half baked.

I also think you are misunderstanding her issue with Ferdinand. It's not just that he was rude to her as a child, it's what he's now so flattering and flirtatious with her that she's a desirable adult. This is why she calls him A Bee. She makes it clear she's seen this pattern before. Nobles who previously didn't care if she lived or died suddenly pretending she is someone they "love" because they just want to sleep with her. And also, like a lot of people find Ferdinand obnoxious at first. He's very sure of himself and that rubs people the wrong way. It would especially rub someone who thinks Nobles treat their lessers like shit. And with the additional content their support gets it's clear she does care about him despite all that. I always saw this as evidence she's actually a very caring person even if the face she puts on preoccupies how you see her.
Good take!

I think the time skip hurts this support for me. It seems as though Ferdinand just wants to know what he did wrong, yet she withholds that information and treats him kinda bad for 5 years. I feel like the explanation should have came in the B support so that Ferdinand can think about the relationship in that time and come back to prove he is not like other nobles. As is, she seems unreasonable, holding a grudge with no justification for a long period of time, then they get married after 5 years of her hating him and doing this, like what? It lacks a flow as it just felt like build up to a reveal, but there is no ending for the characters to really improve, making the potential marriage rushed. It also makes her look bad as once again, 5 years! 5 years where she cannot even give him any kind of coherent explanation. I am not asking for her to love him, but she could at least tell him what he did wrong, leaving him to better himself for her. I also hate how the A support ending hints that there should be more as she seems like she needs time to think.

And her flirty personality in Part 1, which would also break whenever civilians had to die in a mission (it was foreshadowed, you're just wrong about that), was pretty much an act.
Never saw them, so sorry. I guess this just highlights the great writing when one can find these things.

Gonna be honest with you, I don't think you know Dorothea's character very well so a lot of your complaints that they could have done it better (which you can always say) fall flat to me. I think you're probably more familiar with the Blue Lions.
Have not played in a while, so I may be rusty. I have played Black Eagles, let’s say about 3 times. I did an incomplete run of both routes (same save data for prior to split), then a second full run of both routes (same way). I played Golden Deer 1 1/2 times and I played through half of Blue Lions. Also almost completed DLC. I actually should be more familiar with Black Eagles, but those students sort of bore me outside of Ferdinand and surprisingly Hubert. Blue Lions are my favorite. I started with them, but never got a clean run due to college starting mid-way through. After a month of not playing, I gave up on the run as it would feel too disconnected and switched over to others.


I would argue the biggest issue with Dorothea's character is more the order in which information is given. If they had established her kindness toward orphans right away and then gone into her Dating Scheme it would be a totally different ball game. And there were ways to expand her motivation which I guess time and her role as a secondary character would not allow (maybe she's decided to go to school because she also wants to be with people her age and have real friends, part of why she wants a Noble husband in particular is to right the wrong her father did to her mother, etc etc). I've always thought these but one could make similar complaints or observations about many characters too. It's just that some of them, like Sylvain, it's okay to pass off headcanon as canon and people will entertain it.
I wanted to bring this up before, but I think the main thing holding her back is the house. The Black Eagles are so nothing in comparison to Blue Lions or even the Deer. Characters like Caspar are just okay, and characters like Edelgard are just very hard to get a read on. I just found myself bored with them and they felt like they played up gimmicks to often, such as Bernie’s constant screaming and Petra not speaking correctly. I guess I couldn’t really find a connection between characters like in GD or especially BL. BE feels a bit theme-less, I cannot decide what the characters really add to the game. With BL all of them seem to show some level of affects the world has had on them. It is a character driven route that is about how characters handle there situations, and I can see lingering themes/ideas that connect characters. Same with GD, but for more world building and lore purposes

Maybe I am looking too deeply into things, but there are some main themes of both that connect characters
Blue Lions:
Aftermath of Duscar - Dimitri, Dedue, Felix, Ingrid, Ashe, and Annette
Curse of Having a Crest - Ingrid, Mercedes, Sylvain
Family Hatred/ Issues - Felix, Sylvain, Mercedes, Annette, Possibly Dimitri? (Lord Arundel & possibly the Step Mother)
Loss - All of Them!

It also helps that, I believe besides Ashe, all Blue Lions were connected to each other before the game. Dimitri, Felix, Ingrid, and Sylvain were all friends. Dimitri and Dedue were whatever you consider that relationship. Annette and Dimitri were likely connected through Gilbert. Annette and Mercedes were friends.


Golden Deer was sort of the outsider group that really gave the world context. Claude was an outsider trying to uncover secrets and his group seems to reflect this.

Lorenz is the established noble, knowledgable of Fodland.
Hilda is the opposite to Claude, being more closed minded and representing the prejudices in Fodland That Claude wants to break
Lysthia and Marianne are the literal embodiments of the secrets Claude wants to find. Secret crest, evil organization.

Leonie is the opposite of Lorenz and gives more context to Jeralt, seeing as Claude’s route unravels the mystery of Byleth. She also represents the common folk, something Lorenz lacks knowledge of.

Then there is Ignatz and Raphael. They are much harder to pinpoint a purpose to. With Ignatz his connection to the land through his drawings, and the Goddess do highlight the themes as he wants to understand the Goddess like Claude and understand new locations. Raphael just seems content in life, so maybe he’s Ignatz opposite, one who does not question or discover the world?

Either way The Deer sort of have 4 themes
Commoner vs Nobility
Secrets
Bridging the people
Exploring the unknown

All of these relate to the leader. A man who went to an unknown location looking to figure out its secrets and connect people thanks to him changing titles from commoner to noble over night.


With Black Eagles, there i not much that I can see connecting them. I feel like the goal was to have an argument or debate over El’s new world, but none of the cast really relates to each other that hard, leading to conversations seeming weak. None of them feel important to Edelgard and Hubert, besides Ferdinand. Ferdinand is the only one to bring up a debate with Edelgard about how nobility still has a place and he works as a contrast to Hubert in that he is brighter, more honest, and again challenges the soon to be ruler. Bernie and Dorothea could be great in providing arguments for the corrupt system and pushing El, yet they spend time on other means, like Dorothea singing. Caspar just seems neutral to everything, which may be perfect for creating a neutral party, but because the rest of the house is lacking, he lacks too. Petra is IDK? Maybe neutral. She wants Brigid independence I think, but her alignment is all over. Lind Hart should probably go against El and vogue for crests, yet they spend time making El look overbearing. Maybe I am missing something but Black Eagles lack much of the charm and writing of the other two houses, when it should be the most important. I think the issue with Dorothea is that the Black Eagles are not good characters to work off of, to show multiple dimensions of her personality. They feel like they are the most distant house to me, so I never got to invested compared to GD and BL.

Lastly Dorothea is probably more popular than Sylvain tbh. It's just a lot of vocal fans are girls who like the husbandos. So the idea Sylvain gets away with it for X reasons is I think flawed. But the complaint Dorothea receives is that it's "wrong" for her to want to marry well which invective used to justify that. Minor subjective arguments about how you felt about this support or that support are not the reason. The point is, if this argument were seriously stated rather than cynically, the same people would also hate Sylvain but they rarely do. There's no wiggle room. If Dorothea being a poor doesn't justify wanting to marry well, then Sylvain pumping and dumping poors is also bad and exploitative.
I always saw the issue as her attitude, not the fact she wants to marry rich. She seems to push herself onto others in supports and act as though things revolve around her. She just does weird things like the whole Caspar brother thing, the Hubert marriage, just not leaving Felix alone, and shoving Ingrid into a play. She also talks poorly about Nobles in the monaster, yet dates them multiple times. She comes off like one of those girls that posts all men are trash on Twitter while promoting her OnlyFans for men.

Sylvain can be cruel, but it seems to be in smaller doses. His personality carries him better then Dorothea‘s for her. Sylvain is a bro and acts like one to all the BL members. He rarely pushes and seems to drop any act quickly to get to the heart of the problem.

Both are terrible in a similar way, but the personality seems to be what makes or breaks as that is where they are not similar. Sylvain is just more fun to watch and seems more light hearted than her. He’s a meme in the community because he is just a likable side character that does frat boy level activities. Dorothea just lacks much to grasp onto her for. Her personality is so ...nothing... she feels like Hilda without the air-headness that makes Hilda such a joy.

IDK. Let’s just say both are different. Both have different personalities to accompany them, and both have different house dynamics. I like Sylvain more because the memeified personality and Blue Lions cast hold him higher than Dorothea who interacts with the most boring house and has the personality of Ingrid, my least favorite Blue Lion due to her boringness.
 
The waifuism in Fire Emblem is pretty cringe, granted, that's almost a given for a lot of fanbases. The way the fanbase treats the male and female avatars is mildly amusing considering they're the same character.

Is it odd that I picked a female Robin in Awakening simply because it offered better eugenics options for the second generation characters? I mean, other than meme pairings, like Gaius and Nowi. Which is a good pairing besides, but candyman/loli amuses me.

Am I too much of min-maxing gamer to appreciate waifuism?
 
Is it odd that I picked a female Robin in Awakening simply because it offered better eugenics options for the second generation characters? I mean, other than meme pairings, like Gaius and Nowi. Which is a good pairing besides, but candyman/loli amuses me.

Am I too much of min-maxing gamer to appreciate waifuism?

Female avatars are always better. Female Corrin gets Jakob who is wildly better then Felicia if you use the reclass seals and make him into a Paladin to wreck the early game. Female Byleth gets to become a Pegasus in a game where flyers are uber broken and gets free Sylvain recruitment while male Byleth gets to become a brawler. For whatever reason male avatars just get the short end of the stick even if you just care about gameplay min maxing.
 
Female avatars are always better. Female Corrin gets Jakob who is wildly better then Felicia if you use the reclass seals and make him into a Paladin to wreck the early game. Female Byleth gets to become a Pegasus in a game where flyers are uber broken and gets free Sylvain recruitment while male Byleth gets to become a brawler. For whatever reason male avatars just get the short end of the stick even if you just care about gameplay min maxing.
You left out the end game witch class from 3H.
 
Female avatars are always better. Female Corrin gets Jakob who is wildly better then Felicia if you use the reclass seals and make him into a Paladin to wreck the early game. Female Byleth gets to become a Pegasus in a game where flyers are uber broken and gets free Sylvain recruitment while male Byleth gets to become a brawler. For whatever reason male avatars just get the short end of the stick even if you just care about gameplay min maxing.

When I finally got a Fates game far enough to get Jakob as male Corrin, I realized the raw deal I got with Felicia. Fates has so many characters that just aren't that good. It was harder to make broken second generation characters in Fates, not impossible, but I feel like you need flow charts to keep track of which relationships offer which classes to which characters, just so you can make a decent nosferatu tank.

Awakening? Just pair up Lissa and Ricken, unlock the appropriate skills and watch Owain just murder everything. I then paired him with Cynthia, because they're entertaining. Also because it's just stupid effective.
 
You left out the end game witch class from 3H.

I didn't get the extra classes from 3H DLC, last I heard it is still "make everyone a wyvern" because going Pegasus/Brigand into Wyvern at level 20 is easier/faster in the early game then being a 4 move caster unless you have thyrsus on you. Plus Byleth I remember having a really crappy spell list and their stats better favor being physical anyway.


When I finally got a Fates game far enough to get Jakob as male Corrin, I realized the raw deal I got with Felicia. Fates has so many characters that just aren't that good. It was harder to make broken second generation characters in Fates, not impossible, but I feel like you need flow charts to keep track of which relationships offer which classes to which characters, just so you can make a decent nosferatu tank.

Awakening? Just pair up Lissa and Ricken, unlock the appropriate skills and watch Owain just murder everything. I then paired him with Cynthia, because they're entertaining. Also because it's just stupid effective.

Which Fates game? Conquest's early unit pool is much better on average then most FEs imo. The worst in Conquest is like Odin and Laslow who in most FEs would still be a decent unit and they made the early game armor not total garbage for once. I only played Birthright a little, but their roster felt fine.

They gimped kids a lot in Fates in general due to how insane they were in Awakening they're more like above average filler if something goes wrong, the best one is probably Percy because he comes so early in Conquest with Effie/Arthur and is a Wyvern with generally better stats then Beruka (who is still decent). Also Nosferatu is trash in Fates, don't bother using it also casters in general were kind of eh. Even Leo is just above average overall. Ninjas are way too good that mages look bad by comparison.

Awakening if you aren't grinding has a lot of junk units compared to just Chrom X Robin-ing the entire game until it ends. The kids are more insane, but the parents are garbage more often then not.
 
Which Fates game? Conquest's early unit pool is much better on average then most FEs imo. The worst in Conquest is like Odin and Laslow who in most FEs would still be a decent unit and they made the early game armor not total garbage for once. I only played Birthright a little, but their roster felt fine.

They gimped kids a lot in Fates in general due to how insane they were in Awakening they're more like above average filler if something goes wrong, the best one is probably Percy because he comes so early in Conquest with Effie/Arthur and is a Wyvern with generally better stats then Beruka (who is still decent). Also Nosferatu is trash in Fates, don't bother using it also casters in general were kind of eh. Even Leo is just above average overall. Ninjas are way too good that mages look bad by comparison.

I was thinking more the game as a whole then the individual runs, but it does make a difference, since the initial levels in Revelations mean a lot of characters are under leveled right out of the gate. The worst in Birthright was probably Hayato, who starts at level 1 while you'll be floating around 8-9ish. You might think Rinkah's a tank, given those abs, but she's not. That's Birthright's biggest issue, you get no real tanks for most of it, but the battles are straight forward and easier compared to Conquest and Revelations. And then you get Ryoma and doesn't matter, he just murders everything.
 
Back
Top Bottom