Your post above mine seeks to suggest violent thoughts toward me. I assumed it was a joke in the interest of fair play.
I think it’s open-ended and I don’t think you approached it as a discussion. Hence why I was derided for offering a counter-proposal.
Perhaps I should be more clear on this point: I think Edelgard is the villain, but that many of her critics have a vapid obsession with “following da roolz” in the same way her fans have a homosexual obsession with breaking them. That it’s sort of an intra-bugman conflict where any breach of the day’s order cannot by definition be worth it.
It goes back to my critique of Black Eagles where they don’t commit to the Faustian nature of what that route purports to be about. So I do see arguments about Edelgard’s specific characteristics as bait but not the central core disagreement (which I think is better represented in another character anyway).