Why do dumb things like hairstyles have to be segregated?
Why stop at hairstyles? How about we have separate schools? Separate restaurants? Separate bathrooms? Separate water fountains? POCs are clearly seconds away from being triggered to death. They just can't handle being around white folks for even a second, so the only hope is to separate the races permanently and intractably. Look how well it's working on the Reservations!
The sad part is
more and more people are actually listening to this shit. All those years the Civil Rights Marchers took their stand won't mean shit if the first thing we do with a free society is to fight to lock ourselves right back in cages.
Edit:
This is really spergy of me, but what's really been getting to me about Everyday Feminism is that every single article they write is full of at least a dozen little things anyone with half a brain could sperg for hours about. I'm just stunned at how much stupidity can be caked on by these people.
Take the white bitch who wrote the article about cutting off her dreadlocks:
Everyday Feminism said:
While I did run into the occasional asshole on the street who called me a “filthy dyke,” my whiteness led people to read me as
“quirky” and “alternative”.
I wasn’t followed around by security guards every time I went into a store. I wasn’t
hassled by the cops for hanging out with my friends on street corners. I wasn’t
hauled off to jail on the presumption that I was a
gang member just because of my nonconventional appearance.
Bitch, racist cops and white power gangsters don't first look to see if black folks have
inappropriate hairstyles before harassing them. They don't even check to see if they're really black. They act by glance alone. That's why they're racist.
In case you haven't noticed, Tamir Rice, Eric Garner, and Trayvon Martin all had the same haircut as the most powerful man in the Free World. David Duke couldn't give less of a shit about your stupid hair you selfish cunt.
Everyday Feminism said:
Yes, it’s true that dreadlocks are worn in all different cultures around the world, but the context for which they are worn in the US is explicitly rooted in black folks’ (Rastafarians specifically) symbolic resistance to white supremacy.
That's funny. I actually studied a bit about Rasta* history. They wear dreads due to the misinterpretation of passages from Leviticus and Numbers, and the book was referring to white people. Sure, the descendants of the Solomon Dynasty who ruled Ethiopia at the time were black, but the Davidic Jews were white back when they were in Israel at the time.
* How dare you use the phrase "Rastafarian"! Check your privilege, shitlord!
Everyday Feminism said:
You are an oppression tourist – a white girl who always has an escape route back to the open arms of white supremacy once she is through rebelling. You can cut them off anytime.
To pretend otherwise or assume yourself a martyr is misguided and offensive.
So just because there's the possibility that someone can change their mind and recuse what they hold dear -- not even that they're thinking about it but just the fact that it can in theory happen -- now has to dictate people's behavior?
Do these people have any idea where that train of logic ends? By that standard, you shouldn't leave parents alone with their children because even the best parents could -- in theory -- perform acts of physical or sexual abuse. They have the limbs and organs for it, don't they?
Just for a little fun, type anything that pisses you off into the searchbar for Everyday Feminism, and you'll discover a treasure trove of mental retardation.
this shit has to be seen to be believed:
Everyday Feminism said:
Editor’s Note: Like this phenomenal article, Everyday Feminism definitely believes in giving people a heads up about material that might provoke our reader’s trauma. However, we use the phrase “content warning” instead of “trigger warning,” as the word “trigger” relies on and evokes violent weaponry imagery. This could be re-traumatizing for folks who have suffered military, police, and other forms of violence. So, while warnings are so necessary and the points in this article are right on, we strongly encourage the term “content warning” instead of “trigger warning.”
A non-ironic trigger warning against trigger warnings.
Why does anyone want to be an SJW? You can't even come close to winning with these people.