Everyday Feminism - aka Everyday Autism

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Feeling good is Bad

Not voting is Voting

War is Peace

Love is Hate

Report to room 101 please, Mr Smith.........
 
melty said:
Considering these sites always have "how to put up with your relatives who have different political views" articles during the holidays, surely there's an untapped market for how to put up with perpetually triggered twats.
Click to expand...

I have a 100% foolproof method for dealing with politically troublesome relatives, if that bothers y'all so much.

Don't see them.

Like, no one comes to your home to literally force you to eat Christmas dinner. No one ties you to the chair and forces mashed potatoes in there. Go out or don't come over. The takeout places are open. If you need to preserve your intellectual safe space at holidays, just fucking DO IT and don't be a cunt.
 
Fareal said:
Like, no one comes to your home to literally force you to eat Christmas dinner. No one ties you to the chair and forces mashed potatoes in there. Go out or don't come over. The takeout places are open. If you need to preserve your intellectual safe space at holidays, just fucking DO IT and don't be a cunt.
Click to expand...
But they can't simply choose to not go to the family get together. Because mommy and daddy pay all their bills, so they can't say no when the parents demand they go.
 
Fareal said:
Like, no one comes to your home to literally force you to eat Christmas dinner. No one ties you to the chair and forces mashed potatoes in there. Go out or don't come over. The takeout places are open. If you need to preserve your intellectual safe space at holidays, just fucking DO IT and don't be a cunt.
Click to expand...

Or do as the Jews do and go out for Chinese.
 
Found this article in a link from the above piece in Everyday Feminism, citing this as an example of how everything we do is political.

http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2016/11/sexual-preference-political/

This is not to shame our preferences, but a call for us to examine why we have our preferences.While I don’t necessarily think we should pursue sex and relationships to satisfy some political standard, because that can lead to tokenism—that is, the practice of making only a symbolic effort to do a particular thing—we have to understand that more goes into our sexual experiences besides who attracts us.
Click to expand...

I found this part very interesting. So I shouldn't force myself to be attracted to someone because it might lead to tokenism, not because I would forcing myself into a situation where I felt coerced into having sex for political reasons lest I be a racist? I know we all see this line touted again and again by the hard left, but almost never so insidiously. It takes a very kind of sociopathic disconnect to forget that the individual offering their body to your "colored person" is a human being and not just a more or less consecrated virgin sacrifice on the altar of social justice.
 
Gym Leader Elesa said:
Found this article in a link from the above piece in Everyday Feminism, citing this as an example of how everything we do is political.

http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2016/11/sexual-preference-political/



I found this part very interesting. So I shouldn't force myself to be attracted to someone because it might lead to tokenism, not because I would forcing myself into a situation where I felt coerced into having sex for political reasons lest I be a racist? I know we all see this line touted again and again by the hard left, but almost never so insidiously. It takes a very kind of sociopathic disconnect to forget that the individual offering their body to your "colored person" is a human being and not just a more or less consecrated virgin sacrifice on the altar of social justice.
Click to expand...
"This is not to shame our preferences, but a call for us to examine why we have our preferences".

I bet pray-the-gay-away camps use the same kind of words.

You make a very good point. If it's wrong for a loveshy to demand someone use their sexuality to appease him, then it's wrong for an SJW to make the same demands.
 
Not sure why dealing with unlikable family members is such a struggle for these people. Loving people you would never willingly spend time with covers about 10-25% of family interactions.
 
Emperor Julian said:
Not sure why dealing with unlikable family members is such a struggle for these people. Loving people you would never willingly spend time with covers about 10-25% of family interactions.
Click to expand...

It makes a lot more sense when you consider that these are the people who 100% unironically believe that listening to someone with an opinion that differs from theirs is exactly the same thing as being raped.
 
Gym Leader Elesa said:
Found this article in a link from the above piece in Everyday Feminism, citing this as an example of how everything we do is political.

http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2016/11/sexual-preference-political/



I found this part very interesting. So I shouldn't force myself to be attracted to someone because it might lead to tokenism, not because I would forcing myself into a situation where I felt coerced into having sex for political reasons lest I be a racist? I know we all see this line touted again and again by the hard left, but almost never so insidiously. It takes a very kind of sociopathic disconnect to forget that the individual offering their body to your "colored person" is a human being and not just a more or less consecrated virgin sacrifice on the altar of social justice.
Click to expand...

According to their FB page, EF will totally defend a female POC refusing to date a white man. Since white people are the ones with all the privilege and that alone is too much for them to bear.
 
Yaoi Huntress Earth said:
According to their FB page, EF will totally defend a female POC refusing to date a white man. Since white people are the ones with all the privilege and that alone is too much for them to bear.
Click to expand...
To be fair, I'd defend that too - everyone has their sexual preferences. However, in this case they would almost certainly vilify the white man if the situation were reversed.
 
Gym Leader Elesa said:
Found this article in a link from the above piece in Everyday Feminism, citing this as an example of how everything we do is political.

http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2016/11/sexual-preference-political/



I found this part very interesting. So I shouldn't force myself to be attracted to someone because it might lead to tokenism, not because I would forcing myself into a situation where I felt coerced into having sex for political reasons lest I be a racist? I know we all see this line touted again and again by the hard left, but almost never so insidiously. It takes a very kind of sociopathic disconnect to forget that the individual offering their body to your "colored person" is a human being and not just a more or less consecrated virgin sacrifice on the altar of social justice.
Click to expand...

They also have failed to notice that the argument they make in this excerpt is EXACTLY the argument made by closeted non-hetero people for why they remain closeted. "I don't actually fancy men, but there are huge benefits to me in passing as straight and becoming a wife and mother in my own social group, so welp better take the D then".

And this media outlet would NEVER argue for non-hetero people to get into the closet for 'the good of society'. There is no underlying unifying logic to the position they are taking above. Either you should only fuck people you actually want to fuck, or you should make the decision on who to fuck on factors completely divorced from sexual attraction.

Also, I see a LOT of 'cotton ceiling' rhetoric being used there without the actual phrase itself being used. Because y'know even third wave feminists have trouble accepting 'as a woman, it is your duty to be NICE and fuck someone with a penis who wants to fuck you even if you really don't want to fuck them because you're supposed to be NICE'.
 
Fareal said:
Also, I see a LOT of 'cotton ceiling' rhetoric being used there without the actual phrase itself being used. Because y'know even third wave feminists have trouble accepting 'as a woman, it is your duty to be NICE and fuck someone with a penis who wants to fuck you even if you really don't want to fuck them because you're supposed to be NICE'.
Click to expand...
They're a step away from saying "Remember, if someone buys you dinner, they expect something for it..."
 
"more goes into our sexual experiences besides who attracts us."

Wat?

What world are you living in where people are trying to have sexual experiences with things that don't turn them on?

Not being turned on kinda makes the "sexual" part of "sexual experience" a no go, or are we supposed to just lie back and think of England our moral superiors?
 
TowinKarz said:
"more goes into our sexual experiences besides who attracts us."

Wat?

What world are you living in where people are trying to have sexual experiences with things that don't turn them on?

Not being turned on kinda makes the "sexual" part of "sexual experience" a no go, or are we supposed to just lie back and think of England our moral superiors?
Click to expand...

If I'm going to fuck someone I don't actually want to fuck, I need a better motivator than 'FOR GREAT SOCIAL JUSTICE'. 'Money' or 'drugs' are more in the ballpark.
 
Ruin said:
It makes a lot more sense when you consider that these are the people who 100% unironically believe that listening to someone with an opinion that differs from theirs is exactly the same thing as being raped.
Click to expand...
Wonder how many of these people are only children with minimal succesful contact other children. Usually siblings cousins help develop a tolerance to other people bullshit. The absence of this thickening of the skin would explain a lot.
 
EF's daily Trump salt is hilarious, considering they spent the last year telling people that not voting Dem was an acceptable gender choice.
 
What if said POC is a Trump supporter? Are you still required to fuck them, or just go down on them?


Fareal said:
I have a 100% foolproof method for dealing with politically troublesome relatives, if that bothers y'all so much.

Don't see them.

Like, no one comes to your home to literally force you to eat Christmas dinner. No one ties you to the chair and forces mashed potatoes in there. Go out or don't come over. The takeout places are open. If you need to preserve your intellectual safe space at holidays, just fucking DO IT and don't be a cunt.
Click to expand...

Good god. What kind of relatives do these people have? My grandfather would go into political rants from time to time, but we'd just be like, "Okay Pap, whatever."
 
Emperor Julian said:
I got the impression Winston and julia's mutual attraction was based on the fact they were the only normal people about and everyone else was a dour shithead obsessed with politics and victory against an omnpresent faceless enemy....on reflection that's why Everyday femminsm most likely doesnt get it.
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure there's a bit where they make eye contact and realise that each of them is only pretending to love the Party
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom