🍗 Deathfat Eugenia Cooney - Youtube's Reigning uwu Cute, Emo ana-chan Supreme, had a child molester for a discord moderator

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
It's not the internet's job to babysit people's kids. Parents should monitor what their kid does online.

If a kid stumbles upon KF, should KF be deleted?

As I said already, demonetization won't stop EC from uploading videos so your precious children will still see them and learn to starve themselves. Except they won't. The only people who will starve themselves are people who are predisposed to EDs and they will starve themselves with or without EC's influence. That's what people seem to not understand about eating disorders. Yes, people with EDs look up thinspo but they will still starve themselves with or without access to it.
The problem with Eugenia is that she completely denies having a problem at all. That being this thin is just totally natural and no big deal and comes with zero consequences because guys she's totally fine and she never said she had anorexia! If you don't see what sort of impact this might have on young people then I don't know what to tell you.
 
If a kid stumbles upon KF, should KF be deleted?
This argument makes no sense though because KF isn’t pandering to advertisers like Youtube/Twitch/Instagram are.

It's not the internet's job to babysit people's kids. Parents should monitor what their kid does online.

You’re trying to apply logic to people who posses none. Parents use their kids photos as their display photos on Facebook and are shocked and indignant when someone uses that to blackmail their kid.


People fully expect the internet to revolve around their kids and their safety/sensitivities and websites like Facebook/Youtube/etc will continue to pander to these people because they make up a decent chunk of their users.


That’s why I think these people going after Eugenia have a very real argument against her, regardless of how objectively stupid it is, because majority of parents today cannot fathom the thought that it’s their responsibility to monitor their kids online activity and if something bad happens to them, they’re the ones who failed to protect their kids.

You have to think about how many parents give their kid an ipad, let youtube kids play at random and then are shocked to see their kid watching blatant fetish material. And they don’t consider the possibility of just not letting their kid watch Youtube at random, nah, they gotta start a whole hate campaign against YoutubeKids and how it’s destroying children.

I don’t expect things to change. Back in ‘02 parents would buy their kids gta vice city and then cry about how the game was destroying the youth and should be banned. New dipshit parents, same dipshit issues.
 
I feel we are debating stuff that isn’t really relevant. The broader topic of raising kids in a 21st century digital era is hard and complicated. However, the specific website of YouTube official stance on eating disorder is:

ED033732-76F7-4B44-A5EC-3A2005E38A4C.jpeg A4470E78-0791-45F5-937E-7946DCB87F51.jpeg 40B519B6-E0A9-4EBE-8D99-B54FEB26F1D5.jpeg

78438133-8D4F-4DA5-9E26-49CCD0780D2F.jpeg 90A12955-D223-4E61-97D1-F21E10C1B8FE.jpeg

I personally don’t think she should be demonetized. However, I could easily argue that Eugenia is engaging in graphic self harm ect….
YouTube is purposefully vague about things. But they do take a stance against not monetizing eating disorders. And Eugenia is extremely grotesque about showing her emaciated body with as little clothes as possible lol. But as others have said. A starving girl in a posh mansion withering away likely won’t get YouTubes attention is she keeps her anorexia stealthy. She likely gets hundreds of reports every time she uploads. YouTube is aware and they don’t care. There are worse channels still monetized. Say trannies are gross or nigger online. And YouTube is quick to cut monetization. But letting a girl shove a camera in her face while she suicides to the audience’s horror….. not a peep lol
 
that’s some pretty intense twitching. Twitching due to low potassium and shit. Yeah, I know we keep saying it. But that twitching that’s happening in her arms? She is likely in organ distress right as well. Her heart is getting fucked. She could actually die pretty soon. Younger ana-chans that weighed more than Cooney does at this moment have passed away. She won’t make it to the end of the year without a medical episode if she continues this starvation. Also the fact that she just….. isn’t concerned for herself is insanity. Who the fuck sits there at 90 pounds soaking wet with their arms and legs and shit twitching and have literally no concern. This is why everybody knows Cooney is such a big fat liar. Normal people aren’t convulsing in their chair severely underweight and just “uwu nothing is wrong”. She suicidal. She has to be. She literally can’t be that stupid. And it makes the little girl act she plays that much more obvious and insidious

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Hu17MCq1Iwo
Also here is some footage of her mom smiling at her dying sickly daughter with a totally preventable and treatable illness, lol. As if nothing is wrong. Her mom is so weird bro.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=FlYMI58uLO8
The most annoying thing to me is that she's touching and stretching her hair every goddamn scene. Why is she and more cows doing this?
 
In a perfect world, people would be responsible for what themselves and for what their kids are exposed to/do.

But it’s not a perfect world and people expect everyone and everything else to do the work for them.

My issue with demonestization and deplatforming is that it’s always half assed just to shut people up or to appease advertisers, and it is most definitely a slippery slope. I think the only time it’s appropriate is if a crime has been or is being committed, but if they’re going against TOS then that’s that.

Censorship has been around forever and it can definitely be argued that it has done more harm than good. They started censoring movies back in 1934, but it accomplished nothing besides making it more difficult for artists to demonstrate reality, which includes alternate/diverse beliefs and perspectives, leaving people more ignorant and discouraging the practice of independent, critical thought. It can be used against anyone or anything a loud group doesn’t like.

TL;DR: I would love if people actually took sufficient interest in what their children are doing. I would love if corporations and media took more interest in the type of people and behaviour universally viewed as detrimental to society. Unfortunately, neither will ever be done effectively because people are retarded and the media/corporations don’t give a fuck about us or our kids, only their own interests. With that, I say, if it’s not going to be done right, don’t do it at all.
ETA: Jaclyn is a textbook internet grifter/attention whore. She doesn’t have her own thread for no reason. People have been reeing about having Eugenia deplatformed for years now to no avail, and she knows that, therefore it’s blatantly obvious that video was for no other reason than relevance and views. This is the same bitch that denounced onision’s documentary out of pure egotism, jealousy and greed. The doc spread awareness to normies, which was its goal. If she genuinely cared only about the well being of others, she would have no problem with that and would actually promote it positively.
 
Last edited:
This is the same bitch that denounced onision’s documentary out of pure egotism, jealousy and greed. The doc spread awareness to normies, which was its goal. If she genuinely cared only about the well being of others, she would have no problem with that and would actually promote it positively.
I agree with you about Jaclyn and I don't wanna derail the thread too much, but that documentary was shit. It paints Chris Hansen as some kind of hero journalist who was only trying his best, when in reality he is a bankrupt grifter who fucked up every step of the investigation while giving people false hope of Onion boy going to jail. It helped spread awareness, sure, but it also constantly derailed itself to suck off Hansen.

Back to Eugenia, she just posted this Instagram story and even with extensions, the hair loss in undeniable.
 
It's not the internet's job to babysit people's kids. Parents should monitor what their kid does online.

If a kid stumbles upon KF, should KF be deleted?

As I said already, demonetization won't stop EC from uploading videos so your precious children will still see them and learn to starve themselves. Except they won't. The only people who will starve themselves are people who are predisposed to EDs and they will starve themselves with or without EC's influence. That's what people seem to not understand about eating disorders. Yes, people with EDs look up thinspo but they will still starve themselves with or without access to it.

Disagree again. I’ve managed to keep my kid away from youtube all 9 years of his life so far, but he will make it there eventually. It’s inevitable. The people who say this usually don’t have kids though so it’s whatever.

And my point was that it isn’t just bad for kids to see, it’s bad for everyone to see and it’s degeneracy. It’s unethical for anyone to monetize and take a percentage off of a video of Eugenia’s grotesque body in a bathing suit that someone intentionally put on the trending page.

BuT tHiNk oF tHe KiDs is only part of the discussion. The majority of my point is that there are people making money off of this shit and taking advantage of it. It’s not even debatable that it’s fucked up that her mom films her doing try on videos like she’s a freak show and then she takes some of the money. It’s not debatable that YouTube and advertisers are taking advantage of the situation. It’s not a black and white issue and it has many more facets than anorexics and tHe cHiLdReN.

Now, do I think a forum totally dedicated to pro Ana should be taken off the internet? No. Do I think somewhere like kiwi farms should be deleted? No. These are individual websites that serve the purpose that they advertise. They target a specific audience of people. I don’t feel sorry for people we discuss here that seek out our conversations and then get offended.

What I do find questionable is a website that exists to upload basically anything not having any kind of moderation. Websites like YouTube and tumblr are a different story entirely because they’re meant for everyone to look for anything and they don’t have a target demographic. People don’t have to seek out crazy shit in order to stumble upon it because it can either come up via the algorithm being shitty or someone they follow sharing something they might not necessarily look up on their own.

I personally think there should be a minimum expectation of moral decency in society in general, let alone public spaces. That definition varies from person to person and I understand that one person’s degeneracy is someone else’s normal. But I don’t think a situation like the EC one is debatable. I think we can pretty much all agree that it’s fucked up. That’s why Youtube includes a “report” button. If millions of people are reporting videos from one person and nobody is taking that into consideration because they’re making too much money off the train wreck, it’s objectively wrong.


But anyway like someone above said, this is Reddit level sperging so I’ve made my point and that’s that. Also, like someone else said, YouTube has its own standards when it comes to their content. According to their vague ass explanation, EC isn’t supposed to be monetized at all. If they choose to be retarded and selectively enforce rules, that’s their reputation.
 
Last edited:
If millions of people are reporting videos from one person and nobody is taking that into consideration because they’re making too much money off the train wreck, it’s objectively wrong.
I really don’t think anyone is arguing against this point. But the fact that it’s been years and it hasn’t happened yet, meanwhile small creators have their channel’s removed for calling a fat bitch, a fat bitch, should tell you that this type of censorship and system is extremely unfair and flawed and therefore ineffective as it stands.
agree with you about Jaclyn and I don't wanna derail the thread too much, but that documentary was shit. It paints Chris Hansen as some kind of hero journalist who was only trying his best, when in reality he is a bankrupt grifter who fucked up every step of the investigation while giving people false hope of Onion boy going to jail. It helped spread awareness, sure, but it also constantly derailed itself to suck off Hansen.
Ok, but I wasn’t saying the doc was great, just that it’s goal was met. Of course he’s a grifter, he’s a “journalist”. Anyone that trusted him is a retard to begin with. Those girls should’ve gone to actual law enforcement from the start. Regardless, jaclyn and the rest of the leech (reaction) channels using that as an argument completely undermined the actual issue and has given waterhead what he thinks is ammo in proving everyone else is a fraud and he’s innocent. And as I said, the point was awareness and the goal was achieved, the rest is irrelevant and subjective.
 
Last edited:
This whole thread is reddit level sperging now. Any other opinions or efforts at starting a discussion is met by a bunch of reddit expats foaming at the mouth.
Lol does that include yourself? You pretty much initiated the sperging by having multiple posts making the same point on the last 4+ pages because of differing opinions from your own. I don’t even disagree with you but have some self awareness.
 
Lol does that include yourself? You pretty much initiated the sperging by having multiple posts making the same point on the last 4+ pages because of differing opinions from your own. I don’t even disagree with you but have some self awareness.

Maybe it does include me. I've been trying to have a discussion with varied viewpoints. If it came across as sperging, it's due to frustration. I'll go back and read my posts later.
 
I really don’t think anyone is arguing against this point. But the fact that it’s been years and it hasn’t happened yet, meanwhile small creators have their channel’s removed for calling a fat bitch, a fat bitch, should tell you that this type of censorship and system is extremely unfair and flawed and therefore ineffective as it stands.

No I agree with you here. YouTube is broken top to bottom. I personally think that the things that should be censored are pretty straightforward and I don’t understand why it’s so difficult for them to figure it out, other than the fact that they rely on bots and outsourced people for reviews who don’t actually give a shit lol
 
Hey let’s all shut the fuck up and laugh about how someone as wealthy as Eugenia wears the same fucking black strapless bra in EVERY PHOTO AND VIDEO SHE PUTS OUT!

Also her makeup looks terrible and this whole video is a body check.
0ADD2D12-5EF6-4CA2-A8B5-9B30FFBC55EA.jpeg
 
Hey let’s all shut the fuck up and laugh about how someone as wealthy as Eugenia wears the same fucking black strapless bra in EVERY PHOTO AND VIDEO SHE PUTS OUT!

Also her makeup looks terrible and this whole video is a body check.


I wonder if she does her makeup like that to hide the fact that her eyes bulge from her face like a chihuahua. Most people have some kind of fat deposits around their eyes or at least fat in their cheeks. You pass a point of being sickly looking where your eyes go from the sunken in look to your skin conforming to the shape of your eyeball because it sinks into the eye socket.


Usually you only see something like that on very elderly people who are underweight. The fact that she got there before she turned 30 is…. Something else.
 
The old blog called ''Medusa'' (it's gone now) was about women with end stage Anorexia. I remember reading some of the cases about women, Eugenia's age or a bit older that could NOT recover because of the organ damage. They were terminal, there was no going back. This is just the reality. Eugenia had a window of time to get help and to prevent organ damage, that window of time is gone now. If she would have gotten help in her teens there might of been some hope.

Are you talking about this website?

It's inactive as of August 2020 but the old posts are all still there
 
Back
Top Bottom