This is just edgy shock humor, I don't think you are supposed to root for the crowd. In fact they make most middle ages crowds look relatively well behaved, maybe they are making fun of uneducated dumb people.
Well yeah, but you see that's a metaphor for white people being dumb and uneducated and that's super not based or redpilled. Also, the crowd is too diverse, it should only be white straight people doing the fucking, murdering and debauchery, because that's super based and redpilled too!
You don't need anymore more to show how AI is going to do great things than useless eaters like Zoe seeing it as a threat (while arguing for remote work which was so shit almost no one uses it anymore).
Nobody is arguing that AI isn't useful, the argument before was how to best utilize AI in a creative way and neither you nor tweedledum, whoever it was, could argue their points properly. That's because it is impossible to replace proper artists and traditional ways to do visual and art design for a creative genre like an RPG and just replace it with AI slop because "it saves time" on paper. That's fucking retarded, that's literally the "line always must go up" thinking the suits at the top have. For example, Ubisoft give us nothing but open world games because these make the line go up, or endless yearly COD games from Activision with each having worse and worse skill based matchmaking elements everyone hates until the oldschool casual COD experience is pretty much dead, all because the line must go up and our patented, psychologist researched algorithm says the line will go up if we include it in every single one of our games. Also, if we include Beavis and Butthead and Teenage Ninja Turtle bundles for $30 dollars a pop then the line will also go up even more, except neither Ubisoft open world games or yearly COD titles with AI slop and heavy SBMM/EOMM work outside of paper because they are both soulless(in part thanks to AI) and because they suck, line can go up but player engagement will go down. Likewise, some people might buy the cartoon bundles in COD, but most will just be turned off and treat the game as a joke, killing retention even more, which blatant AI art and assets will do for you game as well.
In case I used too many words or ones with too many syllables for you, let me break it down further: More AI means bigger drop in quality of content exponentially, which is detrimental especially for a big RPG game you will invest ideally at least 50 hours into, one which is heavy in writing, characters and countless assets you need to create. You might "save time" but that will amount to cutting corners, most studios don't actually use that time to improve on the AI created assets or add new assets made from scratch because the more they depend on AI, the lazier it makes them. This only works on paper, just like giving people yearly COD releases or turning every single one of your franchises into an open world sandbox or ruining the visual style of your game to sell stupid skins only works on paper. This doesn't change because the human equivalent of a used up, rotting cumdumpster that is Zoe Quinn opposes AI all of a sudden, as neither she nor most people arguing this point have any experience with how a game is made, or ever worked on one to begin with(I'm not going to count anything this whore made as a game).
Or, in layman's terms, Larian heavily depending on AI and being proud of that fact means that they let the success of Baldur's Gate 3 get to their heads, and think they can shit out quite literally anything, using the cheapest methods possible, and it will sell too on nothing but brand recognition. If that's not the case, then it might as well be because that's how their statement made them sound like. We will know for sure once the first paid demo is out.
