Disney General - The saddest fandom on Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter KO 864
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Which is Better

  • Chicken Little

    Votes: 433 27.4%

  • Hunchback 2

    Votes: 57 3.6%

  • A slow death

    Votes: 1,088 68.9%
  • Total voters
    1,578
Pickle Dick said:
'member when Pixar generally made their human characters look like decent caricatures* and not this gneeric, blobby, grubhub version of human beings?

*Pic related:
View attachment 3004759

Wtf happened? CGI Animation is dead lol.
Click to expand...
D2D49DCD-6549-4219-9C95-ED1FE4A1AAF1.jpeg
 
SteelPlatedHeart said:
Disney posted some new stills of that Pixar Red Panda movie coming out.
View attachment 3004638
Gotta say, it ain’t selling me on the animation.
Click to expand...
Pickle Dick said:
'member when Pixar generally made their human characters look like decent caricatures* and not this gneeric, blobby, grubhub version of human beings?

*Pic related:
View attachment 3004759

Wtf happened? CGI Animation is dead lol.
Click to expand...
What do you expect when the director looks like this?
1645491452871.png

Also ironic, considering she said shit like this:
There used to be lots of really great, dark kids’ movies, like “Something Wicked This Way Comes” and “The Dark Crystal.” I don’t think we should shy away from these dark elements, because they’re a part of this world as much as light elements are, and we want to equip children with the tools that they’ll need in life.
Click to expand...
If that's the case, Domee, please tell us why, when given the chance to make your own feature film, you decided to make one that has absolutely NONE OF THOSE?!
eye roll black.gif

Disingenuous Chink cunt.
 
Sorry for the double post, but I've even seen the creator of Rescue Rangers trying to white knight for this movie.

1645501215751.png

But you see, there is a huge difference between taking established characters and thrusting them into new roles and scenarios and....whatever the hell this movie's trying to do.
 
Bread Fetishist said:
Sorry for the double post, but I've even seen the creator of Rescue Rangers trying to white knight for this movie.

1645501215751.png
Click to expand...
Ahhhhh, the ol' "Y-Y-YOU'RE JUST A BUNCH OF BIG WHINY MANBABIES AFRAID OF CHAAAAAAAANGE" rigmarole. Worked so well for Fembusters 2016 and Disney Star Wars, didn't it Tad? :roll:
 
Bread Fetishist said:
Sorry for the double post, but I've even seen the creator of Rescue Rangers trying to white knight for this movie.

View attachment 3005552

But you see, there is a huge difference between taking established characters and thrusting them into new roles and scenarios and....whatever the hell this movie's trying to do.
Click to expand...
That is a massive misinterpretation of the problem people have with this movie, and it’s depressing to hear the creator of the show say so, no matter the reason.
 
I'm going to sound like such an old fart. Fuck it. I don't care.

What the hell happened to children's media being innocent? Even the Disney Renaissance films were subtle whenever they made adult jokes. It was shit you'd giggle at once you got older because it wasn't blatant at the time. Kids films used to be wholesome, plenty of gentle moments between the conflict. WHY does children's media have to explore sexuality now? Kids have their whole life to be bitter horny adults. Give them some Beatrix Potter or some shit. Enough with this thinly veiled fetish shit.
 
Uranus Pink said:
Walt Disney didn't pioneer shit as animation was being pioneered back in 1888 in Europe mainly French animators.
Click to expand...

Eh, no, the dates don't line up. I think you are confusing the work Auguste and Louis Lumiere where doing in pioneering cinematography, NOT animation.

If you want me to be pedantic about it, the first crude attempt at "animation" that we know of consisted in projecting drawing into a wall with a devise called "The Magic Lantern" that used glass panels that were moved by strings. This was done by Athonasius Kircher in 1640.

In 1824 the British physicist Peter Mark Roget described the phenomenon of "Persistence of Vision" which is what allows a fast sequences of images to be seen as fluid motion by the human eye. It was this principle that led to the creation of all sort of devises that used this principle to create the illusion of movement (The Thaumatrope, the Phenakistoscope, the Zoetrope, and the Praxinoscope)

What is canonically considered the first filmed animation was "Humorous Phases of Funny Faces" in 1906 done by James Stuart Blackton and Thomas Edison. That's is two years ahead of your so called pioneering French animator's "Fantasmagorie" ( 1908 ).

As for Disney not pioneering shit:

Steam Boat Willie (1928 ) - First cartoon with synchronized sound.
The Skeleton Dance (1929) - First cartoon with a coordinated musical score.
Flowers and Trees (1932) - First full color cartoon.
Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937) - First fully animated feature-length film.

Which is why it is so exasperating to see Disney being such an unoriginal and derivative media corp now that cannot even recreate the hand draw animation that they did in the 80s and 90s for TV and have to resort to such cheap tricks as using 3D models with a toon shader on top.

Do some research before spouting ignorant pulled-out-of-your-ass opinions again, faggot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom