💼 Careercow Devin J. Stone / LegalEagle - Agenda-driven armchair lawyer who uses his politically charged videos to push his ideology, but holds the power to kill the Trump administration through lawsuits

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Hey hey. Johnathan Fergusson is extremely knowledgeable. He's just a technology and development expert because that's his job as a museum curator.

He also wrote "THORNEYCROFT TO SA80: BRITISH BULLPUP FIREARMS, 1901–2020" published by Headstamp Publishing. Ian's book company.

He's well vetted.
Ian's not exactly the best guy to hang your hat on, either. He's a middling engineer that's just autistic enough to make you think he'd be an expert. But he's got a great voice for mini documentaries and he is a god-tier researcher. I'd trust him to tell me the history of a design and not a lot else
 
He was oddly quiet about Rittenhouse in a way that surprised alot of people, ie they expected him to rant on twitter about it. Some people thought he maybe agreed Kyle had a right to self defense (lol come on guys, you see this dumbass's record?) and thats why he wasnt saying anything.
Anyone who thought legal eagle would agree with Kyle were completely fools. Devin hates anyone or anything associated with the right so much that I would not be surprised if he refused to turn right in his car or when walking out of fear of becoming a republican.
 
Ian's not exactly the best guy to hang your hat on, either. He's a middling engineer that's just autistic enough to make you think he'd be an expert. But he's got a great voice for mini documentaries and he is a god-tier researcher. I'd trust him to tell me the history of a design and not a lot else
You seem to be of the opinion that "firearms expert" is limited to "firearms use expert" and not much else.

There are 0300s out there that are experts with using their M4. Does that make them all "firearm experts"? No. It means they are a bog-standard USMC riflemen. Hand them something different and ask them to field strip it and the parts that didn't get lost would get shoved up their nose with the crayons. We saw exactly this happen when the USMC used the Reising SMG in WW2. The gun wasn't Marine-proof and had to be withdrawn from frontline service.

Expertise is far broader than one narrow concept. History, use, development, repair, etc are all important factors.
 
Someone should start a score card of legal Eagle predictions vs outcomes. He’s wrong about literally almost everything
If you ever need quick cash here is a tip.

1. Ask legal eagle how you think a case is going.
2. Find a bookie who is willing to take bets for court cases.
3. Bet on the oppostite of what Devin says and make tons of cash.
 
LegalEagle just released his vid on Rittenhouse. I watched it, and it is pretty bad. I hope someone like Rekeita tears him a new one on this.


Archive:
trim.C23B39D4-ED3E-4950-860A-0C20154D2A68.MOV
the city slicker is about to get BTFO by Nicky Rackets
 
It was silly to think there wasn't going to be a retaliation. Killing two antifa and shooting at two other, then going around with proud boys with a "free as fuck" shirt? Gloating about it? And then he walks? Brother..

Kyle is partly responsible for any retaliation that will also come, and for the future deaths that will happen when Antifa and the Right both bring rifles.
THANK YOU
You actually understand the context of why this isn't a case of "one side is right vs wrong".
It is literally a case of people on both the left and the right trying to justify their people's actions during an event that nobody had any good reason to be participating in.

I am just imagining people in the future using the Rittenhouse court case as a justification to commit mass shootings, just like how people abuse Sand Your Ground to get away with coordinated murder.
 
He was oddly quiet about Rittenhouse in a way that surprised alot of people, ie they expected him to rant on twitter about it. Some people thought he maybe agreed Kyle had a right to self defense (lol come on guys, you see this dumbass's record?) and thats why he wasnt saying anything.
If he said that stuff about shooting in while somebody is grappling the gun is illegal before the verdict he would be fucked, now that is it past verdict time he can now add the excuse of the court forgetting it with the argument instead of having to do that after people are already mad.
the city slicker is about to get BTFO by Nicky Rackets
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Bv7AH1IhcpA
Mwahaha

He also added a pinned comment, as people are prone to do when they get fucked
BBF77F1E-0B34-478F-A298-0B9565F981E3.jpeg
 
It was silly to think there wasn't going to be a retaliation. Killing two antifa and shooting at two other, then going around with proud boys with a "free as fuck" shirt? Gloating about it? And then he walks? Brother..

Kyle is partly responsible for any retaliation that will also come
"Woah terrorists might kill us if we do things they don't like"
Absolute skunk-shit tier take.

THANK YOU
You actually understand the context of why this isn't a case of "one side is right vs wrong".
It is literally a case of people on both the left and the right trying to justify their people's actions during an event that nobody had any good reason to be participating in.

I am just imagining people in the future using the Rittenhouse court case as a justification to commit mass shootings, just like how people abuse Sand Your Ground to get away with coordinated murder.
Kyle did have good reason to be there, he was trying to help protect people's livelihoods and put out fires.
The fact some commies tried to fucking kill him is proof of exactly why he was wise to bring a rifle to protect himself.

Also KYS, triple-posting faggot.
 
Devin: "Someone grabbing your map is assault and you're allowed to break their arm for it."

Also Devin: "If people bumrush you then you aren't allowed to defend yourself."

Pick one faggot.
 
Devin: "Someone grabbing your map is assault and you're allowed to break their arm for it."

Also Devin: "If people bumrush you then you aren't allowed to defend yourself."

Pick one faggot.
is the person who stole your map a BLM rioter and a pedophile or domestic abuser.
because they are always justified in any situation and retaliation is wrong.
 
is the person who stole your map a BLM rioter and a pedophile or domestic abuser.
because they are always justified in any situation and retaliation is wrong.
This. It takes a true Nazi to not want their life to be ruined by an angry mob.
 
Anyone who thought legal eagle would agree with Kyle were completely fools. Devin hates anyone or anything associated with the right so much that I would not be surprised if he refused to turn right in his car or when walking out of fear of becoming a republican.
I wonder if Devin realized that Kyle had a decent chance of walking, so he withheld is woke spin on it until after the verdict.
That way he can profit off some legal cope arguments.
 
"Woah terrorists might kill us if we do things they don't like"
Absolute skunk-shit tier take.


Kyle did have good reason to be there, he was trying to help protect people's livelihoods and put out fires.
The fact some commies tried to fucking kill him is proof of exactly why he was wise to bring a rifle to protect himself.

Also KYS, triple-posting faggot.
Justify it anyway you want. His actions killed 2 people. He gloated about his killings, mocking political oponents. Then he walked, even though his killings are on video. Now there are 6 deaths and 60 injured. Many children. Antifa is already buying rifles. Regardless of his original intentions, the results of his actions have been terrible for America and he should be ashamed.
 
I wonder if Devin realized that Kyle had a decent chance of walking, so he withheld is woke spin on it until after the verdict.
That way he can profit off some legal cope arguments.
I would assume so. My guess is he kept his mouth shut so he did not have to eat crow when the verdict came out. Now he is as you said, doing legal cope since hindsight is always 20/20 (more like 20/200 in this case)
 
Back
Top Bottom