DDoS attacks

ScatmansWorld said:
The defenses you're using are spiritually the same as Solomon Friedman and porn directors saying there's nothing wrong with talking impoverished 18 year old high school dropouts into a contract deal. You can point at the historical legality of it all you want, but actions seen as exploitative and harmful in the court of public opinion are very frequently actions that become prohibited by real law backed by force. The EU GDPR effectively banned data brokering and phonebooking because people were tired of having their personal information taken from them, at best with the option to opt-out and at worse with the option of jack and shit, and posted publicly or sold between mega corporations. Similar laws are now in effect with at least 20 other U.S states, and it's going to keep growing from there. You don't have to be psychic to see where law is heading, you just need the theory of mind to put yourself yourself into the typical persons shoes and ask yourself if you'd be ok with it happening to you.

There's no way getting around it. People do not want their phone numbers or addresses posted in a public forum which they did not consent to, nor can they give you a reason why that should be allowed in the first place. Even if you have thousands of people who would hate you regardless of the changes you make, I suspect there's a larger amount who are turned against you because the posting of addresses crosses the line for them.
Click to expand...
You sound like a sovcit that got pulled over for speeding and then decided to turn it into a felony by punching the cop, because you didn't "consent" to a search. This is whining and bitching.

Also i find it weird that you're trying to seperate yourself from the farms. You're part of this too buddy.
 
unexpected onions said:
It seems like these people think that one big attack will somehow delete the site for good so they spend all their money on that, celebrate for a day and then are shocked pikachu when it comes back after they run out of money for the month.
Click to expand...
Pretty sure that's what is exactly happening though the culprits are evil fucks that God should come down and intervene. But they definitely don't have the funds to continue this for long. They can't rebuild a stockpile while spending so it will be even less inconvenient. For now at least. Seems to be fine and I'm hoping it stays like this for a bit. Come back every few hours and the site is fine still. What a waste of money honestly.
 
unexpected onions said:
It seems like these people think that one big attack will somehow delete the site for good so they spend all their money on that, celebrate for a day and then are shocked pikachu when it comes back after they run out of money for the month.
Click to expand...
If they were capable of the foresight to avoid this, they probably wouldn’t be lolcows that we are aware of and mock.
 
teriyakiburns said:
The difference between KF and those sites is this: they all removed the dox of a certain individual when threatened. The actors behind this don't care about principles or protecting the innocent, but only about themselves.
Click to expand...
This is not exactly true. Doxbin has an infamous no-remove policy aside from paying up or bad information.
https//:doxbin[,]com/upload/DoxbinTransparencyReport

Soyjak.party has never removed content on individuals either.
Can't attest to 4chan, never researched it too deeply.

The difference between those sites is simple: we have way more information, and it's centralized. Doxbin has a search, no direct categorization, threads on soyjak expire, etc.

On this site, information is centralized, easily accessible, and most of all, it's coherent and backed with receipts and thousands of high functioning autists. Doxbin is mostly just "trust me bro, this is them."

apologize for double posting i didnt see this reply
 
backover.gif
 
unexpected onions said:
It seems like these people think that one big attack will somehow delete the site for good so they spend all their money on that, celebrate for a day and then are shocked pikachu when it comes back after they run out of money for the month.
Click to expand...
"...wait, bro - you mean if we want to take the site down we have to pay to do this *forever*?? oh yeah no, fuck this shit I'm out"
 
Gef Mongoose said:
How about we teach people instead that Wikipedia isn’t a credible source?
Click to expand...

Jose Beaner Luna said:
You cant change the mind of the goycattle, only their masters can do that through carefully crafted propaganda campaigns.
Click to expand...

It's ironic I remember going to school and being told by teachers that you couldn't trust Wikipedia since anyone can edit it. Now the same teachers tow the goycattle line and don't even question it.
 
Legalize Asbestos said:
Contrast that with the current DDoS situation, where the site is either totally down or running normally, and to me it's far, far less annoying. Of the ~4yrs I've been around, this has been the least bothersome disturbance to my user experience. The bad hard drives were far worse. It's like the difference between a brick & mortar shop that has shitty customer service and long checkout lines vs. one that keeps odd hours - except I don't feel cheated by the odd hours, because I didn't walk all the way to the store just to find it's closed.
Click to expand...
I agree, but in the era of frictionless UX, I worry about losing activity. I don't know Tor well enough to pose a solution, but it has me wishing I could help, being that I work as a codefag and I'm used to having some kind of fix whenever something important is breaking.
 
PlugsPugs said:
Loli is gross, but the enemy will happily latch on to that as the beginning of their campaign, and we must not give them a damn inch. Not one damn inch.
Click to expand...
Mr. Hands said:
I don’t support the right to the free expression of paedophilic desires or fantasies. If you do, that’s on you mate. You do you.
Click to expand...
Freedom of expression also comes with freedom of association. You can choose not to associate with loliposters. and also look at them sideways.
Loli firmly falls into the catagory of
"You can have it only because I do not trust a government to regulate it. But even then I'm looking at you sideways" Ideally you don't have it at all.
 
The Gay Oboma Creature said:
it has me wishing I could help, being that I work as a codefag and I'm used to having some kind of fix whenever something important is breaking.
Click to expand...
yeah but this isn't a code problem or a tech problem, it's a political problem

we are being flagrantly, openly attacked with the internet equivalent of a battering ram, and law enforcement is just looking the other way

it's total horseshit
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom