You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
💪 Tough GuysDalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder - Putting the hard r in retard. IRL streamer who provokes confrontations with Tennessee blacks and shot a guy while streaming.
It's pretty simple, hate and violence towards the outgroup has been what is lacking among Whites for a long time.
In general White people are either more or equally as accommodating towards the outgroup than the ingroup.
This is very bad because no other group does this, which leads to the erosion of White countries.
Demographics determine how countries are and if White people are this nice to brown people why wouldn't they come and parasitize from them?
If White people aren't even willing to be rude, then their countries will become third world countries and they will become a hated minority in their own homelands.
It’s almost as if the judge had watched weeks of cops, federal agents, bystanders, and online critics—basically every sane person—screaming at the guy to stop chasing random people with a gun before he got someone killed.
And then… he killed somebody.
When the actual Feds sit you down and warn you to knock off the gun bullshit because you’re going to get someone killed, only for you to turn around and do exactly that, it tends to leave an impression. The judge will almost certainly factor that into sentencing. And so will the jury.
But yeah he’s the free speech guy who didn’t do nuffin
1) hard to defend under the banner of freedom of speech because it's speech that is deliberately, directly, and immediately meant to cause a violent reaction. It's not just calling someone nigger and leaving it at that.
Would you say it's harder than defending any of the following examples I randomly pulled from thin air?
-holding a gun to a pregnant woman's stomach
-stabbing a kid over a seat on the bleachers during a minor altercation
-stabbing a woman on the bus at random
which would never take precedent over action, the whole "yeah but George Floyd held a gun to a pregnants woman stomach" didn't make Chauvin any less culpable for his actions, as if Floyd being a worthless waste should afford Chauvin some leeway in sentencing.
besides, the content of Chud's character is indefensible anyway, you should hope they're not going to take that into account when deliberating how hard he gets gaped.
the obvious question is why a lion would feel compelled to do so, there's going to be an examination and if turns out you were fucking with it (and for clarification: not just being "rude") till it got pissed off enough to try and eat you then that'd be a lot less defensible.
It's not a matter of being 'le heccin based chud', it's about niggers being unable to look for excuses to nig out. You could call any whitey in this thread any number of things and he's not going to go on a rampage. Why can't niggers do that?
Niggers have control over how they respond to the niggerword.
It's not a matter of being 'le heccin based chud', it's about niggers being unable to look for excuses to nig out. You could call any whitey in this thread any number of things and he's not going to go on a rampage. Why can't niggers do that?
Niggers have control over how they respond to the niggerword.
But if you actually watched the streams and not the high light reels of blacks chimping (because they were his main money maker and branding) you’d see a lot of whites chimped at him as well.
All the talk about self defense and SYG and shit is going to end up hinging on this, I think. In TN, a self defense claim is invalidated if the court finds you were provoking the altercation. This doesn't require you to be doing anything illegal btw. The bar for provocation is fairly low. Given Chud's history it seems extremely likely that this'll be brought up if he decides to take it to trial.
The closest analog I could find to Chud's case is this:
STATE v. BENSON (2020)
Tl;dr, Antonio Benson sexually harassed a woman which provoked her into striking him, at which point he shot her 5 times, including twice in the back. This is not a perfect analog imo, as the proportionality of the response is much more clearly wrong here; she was a petite woman, he was a grown man, and he responded to a nosebleed with 5 gunshots. Being attacked from behind, as an adult man, by another adult man is at least a bit more legible as justifying a single non-fatal gunshot in response.
Should Chud decide to take this to trial it'll certainly be an interesting one, but I feel pretty strongly that self defense is not going to work here
The police are stating that they viewed surveillance footage. The whole thing started as a verbal altercation because the non-melanated wet dog loves provoking black people with the slurs. The victim even told him to leave him alone because he has PTSD. Dude is a veteran.
However, per the surveillance video, it did not turn physical until the lice lord reached for his gun! That's when the victim defended himself against an imminent shooting and he kept fighting even after being shot multiple times by the crackerdile beast. How do you shoot someone and still get your ass beat? Recessive genes, that's how. Even the sun hates them.
..And Chode cannot use any of the crowd funded money to pay bail because a hold is in place due to the violent felony charges.
So another violent piece of white trash has been removed from society. Let's hope his son does not became a school shooter because of his father's nature of violence and provocation.
I'm going to wait for the footage before I decide on this one because you can tell a lot about a man by how he shoots someone. Apparently he shot himself in the leg or something too so I need to see that
All the talk about self defense and SYG and shit is going to end up hinging on this, I think. In TN, a self defense claim is invalidated if the court finds you were provoking the altercation. This doesn't require you to be doing anything illegal btw. The bar for provocation is fairly low. Given Chud's history it seems extremely likely that this'll be brought up if he decides to take it to trial.
The closest analog I could find to Chud's case is this: View attachment 9013446
STATE v. BENSON (2020)
Tl;dr, Antonio Benson sexually harassed a woman which provoked her into striking him, at which point he shot her 5 times, including twice in the back. This is not a perfect analog imo, as the proportionality of the response is much more clearly wrong here; she was a petite woman, he was a grown man, and he responded to a nosebleed with 5 gunshots. Being attacked from behind, as an adult man, by another adult man is at least a bit more legible as justifying a single non-fatal gunshot in response.
Should Chud decide to take this to trial it'll certainly be an interesting one, but I feel pretty strongly that self defense is not going to work here
Worst part if for Chud that the victim of the shooting is still alive. If you're gonna use your fucking gun in America shoot to kill. I don't see this going to trial unless randoms online give him more money for a legal defense.
If I have to read one more Reddit-tier essay from some dumb nigger LARPing as a defense attorney or pretending to know how the penal code works, I'm going to actually fedpost. Why does every room-temperature IQ nigger with a keyboard feel the desperate need to drop their two cents on how they think the justice system operates? Spoiler alert: the courts don't work like your dumbass Netflix true crime documentaries
All the talk about self defense and SYG and shit is going to end up hinging on this, I think. In TN, a self defense claim is invalidated if the court finds you were provoking the altercation. This doesn't require you to be doing anything illegal btw. The bar for provocation is fairly low. Given Chud's history it seems extremely likely that this'll be brought up if he decides to take it to trial.
The closest analog I could find to Chud's case is this: View attachment 9013446
STATE v. BENSON (2020)
Tl;dr, Antonio Benson sexually harassed a woman which provoked her into striking him, at which point he shot her 5 times, including twice in the back. This is not a perfect analog imo, as the proportionality of the response is much more clearly wrong here; she was a petite woman, he was a grown man, and he responded to a nosebleed with 5 gunshots. Being attacked from behind, as an adult man, by another adult man is at least a bit more legible as justifying a single non-fatal gunshot in response.
Should Chud decide to take this to trial it'll certainly be an interesting one, but I feel pretty strongly that self defense is not going to work here
We don't have a clear picture of the full story. For example, is this person complication of the story true?
THREE THINGS that very clearly demonstrate Dalton’s “Chud the Builder” self defense claims and why I think he’ll be found not guilty on the basis of self defense.
A lot of people think this was another one of Dalton’s streams where he poses the “do you believe in free speech” gotcha question and then drops the N bomb on an unsuspecting minority. This is not at all the case, and it’s important in the context of his claim of self defense and whether or not Dalton PROVOKED the altercation.
The first point is that Joshua Fox initiated contact.
The story, as we know it so far, is that as Dalton was leaving the courthouse Joshua Fox recognized Dalton and starting pointing, laughing, and calling out to him. Joshua knew who Dalton was, recognized him in public, and made the initial move to invoke some sort of interaction between the two by taunting Dalton from across the street. Dalton then walked over to Joshua and, while we do not know the context of that conversation for certain, allegedly, Dalton only attempted to make small talk before Joshua told him to get on and to go away.
This the second point - Dalton walked away.
Dalton left Joshua, crossed the street back to the courthouse. At this point, the interaction was over and finished. However, Joshua Fox followed Dalton across the street and directly approached him. Then according to Dalton’s testimony, Joshua threatened Dalton by saying something to the effect of “I am a combat veteran. You’re not going to be saying all that “chimpin out” shit around me.” This is a clear verbal threat of physical harm.
Dalton then says to Joshua, “Oh so you ARE chimping out?”. This is when Joshua punches Dalton in the face, knocks him onto the ground, and continues to strike Dalton. Dalton, 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥, fired shots, striking Joshua in the stomach and shoulder and sending another round into his own arm. The last shot further demonstrates the compromised position that Joshua had Dalton in and will undoubtedly be used as justification for Daltons fear of serious bodily harm or death. This was not “Joshua threw one punch and Dalton shot three times”. Dalton was sucker punched in the face and Joshua continued to assault him after being knocked down.
This is exactly what George Zimmerman was acquitted for as continuing to be struck while on the ground meets the threshold for any reasonable person to believe that serious bodily harm was probable or that their life was in danger.
This is when the video of the altercation begins, after the shots were fired, and Dalton wrestles a wounded Joshua over and down onto the ground. Cops break them up immediately after. This is when Dalton begins his stream on http://pump.fun.
So, just to be explicitly clear:
Dalton was not streaming, trying to provoke people to farm engagement.
Dalton was simply walking out of the courthouse and was recognized by someone that had it out for him.
Dalton WALKED AWAY.
Joshua Fox FOLLOWED AFTER HIM.
Joshua Fox assaults Dalton and continues to strike him after Dalton had fallen onto the ground.
This is clear and decisive self defense. If it’s found to be not, it will just be another all too common blight on our Justice system.
If Dalton was walking away, Joshua followed him, and Joshua was attacking Dalton after sucker punching him on on the ground I think we got a pretty strong case of Self Defense. Shit I bet Joshua has a live stream/video some where he talks about fucking Dalton up making this pre-medicated.
No, because it wasn't racial, so it's a completely different matter. Now if he would have been black, he should have been arrested, in my humble opinion.
