💪 Tough Guys Dalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder - Putting the hard r in retard. IRL streamer who provokes confrontations with Tennessee blacks and shot a guy while streaming.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Day of the Cope said:
So, is this thread actually about Chud anymore or is it just a Mass Debate for wignats to sperg about niggers and LARP about their race war fantasy?
Click to expand...
It is how rightwing bros behave nowadays. Their minds are so poisoned by the internet irony, they stopped having an accurate perception of reality. I bet they would let their wives have sex with another men if someone successfully gaslight them into believing that becoming a cuck means "based" and can save the white race.
 
Twix Eatr said:
Please source this. I look forward to you replying with something completely different, such as him declaring his willingness to lawfully defend himself if he's attacked.
Click to expand...
1778916022648.png
1778916046911.png


Given the poor literacy rate of this country, and of our dear, dear forums, I will sum up everything I need to say in one sentence:
Subtext, context, and intent matter more than the specific letter of the word, and they always have.

For those in the audience reading at a PIAAC level 3 or higher, I shall elaborate further:

No, he did not directly say "I WANT TO KILL A BLACK GUY NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER", but there are a few key details here,
1. The insinuation of the necessity of violence, as opposed to de-escalation, "When I inevitably shoot one of you animals".
2. The content of his statements, he says that the day he kills someone for threatening his life is the day that the White man takes his country back. This seems to imply he believes killing Blacks is a good thing, something he would not be opposed to.
3. The context these posts exist within, he's consciously wording these posts with plausible deniability, saying that he would shoot someone for threatening his life for exercising his freedom of speech, but his actions suggest plenty well that he is trying to provoke an incident. He isn't being threatened for his exercise of freedom of speech, he's being threatened because he is harassing people on the street.

Given his actions, these posts clue you in to the mindset that he is in when he goes out to harass people and film them for his audience. He believes it an inevitability that someone will threaten him, and it is an inevitability that he will have to shoot them, there is no room for course correction, and he sees nothing wrong with what he is doing. (Harassing people) He sees killing Blacks who threaten him (regardless of reason) as a victory for the White man. He clearly understands the concept of plausible deniability, hence why he frames these posts with language of being threatened for "solely exercising his constitutional freedoms", but can't bring himself to refrain from showing his clear desire to shoot people. Furthermore, he has a monetary incentive to escalate, as it brings more attention, more viewers, and therefore more money to him. His shooting is the only reason we're even speaking about him, and I can only imagine, given the tenor of this entire thread, it has brought him loads of new fans and followers.

Everything about him, from his posts, to his actions, to his way of life and gaining money, to his outlook on life, to his degenerate criminal past screams that he wants to kill people, and I honestly believe it takes not just an insane amount of cope, semantics, word games, and rules lawyering, but also outright delusion to convince yourself that he wasn't trying to provoke a fight. The reality is that this man is a criminal, with a criminal past of drugs and harassment, as well as behaviors that indicate severe mental illness, and he very clearly wanted to kill a man, and not any specific person either, anybody, as long as they're one of the "animals" he hates.

Campbell_Trio said:
Why is it always the 1 or 2 year old join dates saying this kind of cope
Click to expand...
4chan refugee crisis.

Also, it's not lost on me that half the guys in this thread supporting Chud have acted as if Whites are above unnecessary violence, but the other half is happy to see a Black man get shot by a White man.
Let's not forget that our country was founded by men who regularly engaged in pistol duels and the guy on our 10 dollar bill was shot dead in one of them.
1778921254980.png
 
Last edited:
Again, to get back to the topic of the phony nigger hater, the retards using Shiloh as an example are only further demonstrating their lack of understanding of the issue.

Shiloh called a kid a nigger after catching him stealing from her bag, another nigger then followed with the intent of harassing her as she tried to leave the area.

Had she left a manifesto about how she was going to walk around the local parks calling kids niggers, until she got slapped, and then Start shooting niggers in return to become the ultimate white saviour, then she would have been charged with murder instead of becoming a near millionaire.
 
White Pride Worldwide said:
Moving the goalposts, you asked if people would support him and there is multiple people who did support their freedom of speech just like they did with Shiloh.
Click to expand...
Isn't this whole thread you people moving goalposts? Literally every page has been full of mental gymnastics and shifting the discussion to people that were victims like Iryna Zarutska or Austin Metcalf in order to emotionally manipulate the posters here.
 
Soycast II said:
Isn't this whole thread you people moving goalposts?
Click to expand...
He says this as he keeps trying to derail the subject and move the goal posts. I don't know about the other people but I support the 1st amendment and freedom of speech. I don't think truncating the 1st amendment should happen because we already see the negative consequences of that in the 2nd amendment.
 
I'm Not a fan of Chud. He comes off as trashy, not the kind of guy I'd sit down and drink a beer with. That being said, he is a White man, so I'm gonna sympathize with him, just like any other race would in the same situation. If some nigger was going around calling White people "honky" "cracker" or "peckerwood" and got attacked, and shot a white dude, every single nigger in America would be supporting there racial kin.
That being said, self-defense is self-defense. Niggers do far worse to Whites (and other races for that matter) every single day. The nigger in this situation isn't even dead or seriously injured from what I've heard.
I can understand the contrarian posters in here, cause that's what you faggots are. You guys always do this whenever something like this happens, and you know what? I understand why. There's a lot of fucking slop bullshit in the online racism market. Guys like Chud taking fucking casino sponsorships, or that one beaner with the cowboy hat on IG. It's junk, it's cringe etc etc.
I also know (or suspect ) that a lot of you are the old school edgy, apathetic online types. Like a lot of you are "Racist" in the left wing definition,but you also have a bit of South Park "Caring too much about things is gay" kind of mindset, so you think wingnats and the like are stupid.
Regardless, niggers shouldn't have the right to murder or attack someone over a word, even if you dislike that person that said the word.
 
Evil Whitey said:
Under the standards some usersare setting for Chud, it would have been acceptable for Shiloh Hendrix to be shot/beaten to death
Click to expand...
I don't remember Shiloh actively seeking out niggers to call niggers, following niggers while calling them niggers as they try to walk away, knocking niggers hats off, or taunting niggers to attack her so she can cry victim to her livestream viewers.

I remember her being in her child's life, actually. Then again, my memory on the whole situation is a bit foggy. Maybe if you can remind me it'll come back.
 
Thousandislandstare said:
I'm Not a fan of Chud. He comes off as trashy, not the kind of guy I'd sit down and drink a beer with. That being said, he is a White man, so I'm gonna sympathize with him, just like any other race would in the same situation. If some nigger was going around calling White people "honky" "cracker" or "peckerwood" and got attacked, and shot a white dude, every single nigger in America would be supporting there racial kin.
That being said, self-defense is self-defense. Niggers do far worse to Whites (and other races for that matter) every single day. The nigger in this situation isn't even dead or seriously injured from what I've heard.
I can understand the contrarian posters in here, cause that's what you faggots are. You guys always do this whenever something like this happens, and you know what? I understand why. There's a lot of fucking slop bullshit in the online racism market. Guys like Chud taking fucking casino sponsorships, or that one beaner with the cowboy hat on IG. It's junk, it's cringe etc etc.
I also know (or suspect ) that a lot of you are the old school edgy, apathetic online types. Like a lot of you are "Racist" in the left wing definition,but you also have a bit of South Park "Caring too much about things is gay" kind of mindset, so you think wingnats and the like are stupid.
Regardless, niggers shouldn't have the right to murder or attack someone over a word, even if you dislike that person that said the word.
Click to expand...
Its not even that this guy just glows. We got that nigress saying he is an opp and his middle name is "Levi". Add on to the fact his following feels so inorganic, you really gonna tell me he is near a quarter million followers in a years time? There is so much more to talk about and look into but people here want to talk about mutt's law tier shit and how saying nigger is bad.
 
Evil Whitey said:
Under the standards some usersare setting for Chud, it would have been acceptable for Shiloh Hendrix to be shot/beaten to death
Click to expand...
the key difference between Shiloh Hendrix and Chud is that Shiloh Hendrix was confronted by nigger behavior and called it out accordingly, had no nigger behavior occured then she wouldn't have had to call anyone a nigger because society would've just functioned as it should in that moment.

switch over to Chud who gets upset when he encounters some black people who dismiss his antics and act with a modicum of civility as they walk away, just for Chud to follow them around and get more confrontational ("NIGGERS!! 18 ROUNDS FOR YOU FUCKING NIGGERS!!") in an effort to ragebait them into becoming content anyway, even if his shtick was to stress test his 1st amendment then like any supposed auditor he should be applauding people who recognize his right to call people nigger rather than sperging out because they act in accordance to how he thinks people ought to react to the nigger word.

The Projects said:
He believes it an inevitability that someone will threaten him, and it is an inevitability that he will have to shoot them
Click to expand...
he specified this as "premeditated self defense", which will look hilarious when blown up and shown in court since that's one of the self-defense no-no's.
chudselfincrimination.png
 
The Projects said:
Given the poor literacy rate of this country, and of our dear, dear forums, I will sum up everything I need to say in one sentence:
Click to expand...
The only illiterate one is you, retard. As predicted: "I look forward to you replying with something completely different, such as him declaring his willingness to lawfully defend himself if he's attacked."
 
gay said:
"premeditated self defense"
Click to expand...
Wow, he very aptly described the crime he was committing! I tell ya, his wisdom stat might be a 1, but he's actually got a relatively high int.
Twix Eatr said:
Coping Mechanism
Click to expand...
If you don't see how my post is highly relevant to your previous post, then I don't know what to tell you!
 
White Pride Worldwide said:
He says this as he keeps trying to derail the subject and move the goal posts. I don't know about the other people but I support the 1st amendment and freedom of speech. I don't think truncating the 1st amendment should happen because we already see the negative consequences of that in the 2nd amendment.
Click to expand...
"Freedom of speech", not free of consenquences and it is completely legal to punish retards. You can accuse innocent people of felony and said innocent people can sue you for defamation. On a smaller scale of conflict, instead of getting sued you will get punched in the face. You can dislike negroes all you want, but if you intentionally picking fights with them and get yourself into trouble, that's on you not them.
 
Citus Atro said:
"Freedom of speech", not free of consenquences and it is completely legal to punish retards. You can accuse innocent people of felony and said innocent people can sue you for defamation. On a smaller scale of conflict, instead of getting sued you will get punched in the face. You can dislike negroes all you want, but if you intentionally picking fights with them and get yourself into trouble, that's on you not them.
Click to expand...
You can "sue" people for anything in America doesn't mean it will even be taken seriously by a lawyer. Defamation in particular is very very hard to prove and if you actually weren't a newfag you would know that given how many dog shit lawsuits have been thrown at this site.

Physical violence towards words that cause you no harm is never an appropriate reaction and no one should be defending physical violence towards people for expressing their freedom of speech. He was not picking a fight with anyone he was ATTACKED and had every right to defened himself.
 
Last edited:
White Pride Worldwide said:
You can "sue" people for anything in America doesn't mean it will even be taken seriously by a lawyer. Defemation in particular is very very hard to prove and if you actually weren't a newfag you would know that given how many dog shit lawsuits have been thrown at this site.

Physical violence towards words that cause you no harm is never an appropriate reaction and no one should be defending physical violence towards people for expressing their freedom of speech. He was not picking a fight with anyone he was ATTACKED and had every right to defened himself.
Click to expand...
If you are allowed to murder people due to an altercation- that YOU intentionally caused, then that loophole would be abused by every murderous schizos.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom