💪 Tough Guys Dalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder - Putting the hard r in retard. IRL streamer who provokes confrontations with Tennessee blacks and shot a guy while streaming.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Racism is the new hersey, 500 years ago calling the pope a faggot would get you burned at the stake. Calling someone a nigger will get you legally raped in court instead. Chud is simply taking the 1st amendment to its logical conclusion, hate speech should be protected speech, he's not advocating for TND, he's literally demonstrating that you share your society with barely civilised apes.

Just to clarify, nuisance streamers and influencer culture is fucking homosexual but he has proven that coons will literally conspire to destroy you over something as petty as name calling.
 
Last edited:
I've never heard of any case of a person shooting a black guy in self defense who attacked him over the N-word.
i present the Alabama Cracker Barrel murder.

niggas.jpg
tl;dr: white calls black a nigger over a petty parking dispute, black punches white in response and white pulls out a gun and ventilates black, jury verdict: capital murder, no parole.

it's worth noting that the prosecutor here argued that because white called him a nigger that he couldn't claim self-defense because it turned him into the initial agitator.

If he's going to argue that the attacker has no right no to attack Chud over the N-word, which in my opinion he should, I think he should also bring up the curtis culwell center attack-where Islamic terrorist attacked cartoonists with same mindset-as an example, to make the point that while, "free speech rights doesn't apply to private entities be it, Chud's attacker or the Islamic state, violence as a response to offensive or even hate speech as no place in a civilized society that values free speech.
i think it's a given that you don't have the right to attack someone after they insulted you and i don't think people are arguing that they were justified in doing so (legally anyway), where it gets complicated is that while such speech is protected that same protection does not extend to self-defense when you are the one basically engineering a situation where you put yourself in danger with the express intent (reminder this retard tweeted out he had "premeditated self-defense" to go and shoot niggers) to get a legal kill.

same shit happened with that Karmelo Anthony case, who clearly was trying to start shit and thought that as long as someone else initiates contact first he has carte blanche to stab them to death in response because he was only being verbally antagonistic at that point. i've seen a lot of parallel arguments being used for Chud today that all of Karmelo Anthony's defenders used a year ago, funny how that works.
 
i present the Alabama Cracker Barrel murder.
I think that the "Before backing away from the truck" part is key here. In this case you can at least argue that since he backed off he was not an imminent threat anymore. Here it looks like everything unfolded way faster.

it's worth noting that the prosecutor here argued that because white called him a nigger that he couldn't claim self-defense because it turned him into the initial agitator.
Utterly absurd thing to say if you think about it for more than 2 seconds.
So you call someone "nigger" and now anyone can basically walk up to you and kill you without you being able to defend yourself? Because you dared to say the nigger word which made you the "aggressor"?
 
This guy is a wigger. He went looking for a fight and got one. Just because it was from a nigger doesn't mean he isn't a troublemaker with priors on his record
 
Last edited:
Probably the funniest part about this is on his quest to intentionally instigate shit hes the one the ends up shooting himself. There's no way they don't throw the book at him for this and hes lucky his shit aim only ended up hitting himself and the nog and not some passerby.


He must have been studying the ways of Tex Grebner. Has the retarded hat and everything.
 
Regardless of what you think of Chud, (IMO he's a perfect example of the phenomenon of low class or unintelligent antisemitism/bigotry being uncouth and vulgar. Theres definitely a better way to highlight this issue than by going around and calling black people niggers until they attack you)
but with this murder case he's about to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt what most white people with an IQ over 115 already recognize, and thats that the word "nigger" is a magic word of power that absolves black people of all of the consequences from any violence they commit.
 
Oh yeah he's FUCKED fucked if the judge allows this to be admitted as evidence and if the DA is allowed to bring up his criminal history before a jury or grand jury.

I kind of was wondering what your opinion is on this? @AnOminous
If Chud does get charged for anything by the DA will his livestreams and statements on X bite his ass?
Depends what they're charging him with and what they're seeking. If they're going after it as a "hate crime," which they probably are, it's entirely relevant and admissible that he has a history of provoking confrontations like this based on race.

It's going to come down to whether it's more probative or prejudicial. Prejudicial is where his vile character is introduced just to make the jury/judge hate him and want to convict him, and probative is whether it makes it more or less likely that he actually committed the crime.

I'm going for probative here. This dipshit is going away for a while.
tl;dr: white calls black a nigger over a petty parking dispute, black punches white in response and white pulls out a gun and ventilates black, jury verdict: capital murder, no parole.

it's worth noting that the prosecutor here argued that because white called him a nigger that he couldn't claim self-defense because it turned him into the initial agitator.
That's obviously a bullshit argument even under the current limited "fighting words" doctrine, but you're also not allowed to shoot someone in the head because they punched you and then were walking away. There has to be some currently existing threat.

Everyone involved in this situation acted like a total nigger.

Also, this is a situation where the verbal conflict should have not been admitted because it was irrelevant to the ultimate outcome.
 
Last edited:
Love how even on KF you have a bunch of spineless whites saying he deserved it even though day in and day out in different threads in the site we have examples of black people doing thingsneven worse than this guy and facing absolutely no consequences. But as soon as a white guy acts the same way, the book is thrown at him. It's pathetic.
Yup. Buncha nigger-fellating retards on this site. I can't even imagine hating myself bad enough to stoop that low.
 
In Chud's defense and the defense of provocative speech. Attacking someone over words is pathetic snowflake behavior, nevermind illegal. This was true when Islamic terrorists murdered people over cartoons insulting Mohammed, and it is true now, when a black person attacked Chud over a word (at the time there's more details being revealed). Plus, provocative speech is subjective.
So here’s where public sentiment MIGHT separate from the law.

The problem with provocative speech is that it.. well.. provokes. And in almost every single “self defense” “stand your ground” state self defense can’t be invoked if you started the fight . Not that you were saying otherwise, I just think it’s relevant to state that this wigger is 98% sure going to prison.

I totally agree with you btw, but this probably going to be the last time this dude streams outside of prison.
 
Back
Top Bottom