- Joined
- May 24, 2014
One thing I don't understand about Cool Cat...
Why hasn't AOL Time Warner sued Derek yet? I mean in the 60s, one of the last Looney Tunes characters created was named Cool Cat. I mean, yeah, he sucked, and felt like a lame attempt to recreate Bugs Bunny in the 60s, but he still exists and I assume Warner owns the trademark on the character, right?
Or did this ever come up before and did Derek find a way to get around it?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=5_utLzXcylQ
There's a lot of reasons they probably won't sue: the character hasn't been used in forever, Derek's character is very different, the name "cool cat" is just generic 60's slang, Derek doesn't have any money, they would look like assholes.
It's just not worth it to them, if they even noticed at all.