Crimson Desert - Korean devs really like deserts huh?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
"They made a game they hoped people would like." Are you arguing that this isn't a fact?
All devs make a game that they hope people will like.
Feel free to prove otherwise.

"They've listened to the players and made tweaks." Objectively a fact.
I gave my feedback on their forum that K+M is shit and it still hasn't been fixed.
Not a fact from my point of view. So, it's a bias on your part.

Also, I know you're a pink join date and a retard by default, so here's some spoon feeding.
This is what I mean by bias.
Western AAA developers make games they think customers SHOULD like. Then shit on them when they don't. Fucking idiots
I can give you a lot of examples of western devs that make good games and are quick to improve based on feedback and I can also give you examples of eastern devs that make garbage and never fix it.
 
And why does the nationality/race matter here at all?
i am wondering that myself, while devs are gooks and their game is somewhat censored-ish to fit gook rules, it doesn't matter at the end of the day because gook rules didn't detract from the gameplay enjoyment, similar to gook blade...
i would have given reason were someone complaining about pixelated bob and vegana if it was a western adult game because pixelated bits is a japanese law thing.
 
Didn't know we were supposed to hate devs who don't tardrage like children on social media
Who said that?


And why does the nationality/race matter here at all?
It doesn't.

Here's what stupid nigger said
Western AAA developers make games they think customers SHOULD like. Then shit on them when they don't. Fucking idiots

And here's my take
I can give you a lot of examples of western devs that make good games and are quick to improve based on feedback and I can also give you examples of eastern devs that make garbage and never fix it


Because he's a juvenile retard and as such, best ignored.
That's fine, but you and the other stupid nigger missed my point and chimped out.

@The Laughing Man, explain your "optimistic" ratings for my and @Questions are a Burden's posts, please.
Go back to reddit.
They care about stickers there, along with the rest of the faggots.
 
All devs make a game that they hope people will like.
Feel free to prove otherwise.
No. Plenty of devs make games they hope will make money which is different than making a game players will like. There is also a slew of devs who force shit for political reasons.

They knew people would like Ass Creed Japan / Ninja edition. Instead they decided to piss those people off and have it star a literal niggerfaggot for political reasons. Faggots like sexy ninja asian k pop boys. Niggers dont like open faggots. Everyone else hates niggerfaggots. They made a choice they knew no one would like to help teach a lesson.
 
No. Plenty of devs make games they hope will make money which is different than making a game players will like. There is also a slew of devs who force shit for political reasons.

They knew people would like Ass Creed Japan / Ninja edition. Instead they decided to piss those people off and have it star a literal niggerfaggot for political reasons. Faggots like sexy ninja asian k pop boys. Niggers dont like open faggots. Everyone else hates niggerfaggots. They made a choice they knew no one would like to help teach a lesson.
You're kinda splitting hairs here.

Yes, game studios are companies, and their main purpose is to make money by selling their product.
And the biggest way to sell your product is to have people like it, so, on some level, all devs make a game with the intent of people liking in.

We've all seen and heard that some games were subsidized by investment firms with a clear political agenda, but in my eyes, once that happens, the entity no longer is a game company, but rather a propaganda outlet.

And finally, there are those devs who indeed have themselves a clear political alignment and agenda, but even them make their game with the intent that those who share their beliefs will buy it and like it.

Bottom line, those devs that need to cater to their users will make a product with the intent of being liked, while those that run on investment funds, are glorified comission workers.
So, yes, I do still stand by my initial statement, that all devs make a game and hope people will like it.
 
I really wish there was less bullshit associated with KBM. Aren't these guys Koreans? Surely they should know how to map commands to keys that people actually use.
You can’t rebind?

The story is dumb and nonsensical. If you require a well written coherent narrative to enjoy a game, this will be a pass.
It’s decidedly OK, arguably better written than Skyrim. That’s not a particularly high threshold but Bethesda has fallen way below that standard with every subsequent release and there are other devs who also can’t reach it (e.g., MH Wilds, Every Obsidian game after New Vegas, etc.) Also, I was impressed by the fight choreography in cutscenes, overall quite fun.

Western AAA developers make games they think customers SHOULD like. Then shit on them when they don't. Fucking idiots.
I’d say the big problem with western AAA is that they aim to please an abstract lcd player that doesn’t exist whereas in this case the devs went after actual players and listened to actual feedback (not their buttbuddy LA fag friends á la Highguard).

I don't think they're even engaging with critics at all
I think they stated that they’re aware the story was rough because it was kinda slapped together near the end of development and they’re regretful of that (fair). Other than that, I don’t think they’ve said much unless it was actually addressing it through an update. They certainly haven’t responded to IGN’s retarded critiques lmao.
 
>Oh cool, new game is out, wonder what people on the forum think of it
>Some retard is ranting about "gook dick" and is on a multi page incoherent tirade
>100% change "gook dick" man has a detailed up to date waifu list from his favourite Japanese pedo rape simulator

Its like watching people discuss that Chinese monkey game again. Never change KF.

Game looks good though from what people have said its massive and I just don't have the time to dive into something like that right now but its definitely going on my "play later" list.
 
>Oh cool, new game is out, wonder what people on the forum think of it
>Some retard is ranting about "gook dick" and is on a multi page incoherent tirade
>100% change "gook dick" man has a detailed up to date waifu list from his favourite Japanese pedo rape simulator

Its like watching people discuss that Chinese monkey game again. Never change KF.

Game looks good though from what people have said its massive and I just don't have the time to dive into something like that right now but its definitely going on my "play later" list.

I'm just over 8 hours in and it's pretty good so far. The game looks exceptional and plays well. It's not going to win any awards for originality but that doesn't bother me.
 
Has any kiwi broken the 400 hour mark? If so whats your opinion of the game?
If anyone hates the game at the 400 hour mark I'm going to call them a fucking retard like the people who were raging at Starfield with 200+ hour playthroughs.

I'm at like 70 hours. I'm having lots of fun but life has been getting in the way of me playing as much as I'd like.
 
You're kinda splitting hairs here.

Yes, game studios are companies, and their main purpose is to make money by selling their product.
And the biggest way to sell your product is to have people like it, so, on some level, all devs make a game with the intent of people liking in.
Its not splitting hairs. There is a difference between people making a thing they will like and hope you will like too and give them money for it, and someone making something because its worth money and they could care less about it otherwise.

Forcing in game modes to chase market trends or making a game that is clearly about monetization is how we get used to get shit games.
We've all seen and heard that some games were subsidized by investment firms with a clear political agenda, but in my eyes, once that happens, the entity no longer is a game company, but rather a propaganda outlet.

And finally, there are those devs who indeed have themselves a clear political alignment and agenda, but even them make their game with the intent that those who share their beliefs will buy it and like it.

Bottom line, those devs that need to cater to their users will make a product with the intent of being liked, while those that run on investment funds, are glorified comission workers.
So, yes, I do still stand by my initial statement, that all devs make a game and hope people will like it.
No they dont make it for people like them to buy and consume. The Sweet Baby crew thinks their friend is already awake and wouldnt play awful chud games. The message is to corrupt something of their enemies and force the message to the other side. Alot of devs would never play the game they are working on and it shows. Some because they are hired guns others because they have a message to sell.

Anita Sarkeezian does not buy games, does not like games, and would think less of anyone who played a game she helped develop. Druckman clearly wants to be Hollywood guy and games is where he landed. He thinks higher of the Last of Us show fan than videogame fan.

Contradicting a bit here myself here, this shit has gotten so bad that something like Marvel Rivals a soulless gook gooner game about monetization feels better than modern audience message game because the Chinks have this crazy idea that if you offer people what they want they will buy from you more.
 
>Oh cool, new game is out, wonder what people on the forum think of it
>Some retard is ranting about "gook dick" and is on a multi page incoherent tirade
>100% change "gook dick" man has a detailed up to date waifu list from his favourite Japanese pedo rape simulator

Its like watching people discuss that Chinese monkey game again. Never change KF.

Game looks good though from what people have said its massive and I just don't have the time to dive into something like that right now but its definitely going on my "play later" list.
Had to thread search gook dick and see you're talking about me. Idk bro, for something only mentioned once, it sure made a lasting impression on you.

With that out of the way, go fuck yourself.
You haven't played the game and you don't participate in the thread, and somehow you have the gall to come here, and tell us that the discussion is not up to your faggoty pretentious standards.

Either get your hands dirty and sling shit with us, or go be a dipshit redditor somewhere else.

Its not splitting hairs. There is a difference between people making a thing they will like and hope you will like too and give them money for it, and someone making something because its worth money and they could care less about it otherwise
Yes, I already said that.
Those that do it out of passion, do it for either a love of games or a love of their politics.
Different end goal, but the same drive.

No they dont make it for people like them to buy and consume. The Sweet Baby crew thinks their friend is already awake and wouldnt play awful chud games. The message is to corrupt something of their enemies and force the message to the other side. Alot of devs would never play the game they are working on and it shows. Some because they are hired guns others because they have a message to sell
Sweet baby and their ilk are part of the propaganda crew and I've already given my thoughts on them.
Don't mistake those that make propaganda and those that do it from a belief. Even if both may have the same politics, the motivation is different.
As for the message and the corruption, that's a matter of perspective. I'm sure a faggot redditor would see the games you or I enjoy as corruption.
So, let's drop the moral high ground and simply view it as sides of a conflict.

Contradicting a bit here myself here, this shit has gotten so bad that something like Marvel Rivals a soulless gook gooner game about monetization feels better than modern audience message game because the Chinks have this crazy idea that if you offer people what they want they will buy from you more
The issue here is that you can't separate the games from politics and I'm not blaming you. It's a modern soul sickness that won't go away anytime soon.
Yes, the chinks that made Marvel Rivals are making content with the intent to earn revenue from their user base. They know what the users want, what they spend money on and don't care about pushing an ideology, at least, not with intent.
 
Game looks good though from what people have said its massive and I just don't have the time to dive into something like that right now but its definitely going on my "play later" list.
Thanks for this timely, much-needed update, and for letting us know that you -- personally -- will be considering consuming the product at a later date amid your immensely busy schedule masturbating while thinking about "gook dick."
 
Back
Top Bottom