Consoomers / Consoomer Culture - Because if it has a recogniseable brand on it, I’d buy it!

[Strange Looking Dog]

How is this any better than just carrying the cup? You still have to use one hand to carry the damn thing, plus it's now dangling which means splashes and leaks.

A (slightly) more practical gimmick solution would involve a harness attached to your body. Your upper arm (don't raise it too high or hilarity will ensue!) or your hip.

Still fucking retarded, but frees up a hand and helps prevent sloshing.

Ya'll bustas ain't even carrying you beer in a bag. Sad.

 

[HexBawxUno]

I stand corrected regarding Sneak King guy, it also seems to be a joke here. It’s still on a far greater scale than the Shaq-Fu guys.

Re: Pokémon, I dipped out around Sun/Moon.

 

[Neet Tokusatsu]

I'm not shocked by older pokemon fans consooming despite the DS versions being completely playable. After Sun and Moon, I decided to stop buying the games because I found them to be incredibly lacking and terrible, yet those who knew I liked pokemon were shocked I wouldn't keep consooming the franchise. There's a lot of cope arguments they use to justify keeping up with the games, but most boils down to "Well, it's POKEMON!".

It's very bizarre now that I think of it. Everyone was so sure I'd be happy at the remakes and when I said I found the trailers so disappointing, I had no interest, they couldn't believe I was unwilling to "get hyped". Strange times we live in.

And people do wonder why Pokemon has gotten worse for the last few years and will most likely never get better, the people who care the least about the game's quality are the most loyal consoomers.

I've seen more than a few people here in the farms saying that "Pokemon doesn't need graphics like BoTW", "Pokemon doesn't need to be like other RPGs", "Pokemon is just comfort food to me".

I guess i could say that you either take pokemon for what it is, a childish, unpolished and below-average RPG, or you move on and go play other games, the thing is that 99% of people did the former, buying both versions of a game they no longer enjoy on a yearly basis.

Ya'll bustas ain't even carrying you beer in a bag. Sad.

Man, the memories, that's how they used to sell soda in my country when i was a kid.

 

[Finder]

I don't seem to understand. The person's post history didn't help either, mostly just youtube promotion.

 

[Solid Snek]

The kind of people with those bookshelves are the kind of people who have this quote on their dating profile:

Funny enough, usually people that read Ulysses or Pride & Prejudice always use that quote since they like to be self-important about reading literature and it’s always said by women

I don't really use social media, so this is first time I've ever seen this quote. Does anyone have any context for when and why he said it...?

Because it's John Waters.

John Waters is a man who misses the days of perverts having sex in public bathrooms, openly thirsted for Bieber when he was still underage, and made his career by filming an incestuous tranny eating dog shit off a Baltimore sidewalk.

I know that Waters has a lot of "normie" fans nowadays, thanks to the success of Hairspray and the mainstreaming of deviant culture. But everything Waters says has to be filtered through layers of camp, irony, and sexual perversion, and I'm not sure I'd trust his advice on what men to fuck - at least not at face value, and certainly not enough to use that quote, unironically, on any kind of social media profile.

 

[Cripple]

I don't really use social media, so this is first time I've ever seen this quote. Does anyone have any context for when and why he said it...?

Because it's John Waters.

John Waters is a man who misses the days of perverts having sex in public bathrooms, openly thirsted for Bieber when he was still underage, and made his career by filming an incestuous tranny eating dog shit off a Baltimore sidewalk.

I know that Waters has a lot of "normie" fans nowadays, thanks to the success of Hairspray and the mainstreaming of deviant culture. But everything Waters says has to be filtered through layers of camp, irony, and sexual perversion, and I'm not sure I'd trust his advice on what men to fuck - at least not at face value, and certainly not enough to use that quote, unironically, on any kind of social media profile.

I'm a Waters fan, but I have been since the 90's before he became so mainstream. But yeah I don't think a lot of people get he often makes facetious remarks and likes to ruffle feathers. Maybe not as much as when he was younger, but this quote is from when he was younger. He gave it during an interview iirc.

In short people unfamiliar with him are using it without context. No big surprise there.

 

[Solid Snek]

I'm a Waters fan, but I have been since the 90's before he became so mainstream. But yeah I don't think a lot of people get he often makes facetious remarks and likes to ruffle feathers. Maybe not as much as when he was younger, but this quote is from when he was younger. He gave it during an interview iirc.

In short people unfamiliar with him are using it without context. No big surprise there.

Oh yeah, if it was young JW, then it's definitely not something you want to quote if you're in the dating game and love books.

If I had to guess, he was probably juxtaposing the (what was then) shocking practice of going over to a complete stranger's house to fuck him in the ass, with the (what has always been) basic bitch practice of making sure the people you date are cultured and literate. i.e. he's being a little sarcastic, and playfully taking the piss out of precisely the sort of people who'd have large bookshelves for show, and would use this quote, unironically, on a "hi stranger, let's fuck" dating app.

 

[Strange Looking Dog]

Man, the memories, that's how they used to sell soda in my country when i was a kid.

For real though why do they do this? Is it cause bags are easy to dispose of?

I don't seem to understand. The person's post history didn't help either, mostly just youtube promotion.

View attachment 2762429View attachment 2762430View attachment 2762432

Do you suppose he's made his money back on this scheme? Reddit awards aren't worth shit, but I guess the momentary attention was probably a highlight for him.
Also, his shirt has conspired to call him a simp

 

[Starved Artist]

I'm not shocked by older pokemon fans consooming despite the DS versions being completely playable. After Sun and Moon, I decided to stop buying the games because I found them to be incredibly lacking and terrible, yet those who knew I liked pokemon were shocked I wouldn't keep consooming the franchise. There's a lot of cope arguments they use to justify keeping up with the games, but most boils down to "Well, it's POKEMON!".

It's very bizarre now that I think of it. Everyone was so sure I'd be happy at the remakes and when I said I found the trailers so disappointing, I had no interest, they couldn't believe I was unwilling to "get hyped". Strange times we live in.

It's been down hill since the Alpha-Omega /Leaf-Fire remakes. Nintendo/Game Freak realized that their die-hards are functionally retarded and their hardcores will eat whatever shit they'll get fed while complaining.
For example. Sapphire remake removed an entire section of the game, but they made up to it with a brand new training mechanic for the hardcore players who wanted to maximize their pokemon.

Pearl is just disgustingly bland and it pretty much proves that Nintendo killed the 3DS to justify this shit.

 

[Pissmaster]

The Burger King collector made USA Today (archive), I like how they make sure to identify him as a redditor right off the bat, because he's certainly not a man.

I don't seem to understand. The person's post history didn't help either, mostly just youtube promotion.

View attachment 2762429View attachment 2762430View attachment 2762432

I've never seen that promo disc before. Better picture:


which came from this thread (a), which is full of people downvoting and shredding him for copy/pasting the same reply over and over. Everything else he says comes off super-guarded, which, well, it's Reddit and he's powerleveled his face, so I don't blame him:


I think it's an extremely stupid way to try and get rich, by trying to make himself into the WaCkY bUrGeR kInG cOlLeCtOr GuY!!!!!1, but even Reddit's not buying it. The only interesting thing here is the promo disc, and that's only interesting to game collectors. One later comment of his said it was just in one of 19 boxes of Sneak Kings he bought at some point, and he doesn't know anything else about it. I'd guess it was designed for in-store demonstrations, and was supposed to go back to BK corporate.

 

[seri0us]

I mentioned this on the Fat Acceptance thread, but I noticed a lot of fat people are also big consoomers with non-edible stuff as well. Infact, I do notice Torrid puts out a lot of clothes for shitty consoomer crap movies like this one cardigan for that Birds of Prey movie that looks like someone skinned a muppet for example.

View attachment 2681663

 

[The Ugly One]

It's been down hill since the Alpha-Omega /Leaf-Fire remakes. Nintendo/Game Freak realized that their die-hards are functionally retarded and their hardcores will eat whatever shit they'll get fed while complaining.
For example. Sapphire remake removed an entire section of the game, but they made up to it with a brand new training mechanic for the hardcore players who wanted to maximize their pokemon.

Nintendo isn't making Pokemon games for 35-year-olds who don't care that the series has barely changed since 1996; they're making them for children who have no memories of their own existence before maybe 2014 and neither know nor care about Pokemon's existence prior to them entering the second grade. Pokemon Ruby is almost twenty years old. If you are old enough to remember it, then neither Nintendo nor Game Freak care what you want. By continuing to cater to children, rather than getting into the death spiral of extracting more and more money from a smaller and smaller, aging fan base, they continue to keep their property commercially relevant.

 

[Pissmaster]

Nintendo isn't making Pokemon games for 35-year-olds who don't care that the series has barely changed since 1996; they're making them for children who have no memories of their own existence before maybe 2014 and neither know nor care about Pokemon's existence prior to them entering the second grade. Pokemon Ruby is almost twenty years old. If you are old enough to remember it, then neither Nintendo nor Game Freak care what you want. By continuing to cater to children, rather than getting into the death spiral of extracting more and more money from a smaller and smaller, aging fan base, they continue to keep their property commercially relevant.

Yeah, that's something I've thought about with things like Pokémon and its aging playerbase - it's a franchise specifically for children, yet has a lot of adults who can't bear to ever admit that. I figure it goes back to the days when the whole "Video games are for children" idea was seriously batted around, with pearl-clutching boomers treating the existence of games like Doom as though they were slipping The Satanic Bible into every Happy Meal, not even stopping to consider that those games were designed with adults in mind. So here we are, 30 years later, with an extreme overcorrection. Boomers couldn't see video games as anything but entertainment for children, and now Millenials can't see any form of entertainment as something designed specifically for children. Same deal with My Little Pony, like, they can't even conceive the concept that where you are in life dictates what entertainment will really work for you. It's fun to find unfamiliar, new things to enjoy.

Unless you're severely autistic enough to be mentally stuck at the age where Pokémon most appeals to you.

 

[Sleazy Car Salesman]

Unless you're severely autistic enough to be mentally stuck at the age where Pokémon most appeals to you.

In all fairness to Pokemon, and I can't believe I'm about to defend sweaty motherfuckers on the Farms like this, is that it hits that perfect sweet spot in the "easy to grasp, difficult to master" range. Pokemon is a game for children, you're right about that, but look at competitive Pokemon in a tournament setting or some of the guys who are really into Pokemon Showdown. Pokemon has over twenty years and eight generations of meta to sift through and it keeps getting new toys to play around with every generation and remake, and it can be a very deep game of numbers, strategy, meta and counter meta, reads and predictions, and strats to minimze the need for luck far above and beyond just the simplistic roshambo type game that people who only play the single player know it as. Pokemon can be a surprisingly deep game, and it's also a great time waster for handhelds since the older generations had lots of exploration and side activities beyond just the main story.

That is no excuse for the steaming shit piles that Game Freak has churned out for the past three generations or so or the diehard faggots who refuse to demand to be treated better as customers though.

 

[whitepumpkin]

Nintendo isn't making Pokemon games for 35-year-olds who don't care that the series has barely changed since 1996; they're making them for children who have no memories of their own existence before maybe 2014 and neither know nor care about Pokemon's existence prior to them entering the second grade.

That's true, but kids don't have $80 to fling around for a video game unless they're spoiled. You probably have to get your parents to buy the game for you, and even then some parents aren't willing to pay that much money for a game that's maybe... 15 hours of playtime before your kid gets bored and wants another $80 game.

So you could argue that they do try and pull in the adult market along with kids. They've remade the first generation... how many times? Get some Twitch Streamers to play it - Who hype it up as the Best Pokemon Game Ever so they can collect those bits and subs - have game journalists gush how it's just like your childhood, and if you're lucky those adult nostalgiafags may buy both copies. And if anyone finds the game lacking, then you don't care, you got their money and they'll probably be told by some other 35 year old to Let People Enjoy Things!!

Either way, Game Freak gets paid and they'll churn out another game in a year or two to grab that market along with the Kids Christmas Present spending.

 

[Starved Artist]

That's true, but kids don't have $80 to fling around for a video game unless they're spoiled. You probably have to get your parents to buy the game for you, and even then some parents aren't willing to pay that much money for a game that's maybe... 15 hours of playtime before your kid gets bored and wants another $80 game.

My brother in law just slammed down 200 on pokemon shit. and I just dropped 500 dollerydoos for my wife and daughter's pokemon shit. (Two Switches and several pokemon games)
There's just no escaping it. I sort of get how my parents felt when they bought me pokemon Blue.. Except they had no idea what kind of monster this shit was going to become.

I went from the Consoomer to the Provider of Consoomuption. I'd say kill me now, but I wanna see how this rollercoast of autism crashes.

 

[whitepumpkin]

My brother in law just slammed down 200 on pokemon shit. and I just dropped 500 dollerydoos for my wife and daughter's pokemon shit. (Two Switches and several pokemon games)
There's just no escaping it. I sort of get how my parents felt when they bought me pokemon Blue.. Except they had no idea what kind of monster this shit was going to become.

I remember I wanted an NES as a kid and my mum refused. She did eventually get us a Sega Genesis with educational games and Rollercoaster Tycoon because it's "learning to manage something". But when I think back on it, she spent a lot of money on us and we probably weren't that grateful. I'm thankful now that she did try, and that I do genuinely have good memories of playing The Magic School Bus and Math Blaster, but I can't imagine what it's like today for a parent who may not have such disposable income. Especially with your kid is asking for $500 worth of stuff at Christmas.

Like, you want to spoil your kids, I get it. There's nothing like seeing your kid get excited over their presents (and I spoil the shit out of my kid relatives). But every year it's like, people want more and more. It builds up so much that it's normalized to spend thousands of dollars over Christmas and I'm honestly finally getting why this time is so stressful for people. Because putting yourself into debt for the happiness of everyone in your life is depressing. Especially if there's not gratefulness after.

I'm honestly considering next year to just make everyone a jar of jam and a Christmas card and if they don't like it, then fuck them, I'll eat the jam and give the Christmas card to someone else.

 

[Mairon]

I don't understand why people play newer videogames in some genres. So few of em are worth the price of admission.

FPS Genre: CS, TF2, COD/BF. Every new thing is either a clone of those or Battle Royale.

Loot'n Shoot: Past Borderlands 1, everything else is just far too samey.

RTS: Brood Wars, CnC, Red Alert, AOE. Nothing new any good.

MMO: Ultima Online, Eve Online, Everquest 1, Guild Wars 1, Ragnarok Online, Lineage 2, Final Fantasy 11. Nothing new any good, only old games are good.

2D Fighting games: Street Fighter 2/Z2/Z3/3s, newer ones shit. KOF98/02, all newer ones shit. GGACP+R, newer ones are shit. Mortal Kombat has always been shit and always will be.

ARPG: You've got good old Diablo 2 and Path of Exile, everything else is underwhelming.

Don't forget Dawn of War for the RTS genre

 

[Lobster Cult High Priest]

I'm honestly considering next year to just make everyone a jar of jam and a Christmas card and if they don't like it, then fuck them, I'll eat the jam and give the Christmas card to someone else.

Homemade Jam sounds like an amazing Christmas gift.

 

[The Ugly One]

That's true, but kids don't have $80 to fling around for a video game unless they're spoiled. You probably have to get your parents to buy the game for you, and even then some parents aren't willing to pay that much money for a game that's maybe... 15 hours of playtime before your kid gets bored and wants another $80 game.

Game Boy games cost $30 in the 1990s, which is $60 in today's money...right about the cost of a Switch game today. It wasn't grown-ups who drove the original Pokemon Red/Green/Blue to 31 million units sold. It was that sweet, sweet parental Christmas spending. If you miss Christmas with a video game launch, especially a kid-oriented title, you're looking at losing half or more of your sales. It's a huge deal. There were plenty of kids with a decent collection of Nintendo or Sega games when I was a kid. In retrospect, a SNES with a dozen game cartridges represented an asinine amount of money to spend on a 10-year-old.