Chris court appearance

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Forgive me if this has been discussed before, but is there any plans to get someone in the court room to document the events? Or are we going to hope that maybe a a journalist mentions one or two bit of information in passing again? Actually can the public just rock up to court with a notepad (don't think are allowed to bring in a camera) and ask to sit into Chris-Chan's trial?
 
Does it strike anyone else as odd that he wanted the court to know that he's "internet famous"? It didn't really register to me when I first heard it because I was thinking about his comment about getting his stuff back home.

Chris used to always tell people not to believe what's being said about him on the internet, assuring them it was the work of trolls trying to make him look bad. But in his court appearance he wanted people to know he's a big deal on the internet. Does he think the net's vast documentation of his ridiculous life exonerates him in some way? Maybe it was in the hopes that people would consider him a "special case" while not looking too deeply into it.

I just think it's odd, especially since the only "fame" he has on the internet is infamy, so what did he hope to gain?
 
Forgive me if this has been discussed before, but is there any plans to get someone in the court room to document the events? Or are we going to hope that maybe a a journalist mentions one or two bit of information in passing again? Actually can the public just rock up to court with a notepad (don't think are allowed to bring in a camera) and ask to sit into Chris-Chan's trial?

People did that with the Michael Snyder trial in order to document it.

I'm wondering if this one would be different, though, since it's a high-profile case that has been covered on mainstream news as opposed to something that only a small selection of Internet nerds care about. I would suspect that there are a lot more people (especially locals) who might be trying to attend the trial to witness any outbursts/drama first-hand, so the courts might have a need to restrict who they allow to watch the trial.

I could be wrong about this, though - for anyone who is more well-versed in this kind of thing, feel free to correct me.
 
Forgive me if this has been discussed before, but is there any plans to get someone in the court room to document the events? Or are we going to hope that maybe a a journalist mentions one or two bit of information in passing again? Actually can the public just rock up to court with a notepad (don't think are allowed to bring in a camera) and ask to sit into Chris-Chan's trial?
Considering the amount of time we have to wait for new info I really hope that somebody or two goes down there to document everything that's being said
 
Forgive me if this has been discussed before, but is there any plans to get someone in the court room to document the events? Or are we going to hope that maybe a a journalist mentions one or two bit of information in passing again? Actually can the public just rock up to court with a notepad (don't think are allowed to bring in a camera) and ask to sit into Chris-Chan's trial?
There has to be atleast a few people on here that live in Chris' neck of the woods. Hopefully one can get in and jot down the highlights. Wishful thinking.
 
Does it strike anyone else as odd that he wanted the court to know that he's "internet famous"? It didn't really register to me when I first heard it because I was thinking about his comment about getting his stuff back home.

Chris used to always tell people not to believe what's being said about him on the internet, assuring them it was the work of trolls trying to make him look bad. But in his court appearance he wanted people to know he's a big deal on the internet. Does he think the net's vast documentation of his ridiculous life exonerates him in some way? Maybe it was in the hopes that people would consider him a "special case" while not looking too deeply into it.

I just think it's odd, especially since the only "fame" he has on the internet is infamy, so what did he hope to gain?
I get the impression he thinks he actually has fans and possibly even worshippers. This is due to people who don’t know better being nice to him on twitter plus the usual assortment of trolls pretending to believe his shit in order to get close to him. Chris seems to think he has the good kind of fame.
Edit: and let’s not forget the dumbfucks who buy his shit on etsy.
 
Last edited:
The most one can ask for is Chris' court appearance being drawn with Crayola, which would be poetic irony if ever there was any.
 
If only Truman Capote or Dominick Dunne were still alive to do these legal proceedings justice for Vanity Fair or The New Yorker. Who will write the In Cold Blood of the Chandler family atrocities?
BRB campaigning for this to be the next installment in FX’s American Crime Story series. (Who would they cast, though? 🤔)
 
Forgive me if this has been discussed before, but is there any plans to get someone in the court room to document the events? Or are we going to hope that maybe a a journalist mentions one or two bit of information in passing again? Actually can the public just rock up to court with a notepad (don't think are allowed to bring in a camera) and ask to sit into Chris-Chan's trial?
Gunt lives about an hour away. He can sit in open court and scribble, I doubt he's clever enough to sneak in a recording device. Most likely he'll just paparazzi outside the courthouse and get winded trying to keep up with Sonichu.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom