Cardinal George Pell Charged With Diddling Kids - Australia's most senior Catholic will return from Rome to face charges

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-29/cardinal-george-pell-charged-sexual-assault-offences/8547668

Cardinal George Pell says he is looking forward to his day in court after being charged with historical sexual assault offences.

Key points:
  • Charges involve multiple complainants
  • Pell has always maintained his innocence and strenuously denied any wrongdoing
  • Victoria Police says charging process has involved "common and standard practice"
DDc96YCVoAAeAbs.jpg

Australia's most senior Catholic cleric has been ordered to appear in the Melbourne Magistrates' Court on July 18, after Victoria Police served charges on his legal representatives.

"Cardinal Pell will return to Australia, as soon as possible, to clear his name following advice and approval by his doctors, who will also advise on his travel arrangements," a statement released by the Catholic Archdiocese of Sydney said.

"He has again strenuously denied all allegations."

He is expected to make a further statement in Rome at 4:30pm AEST.

Victoria Police Deputy Commissioner Shane Patton earlier told reporters the charges involved multiple complainants.

A magistrate will decide next week whether to release the details and the nature of the charges. A hearing will take place on July 6.

Last July, police confirmed they were formally investigating complaints about offences alleged to have occurred in Ballarat in the 1970s.

Pell has always maintained his innocence and denied any wrongdoing.

Deputy Commissioner Patton said the "process and procedures" being followed had been the same as those applied "in a whole range of historical sex offences, whenever we investigate them".

"The fact that he has been charged on summons — we have used advice from the Office of Public Prosecutions and also we have engaged with his legal representatives, which is common and standard practice."

As head of the Vatican's finances, Pell is considered number three in the Catholic hierarchy behind the Pope.

In July, Pell said the allegations were part of a smear campaign by the media.

"The allegations are untrue, I deny them absolutely," Pell said.

"I'm like any other Australian — I'm entitled to a fair go."

However, he said he was "quite prepared to co-operate" with the process.

Cardinal's rise in the ranks

Cardinal George Pell has long been one of the most prominent and controversial figures in the Australian Catholic Church.


In October, three Victoria Police detectives flew to Rome to interview Pell.

A Victoria Police statement issued at the time said: "Cardinal George Pell voluntarily participated in an interview regarding allegations of sexual assault."

Australia does not have an extradition treaty with the Vatican, even though it does with Italy.

Child sexual assault survivor advocate Chrissie Foster said it was right that the allegations would now be heard in the courts.

"I've been waiting to see what happens with this investigation for a long time," she said.

Ms Foster's daughters Emma and Katie were raped by Melbourne paedophile priest Father Kevin O'Donnell when they were in primary school in the 1980s.

VIDEO: ABC journalist Paul Kennedy speaks about the decision to charge George Pell (ABC News)

Conservative cardinal's road to Vatican
Pell was the son of a Ballarat publican, a head prefect at school and a talented Australian Rules footballer, who was signed as a ruckman by the Richmond Football Club.

We're in uncharted territory now

Now Victoria Police are charging Cardinal Archbishop George Pell with multiple sexual offences we are in an unprecedented historical position, writes Noel Debien.

His studies took him to Rome and then Oxford.

In 1971 he returned to Victoria as an ordained priest, and rose through the ranks to eventually become Archbishop of Melbourne.

He rankled progressive Catholics with his resistance to reform.

He opposed the ordination of female priests, was anti-divorce and anti-abortion and also refused communion to gay activists at one of his masses.

In 1990 he said: "Homosexuality — we're aware that it does exist. We believe such activity is wrong and we believe for the good of society it should not be encouraged."

His hardline conservatism caught the attention of Rome, and he was chosen to join a Vatican congregation dedicated to enforcing orthodoxy.

"There are many smorgasbord Catholics who choose a bit of this and that ... my business as bishop is to proclaim the whole of the message," he said.

In 1996, then-Archbishop Pell was the first Catholic leader to address the child sexual abuse that has plagued the church.

PHOTO: George Pell was made Archbishop of Sydney in 2002 where he later became a cardinal. (Reuters: Mark Baker [file photo])


He instigated a redress scheme called the Melbourne Response.

When announcing the scheme he said: "It's a matter of regret that the Catholic Church has taken some time to come to grips with the sex abuse issue adequately."

But the Melbourne Response, which capped compensation for victims at $50,000, was widely criticised as being legalistic and not offering enough support to victims.

He then became Archbishop of Sydney and was made a cardinal.

In 2014, he was chosen by the Pope to get the Vatican's finances in order and he moved to Rome.

Ill health prevented him from returning to Australia in 2016 to give evidence to the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.


Holy shit boys, it's about to get interesting.
 
ITT: Soy King passes judgment on the Christianness of Mormonism, admits not knowing some of the most basic details of it.

Yes they have a fucking clergy.
ITT: ughghgughghdughg doesn't realize I was being facetious. Every other "Christian" denomination doesn't believe Eden was in Missouri, that baptizing the dead is a good idea, and that believers get their own planet when they die, so yeah I'm going to doubt their "Christianness."
 
ITT: ughghgughghdughg doesn't realize I was being facetious. Every other "Christian" denomination doesn't believe Eden was in Missouri, that baptizing the dead is a good idea, and that believers get their own planet when they die, so yeah I'm going to doubt their "Christianness."

Well, fair first point, but there is loads of stupid shit in pretty much every denomination (that isn't viewed as stupid just because it's old), the only objective basis you can use for Christianity is whether it has Christ as son of God/savior (anything more strict than that is just arbitrary), and baptism for the dead is actually something that goes back to the original, ancient Christians. I don't have any idea if Joseph Smith was aware of that or if it's a coincidence that they came up with the same idea, but it was really common back then.
 
They're gonna keep going until they get him somehow, no matter if anything happened or not..
Now the father of the deceased choirboy, who himself never made any allegations against Pell prior to his suicide, has engaged a bunch of ambulance chasers to sue Pell for mental shock.

Although this is how they got OJ, I can’t see him winning a lawsuit alleging the same incident that they alleged m in the first two trials. It was farcical he was ever convicted of that incident. If they have evidence m of another incident then maybe.
 
It was farcical he was ever convicted of that incident
I agree. I'm not Catholic and I despise the RCC but do not for a second believe George Pell is guilty of anything other than being a high ranking clergyman and therefore an easy target for opportunist lawsuits.
 
As a general rule of thumb, "emotional damage" lawsuits are complete and utter horseshit. I'd say there's no way in hell this doesn't get thrown out as quickly as possible, but seeing the precedent I'm not so sure.
 
Kinda crazy seeing the comments from 5 years ago where people are adamant he's guilty and should be fried, and now people being doubtful. I'm sure years of #metoo scandals and fake accusations have made people wary about court cases where the only evidence is the statement from the alleged victim
 
Good, this is shit that should have been happening from the start. I've always found it kind of ridiculous that the Church kept this kind of shit up for so long - I guess they didn't want to rattle faith that what's said in the confessional is between you and the priest, but I feel like things on the level of kid diddling, rape, and murder should carry a penance of "go to the authorities and accept your punishment, and if you don't I'm going to have to tell them". That goes even more so when it's Church authorities, because these certainly aren't victimless crimes - people know they happened, and when the Church actively protects them from prosecution or worse, puts them in places where they potentially have access to more children, the Church becomes complicit while actively destroying the faith.
 
late and gay but the woman who wrote the first book about him also wrote a column that was blocked for some reason ( there are two different versions) but you can get it here, it had new accusations and people who were part of the other trial that failed due to lack of evidence ( the swimmers trial)


I don't think these accusations are more compelling than the intial ones but that makes 14 accusers apparently.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom