Canada is a failed state

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
karaokeman said:
Of course Canada would lose in hockey.

The future of Canada is Hindustan. Lol.

Maybe Canada will able to get Jagmeet and Gurwinder to play ice hockey. Hahahaha.
Click to expand...
The national sport will be changed to cricket before there are any jeet hockey players
 
Leaf Wage Slave Jr said:
partly because of Map Autism, mostly so as to not fuck up the Electoral College more than absolutely necessary by adding a second, much colder, somehow shittier California.
Click to expand...
I'm going to preface this with the caveat that I neither actually want annexation of Canadian territory nor do I think it's actually likely to happen. The only 'realistic' way I can see Canadian territory being added as states is in some future where Canada has totally disintegrated and America is in a position to actually absorb the former provinces on an individual basis. I could see British Columbia and Alberta added simultaneously as to balance each other out, Alaska and Hawaii gained statehood the same way when Hawaii was assumed to be a solid Republican state and Alaska for the Democrats.
 
Scale Smerch said:
It has been a glorious mo(u)rning
View attachment 8604235View attachment 8604238View attachment 8604240View attachment 8604241View attachment 8604244View attachment 8604249View attachment 8604253
Click to expand...
As if canadians where not going to be "sore winners" if we won lmfao.
Thiletonomics said:
Do Pajeets even win actual medals in Cricket? Or are those just participation trophies?
Click to expand...
They suck at it lol. I think they won the world cup twice or something lmfao.
 
Gurney Halleck said:
I'm going to preface this with the caveat that I neither actually want annexation of Canadian territory nor do I think it's actually likely to happen. The only 'realistic' way I can see Canadian territory being added as states is in some future where Canada has totally disintegrated and America is in a position to actually absorb the former provinces on an individual basis. I could see British Columbia and Alberta added simultaneously as to balance each other out, Alaska and Hawaii gained statehood the same way when Hawaii was assumed to be a solid Republican state and Alaska for the Democrats.
Click to expand...
As a Yankee, agreed. I don't want Canada nor do I want the based leafs in this thread have to deal with that headache. I genuinely feel bad for them that their nation got overrun by foreigners and those that enable them.

I speak on the annexations as I am wont to do purely from the dis-passioned observations of geography, culture, and history: IE "Maritimes would work, they're very similar in ethnography to New England and physically complete the eastern seaboard" or so (and really all I'd take if forced to annex something at gunpoint (oh irony)). The only province I'd really not want under any circumstances at all is Quebec for obvious reasons, and to a lesser extent, Ontario, as ground zero for the very concept of Canada and Loyalist-land.
 
Last edited:
Gurney Halleck said:
I'm going to preface this with the caveat that I neither actually want annexation of Canadian territory nor do I think it's actually likely to happen
Click to expand...
Barring something so stupid and statistically improbable that I’m not going to bother even guessing, the only way it really happens is if Canada enters full on Failed State status.

And even then, we’d likely be treated more as a Territory than outright Annexation occurring. In the unlikely event of full Annexation, I’d assume the various Provinces would be treated as individual States rather than having one fuck huge “State Formerly Known as Canada” so as to avoid motherfucking the Electoral College too badly.

But that’s too serious of a topic for today, today is for laughing at Leafistani’s Malding.
 
Gurney Halleck said:
The only 'realistic' way I can see Canadian territory being added as states is in some future where Canada has totally disintegrated and America is in a position to actually absorb the former provinces on an individual basis.
Click to expand...
Pretty much, the annexation talk is rightfully a meme and will be so until something fractures this country (e.g. Alberta or Quebec seceding) and starts dusting off think tank proposals. Practically as well any annexation would involve most of the provinces being taken in as a whole given their size, population, and regional distinctions. Only case where amalgamation may happen is with the Maritimes because each province has less population than Rhode Island (PEI for one only has ~100k) and culturally there's enough similarities between them to further justify spinning off a new entity.
 
In that circumstance Canada should be incorporated as a territory. Canadians have proven themselves not responsible enough to handle things like voting.
 
Scale Smerch said:
Pretty much, the annexation talk is rightfully a meme and will be so until something fractures this country (e.g. Alberta or Quebec seceding) and starts dusting off think tank proposals. Practically as well any annexation would involve most of the provinces being taken in as a whole given their size, population, and regional distinctions. Only case where amalgamation may happen is with the Maritimes because each province has less population than Rhode Island (PEI for one only has ~100k) and culturally there's enough similarities between them to further justify spinning off a new entity.
Click to expand...
Well, considering I JUST nerded out on the Maritimes: I can see all of it as a singular state, as it was in 1763, though it feels a bit oddly disrespectful to localisms of all things considering we've plenty of existing small states in New England and Delaware (arguably Maryland too, at least in land area). At least it being said singular state would still make sense considering everything but PEI (till 1769) was part of just Nova Scotia, and the colony had patriot hotspots flare up in both the Fredericton and Halifax areas even if the Eddy Rebellion fizzed out (surprisingly close-run thing, though). So it's just returning it as it was "pre-Loyalism" or something.

But yeah, for the love of God, don't call it "Acadia" - that's the old French colony name, and it got stamped out for a reason with the only ones left up in northern New Brunswick. I hate to insult local Brunswickers and Islanders, but Nova Scotia was the Anglo name for the area since the first English claims to the region in the 1630s or thereabouts.
 
Mayor Cody Travers said:
But yeah, for the love of God, don't call it "Acadia"
Click to expand...
I'm sure you know already, but for anyone that doesn't: Acadians were some of the first European colonists present in North America. When France lost Acadia to the British, most were expelled from their ancestral lands and sent to different parts of the world like Europe, the Caribbean, and most notably: Louisiana. The Acadians that went to Louisiana became known as the Cajuns. This is why you can find many people with the same (or similar) surnames in the Maritimes and Louisiana.

Acadians aren't "only" in New Brunswick nowadays either, they're almost everywhere in the Maritimes, NL. and Québec. The Acadian identity is often submerged in the general French Canadien identity.
 
Last edited:
I'm pretty sure its been said well before but the problem with annexation would be Ontario, Quebec, and BC.

In terms of the electoral college, the Maritimes and West would roughly balance eachother out (PEI would have to be merged with NS or NB since its too small), with Manitoba being a potential swing State. When you add in the demographic swing from Blue to Red States in America right now, its not that bad. It would just be physically extending New England and the American West.

However, throw in ON, QU, or BC and now you have around 40 votes that go hard left and want gay space communism. It's no coincidence that most of the retarded news you hear from Canada comes from these 3 places.
 
Last edited:
Konig said:
I'm pretty sure its been said well before but the problem with annexation would be Ontario, Quebec, and BC.

In terms of the electoral college, the Maritimes and West would roughly balance eachother out (PEI would have to be merged with NS or NB since its too small), with Manitoba being a potential swing State. When you add in the demographic swing from Blue to Red States in America right now, its not that bad. It would just be physically extending New England and the American West.

However, throw in ON, QU, or BC and now you have around 40 votes that go hard left and want gay space communism. Its not coincidence that most of the retarded news you hear from Canada comes from these 3 places.
Click to expand...
Those three would absolutely refuse to join the states and would be so belligerent that they would never earn full Statehood
 
Betonhaus said:
Those three would absolutely refuse to join the states and would be so belligerent that they would never earn full Statehood
Click to expand...
I could see BC becoming buck broken enough to give in, but even if they did it wouldn't be worth it for the Americans.
 
1) Canada loses to the US in hockey
2) Canadians experiencing average life in the third world in Jalisco
3) Government importing foreigners to shoot them if they ever protest

Good day to be a Canada hater (normal person). If I can see the Liberals bring in unrealized capital gains for the boomers, it still wouldn't be enough punishment for the generation that destroyed this country.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom