Canada is a failed state

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Flan Handler said:
I’ve been working on the separation stuff in my area, and it’s been fun to see that other than some federal government retirees, the petition has been very very popular.

I don’t pretend to represent all of Alberta, and I don’t have a good feel for the current urban demographic balance, but the traditional division of power as roughly 1/3 each Edmonton / Calgary / Rural- the rurals are excited and happy.

There seems to be awareness that there will be fuckery but they are looking forward to a fight. We’re blowing past our goals in the first week, and we don’t have our canvassers approved yet. We’re getting more than the population of some towns showing up to sign.

What it reminds me of is a forgotten part of the Trucker Convoy, when whole small towns emptied out and drove to protest in Edmonton. That actually was when the Covid restrictions got rolled back, because it takes a lot to get those people involved and it scared the crap out of Kenney’s rural MLAs, who finally put their foot down.

No idea where this goes but it’s been fun so far,
Click to expand...
I've been generally optimistic. Edmonton might be mostly against it but Calgary is probably 50:50 or for it - it's disappointing that there's not a lot of opportunities to sign in Calgary, I guess there was one Monday but I literally never heard about it until the day so I couldn't plan to be at the other end of Calgary. I do have the one on the 26th scheduled

I do have a question about the calendar. https://stayfreealberta.com/how-to-sign-the-petition
The calendar says signing is at 7, but implies there's a time range. So does signing start at 7, end at 7, or do you need to be in line at 7?
 
Well it only too the NDP in BC three years to realize that decriminalizing hard drugs was a bad idea.

The morons lefty's in BC ran a program in Hongcouver for 3 years where anyone caught with hard drugs wasn't charged in the hope to "provide a chance at rehabilitation".

surprise, surprise it didn't work. People detained on these charges did in fact not turn over a new leaf but rather became even heavier users knowing that they wouldn't face a legal issues.

Yah...why don't liberals understand people? Are they just that retarded or are they just that entrenched in their little do gooder bubbles?

https://vancouversun.com/news/bc-of...nalization-pilot-project-over-public-drug-use
 
Sweeter and Savoury said:
Well it only too the NDP in BC three years to realize that decriminalizing hard drugs was a bad idea.

The morons lefty's in BC ran a program in Hongcouver for 3 years where anyone caught with hard drugs wasn't charged in the hope to "provide a chance at rehabilitation".

surprise, surprise it didn't work. People detained on these charges did in fact not turn over a new leaf but rather became even heavier users knowing that they wouldn't face a legal issues.

Yah...why don't liberals understand people? Are they just that retarded or are they just that entrenched in their little do gooder bubbles?

https://vancouversun.com/news/bc-of...nalization-pilot-project-over-public-drug-use
Click to expand...
The "decriminalization" was province wide and immediately started to get rolled back when smaller towns put legal challenges forward because they refused to let people use near schools or businesses, the only people that were pushing for this were inner city champagne socialists who have never interacted with a lower/middle class person before.
 
Betonhaus said:
I do have a question about the calendar. https://stayfreealberta.com/how-to-sign-the-petition
The calendar says signing is at 7, but implies there's a time range. So does signing start at 7, end at 7, or do you need to be in line at 7?
Click to expand...
That’s the start time for signing, you probably want to be a bit early if there’s a lineup but they will process everyone.

The ones I’m involved with have start and end times, I like that better.
 
Flan Handler said:
That’s the start time for signing, you probably want to be a bit early if there’s a lineup but they will process everyone.

The ones I’m involved with have start and end times, I like that better.
Click to expand...
I'm just looking forward to the day we go from taxation without representation to representation with little taxation.
 
Sweeter and Savoury said:
Yah...why don't liberals understand people?
Click to expand...
A lot of liberal-minded people often have this idea that all people are intrinsically "good," in the same way that conservative-minded people usually have this idea that people are "bad." Whereas the liberals seem to define people morally, conservatives tend to do so ethically.

A liberal doesn't understand that some people are just born rotten. Their ideology posits that every person is born innately "good" and moral. They think that if criminals, or psychopaths, or degenerates are given a chance, then they'll simply "return" to this supposedly inborn state of being. You'll see this a lot with drug or alcohol rehabilitation programs - this idea that the person himself isn't to blame for any of his follies, rather it's his circumstances that are to blame for his behaviour.

"Of course he's addicted to drugs! His father was so abusive!" or "She likes being a prostitute! It funds her heroin addiction." or "He had to rob that convenience store, he comes from a low economic background!" Whatever the crime, there is always an explanation that shields the perpetrator from blame.

Liberals have a hard time believing that some people are just rotten. There are serial killers, serial rapists, career criminals, sexual degenerates, et al., in this world. They are ethically despicable. They are moral cesspits. They enjoy and savor each horrible act that they commit. They are enthralled by anti-social behaviour and willingly partake in it because they crave it. Most of the people addicted to drugs, most of the repeat offenders, most of the homeless fall into this category of person. Most drug-addled criminal hobos enjoy the state of their lives.

A lot of liberals are also very smug people. I think that deep down, they know that their social programs are ineffective, at best, and harmful, at worst. I think they find it thrilling to help the poor and the down-trodden not because it's the right thing to do, but because it confirms their internal preexisting belief that they themselves are good people.

I think conservative-minded people are people that haven't been so insulated from suffering. They're cognizant of the fact that not everyone is a good person, not everyone can be helped. This can swing to the other extreme though, where conservatives can embrace paranoia or conspiracy. Sometimes conservatives have a rough time realizing that not everyone is a bad guy, some people really are just down on their luck, or got prescribed too many pain medications, or whatever else have you.

It's difficult to have political discussions because so often people are subsumed by the worst qualities of whatever belief that they follow. In many countries, and Canada especially, people are very closed-minded. This is even worse in the internet age, when so few people are capable of empathizing with others because of their addiction to screens (i.e., disinformation, propaganda, sexual degeneracy, etc.).
 
Brutality said:

Elbows up :smug: Carney threw dougie as a sacrifice to China lmao
Click to expand...
Canada decided to destroy its auto industry to spite Trump:
quaawaa

Thread '🇨🇦 Canada agrees to cut tariff on Chinese EVs in return for lower tariffs on Canadian farm products'

By KEN MORITSUGU
Updated 10:54 AM UTC, January 16, 2026

BEIJING (AP) — Breaking with the United States, Canada has agreed to cut its 100% tariff on Chinese electric cars in return for lower tariffs on Canadian farm products, Prime Minister Mark Carney said Friday.

Carney made the announcement after two days of meetings with Chinese leaders. He said there would be an initial annual cap of 49,000 vehicles on Chinese EV exports to Canada, growing to about 70,000 over five years. China will reduce its total tariff on canola seeds, a major Canadian export, from 84% to about 15%, he told...
Reactions:Lunacy x 7 Lol x 3 Informative x 1
 
Sweeter and Savoury said:
Well it only too the NDP in BC three years to realize that decriminalizing hard drugs was a bad idea.

The morons lefty's in BC ran a program in Hongcouver for 3 years where anyone caught with hard drugs wasn't charged in the hope to "provide a chance at rehabilitation".

surprise, surprise it didn't work. People detained on these charges did in fact not turn over a new leaf but rather became even heavier users knowing that they wouldn't face a legal issues.

Yah...why don't liberals understand people? Are they just that retarded or are they just that entrenched in their little do gooder bubbles?

https://vancouversun.com/news/bc-of...nalization-pilot-project-over-public-drug-use
Click to expand...
Yeah, never believe the word of anyone who's on the board of Directors for the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users. Or someone in an ivory academia tower at Simon Fraser University. This shit didn't work in Oregon or Seattle, why the fuck would it work HERE? Oregon stopped BECAUSE it CLEARLY didn't work. It's the same mentality as No True Scotsman Communism idiots. "All the other Communisms didn't work therefore it clearly wasn't True Communisms, so let's try it AGAIN! THIS time we'll get it right, I SWEAR!" 🙄🤡
Brutality said:
The "decriminalization" was province wide and immediately started to get rolled back when smaller towns put legal challenges forward because they refused to let people use near schools or businesses, the only people that were pushing for this were inner city champagne socialists who have never interacted with a lower/middle class person before.
Click to expand...
Plus a lot of the time, they're drug users themselves; they just happen to be functioning. So of course they're biased.

kawaiikat420 said:
"Of course he's addicted to drugs! His father was so abusive!" or "She likes being a prostitute! It funds her heroin addiction." or "He had to rob that convenience store, he comes from a low economic background!" Whatever the crime, there is always an explanation that shields the perpetrator from blame.
Click to expand...
Shielding the actual cause of a problem from blame is a very narcissistic/Cluster B Clusterfuck tactic. Many people on drugs have had their brains so fried that it mimics a personality disorder, if they did not already have one to begin with that factored into their propensity for substance abuse.

kawaiikat420 said:
A lot of liberals are also very smug people. I think that deep down, they know that their social programs are ineffective, at best, and harmful, at worst. I think they find it thrilling to help the poor and the down-trodden not because it's the right thing to do, but because it confirms their internal preexisting belief that they themselves are good people.
Click to expand...
A LOT of Liberals are Cluster B Clusterfucks. I know, there's Cluster B Clusterfucks on the right, too. But the Liberal ones can act downright sociopathic when confronted with the idea that their programs are harming ordinary people. That one Conservative MP that called out the Libs for trying to poach him for a floor-crossing explicitly stated he saw how the Libs laughed or acted like smug assholes when in Question Period a Conservative raised concerns about ordinary people not being able to afford groceries. This problem was made exponentially worse when Justin Trudeau took over leadership of the Liberal Party in 2013 whereby he changed the nomination qualifications to ensure that only sociopaths were ever able to be nominated. That's reflected on the current bench of Liberals that were elected since 2015 and beyond. They wear their hearts on their sleeves performatively but that's it.
 
1768614828779.png
Ok but how many of those people who voted "yes" would actually fight against Amerikkka if they did invade lmao.
 
King Metalia said:
Wouldn't an immigrant back to their country of origin be the worst punishment they could receive?
Click to expand...
If chinks would wipe out jeets and sandniggers like in china, I will welcome them with open arms.
The Cum Beast said:
View attachment 8433639
Ok but how many of those people who voted "yes" would actually fight against Amerikkka if they did invade lmao.
Click to expand...
99% of boomers said yes.

I wonder who will give in first.

Their fucking hips or American appetite to deal with Canadian smugness.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom