Canada is a failed state

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
R9K Insurgent said:
https://www.nationalmagazine.ca/en-...wn-mandatory-minimum-sentences-for-child-porn

Writing for the majority, Justice Mary Moreau said that when mandatory minimums apply to a broad range of situations, they can impose a grossly disproportionate sentence on certain offenders.

“The offences with which they are associated cover a very wide range of circumstances,” she wrote.

“They capture both the well-organized offender who, over the years, has accumulated thousands of files showing prepubescent victims, and the young 18-year-old offender who, one day, keeps and views a file showing a 17-year-old victim that was sent to the offender without them having requested it.”

I know someone who almost got fucked with a 5 year mandatory minimum sentence for firing off a warning shot at a nigger faggots feet that was trespassing on his property, but because the libshits removed mandatory minimums for a lot of shit, he didn't get that. I can see the logic, but where there's more logic is oh gee, idk, having a legal system where the crown isn't fucking retarded and obviously wouldn't press charges against the 18 year old for having an unrequested picture of a naked 17 year old on their phone. Of course that's unrealistically optimistic, it's all so tiresome.
Click to expand...

Yep, just watch as the pedos who are a certain skin color and political leanings get the bare minimum.
 
R9K Insurgent said:
I know someone who almost got fucked with a 5 year mandatory minimum sentence for firing off a warning shot at a nigger faggots feet that was trespassing on his property, but because the libshits removed mandatory minimums for a lot of shit, he didn't get that. I can see the logic, but where there's more logic is oh gee, idk, having a legal system where the crown isn't fucking retarded and obviously wouldn't press charges against the 18 year old for having an unrequested picture of a naked 17 year old on their phone. Of course that's unrealistically optimistic, it's all so tiresome.
Click to expand...
They needed the justification to get rid of it. At the end of the day they don't care as along as the minimum is removed.
 
Long Dong Silver 2025 said:
Yep, just watch as the pedos who are a certain skin color and political leanings get the bare minimum.
Click to expand...
OutInTheRain said:
They needed the justification to get rid of it. At the end of the day they don't care as along as the minimum is removed.
Click to expand...
Always a sad day to be reminded that I breathe the same air as the morally bankrupt shitheads who prosecute the living hell out of someone defending themselves on their property, while slapping the wrists of legitimate child abusers.
 
Writing for the majority, Justice Mary Moreau said that when mandatory minimums apply to a broad range of situations, they can impose a grossly disproportionate sentence on certain offenders.

“The offences with which they are associated cover a very wide range of circumstances,” she wrote.

“They capture both the well-organized offender who, over the years, has accumulated thousands of files showing prepubescent victims, and the young 18-year-old offender who, one day, keeps and views a file showing a 17-year-old victim that was sent to the offender without them having requested it.”
Click to expand...
I’m no legal scholar or expert. But what’s stopping them from simply not pursuing charges against the 18 year old in this particular situation? Why not still hand out mandatory sentences for real pedophiles and use proper fucking judgement and logic for these Romeo and Juliet cases?
 
Maker's Mark said:
I’m no legal scholar or expert. But what’s stopping them from simply not pursuing charges against the 18 year old in this particular situation? Why not still hand out mandatory sentences for real pedophiles and use proper fucking judgement and logic for these Romeo and Juliet cases?
Click to expand...
Well this is the thing, that's how it should be. It's the RCMP's job to recommend charges to the crown, the crown can accept them and prosecute (or drop the charges) But both the RCMP and the crown prosecutors in this country have proven time and time again that they are retarded and compromised, and I wouldn't be surprised if sometimes the crown just prosecutes cases in order to justify their jobs.
I might even be persuaded to give the crown a bit of slack and lay more blame on the RCMP since they love to overcharge people with crimes and let the courts deal with it.
 
1762044623834.png
The chugs want to make residential school denialism a form of "inciting hate".
God they want their own holohoax so bad lmfao.
 
harbringer883 said:
View attachment 8111273
The chugs want to make residential school denialism a form of "inciting hate".
God they want their own holohoax so bad lmfao.
Click to expand...
Seeing how that whole thing was concocted from some earth vibrational machine to it's dead children to it was the church and the government to a hundred churches and likely a whole town being burned to the ground to Trudeau laying the teddy bear down and crying to him apologizing on the behalf of all Canadians for committing genocide to now Orange shirt propaganda day, it really makes one think how many historical events were so completely and emotionally spun out of control.

I think the moment for this bill to get through has passed. Had they tried during the initial period of the "discovery" when the fervor was at it's highest it could have gone through. A lot of this residential school "denialism" has come from some "professional", "respectable" journalists at Postmedia, not just from anons. It's pretty much public record the whole thing is bullshit, for anyone who actually wants to look into it instead of just supporting the current thing.
 
It will never not be funny to me that the jays have only one canadian player out of their entire team, yet the boomers will still root for them.

These people can vote btw
 
Brutality said:
It will never not be funny to me that the jays have only one canadian player out of their entire team, yet the boomers will still root for them.

These people can vote btw
Click to expand...
Canadian liberalism is a purely emotions based ideology, no logic or thought required.


Also, it both sad and funny that Canadian boomers are normally super racist UNLESS you bring politics, then they do a 180 and become super liberal and progressive. It's just their "white and colonial guilt" overshadows their racism. This is just double-think at it's finest.
 
Brutality said:
It will never not be funny to me that the jays have only one canadian player out of their entire team, yet the boomers will still root for them.

These people can vote btw
Click to expand...

Some TikTok whore was chastising young ace Trey Yesavage for following Charlie Kirk, JD Vance, and Donald Trump. These people are absolutely sick.
 
Brutality said:
It will never not be funny to me that the jays have only one canadian player out of their entire team, yet the boomers will still root for them.

These people can vote btw
Click to expand...
It's a fucking sports game who gives a shit if an American or Canadian team wins or not?
 
King Metalia said:
It's a fucking sports game who gives a shit if an American or Canadian team wins or not?
Click to expand...
But don’t you see, every form of Escapism has to have politics shoved into it.

Thank Fuck that Baseball fans are either autistic or drunk, it mostly curtails those conversations when the games on.
 
Leaf Wage Slave Jr said:
But don’t you see, every form of Escapism has to have politics shoved into it.

Thank Fuck that Baseball fans are either autistic or drunk, it mostly curtails those conversations when the games on.
Click to expand...
Please tell me the next form of escapism to have politics forced into it will be pornography.
That would actually be funny watching lefties fail at making porn PC.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom