Canada is a failed state

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Day of the Cope said:
The same government that debanked people for opposing tyranny are allowing pro-Palestine protesters to chant "death to Canada" while marching down the street.
View attachment 6501635
Source
Click to expand...
Yknow for once I agree with the pro Palestine people, we have proven incapable of governing ourselves. Cede our lands to the US so that some semblance of sanity comes back to these lands
 
Mortan Shekelstorm said:
Anyone else remember Air India Flight 182 ?
The single most deadly attack against Canadians.
Click to expand...
Was it really against Canadians. Since no sane White Canadian would decide to fly to India.
Brutality said:
Yknow for once I agree with the pro Palestine people, we have proven incapable of governing ourselves. Cede our lands to the US so that some semblance of sanity comes back to these lands
Click to expand...
The US would instead use Canada as a dumping ground for Haitians
 
wry wrangler said:
The Air India bombing was the single most deadly attack against """Canadians."""
Click to expand...
I just hate how softly it was handled because it was "Canadian Sikh terrorist group"
according to wiki and totally not just Babbar Khalsa.
Can't let people realize how deranged these jeets and sikhs we let in are and what they bring with them.
wiki also says it was them who did it on their page. despite claiming a Canadian Sikh group did it, not a cell of Babbar Khalsa in Canada. Fun with semantics
 
Almost 25% of the official number of Canadians now need to have a side hustle (Does Gig work even count as a Hustle since when you crunch the numbers it's not worth it to drive Uber)

I wonder how many of the 7 million are Pajeets and other forms of Shitskins? Probably all of them if not 90% minimum.

Probably going to be a Conservative narrative that White Canadians refuse to get a side hustle to further grow the economy (and are thus unproductive since we aren't driving for Uber) like Based Pajeet Small Business Entrepreneurs.

It's a telltale sign of a third world economy when everyone is a Entrepreneur running some kind of Hustle (nee Scam).

 
Betonhaus said:
So are we closer to a snap election or no? I don't have the spoons to watch the reality tv show that claims it is canadian political news in order to parse what scraps of factual information it contains.
Click to expand...
We have to wait and see.
The Bloc was supporting the Libs in as much as they could suck the LPC of all benefits it can before the LPC inevitably becomes an empty, dried out husk. They thought it could go on for another year, but as soon as the LPC turned around and refused to support the Bloc on a senior pension bill, the Bloc decided to play ball on trying to topple the government.

Then comes the bit about the brewing scandal about the LPC using the Green Tech company funds for their own desires. I guess that's why Trudeau is so eager to raise the carbon tax across Canada - to continue to pay for vacations to Tofino and Jamaica.

So Parliament is ground to a halt because the Conservatives are filibustering until the Libs hand over the documents which will expose government corruption to the highest degree. The Libs are burying their head in sand and pretending they can't hear anything, so now we're going on 9 days where absolutely nothing has been done in Parliament. No new legislation heard, no issues beyond the corruption documents brought up, and most importantly - no votes of non-confidence can happen, if I'm understanding the situation correctly.

EDIT:

upon closer inspection, it seems what happened was that the Conservatives speak, Andrew Scheer (for all those who remember him), raised a question of privilege, to which he initiated the debate on having the government hand over said documents.

"From the moment the motion is brought forward, all MPs are allowed 20 minutes to speak to it followed by 10 minutes of questions and comments (the only exception are the prime minister and leader of the Opposition, who have unlimited time) ... If the 119 Conservative MPs wanted to clog the House of Commons as long as possible, quick napkin math by Bloc Québécois House Leader Alain Therrien suggest they could theoretically do so until Christmas … of next year."

"Proroguing Parliament allows the government to suspend the House for a certain period, then hopefully “reset” the agenda with a new throne speech...Obviously, Trudeau asking the Governor General to dissolve Parliament and launch an election would also end the debate on privilege."
 
Last edited:
Lobster Cult High Priest said:
Almost 25% of the official number of Canadians now need to have a side hustle (Does Gig work even count as a Hustle since when you crunch the numbers it's not worth it to drive Uber)

I wonder how many of the 7 million are Pajeets and other forms of Shitskins? Probably all of them if not 90% minimum.

Probably going to be a Conservative narrative that White Canadians refuse to get a side hustle to further grow the economy (and are thus unproductive since we aren't driving for Uber) like Based Pajeet Small Business Entrepreneurs.

It's a telltale sign of a third world economy when everyone is a Entrepreneur running some kind of Hustle (nee Scam).

https://youtube.com/watch?v=o3HMfY9VL5g
Click to expand...
Yeah, when they mean "side hustle" they mean being a gigger, since it enriches the kikes that own those companies, that money also gets taxed which allows the gov't to misuse it and it serves as an excuse for turd world infinimmigration. Because when I think "side hustle" I don't think schemes, scams and giggers. I'll be the first to admit that I'm a Balkanigger and that I don't live in Canada but it's only invitable until the Poojeet floodgates open here since it already happened in Croatia. A "side hustle" where I'm from means cutting firewood for some old grandpa in the village, or fixing TVs, or tutoring schoolkids in subjects they suck at. Any nuWestern government sees those as problematic because money changes hands without some kike middleman being involved and the state getting its cut. That's why they'd rather have 300k Poojeets disrespecting the laws of the road while delivering slop with their stinky hands through UberJeets.
 
BeetleBug242 said:
Simple Goy.mp4
Yeah, go vote!

And I'm the crazy one.
Click to expand...
seeing this made my consciousness flash red because even though Pierre on his worst day will be a better manager than Justin on his best, this virtue signaling is absolute cancer and if this is a preview of the next however long then emigration is the play
 
Yttrium said:
"Proroguing Parliament allows the government to suspend the House for a certain period, then hopefully “reset” the agenda with a new throne speech...Obviously, Trudeau asking the Governor General to dissolve Parliament and launch an election would also end the debate on privilege."
Click to expand...
What I find most humorous about Trudeau proroguing Parliament is that it would hurt him more than it would the opposition. Sure, it would kill the parliamentary investigations, but it will also kill legislation like Bills C-63 and C-293 on the floor so they would have to start over. What's more is that it makes the Liberals look more corrupt and presumption of innocence means jack shit in the court of public opinion. Was it scummy of Harper to prorogue Parliament to get himself out of hot water? Sure, but the Harper government scandals amounted to a $16 glass of orange juice and the overblown Duffy scandal. Trudeau government scandals involve hundreds of millions (possibly billions) given to Liberal insiders so we're working on a completely different scale.

They can tout dental and pharmacare to their heart's content, but the fact still remains: they took a sledgehammer to the economy during Covid-19 and this is their feeble attempt to "fix" it. That and flood the country with pungent Punjabis to stretch housing and job markets to their breaking point. No one with functioning cognitive abilities believes that they are better off now than they were in 2019.

Word has it that the LPC is rushing the Pharmacare bill to the Governor-General for royal assent so Trudeau can prorogue Parliament until the new year. I honestly urge him to do so because his chief bootlicker, Jagmeet Singh, won't have any reason to keep him in power after he gets his pension and bails with his golden parachute. Even if he calls an election or the governments when Parliament sits once more, the LPC is cooked because they had no intention of changing their agenda or adapting to the changing political climate.

EDIT: I was mistaken. The government could force the bills back on the docket according to MP Michelle Rempel Garner. However, this is still the "nuclear option" so the Liberals could potentially hurt themselves in using it. Susan Delacourt of the Toronto Star recently wrote an article advocating prorogation to test the waters. It is utterly hilarious that she believes that it would temper down cynicism in Canadian politics. Trudeau's reasons for doing if would be solely out of self-interest.

 
Last edited:
Jetpack Himmler said:
Sure, but the Harper government scandals amounted to a $16 glass of orange juice and the overblown Duffy scandal. Trudeau government scandals involve hundreds of millions (possibly billions) given to Liberal insiders so we're working on a completely different scale.
Click to expand...
The best part of the $16 orange juice, is that was the max the treasury board would compensate for breakfast when government employees travel. You had to produce a receipt to get it. So of course if you are staying in an expensive hotel for work travel, the food is going to be expensive. After that the receipt requirement went away and they would just give you the max meal rate.

As for Duffy, it was a loophole in the rules that allowed him to do it. One that most Senators and Parliamentarians were probably making use of. I don't blame him for not wanting to be a part of the PEI healthcare system. I mean look at him, I'm shocked he still has both feet.
 
I moved back to the area of the city I grew up in about a year ago and it is all Indians there now. All the businesses such as the restaurants, grocery stores, etc. are all owned or operated by Indians. There's this one strip mall where there is three Indian Restaurants all right next to each other. How the fuck they are able to stay open with so much competition I'll never know, but if I had to guess then I'd say they are all working together. The grocery store I used to go that was there since I was a kid recently had to close down a couple months ago due to thieves and too much competition. I bet my bottom dollar that it'll be bought up by brown people and turned into an international grocery store with all the ingredients for the slop they eat.
 
I asked my landlord to stop feeding the homeless on the front porch because of an increase in thefts and harassment. I told a couple neighbors about the homeless hanging out on the front porch and the landlord had a lawyer send me a cease and desist letter telling me to stop talking about how she feeds the homeless on the front porch and that she certainly never invited them except for when she invited them to use the water hook up freely. She then claims I caused her harm by talking about how she feeds the homeless on the front porch because now the neighbors don't like her. She's sent me so many incriminating messages she has no grounds for proper eviction through the actual courts so I think she also missed the part where she cannot coerce or harass a tenant either.

People wonder why the rental laws are so strict and it's because of the massive ridiculous entitlement either party can have. This is so ridiculous to me that it sounds like a rage bait post on Facebook because what kind of fucking property owner does this? This is how brain broken liberal Canadians have become they are literally ready to give away their property to the homeless to prove some point.
 
Totallyunknown said:
This is how brain broken liberal Canadians have become they are literally ready to give away their property to the homeless to prove some point.
Click to expand...
The short answer is that Liberal Canadians are stuck in an outdated and highly ideological way of thinking. One of their central tenets is that people are A) inherently good, and B) blank slates for them to write on. As such, many believe if they show compassion to someone, that person will reciprocate or pay it forward when humans are still animals driven by primal instincts like hunger. The homeless in case recognize your land lady as a preferable source for food than diving in a dumpster. They may not be actively looking to harass tenants, but are definitely being as opportunistic as any other animal foraging for food.

On that note, displays of charity can definitely be interpreted as displays of social status via virtue signaling. Think like a peacock that fans out its train to impress a potential mate despite its coloration and loud mating calls making it a tempting target for predators. Pointing out the negative impacts of their behavior typically elicits a defensive response because "much good intentions". They often forget what paves the road to Hell.
 
They are, in fact, actively looking to harass residents and have broken into cars, stolen packages, stolen bikes and more as their nearby encampment grows. The landlord seems to support this because she believes we all deserve to suffer if the homeless are suffering. However, she somehow managed to evade the suffering the homeless creates for others by just handing it to them point blank.

The neighbors really fucking hate her - they are actual home owners. She just picked the weakest link to bully because her neighbors hate her and she wanted to send a message to them. I've never seen someone so proud to have so much volitility around them.
 
Why Canadians can't afford a house anymore:
1728737386146.png
Floor plans:
A2172142_2.jpg A2172142_3.jpg
A2172142_1.jpgA2172142_4.jpgA2172142_5.jpgA2172142_6.jpg
Source (Archive)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom