UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Similarly, I've noticed that the BBC has tons of Scottish presenters / announcers, despite them being 8% of the UK population. It just goes to show that endlessly whinging really does work in getting your own way.
That’s more because Scottish accents are seen as trustworthy.
 
I dunno about FB, but Jack Dorsey has said that porn is allowed in the platform.
If Jack Dorsey's IQ were the room temperature you'd freeze to death. I don't trust him to have any idea what he's talking about especially when it comes to his own platform.
 
India had the whole caste system problem (I don't know if the different castes are racially divided or not)
There's been some genetic research that suggests that initially they may have been largely race based but it was a very long time ago. Either that or they've somehow actually selectively bred themselves to the extent it show up in testing.
 
There's been some genetic research that suggests that initially they may have been largely race based but it was a very long time ago. Either that or they've somehow actually selectively bred themselves to the extent it show up in testing.
If you've got a culture that vehemently insists only like breed with like, how few generations does it take to have proof that there's racial basis to the bigotry?
 
Just in time for a new Prime Minister in a horribly unpopular party to score some Brownie points from the public...
 
I think it's because MindGeek, who owns Pornhub, Brazzers, Digital Playground, Redtube, Twistys, YouPorn, Reality Kings, Elegant Angel, and so forth, also just happens to have developed the AgeID age verification technology. In fact, I heard somewhere it was someone at MindGeek who pitched AgeID to the Government as a way of implementing the porn loicense provisions in the DEA in the first place.
This is unrelated, but what exactly is the purpose of running 3-4 different porn sites that are more or less functionally identical? Is it just a case of a company expanding and buying out its competitors without renaming them, or are they somehow driving more traffic overall by having 3-4 different sites giving the illusion of choice?
 
This is unrelated, but what exactly is the purpose of running 3-4 different porn sites that are more or less functionally identical? Is it just a case of a company expanding and buying out its competitors without renaming them, or are they somehow driving more traffic overall by having 3-4 different sites giving the illusion of choice?
Probably both. Mindgeek owns most of the sites we know. Pornhub, Brazzers, Reality Kings, Digital Playground, Twistys etc. It's basically a monopoly on the mainstream porn sites. All are under them. IIRC, all of those sites have different memberships, so if you want different content (scene direction, kink, actresses), you gotta pay for each one. More membership = more money.

Edit: IIRC some of those sites (DP and Wicked especially, I think) have popular actresses on exclusivity contracts, where they only do scenes for that site, even though they all fall under ownership of Mindgeek. You want to see that actress' latest scenes, you have to sign up membership to that specific site.
 
Probably both. Mindgeek owns most of the sites we know. Pornhub, Brazzers, Reality Kings, Digital Playground, Twistys etc. It's basically a monopoly on the mainstream porn sites. All are under them. IIRC, all of those sites have different memberships, so if you want different content (scene direction, kink, actresses), you gotta pay for each one. More membership = more money.
I guess they must really be relying on whale logic here, considering that their main service revolves around distributing free porn to the masses. I guess it just baffles me that there are people who don’t just pay for porn, but in fact subscribe to multiple sites when there’s a literal fuckload of free porn floating around.
 
I guess they must really be relying on whale logic here, considering that their main service revolves around distributing free porn to the masses. I guess it just baffles me that there are people who don’t just pay for porn, but in fact subscribe to multiple sites when there’s a literal fuckload of free porn floating around.
And why does anyone look at regular porn now that *insert your fetish here* sites exist?
 
It's all overly PC 'inclusion' to have your gays, blacks, pakis, trannies, disabled people in every show. Meeting the diversity quota has replaced hiring general talent.

The latest BBC drama 'Years And Years' is the best example of this, it's a legit good concept (following 15 years in the lives of 'a typical British family') and some of the things it introduces is actually really fucking fascinating (one of the teenage daughters comes out as trans. Trans-HUMAN that is! The full face Snapchat emoji faces are creepily cool too) and is of course going to be a character drama.

The main characters are a girl with Spina Bifada who has a kid from a Chinky guy in the very beginning and raises him as a single mum, a gay guy, a straight guy who is married to a stroppy nigress and a leftie bitch activist.

But they're not BBC characters! Most of these people live in Manchester rather than London!

Fuck off are these your typical Mancunian family members. They don't even have the accent.
 
If you've got a culture that vehemently insists only like breed with like, how few generations does it take to have proof that there's racial basis to the bigotry?
They might insist on it in theory, but in practice I doubt the separation has ever been that airtight.
Even going back as far as the Laws of Manu (see especially Chapter X in here) they go into great detail about the various "hybrids" resulting from different castes, inheritance laws for men with wives of multiple different castes, and criminal punishments for various types of forbidden intercourse between castes. Some of it seems fanciful, but this was obviously on people's minds enough that someone saw fit to put these laws into the mouth of a sage.
 
I googled that and learned it is entirely fake.


Debunked, it wasn't true says The Guardian.







Guardian 5 years later:


:thinking:
That last part didn't actually happen by the way, they didn't stop anything, just faked it thinking it'll keep the parents away, but they've been protesting for the last 2 months and only just now lost to the gays/trannies because of a court injunction.
 
The great mayor of London, Sadiq Khan was out today saying how he opposed Trump's state visit. The face of London despises Western values. Cleese is right on this.

Saying being anti-Trump is "despising Western values" is a bit much, don't you think? I get that since he's a Muslim everything he says has to be put under a microscope, and I'm sure he has TDS, but isn't the ability to slag off a world leader kind of a key Western value?

And hasn't London always been kind of a crime-ridden shithole? The types of crimes and the areas may have changed, but some people seem to act like it was a glorious paradise before all the brown people moved in and ruined everything.
 
Saying being anti-Trump is "despising Western values" is a bit much, don't you think? I get that since he's a Muslim everything he says has to be put under a microscope, and I'm sure he has TDS, but isn't the ability to slag off a world leader kind of a key Western value?

And hasn't London always been kind of a crime-ridden shithole? The types of crimes and the areas may have changed, but some people seem to act like it was a glorious paradise before all the brown people moved in and ruined everything.
No different than New York or any other major international city. Crime, especially murder/homicides, was decreasing slowly for years, then suddenly has bumped back up since he got in. He's slashed stop and search, only to then u-turn on it when this backfired and was put under pressure. Knife, burglary and robbery have gone up by more than half in his three years. The crackdown on knifes have not only failed, but lead to gangs switching to acid carried in waterbottles. The guy seems more concerned with signalling his love for the EU and his disdain for Trump than cracking down on crime.

Yanks may also know him as the human rights lawyer who represented Louis Farrakhan in his appeal to enter the UK back in the early 2000s. So someone like Farrakhan, who is on record saying that "Hitler was a great man", is the leader of the NOI, and made all other sorts of "racist comments", is someone who Sadiq represented and to this day, finds it fine that he does so, whilst wanting to bar the leader of a country and the UK's most vital ally post Brexit. I didn't see him kicking up a fuss when the Emir of Qatar in spite of its heavy restrictions and support for terrorist groups.

Is he anti-western? It's arguable/disputable. Is he a complete cunt? Definitely.
 
This is unrelated, but what exactly is the purpose of running 3-4 different porn sites that are more or less functionally identical? Is it just a case of a company expanding and buying out its competitors without renaming them, or are they somehow driving more traffic overall by having 3-4 different sites giving the illusion of choice?

It's a saturation business. In a way it's like bitcoin mining and throwing more and more money on retaining or getting a bigger piece of the pie.

I guess they must really be relying on whale logic here, considering that their main service revolves around distributing free porn to the masses. I guess it just baffles me that there are people who don’t just pay for porn, but in fact subscribe to multiple sites when there’s a literal fuckload of free porn floating around.

Owning the free stream sites enables them to take down the porn they are selling while letting people upload shit from their competitors.
_goodthinking.png
 
So is it right to compare this?
Sexual degeneracy parades in Europe with sexually explicit behavior in public. - Fine
Wanna watch some pron in the privacy of your own home. - Need a gubment permission slip.
...
So what if you fap at the parade? There's enough degeneracy going on that one more act isn't going to ruin things.
 
Back
Top Bottom