UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

  • 🔧 Issue with uploading attachments resolved.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Greenland seems like a loud powerplay tbh, Trump wants to buy it and Denmark said "No" so he's turning the screws so Denmark capitulates and goes "ok fine, it'll cost X"

Trump absolutely is not going to go to war with NATO, if anything it seems he's aware that barring the UK, France and Poland, Europe has a major defence problem so if they're not going to up their military spending then he'll make an indirect threat to force them.

But ultimately nothing will happen as European militaries are complete paper tigers and no country seems to want to up their military spending or provide any form of defence when they know the UK, France and Poland would bail them out if they were attacked. If you really want to have a bad day, check military casualty reports from Afghanistan and notice how despite Europe getting involved, the absolute drop off in casualties after US and UK stats is harrowing. It's clear that the Germans and Italians did the square root of fuck all apart from hang out in their barracks, and these are some of the key players that would defend us from Russia???
Speaking of, Happy Page 1776!
 
Lindsey Hoyle, you absolute mad lad:

'Ah'll tell thee off in't Northern lingo!'

Starmer is basically Boris without the personality - 'I'm above you lot so shut your holes.'

Much as I couldn't stand the weasel Bercow, he did at least point out that the PM is not above Parliament and that there are certain ways and means within the system which even the leader has to obey.

Starmer is the sort of prat who'd think Erskine May was the Grandfather of Theresa May,

Anyway, mentioning 'wrong 'uns' Martin Clunes is set to play Huw Edwards in a new TV drama coming to Channel 5 soon:

 
Last edited:
Honestly if Trump decides to invade us and kidnap Starmer and the Cabinet I will welcome them with open arms. I will pay my federal and state taxes with no complaints. I will even pop kettle on and crack open the good biscuits.

Anything, fucking anything has to be better than this.
 
Starmer seems to be doing his best to piss off the zoomers again. Young people say new driving rules are condescending and expensive. They want to make learners wait six months between the theory and practical, because that's definitely not going to cause any knowledge retention problems.

Regarding the experiment:
The last couple of months, I've seen more muslims wandering between the shelves than any time in my life. Mostly men, in their stupid pyjama robe things. They must have started shipping them in to social housing somewhere nearby. I can run an experiment now, though. Last minute trip out of the country (wife's relatives have invited us up to parts unknown) means I'll get to compare the change after a two week gap. I wouldn't be surprised if it looks like little mogadishu when I get back.
Happy to report that things are not as bad as they could have been, but comparing here to where I stayed over christmas is night and day. Almost literally. You may or may not have guessed (because I made it pretty obvious) that these parts unknown were in Sweden (because I was hardly going to turn down free flights and two weeks of pork and vodka for christmas). They have their own immigration problems, of course. I know for a fact that there's an immigrant enclave near where I was staying, but it seems to have shrunk since the last time I was there. That aside, it was nice. Homogenous and familiar, though swedes are very obviously swedish in the face (they all look like potatoes that have been left to dry out in the sun). It was quiet, but the thing that really stuck out was just how empty Sweden is. Where I live is relatively small and out of the way, but it has always felt a bit crowded, especially with the new developments around and about over the years. The whole country always feels crowded. Returning from a place like that feels like I've dropped onto the set of Soylent Green. It makes the back end of the trossachs feel like it had standing room only.

So anyway, the disaster has not struck as badly as I feared, though there are still too many muslims wandering around Morrisons in their stupid clothes. I fully expect there'll be more of them in the next few months, all wearing fucking ugly puffer jackets and scarves over their arab paedophile worshipping gowns even when it's above zero. I hope they all freeze to death.
 
Honestly if Trump decides to invade us and kidnap Starmer and the Cabinet I will welcome them with open arms. I will pay my federal and state taxes with no complaints. I will even pop kettle on and crack open the good biscuits.

Anything, fucking anything has to be better than this.
I struggle to see how my life would be made worse by living under the DOG (Donald Occupied Government). I'm taxed out the arse, the government hate my race and sexuality, the government keep trying to drive my main hobby out of existence and now they're even trying to take the post-work pint off us.
 
I've had a thought, if Wales cutting the speed limit to 20mph caused fewer accidents why don't we just ban cars for civilian usage and hang degenerate carphiles along the sides of the motorway?

We'd get rid of practically all road accidents and it'd lead to a return to serfdom so Barry Northerner can't up and go to the city to compete with people like me.
 
I've had a thought, if Wales cutting the speed limit to 20mph caused fewer accidents why don't we just ban cars for civilian usage and hang degenerate carphiles along the sides of the motorway?

We'd get rid of practically all road accidents and it'd lead to a return to serfdom so Barry Northerner can't up and go to the city to compete with people like me.
This could actually work. Cars only exist in the cities in Wales anyway and people who live there can easily adapt to public transport. Everyone in the countryside can keep on using their horse and buggy.
 
I've had a thought, if Wales cutting the speed limit to 20mph caused fewer accidents why don't we just ban cars for civilian usage and hang degenerate carphiles along the sides of the motorway?

We'd get rid of practically all road accidents and it'd lead to a return to serfdom so Barry Northerner can't up and go to the city to compete with people like me.
The Senedd came up with its own 'figures' which said that 20mph speed limits work.

The areas which they surveyed had been 20mph for years before - around hospitals, schools etc.

Making parts of the A470 20mph instead of 30mph didn't work - in fact there's villages along Wales' main north-south artery which have vehicles passing at 50mph literally at their front garden.

Nothing is going to be done about them, strangely enough.
 
The US military is a sword. The British military is a pen.
If we're talking paper tigers, the US forces are the thickest, dumbest, strategically-inept group of people I've ever worked with. They follow rules to the letter of black and white to such a degree that would make autists laugh at the lack of nuance.

Their arms are built by Israel and US made platforms are usually complete dog shit, see the Osprey for example.

While we have moved away from making world-beating platforms and have moved towards joint programs with America, instead of Europe, the comfort is we know how to use the tools that we have, America, does not.

There's a reason why they've lost every war they fought solo and why they lean heavily on Uk/France to assist them in wars. They can shout and yeehaw all they want, in typical fat fuck fashion, yet when it comes down to it, they're a fucking crap military.

In a parrelel universe, where the US is Russia and Russia is working with Europe to defend Ukraine, the US would lose the ground war within 6 months and resort to throwing their toys out of the cot.
In this universe, there is an end point where america begins to wain in power and they sulk by throwing nukes.
For the peace and good of the world, America should be nuked.
 
The US military is a sword. The British military is a pen.
If we're talking paper tigers, the US forces are the thickest, dumbest, strategically-inept group of people I've ever worked with. They follow rules to the letter of black and white to such a degree that would make autists laugh at the lack of nuance.

Their arms are built by Israel and US made platforms are usually complete dog shit, see the Osprey for example.

While we have moved away from making world-beating platforms and have moved towards joint programs with America, instead of Europe, the comfort is we know how to use the tools that we have, America, does not.

There's a reason why they've lost every war they fought solo and why they lean heavily on Uk/France to assist them in wars. They can shout and yeehaw all they want, in typical fat fuck fashion, yet when it comes down to it, they're a fucking crap military.

In a parrelel universe, where the US is Russia and Russia is working with Europe to defend Ukraine, the US would lose the ground war within 6 months and resort to throwing their toys out of the cot.
In this universe, there is an end point where america begins to wain in power and they sulk by throwing nukes.
For the peace and good of the world, America should be nuked.
Agree with everything but the last bit, cos I’m a sappy bastard really and don’t want that for anyone. But the attitude of their political and economic elite is really frightening. It’s an empire on the decline and armed to the teeth (assuming some work). It’s not going to go quietly, and we’re all going to suffer as a result.

The ‘co-operate with Russia & China economically and in technology and the whole world wins’ option is right there, but no, stupid US wants to be the big Hollywood cowboy. You think it shouldn’t be happening today after all the lessons from past history, but here we are, with it streaming in glorious 4k.

Uk being the US’s military outpost and general blatting spot to prevent the yanks getting any grief seems to be Starmer’s great idea. The idiot.

They’re gonna get us all killed. Can’t we just live in peace to enjoy the sausage rolls, man?
 
In a parrelel universe, where the US is Russia and Russia is working with Europe to defend Ukraine, the US would lose the ground war within 6 months and resort to throwing their toys out of the cot.
In this universe, there is an end point where america begins to wain in power and they sulk by throwing nukes.
For the peace and good of the world, America should be nuked.
US and Russian military doctrines are different for geopolitical reasons. Russia's military leans more towards defensive and near neighbour capability as befits a nation with very limited sea access, extensive land neighbours and which historically has been attacked more on its borders than elsewhere. The odd historical excursion to India or wherever aside, Russia mostly focuses on its immediate neighbourhood. It has long range missiles but those primarily serve as deterrence as Russia isn't really set up for long range military occupations. The USA on the other hand, is an unassailable island nation with extensive water access and whilst it has a couple of very long land borders they are to just a couple of nations neither able to stand up to it in the slightest. Consequently, its military approach focuses around force projection - carrier groups, a devastating airforce, hyper-trained elite strike forces. And a very mobile regular army for taking and holding places in conjunction with the former.

Russia's approach seems to work quite well but is obviously restricted in scope. They're very hard to beat in their neighbourhood and have sufficient deterrents that it would cost the West greatly to actually try to militarily assault Russia. Not least of which the real possibility of it going nuclear. But contrary to Barmy Starmy's claims, their ability to occupy Britain is nil. They could hit us with missiles but they wouldn't because there's nothing to gain from it and they'd get missiles right back. The USA approach works quite well also, but begins to peter out quickly against actual peer forces. They could hurt China, there's no way they could conquer China. Anymore than China could conquer the USA. They'd be like two guys on sofas throwing things at each other, neither able to get up and cross to the other's. The USA can't even exert their will against Afghanistan solely through military power. The military component was critical, but to actually control the country required suborning of local peoples, buying off local warlords to serve as proxies and, to be blunt, ignoring large parts of the country and sitting in Kabul.

Where does that leave Britain? Well, the USA protects Britain, but from what? Not Russia. Not European powers. The biggest threats to the UK are globalist corporations exporting jobs elsewhere and mass immigration. An Abrams never stopped either of those.

Starmer is serving his masters with this. There's no supportable case how it serves the British people. Building up our army might be good for other nationalistic reasons, but Starmer just wants bodies to throw into Ukraine in the hope that Russians will drone strike them and give more reason to escalate. Something Russia clearly doesn't want.

And unrelated:
There is at least one wildlife parklet that has a capybara according to my dim memories.
Capybaras are ace.
1767871717443.png
 
Last edited:
Welsh football legend and manager Terry Yorath has died.

Archive: http://archive.today/WOj5w

Former Leeds United and Wales midfielder Terry Yorath has died at the age of 75 following a short illness.

Yorath scored 11 goals in 199 appearances for Leeds, his first professional club, in a nine-year spell from 1967.

He won the First Division title with Leeds in 1974 and earned a runners-up medal in the FA Cup, European Cup and Cup Winners' Cup.

He played 59 times for Wales, 42 as captain, before leading them to the brink of the 1994 World Cup finals as manager, only to see his team beaten 2-1 by Romania in their final qualifier.

Yorath had spells as a player with Coventry City, Tottenham Hotspur, Vancouver Whitecaps and Bradford City, before finishing his playing career with a solitary appearance for Swansea City.

The father of BBC Sport presenter Gabby Logan, Yorath was a player-coach of Bradford on the day of the Valley Parade fire in 1985, which killed 56 fans and injured 270.

Sad to see. He was a good man, very deeply wounded by the Bradford fire that haunted him for the rest of his life. His son died at age 15 from a previously undiagnosed heart issue, while playing football in the back garden. If you’ve ever seen interviews with Terry Yorath on the later anniversaries of the Bradford fire, his horror at what he witnessed was so raw, even after 30+ years and more.

RIP to a great man.
 
Last edited:
The UK is considering taking further military action against Russia's shadow oil fleet without US support.
Farage has praised Kemi, saying she's 'had a tough couple of week's - Reform/Tory deal in the works?
Reform MP Lee Anderson has said he no longer pays the BBC licence fee because he does not want to fund the pensions of "perverts", hysterical.
All five Reform UK MPs will vote against deploying British troops on the ground in Ukraine under the current conditions - cue 'muh russian funded party' accusations.
MORE police corruption - rapist was hired by Met to boost diversity numbers. (Who was that white fella who was a right wrongun, stalked a woman a while ago? big case?) The Government has launched an "urgent independent inspection" into the Met Police recruitment and vetting standards

I'm sort of expecting the power to go out tonight with this storm so got some candles and charged my power banks. I hate how every fucking burglar alarm starts going off when it cuts though, hoping its only tonight and not tomorrow becoz nothing beats making a nice roast on a snow day. Stay warm!
 
It’s an empire on the decline
It's not an empire. It was the latest hang out and HQ of the banks and financiers who run the world.
Consequently, its military approach focuses around force projection - carrier groups, a devastating airforce, hyper-trained elite strike forces.
You got it right with force projection, they have nothing else but projection. An army's strength is 80% perception. Those hyper-trained elite strike forces pale in comparison to the RM and Royal Commandos. There are opinions and national pride on the internet, but trust me bro, I've seen first hand who has the world's respect and Mossad are the master of recon and British elites are the boys who get the shit done behind the lines. We're in and out before anyone knows what's going on.

For a quick insight into the pecking order, look no further than the kaffufle that occured in Kandahar where Brits - at yank gun point, told the yanks if they open fire they'll be dead before they knew it. The yanks give it the charlie large on the worlds stage and in the media, but on the ground, in the trenches, the Brits rule the show.
Not least of which the real possibility of it going nuclear.
Russia, Europe and China would never. US would, but I think they'd be universally wiped out before they could launch.
The British and USSR empires ended without a bang, nuclear or otherwise, because they know that some influence on the world stage is preferable to going the way of the Spanish and French empires.
They could hurt China, there's no way they could conquer China.
Agreed. The problem there is China would happily starve 70% of their population in a face off if it meant killing off an enemy.

Starmer is serving his masters with this. There's no supportable case how it serves the British people.
It started with Blair. He cosied up with Bush as part of the global MIC/WEF plan. Trump is leading the 'special relationship' at the moment, where Bush played lapdog to us. Swings and roundabouts.
Well, the USA protects Britain, but from what? Not Russia. Not European powers. The biggest threats to the UK are globalist corporations exporting jobs elsewhere and mass immigration. An Abrams never stopped either of those.
USA protects nothing but its' own interests, which you can't blame them for, everyone else does the same. The problem is, they're not good for our society. We only share a language with America. If they spoke mandarin, russian or tongue-clicking, we would have nothing to do with them.
They flooded us with consumerism, fast food, lgbt woke shite, BLM, internet addiction, basically everything that has brought our society down for the past 20 years is directly linked with American corporations. They have invaded using propaganda.
Unfortunately, our country has had a section of foreign-loving traitors going all the way back to the Normans, so they'll cheer on anything that ruins Britain.

America is not an ally, it is not a friend and their government and corporations should be wiped out.
There are a group of yanks that I have a great fondness for, who are of the same values and understanding as the brits, aussies, canadians and kiwis who are humble people who want to grill and build a society they're proud of. I would rescue them from the nuclear hellfire and chuckle while the rest were cleansed.
 
Back
Top Bottom