Can I be reminded of what Brexit has made better thus far? Which was pushed by Nigel. Understand that it's a push against the "establishment", but weren't most reformers part of the establishment at one point?
Because instead of Poles and slavs, we've got more pakis and pajeets, and I know which are more preferable.
The EU has been a club. Like all clubs, members get benefits, but also have to abide by the rules.
Some of rules of the EU are ones that the vast majority of British people like. A few of them are seen as not ones we’d choose to enforce on ourselves.
By exiting, we gain the ability to choose which we’ll keep, and which we’ll abandon.
One that is key is that we’ll gain the ability to negotiate unilateral trade agreements. Of course, there are downsides which are (in my view) much bigger, like losing the current free trade agreement with the rest of the EU. And it’s much quicker to lose that than negotiate new ones with other countries.
We also become a full sovereign nation (in theory, anyway) and no longer have to abide by the EU's draconianism.
Brexit allows Britain to build reinvigorating ties with the realms of Asia, which are going to play a leading role in the world in the coming decades; the coming dominance is going to reshape world politics because for the first time since the 1700s, the leading region of the world isn’t going to be from what is touted as the West. Asia culturally, economically, politically, and from a mercantile perspective is a very different entity than the West, and this gives Britain more leeway to plan for her future. On the whole, the UK is respected by the Asian markets and despite the 'disagreements' with China, Xi still sees the UK as more of an ally than an enemy (though we caught in the USA/Russia crossfires at times).
The second benefit is that Britain keeps out of the series of domestic conflicts that will emerge as the EU tries to evolve into an empire; a series of referendums held since 1990s have continued to indicate that a sizable figure of people do not wish for a political union of the EU. It happened when the French said non to the Maastricht treaty. It happened in 2005 again in France when the people categorically denied giving legitimacy to an EU Constitution (which was then repackaged and sold as the Treaty of Lisbon). The Republic of Ireland were made to vote twice for it, and the EU bunged RTE 8.5 million Euros to push their propaganda.
The EU is the antithesis of the USA - whereas the USA is open for business, new ideas and new ventures, the EU is not and remains stuffy and pompous towards change. You can form a company within four days in the USA, in the EU this takes 45 days and most applications get turned down because unless they can benefit you aren't allowed to either.
As for 'weren't they all once part of the establishment' - well, once upon a time, most of us were as we believed in church and state (or at least the belief that both were more beneficial than harmful). Now, the paradigm shift has changed - both have lost their standing and people have woken up to the corruption and folly in both. Since 2019, the world has changed dramatically and people will not accept being lied to and pushed about anymore and this has been seen in the UK by an outright rejection of the 'big two'. The message is 'don't you dare tell us no anymore, we will not accept!'
Yes, we are getting more Pakistanis and Indians, but let's not kid ourselves that all the Slavs are good - Romanians and Albanians in the UK can be as violent as any street-shitting Pajeet or Cardiff Choirboy, in fact they make up most of the assault and robbery statistics in London as well as a lot of the gang-on-gang warfare in major UK cities. You will get a mixture of good and bad, everywhere you go.
The main benefit of Brexit to me is showing arrogant, self-righteous, pompous and Working Class hating majority White Libtards that we can defeat them en masse and make them cry. They believed that they were untouchable and unbeatable - they found out they're not and nearly ten years on from Brexit the alignment has changed and they are now 'old hat'. Their time at the top is over and it's time for them to leave the stage.
Looking ahead, the results from the votes yesterday are now going to change everything - Starmer surely cannot stay in power for much longer, and Ellie Reeves talking out of her shitter on BBC Breakfast News about 'oh well, incumbent parties never do well with by-elections' has not helped the cause and also she got it badly wrong - just look at the by-elections since 1997, the incumbent party tends to do well (as an example, this is a list of by-election results from Tony Blair's first four years as PM, 1997-2001:
https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/commons-information-office/m16.pdf).
What will happen before the July recess? Well, this month sees two recesses (one for May Bank Holiday and the other for Whitsun) and Labour will try to focus attention on its new White Paper for stopping Rapey and Stabby from coming across the channel, but with the mood of the nation now vehemently anti-Labour and fearing for their survival could we see either a leadership challenge from Rayner, Reeves, Streeting or even Burnham (the latter would have to leave his position as Mayor of Manchester and fight for a future vacant seat). There is also rumour that the anti Supreme Court pro-Trans Labour MP's could quit in order to show 'solidarity' with the Trans community, and there is pressure on them to do so - 'put up or shut up' as pro-Trans people have shouted out in recent weeks.
However, the biggest surprise/shock of all could see a snap General Election called roughly a year after the last one, if Starmer is unable to a) push through the party's manifesto plans/pledges without being scuppered by his own side and b) to fight off a rebellion and mass resignations. I would personally not rule this out as between the years 1922 and 1924 the UK had three elections (one a year) between Bonar Law, Asquith, Clynes and Lloyd George (1922), Baldwin, MacDonald and Asquith (1923, Baldwin seeking a mandate from the people to govern) and the same three gentlemen in 1924 (the Zionev letter being pivotal to this year's General Election) and the current shortest gap between General Elections is the nine month gap between the February 1974 General Election (resulting in a Hung Parliament when Heath's gamble backfired) and November 1974 with Harold Wilson winning a clear majority. Incidentally the second shortest gap between General Elections is 10 months (between the 1923 and 1924 General Elections) therefore, don't believe anybody who tells you that Labour have to and will serve five years - the Conservatives had three General Elections in four years (2015, 2017 and 2019) therefore anything is possible.
Reform UK are on the up, as are the Lib Dems and Greens, the times are changing and I believe that soon we are about to witness something very special in UK politics. It's no longer a question of 'if' but 'when'.
Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.
