UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

SirCliveSinclairdabbing · Sunday at 12:51 PM

Hint, joined Wednesday, antagonising, presenting ludicrous edge cases bordering on handmaidens fantasies.

Tom Nook's Gloryhole · Sunday at 1:10 PM

Chunky Salsa said:
I think if your husband abuses you, you should kill him or get someone else to

Just curious, if your wife abuses you do you have the right to kill her?

Because I will forever be against the murder of a partner as there's a clear option that sits in between killing them or being killed and that's running away. Murder is a permanent solution to an avoidable problem and it creates a scenario where the alleged abuser cannot argue their case as they are fucking dead. Anyone who kills their partner should serve a full life sentence as they've already weighed up in their heads that killing their partner is preferable to them being alive. You don't get to kill your partner and ALSO walk free.

It's one of the key reasons why I don't actually blame the police one bit when it comes to domestic disturbances: they require years of fucking context, can feature elements of out of context moments (like joking about killing your partner when things are going rosy, which is now considered a valid threat to life now things are on the verge of breakdown) and ultimately it's a he said, she said scenario. Kind of how rape is virtually impossible to prosecute against unless the rapist is a zero IQ retard who denies any sexual activity (when there's DNA present) or did it in front of witnesses.

Is it really any surprise that the police rock up, see that the CPS would never touch it with a bargepole and give a condescending "There, there". The fact that the police are there in the first place is indication that the abused person believes that living in the same house with all their belongings is better than going straight to the council for emergency housing. The police know that even if they have a bang to rights abuse case, the victim can turn around and admit consent and derail the case (just look at the Mason Greenwood case).

The ultimate issue here is that there are no solutions, and while it is fucking horrible to witness things play out knowing you cannot do anything there's realistically nothing that can be done to fix it. You can't change how trials work to boost abuse/rape convictions without breaking how UK law even works. You can't create a magic lie detector that can determine which person is the abusive one. Domestic cases do my nut in because there will always be people whining about how the police/council/public services won't help and it'll always gain an incredible amount of traction because you can't just say "It doesn't work like that" without people getting even madder.

DreinMeinVein · Sunday at 1:20 PM

Otterly said:
5. Etc etc
The OSA is about control of the internet, stifling dissent, and removing anonymity

@emptypacketofmethadone

I agree with the online safety act's stated aims. I think that leaving your kids with smartphones is akin to handing them 20 Bensons and a bottle of whisky. It'll take several years of cultural shift, at minimum, for teens to stop expecting to own one. Smartphones can be a blight on anybody, but aspects of social media are extremely damaging to children.

Many socmed sites have a minimum sign-up age of 13, yet freely allow 18+ content. They should all be adult only. If you allow tits, swears or glamourised scars on your site, it's an adult site.

The online safety act is far more censorious than that. The OSA is all about protecting ME, a grownup, from reading the naughty N word. It's to stop US from reading an annoyed mother's vent about the state of the country. It's stopping adults from reading/writing things that most of us believe fall well within the limits of free speech.

No, a 13yo girl shouldn't be bombarded with self-harm photos or tranny propaganda. Totally. They shouldn't be allowed to post it, look at it, whatever. They shouldn't be on those sites.
A task force to combat grooming on Roblox I can get with.
A law that's the opposite of USA's section 230 (?) on websites for adults makes me feel suspicious.

I don't like censorship laws that read like using a sledgehammer to crack a nutsack.
I won't miss choking porn. Never did it for me.

Chunky Salsa · Sunday at 1:50 PM

Tom Nook's Gloryhole said:
Just curious, if your wife abuses you do you have the right to kill her?

I'm not the best person to ask this, since I think if your wife cheats on you and you catch her, you should be let off if you murder her and her lover. I am a very unreasonable person, and so will say 'Maybe?' as the answer to the question. I fundamentally don't see women abusing men, as bad as men abusing women.

EDIT: I think my worldview has been warped because all I hear for every issue is 'It's complex' which just gets used an excuse and fig leaf to do nothing. So now I wish to simply shoot everyone that disagrees with me.

Whoopsie Daisy · Sunday at 2:06 PM

emptypacketofmethadone said:
Every woman I know would flip out if a bloke tried to strangle them during sex, it's not normal

Every woman I know has soft choking as a turn on. I'm not talking going full homer simpson, but a light grasp around the neck triggers caveman shit.
It shouldn't be shocking when 80% of women rank rape (CNC) as their top fantasy.

FedPostalService · Sunday at 2:12 PM

Whoopsie Daisy said:
Every woman I know has soft choking as a turn on. I'm not talking going full homer simpson, but a light grasp around the neck triggers caveman shit.
It shouldn't be shocking when 80% of women rank rape (CNC) as their top fantasy.

There's a difference between a rough fuck and choking. There's a time and a place for the first, the second would make me finish a relationship if a woman requested it. Right after I bust a nut after hearing her gasping for breath of course. I am a gentleman and wouldn't refuse the request.

Whoopsie Daisy · Sunday at 2:18 PM

FedPostalService said:
There's a difference between a rough fuck and choking. There's a time and a place for the first, the second would make me finish a relationship if a woman requested it. Right after I bust a nut after hearing her gasping for breath of course. I am a gentleman and wouldn't refuse the request.

Gasping for breath?
Has anyone ITT even had sex? I know I haven't. If I had though, I would know that choking isn't strangulation. It's no different than pinning wrists to the bed.

Or do you all get it on like the family guy sketch?

Otterly · Sunday at 2:19 PM

Whoopsie Daisy said:
soft choking

Problem is there’s no such thing as soft choking. If you apply pressure to the arteries around the windpipe, you are dicing with death. It’s very easy to go too far, and even if you don’t, you’ve no idea if there’s a bit of plaque just ready to break off and lodge in their brain. This idea that you can do it safely comes from porn. In reality, choking is the number one indicator if done as DV that a man will kill you. If he’s had his rounds round your neck even without pressure that’s seen as the biggest red flag there is.
I truly believe that all this stuff - the easy hardcore porn everywhere, the degeneracy, the troonism, is all pushed to destroy society. I have no wish to live in a puritanical state. I know people have been carving tits into stones since man could hold a pointy rock and i know that men are visual and that’s that. Porn will always exist, people will always get their rocks off, whatever - but we had a set of taboos about it, and when you take the shame brakes off things go downhill fast.
All this is pushed to desensitise people so that people like the aforementioned Nonces In The Establishment etc can get their rocks off without fear of censure. They go after anyone who objects and slander them. They push the idea it’s normal until it becomes normalised and that’s why you’re seeing so many girls thinking it’s normal. Except it’s not.
The OSA is a nasty bit of legislation. It’ll do nothing to keep children safe. We keep children safe by making their parents aware of whats out there and to keep the children away from it and by using our considerable intelligence apparatus to ruthlessly hunt down child predators. Preferably we them shoot them all into a pit but since we no longer hang them lock them up for life.
The fact that the men in the rape gangs got tiny sentences, Hugh Edwards got a slap on the wrist and nonces up and down the country get off Scot free shows the government has no wish whatsoever to keep our children safe. They are importing a bioweapon population to exterminate us. They DO however want to restrict what naughty adults can do or say. Freedom of speech and thought is a huge threat to them.

Made In Wales · Sunday at 2:20 PM

Otterly said:
We can have plenty of sympathy while still pushing the point that
1. You have to leave
2. We will keep you safe if you leave
As people have pointed out, when they lose control of you is the point they will break and get very nasty. It’s important that women’s refuges exist, that they are women only (no male trannies) and that women are supported to leave. Part of that is all of us - if you have a female friend or family being isolated (I know this is not a close person, so I’m not saying you and her personally) do NOT let it happen. Be a pain. Go round and visit. Make it clear you’ll help. Make them memorise your phone number and get them to pack a bag and hold the kids passports.
Actively seeking out the big boy thug gangsters? No sympathy at all. But we have someone we know (again not terribly well) who is being financially and coercively by her asshole husband and we keep going round and making sure she knows that when she gets the courage, one call will have half a dozen people there to get her out. It’s her Choice and we can’t make her

A very fair post.

I am not without some sympathy or empathy, and would not delight or revel in anybody getting hurt, but when time after time I see and hear women especially making poor decisions about men then I think I can at least be forgiven for thinking 'oh fucking hell, not again.'

The one phrase I am sick of hearing is this:

'I can change him'

Unless it's a baby, you can't and shouldn't need to change the man you're with. If he acts like an ape on steroids and has the intelligence of wet cardboard at the age of 25, no you aren't going to change him.

Otterly · Sunday at 2:23 PM

Made In Wales said:
'I can change him'

Well, I don’t disagree but that’s not going anywhere either. It’s so hard wired into women that it’s in the epic of Gilgamesh. taming the wild man is one of the oldest narratives we have written down.

Whoopsie Daisy · Sunday at 2:23 PM

Otterly said:
Problem is there’s no such thing as soft choking. If you apply pressure to the arteries around the windpipe, you are dicing with death. It’s very easy to go too far, and even if you don’t, you’ve no idea if there’s a bit of plaque just ready to break off and lodge in their brain.

That's a tad bit over-reactionary from you, Otterly, but I appreciate the sentiment. Maybe I haven't watched enough porn (anyone who does is a cuck) but choking is like putting on a tie a little too tight. The presence of the hand is enough. Force of any kind is not required.
Do some fucking spastics throttle the shit out their lass like they're trying to asphyxiate a chicken? I don't doubt it. Those people are just doing darwins natural selection though.
Besides, being choked is Scarlet's smallest problem when big tyrone jackhammers her inside to mine meat.

Otterly · Sunday at 2:27 PM

Whoopsie Daisy said:
Force of any kind is not required.

Minimal to no force required to knock a bit of plaque off either (especially as everyone’s so fat these days.)
There was a fat Anna video of her using one of those massage guns on her neck ‘for inflammation’ and everyone was rightly pointing out that this is about the best way she could have induced a stroke.
Honestly, hands around the neck is a no no. it’s not ever safe

Chunky Salsa · Sunday at 2:29 PM

Otterly said:
especially as everyone’s so fat these days

No penis for fatties then!

FedPostalService · Sunday at 2:41 PM

Whoopsie Daisy said:
Has anyone ITT even had sex?

Look where you are, mate. None of us here have even touched a boob

lamppost · Sunday at 2:43 PM

Cheers for frightening the shite out of me Otterly. Never again :story:

Made In Wales · Sunday at 3:02 PM

Whoopsie Daisy said:
Gasping for breath?
Has anyone ITT even had sex? I know I haven't. If I had though, I would know that choking isn't strangulation. It's no different than pinning wrists to the bed.

Or do you all get it on like the family guy sketch?

Yes, and I was dying for a pint of Brains Dark afterwards.

Also, no, she wasn't called 'Dolly', 'Maaaary' or 'Baaaarbara'.

femboy fart huffer · Sunday at 4:03 PM

Otterly said:
I also know that the OSA is nothing whatsoever to do with keeping children safe.

Anyone who believes any government or company or whatever is being truthful when they say they are 'protecting kids' should be dragged out into the street and shot. You are at the absolute best a fucking blind retard if you think the excuse that has been used to push orwellian surveillence and totalitarianism for the past 500 times it's been used will magically actually be good on the 501th time. Governments do not give a shit about you or your kids. They give a shit about their own wellbeing and nothing else.

The government cares about kids, that's why they banned this site which documents and exposes paedophiles and groomers. They care about kids, that's why public funding and education are being cut to flood the county with child rapists. They care about kids that's why they are importing the entire third world so they can decimate your kid's future life and career all so they can pay less wages and increase their own income. Believing the government cares about kids is a level of delusion worse than transgenderism and you should kill yourself just like they do.

ProximityThrill · Sunday at 4:45 PM

emptypacketofmethadone said:
A woman can have a ton of indisputable evidence of a bloke abusing her and the UK police won't prosecute even if the victims wish is to prosecute.

(Source: my cousin had messages on her phone of her ex blackmailing her for sex and threatening to break her belongings and stab her if she didn't comply. Police did not prosecute even though the suspect had a prior conviction of woman abuse)

British police when child rape, murder or sexual abuse:

British police when a boomer posts on Facebook that maybe Abdul shouldn't get a free house and welfare:

femboy fart huffer · Sunday at 5:02 PM

emptypacketofmethadone said:
That comment that I made in complete jest had now been misappropriated so severely that it now became a super serious threat worthy of interview under caution, even though the accuser was telling them in knowing bad faith.

Yea sure women can be cunts with false allegations and they should 100% face legal consequences for obviously maliciously making them to the police. But like I don't see what's wrong here. The police could not possibly know it was bullshit without talking to you and even if they did I would rather have them be sure instead of half arse it like they do with everything else. From the police's perspective I don't see how they did anything wrong. I mean what else were they meant to do? Assume every woman is a liar and ignore them all? The police waste their time investigating nothingburgers all the time, their entire job is to investigate nothingburgers to make sure they actually are and that there was no crime. A large amount of police reports end in them showing up and just leaving. I had a policeman sat in my room for almost 4 hours just to collect a statement when I reported a family member dead of expected natural causes when it would have taken maybe 20 minutes to fully explain everything.

I just wish they actually held pakis and indians to the same standards.

emptypacketofmethadone · Sunday at 5:10 PM

femboy fart huffer said:
Yea sure women can be cunts with false allegations and they should 100% face legal consequences for obviously maliciously making them to the police. But like I don't see what's wrong here. The police could not possibly know it was bullshit without talking to you and even if they did I would rather have them be sure instead of half arse it like they do with everything else. From the police's perspective I don't see how they did anything wrong. I mean what else were they meant to do? Assume every woman is a liar and ignore them all? The police waste their time investigating nothingburgers all the time, their entire job is to investigate nothingburgers to make sure they actually are and that there was no crime. A large amount of police reports end in them showing up and just leaving. I had a policeman sat in my room for almost 4 hours just to collect a statement when I reported a family member dead of expected natural causes when it would have taken maybe 20 minutes to fully explain everything.

I just wish they actually held pakis and indians to the same standards.

The problem was that I asked the police to take my ex to seek medical treatment for a wound that almost killed them about 10 hours later, but they wasted time investigating 'DV' even though my ex was absolutely adamant that they 1) did not want to give a formal statement 2) did not want to press charges and 3) had no interest in escalating it any further.

They nearly died of sepsis because the police wrongly informed them they had to give an interview about the alleged abuse and a fair portion of this 'interview' they had been told was 'mandatory' was just the police insulting me, flirting with my partner, and my partner slurring their words and slowly fading from earth but the cop was too horny to notice. Completely disregarding my request to get them to a hospital. The police was fully aware there was no DV and fully aware my ex didn't want to pursue this.

Police outright refused to tell me if they had gotten help or where they last saw them. If I hadn't driven around for hours, my ex would be dead. Ain't no song called Fuck the Firefighters, Fuck the Nurses, Fuck the Teachers is alls I'm saying.

UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

SirCliveSinclairdabbing

I'm on the ZX Spectrum.

Tom Nook's Gloryhole

DreinMeinVein

Chunky Salsa

Whoopsie Daisy

FedPostalService

Delivering threats in Minecraft

Whoopsie Daisy

Otterly

Primark Primarch

Made In Wales

Otterly

Primark Primarch

Whoopsie Daisy

Otterly

Primark Primarch

Chunky Salsa

FedPostalService

Delivering threats in Minecraft

lamppost

Made In Wales

femboy fart huffer

Brapping for Biden since '09

ProximityThrill

femboy fart huffer

Brapping for Biden since '09

emptypacketofmethadone