Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
She's charging her membership to The Wing to the campaign, because of course she is. Also, the catering expenses for her fucking housewarming party went on her scampaign bill. She even "repaid" 1000 bucks of the loans outstanding, I'm going to guess that went to a new iPhone. That's SUPER dodgy because the campaign is really cash negative due to earlier accounting mistakes. Various "travel" and "subscription" charges were laundered through Frank's credit card, so god knows what those actually paid for.

LOL. We all knew John was going to use his campaign money as his personal slush fund, but you'd think he wouldn't have been as brazen as this considering his past few filing fuck ups have put him on the IRS's radar.

Not surprised that he paid that ridiculous entry fee to The Wing, because The Godzilla of Women in Tech would rather stop dilating his True and Honest vagina than not be in the Kewl Women in Business Klub! I'll bet he hasn't even gone once to do actual work, and never will until a photo op or some big name shows up. "Oh hi! I just happened to be programming my latest award-winning game on the very same day that Hillary Clinton shows up!" Crazy coincidence, right?"

Was that meet and greet actually catered? IIRC, there was hardly enough people RSVPing to make it worth the money and effort, and I can't recall seeing any refreshments in the photos.

There's no doubt that the "loan" was used to buy the new iPhone, because John needs the latest Apple toy more than oxygen.
 
Most bizarre entry: the campaign apparently gave $318.11 of "in-kind contributions" of food and beverages to Brianna Wu on 7/26/19. Are we really to believe that Wu For God-Emperor Inc. had $300 of food lying around that it gave to John all on one day? Or is this a misfiled donation where someone gave them free catering?
I took a closer look at this, and I think there's actually just a bug in whatever FEC system is generating PDFs out of the raw reports. If you go back to the underlying data, the in-kind food item is listed as a receipt, not an expenditure. And indeed on line 11d of the main report we do see that charge listed under "Contributions from the candidate". So really, what that item is saying is that Brianna Wu gave $318.11 of food directly to the campaign.
I assume this really means that John paid for catering out-of-pocket and couldn't reimburse himself for it somehow, so he just counted it as a donation.

By the way, those credit card payments from Frank completely don't add up. There are 34 items that link back to one of four reimbursements to Frank, but the numbers just don't match, either taken by group or as a whole.

Interesting new donors this cycle:
My troon senses are going off like crazy, especially given the part about being a "devoted parent of two children". You know, rather than mother.

This lady played at Lilith Fair and she still can't tell what's a woman?
She also maxed out her contributions for both the primary and general elections, as well as getting her husband to max out on the general.
 
Last edited:
I think that what needs to happen is they take Brianna off the endless campaign trail for just one weekend and let her, a successful small business owner, take a crack at the numbers. Her history of doing the weekly figures for Spacekat's books, a major game studio and a major cybersecurity firm with many employees, will make her the ideal candidate (see what I did there?) to settle up these small accounting issues.

She can probably get it done in just an hour or two and then get back onto the campaign trail in California, Washington and the many other other states outside the 8th District of Massachusetts.
 
The squad is apparently endorsing Sanders, including Ayanna Presley. This is going to really rile up the black woke women on twatter who rushed to support Warren and hate Bernie.

How will John play this out? Either way, I’m grabbing my popcorn.
 
Seems like Frank's juggling his money in and out of the campaign, but why?

That's not really what is happening, the money never leaves the campaign. Just the accounting disappears. Here's what her accounting should look like:

IncomeExpendituresNet Cash Flow (sum)Declared Cash On HandLoans DeclaredReal Cash On HandNotes
Q1 201721814.6810275.9411538.7411538.74011538.74
Q2 5128.1811311.085355.845355.8405355.84
Q3 5056.896125.124287.614287.6104287.61
Q49820.0013544.22563.39453.390563.39110 bucks just disappears from cash on hand here, god knows why.
Q1 20188591.005975.003179.393179.3903179.39Aaaaand it's back! Magic.
Q228675.4947676.07-15821.1934178.815000034178.81
pre-primary7108.007350.00-16063.1933936.815000033936.81
Q311583.0010627.19-15107.3834892.625000034892.62
Q416360.0032624.40-31371.7818628.220-31371.78The loan mysteriously disappears, but the cash is not gone.
Q1 201924052.6239911.40-47230.5652769.44500002769.44A new loan arrives that just barely makes the committee cash positive again.
Q245125.2961930.30-64035.5735964.4350000-14035.57Whoops, now we're cash negative.
Q357975.2565142.49-71202.8128797.1950000-21202.81

I suppose one could say the original loan was forgiven, but that's not really what the forms say. The loan should still be listed, but its value removed from the debts and obligations box if that were the case.

In any case, why would you bother to forgive a zero interest loan? It's useful for taking any surplus value out of the committee at the end of its life.
 
repo-png.971830


Bri is starting to show her age. This is surprisingly unwoke. The new crop of genederspecials would never say that "reproductive health" has any connection to "women". It's pregnant people, bigot.
 
That's not really what is happening, the money never leaves the campaign. Just the accounting disappears.
Well yeah, what's really really happening is that they don't even have a separate bank account for the campaign and all their personal and campaign funds are mingled.
 
I think it's another case where we'll see Wu is paying from the campaign and being reimbursed personally. She's done that before.
Awaiting my incoming jigsaw puzzle reacts, because this has been gone over a thousand times already, but it just narks me that he's not going to get taken to task over this. It's blatantly dodgy, and I just wish the FEC had the time and resources to clamp down on it. Is it so much to ask for John to face even a teeny tiny bit of comeuppance?
 
Thing is, you can't anonymously report to the FEC. And they'll send the complaint to the campaign.

 
White men claiming that they're doing all the heavy lifting when it comes to women's rights - it's a sad state of affairs, isn't it John?

biden.png
 
Thing is, you can't anonymously report to the FEC. And they'll send the complaint to the campaign.


Most complaints are made by political opponents, who have the financial wherewithal to get a lawyer to whip them into shape. It's irritating to see the FEC just let this bullshit slide time and again, though, when they could make enough money to profit from it by just fining the screaming mongoloid cuck $20K or so every time.
 
That's not really what is happening, the money never leaves the campaign. Just the accounting disappears. Here's what her accounting should look like:

IncomeExpendituresNet Cash Flow (sum)Declared Cash On HandLoans DeclaredReal Cash On HandNotes
Q1 201721814.6810275.9411538.7411538.74011538.74
Q25128.1811311.085355.845355.8405355.84
Q35056.896125.124287.614287.6104287.61
Q49820.0013544.22563.39453.390563.39110 bucks just disappears from cash on hand here, god knows why.
Q1 20188591.005975.003179.393179.3903179.39Aaaaand it's back! Magic.
Q228675.4947676.07-15821.1934178.815000034178.81
pre-primary7108.007350.00-16063.1933936.815000033936.81
Q311583.0010627.19-15107.3834892.625000034892.62
Q416360.0032624.40-31371.7818628.220-31371.78The loan mysteriously disappears, but the cash is not gone.
Q1 201924052.6239911.40-47230.5652769.44500002769.44A new loan arrives that just barely makes the committee cash positive again.
Q245125.2961930.30-64035.5735964.4350000-14035.57Whoops, now we're cash negative.
Q357975.2565142.49-71202.8128797.1950000-21202.81
I suppose one could say the original loan was forgiven, but that's not really what the forms say. The loan should still be listed, but its value removed from the debts and obligations box if that were the case.


In any case, why would you bother to forgive a zero interest loan? It's useful for taking any surplus value out of the committee at the end of its life.

Fun fact about politics

Canidates like Mz Wu exist for fundraising consultants to milk money out of. The fake canidate develops a mailing list and donor list and the financial consultants charge luxurious fees
 
Fun fact about politics

Canidates like Mz Wu exist for fundraising consultants to tard cum money out of. The fake canidate develops a mailing list and donor list and the financial consultants charge luxurious fees

A donor list for someone like John is probably worth its weight in gold, too. It's the very definition of a sucker list.
 
Did he just stroke out while reading the tabs in Maya? This one was particularly painful.

It's literally the only thing she knows about 3D modelling. Probably the contractor who sculpted the one model they made for R60 mentioned it in passing and Wu has been repeating it like an automaton ever since.
 
Back
Top Bottom