Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
AprilRains said:
Beware people who insist there is no time to think before adopting their proposals.
Click to expand...
Same goes with anyone telling you to get scared or angry.
"The terrifying new menace from 8chan!" "What Trump said at the premiere of 'Debbie Does The Department Of Defense' and why you should be scared!"
Anyone who pretty much outright says "I want you to read this with your lizard brain activated" is a scammer, and I wish more people realized it.
 
PantsOfDesire said:
Has John ever understood any industry in to which he inserted himself and promptly proclaimed himself to be a big player?

He was good at Patreon paypig farming. I’ll give him that.
Click to expand...

I think Wu has always had the notion that if you shout loud enough and think you're dropping enough buzzwords to sound like you know what you're talking about, people immediately believe you're a guru in that shit...because that's how Wu always saw things. People going on about subjects that Wu can not actually fully comprehend and whatever mental condition Wu has dictates that if it's true for them, then it must be true for EVERYBODY.

It's probably why Wu always wants the cutting edge of everything, to give off the impression of being on top of an industry and reaching new heights, when in reality they still don't know shit taught in Computer Science 101 like how optimal efficiency in computers is only having just enough computing power to get the job done as opposed to wasting money on something with a hell of a lot more capacity that isn't ever used.
 
821839
 
Harvey Danger said:
As a matter of numbers, the first two make sense... but gays? Are you sure 1-2% of the population is the crucial swing voting bloc you think it is?
Click to expand...

Anything that can be expressed as even a single digit percentage is electorally significant in elections where things are often, as you pointed out, determined by mere hundreds of votes. So the LGB part of the equation is significant. What isn't is troons. They're a rounding error.

Optimus Prime said:
I think Wu has always had the notion that if you shout loud enough and think you're dropping enough buzzwords to sound like you know what you're talking about, people immediately believe you're a guru in that shit...because that's how Wu always saw things.
Click to expand...

John's problem is he's so illiterate and incompetent at any field he pretends to be an expert in that he completely mangles and misuses his buzzwords so he's saying utterly dumb shit about dropping moon rocks and flashing your ROM BIOS with MD5 hashes and other idiot shit that makes no sense.
 
AnOminous said:
Anything that can be expressed as even a single digit percentage is electorally significant in elections where things are often, as you pointed out, determined by mere hundreds of votes. So the LGB part of the equation is significant.
Click to expand...

Yeah, except the construction was that he "can't win without them". You literally can't win without women, they're 51% of the general population; fair enough. But you can win without black votes; Republicans have been doing that for decades, getting only 5% there, and sometimes with enough margin to win with 0%.

And you absolutely can win without that 2% gay vote. Obama's margins were comfortably above 2%, and xenophobic homophobic teh Hitlerz Trump won, presumably without any gay person voting for him (even though he walked across a stage waving a rainbow flag).

It's the state level fights that hinge on a sliver where you need every vote you can get. Those fights matter because the small margin tips a chunk of electoral votes into one column or the other, which is when that tiny demographic may be important... but wait a minute, who's the party that's all hot and bothered to kill the Electoral College? Can you say gay erasure, you popular vote-fetishizing bigots?!?

What isn't is troons. They're a rounding error.
Click to expand...

They're several other kinds of errors as well.

I'm waiting for the year that polling doesn't just ask Democrat/Republican, race, etc; they start asking about gender and sexual orientation. We know where all the non-cis responses will wind up, but it will be funny to prove the groupthink. I don't think the special snowflakes, so desperate to make up terms and fashion to flaunt their uniqueness, appreciate how easily you can be dismissed when you become predictable.

"It's not sir, it's MA'AM! Wait, don't you want to know who I voted for? What do you mean you already know?"

Plus we'll see normies get mad when a pollster on the street asks about their gender. Some fool with a clipboard is gonna get slapped...
 
Peace and Harmony said:
"structural change for the middle class", what does that shit even mean

View attachment 822333
Click to expand...

It means that the verminous middle class is going to get fucked over and then reduced to poverty, while John, as a member of the ruling elite, continues to live the ostentatious and extravagant redneck drag-queen dream life of a tranny golem. (John doesn't seem to realize that he and Frank are in the middle class.)
 
Optimus Prime said:
I think Wu has always had the notion that if you shout loud enough and think you're dropping enough buzzwords to sound like you know what you're talking about, people immediately believe you're a guru in that shit...because that's how Wu always saw things. People going on about subjects that Wu can not actually fully comprehend and whatever mental condition Wu has dictates that if it's true for them, then it must be true for EVERYBODY.
Click to expand...

It's how Wu does things too, for example that campaign email from last month. She was going about how Lynch voted for a "voted for a partial birth abortion ban", which is really weird because that's not what democrats call that particular procedure, not even when they're in full Moloch mode. It's always referred as a "late term abortion" when dems are talking about it.

But she definitely understands politics and the laws and whatever, visably not knowing your own party's terminology is not the kind of thing that should bar you becoming an elected representative of that party.
 
Last edited:
822744


Normal jobs you've never held:


❌ Software engineer
❌ Investigative journalist
❌ Political fundraiser
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom