Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
What?

upload_2018-7-2_17-21-55.png


How the fuck has she spent 8000 bucks? She's spent most the campaign wearing one fucking dress that cost $200. She has it in a few more colours now, but how does that ever come to even close to $8000? If she spent so much, wouldn't she have a bigger wardrobe to show for it?
 
Norvic said:
What?

View attachment 486712

How the fuck has she spent 8000 bucks? She's spent most the campaign wearing one fucking dress that cost $200. She has it in a few more colours now, but how does that ever come to even close to $8000? If she spent so much, wouldn't she have a bigger wardrobe to show for it?
Click to expand...

Here's a horrifying thought: maybe what we're seeing is the result of an $8000 budget, and without it John looks even more like a decayed corpse than usual.
 
Peace and Harmony said:
How about forced child marriages, do those count too? #loveislove

View attachment 486629
Click to expand...
But you’re a true and honest cis woman married to a cis man, right? Why would Trump’s marriage be any better/different than yours?

Norvic said:
What?

View attachment 486712

How the fuck has she spent 8000 bucks? She's spent most the campaign wearing one fucking dress that cost $200. She has it in a few more colours now, but how does that ever come to even close to $8000? If she spent so much, wouldn't she have a bigger wardrobe to show for it?
Click to expand...
Ahahaha... any real woman is scratching their head wondering how another true and honest woman gets by spending less than 10 minutes a day on hair/makeup/clothes.
 
_01 said:
I'm honestly not sure which kind of posts of Brianna are more tiresome. The clearly uninformed political ranting, or Brianna's attempts to look like a so quirky and zany gamer!

Maybe the former because you can at least laugh at it. But Brianna's attempts at humor are just terrible. It absolutely reeks of an old man desperately trying to fit in with the "hip" younger generation (which it is, but it's so painfully obvious).
Click to expand...
you just don't understand John's humor you must be a fat dyke sandnigger.
 
Norvic said:
What?

View attachment 486712

How the fuck has she spent 8000 bucks? She's spent most the campaign wearing one fucking dress that cost $200. She has it in a few more colours now, but how does that ever come to even close to $8000? If she spent so much, wouldn't she have a bigger wardrobe to show for it?
Click to expand...
I bought a new suit, blazer, pants, shirts, shoes, accessories and some other clothes for several events in July and didn’t spend as much as John. All my clothes are designer labels because I’m an idiot.

There is no way in hell he’s spent $8000 on clothes and hair when he’s wearing the same three $200-300 dresses to every function and his hair always looks like a birds nest. His shoes are not designer nor is anything else in his wardrobe. The Wu’s don’t value nice clothes whatsoever. They value expensive toys like the 3 Porsche’s they own. That’s where the $8000 went.
 
Norvic said:
What?

View attachment 486712

How the fuck has she spent 8000 bucks? She's spent most the campaign wearing one fucking dress that cost $200. She has it in a few more colours now, but how does that ever come to even close to $8000? If she spent so much, wouldn't she have a bigger wardrobe to show for it?
Click to expand...

Interesting fact: Since the first televised debated, the presidential candidate who's been poll as most physically attractive (to both men and women) has won the election. Men are not immune to this, they just only have half a closet of overpriced suits and a couple pairs of overpriced loafers instead of a closet full overpriced dresses, also crammed with overpriced shoes, and the hall closet full of over priced purses.
And the overpriced dresses and purses are obviously only to impress men. I mean, I don't know about you guys, but if a girl wanna ride this dick, her hand bag better be genuine. No knockoffs gonna be knocking these boots.


More than skin color or money, attractive people have the most "privilege" in any society. Something John would know nothing about.
 
Norvic said:
What?

View attachment 486712

How the fuck has she spent 8000 bucks? She's spent most the campaign wearing one fucking dress that cost $200. She has it in a few more colours now, but how does that ever come to even close to $8000? If she spent so much, wouldn't she have a bigger wardrobe to show for it?
Click to expand...

If John spent $8k during the corse of the campaign on his appearance it certainly looks to have been been a very bad investment.
 
Eli Whitney said:
If John spent $8k during the corse of the campaign on his appearance it certainly looks to have been been a very bad investment.
Click to expand...

John is always going to be an uggo, but it's his own choice to look like he got his wardrobe by fishing through a dumpster behind a Goodwill.

Peace and Harmony said:
John may be an ugly man but at least he has a great personality!

View attachment 486878
Click to expand...

Says John while chimping the fuck out because someone called him ugly, after claiming a bunch of bullshit that never happened.
 
Norvic said:
And yet Wu refuses to voluntarily appear in photos, which severely hamstrings her campaign.
Kind of suggests that perhaps there's some sting to the charge.
Click to expand...
To be fair, there is a difference between being an unattractive woman and looking like you just escaped from the remake of Nightmare Alley.
 
Peace and Harmony said:
John may be an ugly man but at least he has a great personality!

View attachment 486878
Click to expand...

As far as any literate person is concerned, when John writes "we" in that tweet the only possible antecedent is "women who have been called ugly" (i.e. ugly women). Probably not what John intended. And absent money or position or accomplishment, how does mere ugliness confer power?
 
Dr. Merkwurdichliebe said:
As far as any literate person is concerned, when John writes "we" in that tweet the only possible antecedent is "women who have been called ugly" (i.e. ugly women). Probably not what John intended. And absent money or position or accomplishment, how does mere ugliness confer power?
Click to expand...

He held the power of life and death over his doggy that he left outside to freeze and die. That's power, but not power that he used for good. And this is why he can't be trusted with anything of any import greater than deciding what sandwich to hog down on at the local Potbelly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom