Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
engagement-png.396453

I just can't get over Wu describing Giant Spacekat as an institution. In what way? It made one game that flopped, has no staff and no lasting impact on the games industry.

I can't tell anymore who Wu is trying to kid, her audience or herself.
 
Oh no! What will those poor, middle-class developers living in San Francisco do? You mean they might have to move to a cheaper city? But that's impossible, they can't be seen interacting with the commoners!

Now about the state you're running in Brianna?

dorms.PNG
 
Oh no! What will those poor, middle-class developers living in San Francisco do? You mean they might have to move to a cheaper city? But that's impossible, they can't be seen interacting with the commoners!

Now about the state you're running in Brianna?

View attachment 396472

What state? Bri has all but given up the election at this point
 
Promote people because bobs and vegeana

View attachment 396452

For fuck's sake, Brianna.

You know how disingenuous this shit is. Even by your standards this is a fucking retarded tweetstorm.

The problem is not that women can't ascend to higher echelons in these fields: It's because given the decision, most of them don't. Not because of sexism, not because of structural oppression, but because the demands of the job are higher and, statistically, women are substantially more likely to go for options that will give them more time for family care, personal work, et al.

You are never going to change this.
 
You are never going to change this.

How dare you. The Diversity Statsi WILL implement 50/50 gender quotas at every tier of every job, even if it means dragging women away from their husbands and children at rifle point. This is the EMPATHETIC and EQUITABLE thing to do. John Flynt, being of course among the Enlightened Elect, will serve as chief minister of this glorious enterprise.

P.S. people actually believe this.
 
Once again, John is wrong about the Facebook survey. The survey is asking about deciding who makes the rules for Facebook. It's not asking if it's OK that an adult asks for sexual pictures.

nW6eI2p.png
The horrible thing is, that facebook thinks that there is even a survey needed about this shit. This is less about finding the most legal and moral way of dealing with that sort of shit, but simply to figure out what would appease that masses. We are talking about a survey with a question, where most people would click: "Facebook should release the adult's name and address so the mob can hang that pervert on the next tree." if it was available.
They are a billion dollar company that could fire lawyers and philosophers out of a clown cannon at that issue until even god thinks it's waterproof.
 
Wu gets the facts wrong because her "hot takes" are always half-baked and uninformed by reality but it's still a deeply stupid way to ask about an issue that could be approached so many ways. Assuming FB was actually the one that created it and it wasn't sponsored.
 
How dare you. The Diversity Statsi WILL implement 50/50 gender quotas at every tier of every job, even if it means dragging women away from their husbands and children at rifle point. This is the EMPATHETIC and EQUITABLE thing to do. John Flynt, being of course among the Enlightened Elect, will serve as chief minister of this glorious enterprise.

P.S. people actually believe this.
But if there are more than two genders having a 50/50 split would mean discriminating against all the other genders? Has anyone done research into the trans wage gap yet?
 
But if there are more than two genders having a 50/50 split would mean discriminating against all the other genders? Has anyone done research into the trans wage gap yet?
Heh, Tim Pool did a video on exactly this subject.
 
And imagine what you're supposed to do with some of the idiots featured here that fall into multiple categories on any given day ("I'm a sometimes boy!").

The insanity becomes even more apparent when you draw it to the logical conclusions.
 
And imagine what you're supposed to do with some of the idiots featured here that fall into multiple categories on any given day ("I'm a sometimes boy!").

Seems obvious to me. Require them to file two tax returns, and pro rate their income by how much of the year they were a man.
 
Why does he insist on wearing that getup endlessly? Short dresses only look good on slim, young women. Even men know this, surely?

Not autistic men.

Once again, John is wrong about the Facebook survey. The survey is asking about deciding who makes the rules for Facebook. It's not asking if it's OK that an adult asks for sexual pictures.

No option for "Facebook calls the outside experts known as the fucking police."
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom