Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I know it's shocking, but Brianna and Frank might just have a happy marriage. They seem to have the same retarded sense of humor and political views.

I dislike Brianna almost totally, but her marriage to Frank does seem from a Kiwis perspective to be an happy one.
 
Frank was so desperate to marry a white woman, he was willing to do anything. Even have sex with a white man's surgical wound.
 
Mola Ram said:
There are a lot of nuances and problems with even simple affirmative defenses. I don't really expect even a halfway honest politician to address them all when campaigning on either side of them, but making the leap from "This defense shouldn't be permitted" to "THIS IS LEGALIZING TRANS MURDERS REEEE" makes my head hurt.
Click to expand...

There are ways you could change procedures not to allow a specific enumerated affirmative defense, but you couldn't constitutionally outlaw making an argument based on the fact that the elements of the offense haven't been proven because there's a reasonable doubt as to a necessary element, e.g. premeditation for first degree murder.
 
KerryDixon9 said:
I know it's shocking, but Brianna and Frank might just have a happy marriage. They seem to have the same exceptional sense of humor and political views.

I dislike Brianna almost totally, but her marriage to Frank does seem from a Kiwis perspective to be an happy one.
Click to expand...

Come on, you know there's something more going on behind the scenes.
BriBri is a) Ugly as fuck, and b) a man. Doubly so when Frank met her. There has to be at least some initial spark of attraction between people. Out of all the people in the world, why would Frank be attracted to someone who looks like an extra from the twilight zone? They may be happy, but it's a happiness built on fetishes and dependency.
 
Here is a positive thread about men who licked my taint wound

men.png
 
Chemical snorfare said:
So here's the thing, and we've been over it before but it might be useful for the people new to WuWorld.

I just don't get Frank.

The theory is he's a control freak who, having been walked out on by two true and honest women so far in his life, now want someone who is wholly dependant on him.

Thing is, I don't see a control freak putting up with the way John publicly humiliates him.
I'm not a narcissist or a control freak (honest, I have problems in other directions) but the "LOL so patient, look at my stupid husband" shit would have me getting drunk and murdering John in his sleep.

I don't know how Frank does it , he's either so laid back he's catatonic, unlikely given his past relationships, or he's repressing some major rage issues that could end badly.
Click to expand...

I can answer that.

Frank is in every way a match for Flu, but he has a difference in that he's got a veneer of subtlety. He's just as abusive and petty as his wife, who he in essence controls the fucking existence of - Flu is completely dependent on him, and that's the fucking point.

Flu cannot possibly leave Frank or she'll be fucking lost. Even better, Flu gives Frank a perfect companion - she will never outperform Frank in any capacity (unlike his previous wives, who he abused over this), and her oddball behaviors give him the perfect smokescreen. By being Flu's victim in public, he appears likable and affable, when in truth he's just as much of a fucking viper.

During GG, Frank was constantly running interference for Flu, keeping tabs on her enemies and gauging the best way for Flu to exploit them. Multiple false-flag attacks Flu attempted and failed at came from Frank. During the Kickstarter Backer Revolt (that got Rev60 released), Frank was the one who had to take charge when it was clear that Hoskstation and the other backers weren't going to shut the fuck up.

In every capacity, Brianna Wu, Godzilla of Feminists is a 2-man act.
 
Jaimas said:
I can answer that.

Frank is in every way a match for Flu, but he has a difference in that he's got a veneer of subtlety. He's just as abusive and petty as his wife, who he in essence controls the fucking existence of - Flu is completely dependent on him, and that's the fucking point.

Flu cannot possibly leave Frank or she'll be fucking lost. Even better, Flu gives Frank a perfect companion - she will never outperform Frank in any capacity (unlike his previous wives, who he abused over this), and her oddball behaviors give him the perfect smokescreen. By being Flu's victim in public, he appears likable and affable, when in truth he's just as much of a fucking viper.

During GG, Frank was constantly running interference for Flu, keeping tabs on her enemies and gauging the best way for Flu to exploit them. Multiple false-flag attacks Flu attempted and failed at came from Frank. During the Kickstarter Backer Revolt (that got Rev60 released), Frank was the one who had to take charge when it was clear that Hoskstation and the other backers weren't going to shut the fuck up.

In every capacity, Brianna Wu, Godzilla of Feminists is a 2-man act.
Click to expand...

I hear what you're saying, and I believe every word of it -- or at least I find it all plausible -- but none of this explains why any sane man would want to engage in sexual congress with Bri'wuu, the Living Cadaver.
 
Mola Ram said:
I hear what you're saying, and I believe every word of it -- or at least I find it all plausible -- but none of this explains why any sane man would want to engage in sexual congress with Bri'wuu, the Living Cadaver.
Click to expand...
Some people get off on control more than sex.

Beats me why, dude. Ain't my scene.
 
Today is Transgender Day of Remembrance. Is Brianna not acknowledging this?
Although to be fair, it’s more of a Black People Hate Trannies Day, since 80% of the victims were blacks killed by other blacks.
 
Doug_Hitzel said:
Today is Transgender Day of Remembrance. Is Brianna not acknowledging this?
Although to be fair, it’s more of a Black People Hate Trannies Day, since 80% of the victims were blacks killed by other blacks.
Click to expand...

well, bri is massively racist so I'm sure she enjoys parts of it

*one of my favorite kiwi's liked this comment, Thanks for the praise @Mola Ram*
 
Last edited:
Pointless Pedant said:
Yes, but if all this nonsense hasn't made him do that, what will?
Click to expand...

I've wondered about this, too. What can Flynt/Wu do that would cause Frank to toss him into the nearest ditch? It would have to be something so horrifying that it threatened Frank's job or his beloved position in the inner circle of sci-fi fandom. Is Flynt/Wu capable of an action that would meet either or both of these criteria? I vote "yes."
 
Mola Ram said:
He elides the fact that "trans panic" is an affirmative defense, which usually means the defendant has to prove to the fact finder that he acted reasonably in the circumstances that led to the victim's death. Such a defense certainly didn't help Matthew Shepard's killers, because no reasonable person can be allowed to fucking crucify someone in an empty field because they wanted him to give up the location of his stash of meth and horse, and then try to hide that fact and say it was because they got hit on by a gay man one of the killers had had sex with before.
Click to expand...

Fix'd
 
Mola Ram said:
:offtopic: I'm aware of this version of events. Was it ever confirmed?
Click to expand...

:offtopic:Short answer, as much as you can prove anything re: meth heads. TO (this forum's gay excuse for) PMs!

Anyway, its as you said, its not legal to murder trannies. (yet) Its an affirmative defense that primarily see use would be to drop a murder charge to manslaughter. To use it, you're going to have to pretty much confess "Yes, it was me, I killed that man in the dress", and that's the bulk of the prosecutions heavily lifting done for them.
To get off scott-free, you'd have to convince 12 people of this reasonable argument:
"Yes, see, when I discovered that woman had a ladypenis, I was over come with such emotion, well, I had no choice but to kill them. I definitely couldn't have just thrown up in my mouth a little and walked away. I am definitely not a further danger to myself, others, or society."

Honestly the only way someone'd walk is if the judge allowed the prosecution to be completely ‮dedrater
and only allow the jury to consider murder charges. Which means this would only work in Florida. (ha-ha.... Casey Anthony)
 
Last edited:
Jaimas said:
Flu cannot possibly leave Frank or she'll be fucking lost. Even better, Flu gives Frank a perfect companion - she will never outperform Frank in any capacity (unlike his previous wives, who he abused over this), and her oddball behaviors give him the perfect smokescreen. By being Flu's victim in public, he appears likable and affable, when in truth he's just as much of a fucking viper.
Click to expand...

A viper who dressed up in a horrifying angel costume and danced like an idiot on stage at a con.

What I'd like to know is what Frank's co-workers think of him.
 
Ghostse said:
:offtopic:Short answer, as much as you can prove anything re: meth heads. TO (this forum's gay excuse for) PMs!

Anyway, its as you said, its not legal to murder trannies. (yet) Its an affirmative defense that primarily see use would be to drop a murder charge to manslaughter. To use it, you're going to have to pretty much confess "Yes, it was me, I killed that man in the dress", and that's the bulk of the prosecutions heavily lifting done for them.
To get off scott-free, you'd have to convince 12 people of this reasonable argument:
"Yes, see, when I discovered that woman had a ladypenis, I was over come with such emotion, well, I had no choice but to kill them. I definitely couldn't have just thrown up in my mouth a little and walked away. I am definitely not a further danger to myself, others, or society."

Honestly the only way someone'd walk is if the judge allowed the prosecution to be completely exceptional and only allow the jury to consider murder charges. Which means this would only work in Florida. (ha-ha.... Casey Anthony)
Click to expand...

Isn't gay panic defense largely a mythical bugbear brought up mostly by activists to whine about how evil the world is?
 
Doug_Hitzel said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_panic_defense#United_States_of_America
Click to expand...

Yeah, it's used, but you can use almost any defense. It looks like a Hail Mary argument when the lawyer knows they're fucked. From what I remember and see here, it seems like it has almost never actually worked, and it seems like most of the cases they had they thought they were going to get buttfucked.

I've seen Tranny Evangelists try to claim that they were being killed left and right and people and it was legal due to "laws."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom