Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I'd like Wu to define both "Assault Rifle" and "Field Strip" without referring to google. Bet she can't do it correctly...
 
Easy.

BUYCQ_tCAAA0JYk.jpg-large.jpeg
 
NotAKitty said:
"Idle" sounds about right.
Click to expand...

My curiosity got the better of me and I downloaded the game. Found something that A) has me laughing way more than it should and B) Makes me wonder if this game might actually be partially inspired by Wu.
 

Attachments

  • 1501951144905.jpg
    1501951144905.jpg
    314.6 KB · Views: 381
Dr. Boe Jangles Esq. said:
"I can identify any rifle because I play video games."

.....I feel a great disturbance in the autism, as though every former /k/omrade on the farms suddenly REEEEEEEE'd.

So putting aside that for a moment, does this mean that Brianna believes there are like 12 firearms in existence? Because every "realistic" shooter I think I've played picks guns from a pool of about 12 or so.
You got your 1911, your Colt revolver, an AK-47, M16, SPAS-12, RPG-7, AA-12, Barrett .50, something historical like a Mauser C96, and then usually some kind of gimmick gun that looks cool like the Vector.

So I guess she believes that covers about everything.
Oh, and I guess she knows Glock, since she claims to be able to field strip one.
Click to expand...
I suspect Wu's one of those people who thinks that 'assault rifle' and 'assault weapon' are interchangeable.
 
Quasar said:
I'd like Wu to define both "Assault Rifle" and "Field Strip" without referring to google. Bet she can't do it correctly...
Click to expand...

Flynt/Wu has already demonstrated that he thinks that "field stripping" is what you do to a gun before you clean it. If he had a Glock and it malfunctioned at the range, he'd be on Twitter in less than twenty seconds asking how to fix the problem. And God help any man who offers a suggestion.
 
Dr. Merkwurdichliebe said:
Flynt/Wu has already demonstrated that he thinks that "field stripping" is what you do to a gun before you clean it. If he had a Glock and it malfunctioned at the range, he'd be on Twitter in less than twenty seconds asking how to fix the problem. And God help any man who offers a suggestion.
Click to expand...

What about a woman though?
 
facepalm said:
A woman would get accussed of mansplainin' and then Brianna deletes the whole exchange.
Click to expand...

What is the "correct" way to answer a Brianna question? You obviously can't just suggest a solution or recommend a place to find the info because that's condescending and masculine. And that's terrible.
So you'll have to humble yourself and offer the info like a peasant offering tribute to a king. First, be obviously female. This way Brianna won't disregard your answer out of hand.
Be submissive, because Brianna's ego will not allow itself to be lowered.
Pander to the ego. Make Brianna feel smart. She's only asking the question because she wants a chance to humble brag or show off.
 
Furina said:
What is the "correct" way to answer a Brianna question? You obviously can't just suggest a solution or recommend a place to find the info because that's condescending and masculine. And that's terrible.
So you'll have to humble yourself and offer the info like a peasant offering tribute to a king. First, be obviously female. This way Brianna won't disregard your answer out of hand.
Be submissive, because Brianna's ego will not allow itself to be lowered.
Pander to the ego. Make Brianna feel smart. She's only asking the question because she wants a chance to humble brag or show off.
Click to expand...

You click the "heart" next to her tweet and move on.

When she asks questions, she's not actually asking questions - she's creating "content" and "engagement" for her Twitter account. Any ebook on how to gain twitter followers will explain it all very clearly.
 
Yellow Yam Scam said:
You click the "heart" next to her tweet and move on.

When she asks questions, she's not actually asking questions - she's creating "content" and "engagement" for her Twitter account. Any ebook on how to gain twitter followers will explain it all very clearly.
Click to expand...


You forgot donate to campaign or patreon.
 
Melchett said:
So I went to further lookup the video currently in the sidebar and ended up on a Guardian article about Google's current echochamber of SJWs. Guess whose tweet is featured?

View attachment 258458
Software engineer my ass :story:
Click to expand...
I've read a summary of that manifest and it was mostly in favour of diversity of opinions and about using data-driven methodologies to diversity hiring as well (since they are used for lots of thing in Google) instead of following SJW hiring methods blindly.
So to answer Flynt's question: if the manifest is taken seriously by Google, then the ones getting sacked are the ones who deserve it.
 
Melchett said:
So I went to further lookup the video currently in the sidebar and ended up on a Guardian article about Google's current echochamber of SJWs. Guess whose tweet is featured?

View attachment 258458
Software engineer my ass :story:
Click to expand...

Yet again, the peculiarity of the Wu-phenomenon raises its head. John is a damaged, useless, shriekingly obvious fraudster ... and yet allegedly respectable outlets and publications give him airtime for no reason whatsoever.
 
Peace and Harmony said:
View attachment 257357
Click to expand...
Its always generally annoyed me how people like Wu talk about "The Trump Years" like we're in the middle of some kind of world-ending, apocalyptic event.

Like shit, not to be too specific but I'm in lot of groups that Trump is supposedly going to send to camps or something, and my life hasn't changed even fucking remotely.

I've just become tired of this fear-mongering bullshit Wu treats as gospel.
 
Mola Ram said:
Yet again, the peculiarity of the Wu-phenomenon raises its head. John is a damaged, useless, shriekingly obvious fraudster ... and yet allegedly respectable outlets and publications give him airtime for no reason whatsoever.
Click to expand...

Networking.

Basically if you are affluent enough to afford socialising with media people and other "influencer" types (and have no actual work so you are able to actually go out and socialise with them), have the correct and "trendy" politics, and are able to get some kind of foot in the door either by sucking the right dick (in the case of Zoe Quinn), being a potential well of clickbait (in the case of Anita Sarkeesian) or by marrying somebody who is already friendly with media people (as in the case of Brianna Wu) then you might be able to get in with the right media clique(s) who will shill your work/personal struggles/opinions as the most amazing and well crafted/horrifically painful and serious/world-changingly important that exist today....even if literally fucking nobody outside said clique has ever heard of you, and your work/struggles/opinions are regarded about as highly as a child-fucker in supermax by those who do know of you.

Alongside these media cliques are countless other media cliques who will echo exactly what eachother says down to the letter in their publication, even if they are not socially or professionally connected in any meaningful way, and will actively ignore whether what they are echoing is newsworthy in any way. Once they reach critical mass with a certain story/narrative the bigger and more mainstream media sources start regurgitating what they say, again without knowing or caring whether the subject of their coverage is significant enough to deserve any media coverage.

These journalists and writers are themselves in a hermetically sealed bubble of comfortable narcissism and are as far removed from the public they claim to speak for as the fucking Romanovs, so they assume that the peasants (i.e. us) will automatically go along with what they say. With this illusion of being "important" and "popular", even the most repulsive and bugfuck insane charlatans like Wu are waited on hand and foot by corporations and institutions (whom are even more out of touch than the media they mistake for public opinion) desperate to appear trendy and to give themselves "real true progressive" kudos by association.

Thus femfreq is feted by twitch and youtube despite her videos barely ever getting more than 100k views months after being uploaded. Thus zoe quinn getting called mean names by trolls turns into a 3 year "HEROIC CRUSADE AGAINST THE LITERAL RAPE NAZI CONSPIRACY THAT SEEKS TO MURDERFUCK ALL WOMEN IN TECH!!!!" chimpount. Thus Brianna Wu being made fun of by fucking Jace and Tyce has spiralled out to her running for congress with the explicit support and approval of multiple mainstream media sources.
 
Furina said:
What is the "correct" way to answer a Brianna question? .
Click to expand...

There isn't. Any man that answers - regardless of how much of an expert he is - gets accused of mansplaining (despite the fact that mansplaining is when a man explains something to a woman that she already knows about). Any woman that answers will get ignored, since Bri-bri doesn't dare to let a True and Honest Woman show her up. Any fellow traps will be questioned heavily - because Wu-boy can't risk pissing off the Rat King, the safest move she can do is to make other trannies look like they're not on the same level as her.

The only winning move is not to play.
 
Water-T said:
There isn't. Any man that answers - regardless of how much of an expert he is - gets accused of mansplaining (despite the fact that mansplaining is when a man explains something to a woman that she already knows about). Any woman that answers will get ignored, since Bri-bri doesn't dare to let a True and Honest Woman show her up.
Click to expand...

Actually, John even accuses actual real women who respond to his bullshit of "mansplaining," like that woman pilot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom