Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
This is a campaign ad??

It rather resembles Frank talking to his therapist.

Actually, it's a pity Jace wasn't real, he could have run as a Republican counter-candidate to Brianna.
It looks weird, like they took their wall and instead of shooting in front of it, took a still at a slightly different angle and green screened it in, realized it looked strange then blurred it to get a fake DOF that cant possible exist at that distance.

The shadow makes it seem unkeyed, I doubt she'd be able to figure out how to make that work, so instead it's probably just the weird as hell angle, like 30 degrees off the wall and then with Frank looking off to one side of the camera-- it's just unsettling and poorly framed.
 
Yup, you're a dirtbag John. You and the alt-right belong together.

okay.png
 
I find it amusing that Wu spells so many incredibly basic words wrong, yet manages to spell "doxing" correctly when most of the left insists on shoving in a redundant "x".
 
I really enjoy the occasional moment of clarity where Wu ALMOST says something reasonable, then immediately backtracks so that he can agree with the SJW crowd.

Off with HanAssholeSolo's head!
 
You would think someone running for public office with a history as storied as John Flynt's would be more for the defense of this shitposter's identity.

Let's put this in a way that will get through John's thick skull - if you think it's okay for CNN to publish this rando's name then it's okay for Fox News or Breitbart or whoever to plaster your real name everywhere, "Brianna". You've done a hell of a lot worse than this dude.
 
Also, what are the odds that if Wu stays in this after he loses the primary he becomes an "independent" and runs in the general against Lynch and a Republican? He might not, but you never know.

Damn you, shittiest president ever, don't tempt me with a good time!

I'm starting to worry that Stephen Lynch, man of the people, is so busy working for his constituents that he doesn't have time to learn about fast shutter speeds for photographs of parades to reduce blur of what I'm assuming are his kin carrying that banner. Maybe he could ask that FUCKING WHITE MALE he's shaking hands with there to mansplain the basics to him before he takes another slightly blurred image of his supporters walking down the street in public on the holiday celebrating the birth of the country he's been elected to represent in national government? Plus, those boy scouts obviously can't vote, why is he even wasting time with the shitlords in training? Mistakes like this are what is going to keep the door cracked open a sliver for Flu to slime his way through by the narrowest of margins . . .
 
Let's put this in a way that will get through John's thick skull - if you think it's okay for CNN to publish this rando's name then it's okay for Fox News or Breitbart or whoever to plaster your real name everywhere, "Brianna". You've done a hell of a lot worse than this dude.

You know what gets me every fucking time? What gets me is how certain segments of the population will answer this. They will say something like, "no, no, morality is not the same for everyone; it depends on whether or not you belong to an OPPRESSED class. So if you are a member of an oppressed class, your 'struggle' is vindicated as long as its against the oppressor class." Basically Marxism.

Okay. Let's accept that premise, as re,tarded as it is. People like John will say that CNN reporters - some of the wealthiest, most influential, and most protected people in the history of civilisation - are an oppressed class, and some middle-aged leddit frogposter in his basement is the oppressor.

Seriously.

These people cannot get fucked fast or hard enough.
 
You know what gets me every fucking time? What gets me is how certain segments of the population will answer this. They will say something like, "no, no, morality is not the same for everyone; it depends on whether or not you belong to an OPPRESSED class. So if you are a member of an oppressed class, your 'struggle' is vindicated as long as its against the oppressor class." Basically Marxism.

Okay. Let's accept that premise, as re,tarded as it is. People like John will say that CNN reporters - some of the wealthiest, most influential, and most protected people in the history of civilisation - are an oppressed class, and some middle-aged leddit frogposter in his basement is the oppressor.

Seriously.

These people cannot get fucked fast or hard enough.

Well, to be fair, if you're posting memes on plebbit, you probably don't have too many major issues to worry about either until you reveal your dox to people who hate your guts.
 
I don't think there's any way to parse this that doesn't boil down to "it's fine when WE do it."

damn terrorists.png


After all, I think Wu is one of the more harmful people on twitter and deserves to be outed for the lying, grifter scumbag that she is. I doubt she'd agree.
 
I don't think there's any way to parse this that doesn't boil down to "it's fine when WE do it."

View attachment 243175

After all, I think Wu is one of the more harmful people on twitter and deserves to be outed for the lying, grifter scumbag that she is. I doubt she'd agree.
That quote should just say, "its ok when we do it." If we consider the farms a news site can we call doxing reporting instead? You could also say what's harmful is subjective and can now justify all our doxing with this argument. I believe Wu's campaign is harmful to district 8 and congress in general, therefore we have a moral obligation to report as much of Wu's private information as possible. Its not terrorizing its reporting.
 
View attachment 243007
I almost admire John's commitment to making impossible spelling errors.

and I'm totally going to read into John finding "hole" more worthy of censorship than "ass".

It's the esoteric rules the FCC has in place regarding cuss words. You can say "damn it" because it's not that bad but you can't say "god damn it" because of religion. Same with "ass" you could be calling someone a donkey brain but you can't say "asshole" because it's an obvious cuss.

Wu doesn't know that though and legit thinks that's his name.

It's okay to broadcast the dox of private individuals via a news network with international reach! Also deadnaming is literally rape.

I feel this gives us full and total license to dox anyone at any time because we just report the facts.
 
Back
Top Bottom