Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Peace and Harmony said:
What's that John, you have a 2001 Audi TT that you don't know how to drive? Thanks for reminding me, I too was stabbed in the head at my previous job and have short-term memory loss as well, all because I was trying to protect my gay friend but sadly he got raped and died

View attachment 202755
Click to expand...
"I bought a car that was a shitbox at the time it came out because there's no innovation in cars these days."

I get buying older performance cars because it's hard to find affordable new performance cars, but Brianna bought an overpriced wheezer of a car that can most accurately be described as a designer handbag, not a performance car...

And of all the cars to buy to illustrate the point about lack of innovation...you bought a first gen audi TT? Okay I can see how that might work...if you got one with the DSG, which iirc, was first offered on the TT as an option Edit: disregard that, I suck cocks; it was first offered on a Golf Mk4 R32, however it was first offered worldwide on the TT 3.2l.

But you didn't buy one with the DSG, so we're back to square one.

Also what the fuck do you mean "innovation has all but ended"? I can't go 5 minutes without hearing about something cool that a car company did to make something better. Not too many years ago LASER HEADLIGHTS debuted at Le Mans and that quickly trickled down to Audis and BMWs as an option. Rear wheel steer that works properly has become a selling point on fucking HONDAS. It's hard to find performance cars from overseas that DON'T have DSGs. Suspension that you can adjust on the fly without breaking out hex keys and jacking the car up have become a feature on many cars. And have you seen the new hybrid hypercars? Those things are and continue to be masterworks of engine tuning innovation. Not all of it works well (see the new NSX) but that statement about lack of innovation is ridiculous on its face.

What I think Wu WANTS to say but can't find the words for it is what I call the "Corolla-ization" of cars. Most cars produced now all look like each other or something another company produced 5 years ago. That doesn't mean under the hood there's not a lot of neat stuff going on.

Edit:
Kiras left nipple said:
View attachment 202768



yeah im sure the FEC will wanna word...
Click to expand...
Oh mother of fuck PLEASE BUY A TTRS.

Don't get me wrong, those cars are amazing.

But uh...you know if you buy one you basically have to move to a place where there's garages that will service them right? There aren't many places that do because that engine was a one off.[/sneed]
 
Last edited:
This is what is so funny about John pretending to be a woman car goddess.
The more he tweets about cars...the more you see he truly knows jack shit about them.

:powerlevel:
Local small used lot in town has a 01 TT it has been there for over a year.
In that time the lot has sold TWO Saturn Sky's :story:
 
SmaugsSmokeyHole said:
The heavy push for relying less on oil and buying cleaner vehicles also had an impact on the sports car market.

But John is in his Marie Antoinette phase where he's confused because he can't understand why everyone else doesn't have sports cars. Not that he has one himself, he just believes that because he's dumb.
Click to expand...

John is the kind of annoying jackass who will make fun of people for not knowing something he only ever heard of because he read a Wikipedia article on it 5 minutes ago.
 
Pointless Pedant said:
I really want to see Wu in a debate, but it's far from certain he'll get there like this.
Click to expand...

I honestly doubt it. The debate would be hilarious though. You can't screech mansplaining at a debate, you actually have to rely on your points and not your identity, which voters don't give a fuck about.

John has NO experience in debate, all he ever does is block people who try on twitter and use his identity like a crudgel. It might work when you are a fake, failed developer but not for anything else.

His arrogance is fucking hilarious. You look at him speak for 30 seconds and its obvious he doesn't know shit. The only reason he gets ANY attention is because of his identity. Not his accomplishments or intelligence or talent. Once he opens his stupid fucking mouth, its obvious that is his only quality. And aside from dumbfuck progressives, that is not enough.
 
Secret Asshole said:
Yeah, people don't realize this. Part of the President's executive power is Commander-in-Chief, meaning he has full authority to do whatever he wants with the military basically. Imagine the cluster-fuck if you had to ask Congress every time you wanted to do a covert action or launch a cruise missile up someone's ass
Click to expand...

Not exactly. The president can mobilise and deploy troops but after a certain period (I think it's like 90 days) Congress gets to vote to keep them there, there's other checks as well.
 
Darndirty said:
Not exactly. The president can mobilise and deploy troops but after a certain period (I think it's like 90 days) Congress gets to vote to keep them there, there's other checks as well.
Click to expand...

While the President can use the military without consulting Congress in a conflict for 60 days (and has 30 more days to get em out), the War Powers Act specifies that this is to be done in the context of "a declaration of war, specific statutory authorization, or a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces." After the 60 days the President is supposed to go to Congress, hat in hand, and ask for authorization to continue. So it would be perfectly reasonable to argue that this is a violation of the Act... as it was a violation when Bill Clinton intervened in Kosovo and when Obama intervened in Libya, both of which did not involve attacks on the US and both went past 60 days.

So, yeah, it's probably a violation, because the US wasn't attacked by Syria. But what is Congress- and soon to be representative Wu:optimistic:- going to do about it? The courts found that it was a political question and refused to intervene. The only option the Congress would really have left besides complaining on twitter would be to cut off funding to the military. Would Wu go that route and put all that money into moonbases instead?

We can be sure we'll never find out.
 
I don't think Wu is quite at the point where he's delusional enough to attend a debate. I'm surprised he managed to get out of the house for any of his softball interviews. I don't think he'll ever run any kind of town hall style campaign event either, because he knows he'd have to answer real questions and can't just block people/ignore their questions. He also won't be able to jump onto Wikipedia to act like he knows whatever the hell he's trying to ramble on about.
 
Cyber Bowling said:
I don't think Wu is quite at the point where he's delusional enough to attend a debate.
Click to expand...
I'd say all we need is for her to get a few more asspats in her Twitter bubble but even that forcefield is reaching its limit. She can't stop saying stupid shit long enough to nurse her bruised ego for the last volley of stupid comments. I think eventually she's going to quit and make a big spectacle of it for the bonus "woman harassed out of politics" buzz she can get. Brianna can't take people telling her she's stupid for very long.
 
Francis York Morgan said:
I'd say all we need is for her to get a few more asspats in her Twitter bubble but even that forcefield is reaching its limit. She can't stop saying stupid shit long enough to nurse her bruised ego for the last volley of stupid comments. I think eventually she's going to quit and make a big spectacle of it for the bonus "woman harassed out of politics" buzz she can get. Brianna can't take people telling her she's stupid for very long.
Click to expand...

As much as I want to see a Lynch/Wu debate that'll be reminiscent of when the Ultimate Warrior would murder a jobber in under 10 seconds, this sounds pretty damn accurate and I doubt it's ever going to happen. Where the insanity ends and the scheming begins I don't know, but I think this whole thing is more scam than delusion and John'll be looking for an escape hatch by the end of the year.

But goddamn, people, if the debate happens we all better be rolling tape.
 
Francis York Morgan said:
I'd say all we need is for her to get a few more asspats in her Twitter bubble but even that forcefield is reaching its limit. She can't stop saying stupid shit long enough to nurse her bruised ego for the last volley of stupid comments. I think eventually she's going to quit and make a big spectacle of it for the bonus "woman harassed out of politics" buzz she can get. Brianna can't take people telling her she's stupid for very long.
Click to expand...
If she tries it to spin it that way, she'll cement her being a joke-candidate forever. No one wants to vote for a pushover, who gets herself bullied out of her campaign by some mean Tweets. But I guess that would be fine with her, she does it for her ego, the asspats and white knights sending her money anyway.
 
Mola Ram said:
As much as I want to see a Lynch/Wu debate that'll be reminiscent of when the Ultimate Warrior would murder a jobber in under 10 seconds
Click to expand...
I've mentioned this before, but I wouldn't count Wu out in a debate, and I'm not joking at all. Debating complete cranks is a specialized skill that most public figures don't have, because it so rarely comes up. If you're forced to debate someone on equal terms, who's completely wrong about everything and perfectly willing to derail the conversation into irrelevancies, you can very easily lose in the public eye. The example I like to go back to is when scientists "debate" Young Earth Creationists. The creationists often come off as the winners because they're charismatic, they come up with spurious arguments serious scientists have never heard of before and don't immediately know how to answer, and they can throw out more nonsense than there's time to correct.

Imagine for a moment the "perfect storm" scenario:
John tapers off the Ambien, gets his tweaking under control, and wears clean clothes to the debate. He derails every question with academia-inflected SJW rhetoric that Lynch doesn't know what to make of. When Lynch tries to engage in good faith, he inadvertently steps on one of the many third rails of SJWism and ignites a tweetstorm. John uses his time talking passionately about complete rubbish like turning District 8 into Silicon Valley 2, and Lynch comes off as a misogynistic scold when he tries over and over to correct the record with actual facts. Or worse, he loses his cool when John spouts condescending bullshit to his face one time too many. Finally, by chance John gets the final closing statement at the debate, and he pulls at the ol' heartstrings by trotting out the imaginary corpses of his imaginary friends, who all used their dying breaths to urge him to run for the House. The TV crews eat it up.

Maybe a little far-fetched, but if you get John on his best night and Lynch on his worst, don't take the outcome for granted.
 
NOPE. You stay at home all day watching TV and don't talk to anyone.

yup.jpg
 
Kosher Dill said:
I've mentioned this before, but I wouldn't count Wu out in a debate, and I'm not joking at all. Debating complete cranks is a specialized skill that most public figures don't have, because it so rarely comes up. If you're forced to debate someone on equal terms, who's completely wrong about everything and perfectly willing to derail the conversation into irrelevancies, you can very easily lose in the public eye. The example I like to go back to is when scientists "debate" Young Earth Creationists. The creationists often come off as the winners because they're charismatic, they come up with spurious arguments serious scientists have never heard of before and don't immediately know how to answer, and they can throw out more nonsense than there's time to correct.

Imagine for a moment the "perfect storm" scenario:
John tapers off the Ambien, gets his tweaking under control, and wears clean clothes to the debate. He derails every question with academia-inflected SJW rhetoric that Lynch doesn't know what to make of. When Lynch tries to engage in good faith, he inadvertently steps on one of the many third rails of SJWism and ignites a tweetstorm. John uses his time talking passionately about complete rubbish like turning District 8 into Silicon Valley 2, and Lynch comes off as a misogynistic scold when he tries over and over to correct the record with actual facts. Or worse, he loses his cool when John spouts condescending bullshit to his face one time too many. Finally, by chance John gets the final closing statement at the debate, and he pulls at the ol' heartstrings by trotting out the imaginary corpses of his imaginary friends, who all used their dying breaths to urge him to run for the House. The TV crews eat it up.

Maybe a little far-fetched, but if you get John on his best night and Lynch on his worst, don't take the outcome for granted.
Click to expand...
Alternatively: we flood local news with Wu's falsehoods.
 
Kosher Dill said:
I've mentioned this before, but I wouldn't count Wu out in a debate, and I'm not joking at all. Debating complete cranks is a specialized skill that most public figures don't have, because it so rarely comes up. If you're forced to debate someone on equal terms, who's completely wrong about everything and perfectly willing to derail the conversation into irrelevancies, you can very easily lose in the public eye. The example I like to go back to is when scientists "debate" Young Earth Creationists. The creationists often come off as the winners because they're charismatic, they come up with spurious arguments serious scientists have never heard of before and don't immediately know how to answer, and they can throw out more nonsense than there's time to correct.

Imagine for a moment the "perfect storm" scenario:
John tapers off the Ambien, gets his tweaking under control, and wears clean clothes to the debate. He derails every question with academia-inflected SJW rhetoric that Lynch doesn't know what to make of. When Lynch tries to engage in good faith, he inadvertently steps on one of the many third rails of SJWism and ignites a tweetstorm. John uses his time talking passionately about complete rubbish like turning District 8 into Silicon Valley 2, and Lynch comes off as a misogynistic scold when he tries over and over to correct the record with actual facts. Or worse, he loses his cool when John spouts condescending bullshit to his face one time too many. Finally, by chance John gets the final closing statement at the debate, and he pulls at the ol' heartstrings by trotting out the imaginary corpses of his imaginary friends, who all used their dying breaths to urge him to run for the House. The TV crews eat it up.

Maybe a little far-fetched, but if you get John on his best night and Lynch on his worst, don't take the outcome for granted.
Click to expand...

Wu doesn't have anywhere near the charisma of a young earth creationist.
 
Chan the Wizard said:
It's the Enterprise-J, it only appeared in the background of the terrible Enterprise show, and I thought you were running a congressional campaign, Mr. John "Fakewoman" Flynt?
Click to expand...

millais said:
I'm not sure Brianna's Trekkie credentials are much better, seeing as he salivates over the Star Trek Voyager that is universally shit on and his most impressive commitment to the franchise is the thousands of dollars of microtransactions he has spent on the Star Trek mobile game.
Click to expand...

I think the fucker is playing Star trek online too, is F2P with microtransactions and he can play it in his PS4, i have never heard of the Enterprise J until one of the guys in the IRC i lurk was sperging about the update where the J appears
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom