Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
GiantSpaceKat could afford to give programmers $1 before telling them to fuck off without credit, surely you could have spared a couple of quarters for an artist or a composer.
Also kindly welcome Concert Pianist John to the pantheon of dickless headmates.

View attachment 4007847
Given John's portfolio (Socially Unconscious, Election Eve, Revolution 60, getting caught tracing over a Sailor Moon screencap, etc.), nobody in their right mind would confuse him for a professional artist. I wonder how an AI would depict John's wank fuel characters.

As for piano, I didn't remember him bringing that up before. Turns out he's mentioned it multiple times, claiming that his parents forced him to learn when he was a kid. Naturally, he provides no proof of these skills, though he has stated it's been "invaluable in [his] career." Creative kiwis, please feel free to tear into this one:
1670283889601.png

Also, being able to play fightan games against retarded opponents translates flawlessly into playing piano (again, no video proof):
1670283977302.png
 
Very little written history actually is based on original sources, I'd probably guess that no history John has ever read listened to is based on original sources, almost no popular history really is. This isn't a criticism because someone actually familiar with historiography already knows this.

You guys had some nice examples but how about this bigger scale and more recent one in those HISTORIANS John is praising? The most powerful scholar in all of academic history about North Korea was brought down and driven out of Columbia because he just totally fabricated sources he never visited and outright stole all his other material from a foreign historian, then when another historian called him on this him and his buddies circled the wagons and smeared the other historians until too much evidence piled up. (Then later a student accused him of rape lol)
https://sthelepress.com/index.php/2016/09/13/revoking-a-recommendation-b-r-myers/ (good long summary attached to the original post that started the downfall)
1670291973373.png 1670292007221.png
 
Very little written history actually is based on original sources, I'd probably guess that no history John has ever read listened to is based on original sources, almost no popular history really is. This isn't a criticism because someone actually familiar with historiography already knows this.

^^°^ This. And the farther back you go, the truer it is. Most Greek and Roman history, for example, is based on the writing of ancient historians whose work records what people told them, often generations after the events being reported. What primary sources exist were frequently written by participants with axes to grind and are taken cum grano salis by real historians.

It's pretty ballsy of someone who flunked out of a third-tier university after ten years of unsuccessfully pursuing a journalism degree to lecture the world on the ethical standards of academic historians. Clio wept.
 
I'm not going to try to do some gotcha like it's universally wrong...but to people who actually took it
It's just Music Theory
Oh,I'd say you would be well within rights to just call John the dumbass he is

After all


Julliard courses...
musth.png

Stanford courses...
mt4.png

New England Conservatory...
mt6.png


To give John the benefit of a doubt, search for for MusicAL Theory books, and you get Music theory instead

mus theory 2.png
mustheory.png
 
Last edited:
^^°^ This. And the farther back you go, the truer it is. Most Greek and Roman history, for example, is based on the writing of ancient historians whose work records what people told them, often generations after the events being reported. What primary sources exist were frequently written by participants with axes to grind and are taken cum grano salis by real historians.

It's pretty ballsy of someone who flunked out of a third-tier university after ten years of unsuccessfully pursuing a journalism degree to lecture the world on the ethical standards of academic historians. Clio wept.
Also, John writing that a historian "just working from the point of view of the victors would be fired" is maybe the stupidest thing he said in the entire tweet. What if I was writing a history on the victors? He thinks everybody who wrote solely about, say, the Americans in World War II got fired from being historians? All history is general history now? (Not to mention how John would REEEEEEE if someone wrote a history that treated the Nazis as having a legitimate purpose that others merely disagreed with even though he advocated for that here.)

Historians have had endless disputes about how to write history about just the losers and nobody gets fired: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historikerstreit
Not to mention where historians dispute how to even characterize events: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_wars
Or have disputes over how to interpret new information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Historians
You'd almost think they'd have an entire phrase for this kind of stuff: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_revisionism
 
Last edited:
Given John's portfolio (Socially Unconscious, Election Eve, Revolution 60, getting caught tracing over a Sailor Moon screencap, etc.), nobody in their right mind would confuse him for a professional artist. I wonder how an AI would depict John's wank fuel characters.

As for piano, I didn't remember him bringing that up before. Turns out he's mentioned it multiple times, claiming that his parents forced him to learn when he was a kid. Naturally, he provides no proof of these skills, though he has stated it's been "invaluable in [his] career." Creative kiwis, please feel free to tear into this one:
View attachment 4008642

Also, being able to play fightan games against retarded opponents translates flawlessly into playing piano (again, no video proof):
View attachment 4008645

He never actually says how "musical theory" has helped him
in other endeavors

well hey, it's not like his Rev 60 score used live musicians
maybe one fewer Porsches and some food in AFM members' mouths????
nah....More Porsches

scr.png
 
Guess how many runs for Time Crisis there are on speedrun.com. It will shock no one that this is yet another attempt to grab an "easy top 10" speedrun record.

I occasionally play a video games. I just beat both Portal games since they were just released on the Switch and I could play them on the can or while my kids were watching Paw Patrol (they are apparently on a roll).

That being said, it’s not a point of pride or something that I that I’d dedicate the time to compete in. I enjoy it for what it is, an amusing waste of time.

The fact that his life is empty to the point that he needs to validate himself by being the best at some 2 decade old game is frankly pathetic.

Don’t get me wrong, I grew up with the NES and some friends and I will occasionally hook it up and play (and trash talk…. Because I am really good at Megaman 2). But I don’t understand why a grown ass man (or Eunuch in John’s case) would dedicate the time to be the fastest there is at it. And if you are going to dedicate the time to claiming that you are the best at this weird autistic thing, you don’t cheat or else you’re just lying to yourself and others.

It’s just pathetic.
 
Last edited:
For internet shit posting, yes. Not for a published volume.
The guy who corrected her wasn't even a victorian justice specializing historian, just one who had been through the UK uni system. If she had bothered to get any actual UK historian to review her work for accuracy during writing, it would have been quickly caught.

This is like some britbong writing a book on America and proclaiming New York as the nation's capital. It shows the person doesn't actually know shit about what they are writing about.
The clip is really funny. (there's an extra twist at the end)

well hey, it's not like his Rev 60 score used live musicians
maybe one fewer Porsches and some food in AFM members' mouths????
nah....More Porsches
Didn't Rev60 use royalty free songs?
 
Last edited:
I occasionally play a video games. I just beat both Portal games since they were just released on the Switch and I could play them on the can or while my kids were watching Paw Patrol (they are apparently on a roll).

That being said, it’s not a point of pride or something that I that I’d dedicate the time to compete in. I enjoy it for what it is, an amusing waste of time.

The fact that his life is empty to the point that he needs to validate himself by being the best at some 2 decade old game is frankly pathetic.

Don’t get me wrong, I grew up with the NES and some friends and I will occasionally hook it up and play (and trash talk…. Because I am really good at Megaman 2). But I don’t understand why a grown ass man (or Eunuch in John’s case) would dedicate the time to be the fastest there is at it. And if you are going to dedicate the time to claiming that you are the best at this weird autistic thing, you don’t cheat or else you’re just lying to yourself and others.

It’s just pathetic.
Speedrunning in general is its own brand of autism (one that we even have a thread about over here), but I'm not just going to dismiss it out of hand. It's not like there haven't been strange things that people have competed to be the best at before; ever since the dawn of arcades, nerds have been trying to get the absolute highest scores possible. Hell, flip the Guinness Book of World Records open to any page and you'll probably find something bizarre that someone's apparently the best at.

Thing is, for most of these, only a tiny niche of people will actually care about the record in question. Speedrunning is a niche hobby that only a particular breed of autist enjoys doing, and few outside of the community itself actually care about it. The most notability it gets is during GDQ events twice a year, which are about the only times it attracts an audience that normally doesn't pay attention. If you came up to me and told me you held the world record for, I dunno, Booby Kids (lol Japan), I would just say "oh, okay," and that would be that. It's meaningless to me, and same for almost everyone else out there. Even if you held the record for a more famous game that's speedrun constantly like Super Mario 64, I might think it's kind of neat but wouldn't ask for your autograph or anything.

Speedrunning in particular is also a hobby that requires massive time investment for little to no gain elsewhere in life, so it's pretty much exclusive to NEETs as they're the only ones that can afford to sit around playing vidya all day every day practicing their runs. Maybe you might develop faster reflexes, but that's about the only benefit I could concede. Compare that to something like sports, where physical activity will help keep you in shape. Meanwhile, an autist playing a Mario level for the thousandth time that day has basically done nothing at all.

So yeah, John bragging about being a NEET wasting all day on vidya so he can claim records in things nobody cares about is indeed pathetic. If he had any idea about optics, he wouldn't be posting about shit like this when he supposedly has a very important job with his scam PAC. But this is the same man of the people that also brags about his four (4) Porsches, his multiple Pelotons, his vidya and anime statue collections, his 3D printers, his tabletop games, and all the other bullshit he bought with Frank's money. I think it's safe to say that "optics" isn't in his vocabulary, like many other words.
 
Back
Top Bottom