Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
And if you are of the working class, a woman, a person of colour, an LGBT individual, or a disabled person who disagrees with identity politics? FUCK YOU I hope that you and your family are RAPED and GASSED to DEATH.

View attachment 1116228
Tweet 1: You can't legislate respect and to think that means your a Leftist who wants the state to control everything.
Tweet 2: Didn't Chloe Segal use "the only voice [he] ha[d]" to try and get your respect yet you wrote him off as a crazy, power/attention hungry troon?
Tweet 3: I'm shocked John didn't plug his campaign!
 
Groom your motherfucking dogs.

dog.jpg
 
It's only a matter of time before Johnny saves time by combining his Porsche bragging and Stephen Lynch sniping.

"Did you known that my opponent Stephen Lynch not only beats up trans women and rapes babies, but he doesn't have a Porsche like I do?"
 
No only that, Porsche also designed and built tanks for the Nazis. If only John knew before bragging about owning three of them.
I don't know where this falls on the timeline of the Porsche purchases (I'm assuming it's post-purchase of at least one), but John knows. In fact, with the "most successful/10-to-1 kill ratio" bit, it could be interpreted as a point of pride. Just more "rules for thee..."
1580082334158.png
 
I don't know where this falls on the timeline of the Porsche purchases (I'm assuming it's post-purchase of at least one), but John knows. In fact, with the "most successful/10-to-1 kill ratio" bit, it could be interpreted as a point of pride. Just more "rules for thee..."
View attachment 1116916

Does that ratio include bollards and stanchions?
 
I don't know where this falls on the timeline of the Porsche purchases (I'm assuming it's post-purchase of at least one), but John knows. In fact, with the "most successful/10-to-1 kill ratio" bit, it could be interpreted as a point of pride. Just more "rules for thee..."
View attachment 1116916
Not a military scholar, but I've got a bit of knowledge from casual interest, so I'm going to be nitpicking Brianna's military history here - I'm pretty sure that the first tank listed would not really count as one of the most successful tanks. VK 45.01 was the designation for the prototype for the tank more commonly known as the Tiger I. Porsche submitted a proposed design (the VK 45.01 (P)), which was rejected in favor of a competing design from Henschel & Son (the VK 45.01 (H)) because it was unmaneuverable and a maintenance nightmare, even compared to other german tanks of the time period. Only one of the 45.01P's ever saw combat, so it would be weird to call it one of their most successful tanks and Wu is probably confusing the two.

The Elefant (sometimes also known as the Ferdinand) was Porsche taking the produced VK45.01P chassis and turning it into a tank destroyer. The figure about the kill ratio seems to be true, although once again I would point out that it was really maintenance heavy, and more importantly difficult to transport, which is just as if not probably even more important (There's a saying to the effect of "amateurs study tactics, professionals study logistics" - an invincible tank is no good if the enemy forces can outmaneuver it on a strategic level).

Now, with that being said I don't actually fault Wu for the mistakes here. She is (for once) relaying some kind of knowledge she heard offhand somewhere without attempting to claim to have 3 Ph.Ds and the rank of eight-star general, or even pretending to have some kind of special interest in the subject - it's clearly meant as an aside to her porsche-as-luxury-car line of interest (in which she does display her typical incompetence).
 
Looking at the FEC contribution data and what really stands out is the number of out of state contributions for Wu vs for Lynch, and Wu has a lot of contributions from unemployed people. Why do people give John money?
 
I don't know where this falls on the timeline of the Porsche purchases (I'm assuming it's post-purchase of at least one), but John knows. In fact, with the "most successful/10-to-1 kill ratio" bit, it could be interpreted as a point of pride. Just more "rules for thee..."
View attachment 1116916

The reason a lot of people don't know what John was spewing is because Ferry Porsche didn't found the company and he didn't get his start by designing weapons for the Nazis. Historian John has apparently lost the ability to even lift information from Wikipedia.
 
The reason a lot of people don't know what John was spewing is because Ferry Porsche didn't found the company and he didn't get his start by designing weapons for the Nazis. Historian John has apparently lost the ability to even lift information from Wikipedia.

I think this is the third time he's said this exact bullshit, so either nobody corrects him on the absolutely idiotic nonsense that he excretes from his anus of a mouth every time he opens it, or he dismisses it all as mansplaining.
 
The reason a lot of people don't know what John was spewing is because Ferry Porsche didn't found the company and he didn't get his start by designing weapons for the Nazis. Historian John has apparently lost the ability to even lift information from Wikipedia.
Seems like it could be an honest enough mistake, if one was just looking at it as simple trivia and not trying to play know-it-all automotive expert Engineer Wu. Seems "Ferry" was the junior, while Ferdinand Porsche Sr. was the founder and tank guy (though "got his start" is just wrong either way).
 
Back
Top Bottom