Brianna Wu / John Flynt - Original Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

What are you opinions on GamerGate and Brianna Wu / John Flynt?

  • I am of no opinion towards either.

    Votes: 104 8.6%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, but think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 631 52.1%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, but still think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 112 9.2%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 37 3.1%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 309 25.5%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, but still think that and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%

  • Total voters
    1,211
Status
Not open for further replies.
What doesn't Brianna understand about giving everyone their day in court? No matter how obviously guilty we might think someone is, we have to let them present their side of the story, because you better fucking believe that the prosecution will always try to present itself as pure angelic beings being victimized by barely-human monsters who rape and kill for fun.
Justice literally doesn't work without both sides presenting their cases before an unbiased audience.

Hell we even think people like Nick Bate deserve a fair trial, if only for the lulz.
 
If Rev 60 bombs, Brianna Wu will blame GamerGate and claim oppression. To be completely fair, Rev60 is not unplayable nor offensive on its own, and there is some chance that it is merely "Bad" as opposed to "Bomb". I think the idea of trying to segment the market ideologically and getting people who are "Pro-Causes I try to speak loudly for" to buy the game has worked many times in the past, but generally the Pro-Cause individual is more sincere and the game in question actually supports said cause. A game made to support environmentalism promotes the idea in game, etc.
The game was doomed to bomb financially the moment Brianna decided to be an idiot and pour over $400k into creating it. Her piss-poor management skills, writing, concepts, marketing, and so forth would critically handicap any game but it's the ridiculous amount of money poured into this one mobile game that ultimately kills Rev60. Nothing about it justifies the amount of money spent on it and there is practically no way they can recoup the money spent on it.
 
Mr. Flynt insults Binding of Issac and calls it childish, but making a "game" that's only QTEs with a main character that has an hourglass figure and a ballsack for hair is good and for mature audiences? Mr.Flynt, fuck off.
Long spergy post ahead.
I'm a big fan of the Binding of Isaac, it's one of my all time favorite games ever. And you know why? It manages to tell a deep and fairly dark story with barely any dialog in the game at all. It forces you to piece together what's really happening by watching the cryptic endings and thinking everything through. Hell, a lot of info about the story can even be found in some of the random items you find in the game. There was a lot of thought and hard work put into this game, and it makes it fun to play and watch.

Rev60 on the other hand, was clearly only made so that Wu could say she made a game. It's graphincs and framerate are horrible, all the characters are horrifying, and the story somehow manages to be both convoluted and underdeveloped at the same time. Seriously, if you realease an artbook or something that gives you a little extra info on the characters and expands on the history of your world that's totally cool. But if its literally the only way anyone could be able to understand whatever the hell is going on in the plot, especially if you go on and on about how you focus sooo much on storytelling and emotion in your games, then you've failed in almost every way possible.
 
Last edited:
"What is this, third grade?"

Says the childish "developer" of an insipid pile of shit. That and none of the hideous abominations of the game are as ugly as her.
 
Mr. Flynt insults Binding of Issac and calls it childish, but making a "game" that's only QTEs with a main character that has an hourglass figure and a ballsack for hair is good and for mature audiences? Mr.Flynt, fuck off.

Binding of Isaac is a vastly better game than anything John fucking Flynt will ever produce, assuming John fucking Flynt ever makes another "game."
 
Now Wu is trying to play like he can take being shit talked without chimping out


Where was this calm, chill reaction with all the other people who have called you out?


Gloating.txt


Well, shit, if John did that more often, he wouldn't be a lolcow:

 
Now Wu is trying to play like he can take being shit talked without chimping out

[MEDIA=twitter]627215036222730240[/MEDIA]
Where was this calm, chill reaction with all the other people who have called you out?

[MEDIA=twitter]627215688617336833[/MEDIA]
Gloating.txt

[MEDIA=twitter]627215886114553860[/MEDIA]
Well, shit, if John did that more often, he wouldn't be a lolcow:

[MEDIA=twitter]627216295906385920[/MEDIA]
Or as John Flynt prefers, "kill with Twitter bans."
 
Wait, wait, wait, I get it now...

Think about it for a second, guys.

The Reapers only exterminate all sentient life in the universe because sentient life inevitably creates synthetic life.

Synthetic life will inevitably rebel and try to destroy organic life because organic life doesn't know any better to avoid creating synthetic life.

The Reapers believe that by exterminating all life, they are preventing them from destroying themselves and thus preserve the world for a new cycle.

AAAAAAAND

The men only suppress all women in the world because women inevitably desire more rights.

Women will inevitably abuse these rights and bring down the whole of society because women don't know any better to avoid using their new rights in any way but some sort of horrible worst case scenario.

Men believe that by suppressing all women and keeping them in a subordinate position, they are preventing them from destroying themselves and thus preserve the world for a new cycle.

OH MY GOD REAPERS ARE PART OF THE PATRIARCHY I'M TRIGGERED.
tumblr_m683mcbuLt1rzr632o2_500.png
 
Unrelated but all this is inspiring me to finally start playing ME.

Can't wait for the ending to disappoint.
 
[MEDIA=twitter]627217563035037696[/MEDIA]
Then why block people, hypocrite?

Christ, these people are fucking idiots. The only difference between Wu and any other troll is that most trolls don't claim to be victims when people fall for their bait. Nor do most trolls have an army of mongoloids to buy their victim narrative and administer asspats and attention.
 
So will Wu have her "harassment officer" report this @BillWillingham guy for "harassment" if he has the temerity to respond to her incessant flood of defamatory tweets?
 
So will Wu have her "harassment officer" report this @BillWillingham guy for "harassment" if he has the temerity to respond to her incessant flood of defamatory tweets?

Of course. If he doesn't like it, he should get off Twitter. He's male, he has no rights.

Dawkins, have a rebuttal?


...Thank you Dawkins.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom