Brianna Wu / John Flynt - Original Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

What are you opinions on GamerGate and Brianna Wu / John Flynt?

  • I am of no opinion towards either.

    Votes: 104 8.6%

  • I am neutral on GamerGate, but think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 631 52.1%

  • I am neutral on GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%

  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, but still think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 112 9.2%

  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 37 3.1%

  • I am PRO-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 309 25.5%

  • I am PRO-GamerGate, but still think that and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%
  • Total voters
    1,211
Status
Not open for further replies.
Peace and Harmony said:
Well John, you don't have any close relationships with any women, but that's alright since you're a dude.

View attachment 55475
Click to expand...
Got to love the timeliness of that retweet. Brianna spends almost three days getting pissy at women who don't buy her bullshit (instead of working on her game) and is now resorting to passive-aggressively appealing to some sort of mythological, sacred unity that she feels women should have with one another (but most importantly her).
 
Peace and Harmony said:
I hate to say it but as much as I would like to see John crash and burn as anyone else here, I doubt this will come to anything. As was said in this topic by several other people, anyone cucked/stupid enough to donate to John isn't going to care, and the rest of us already know that John is a pulsating bag of shit (:alog:). I can only see this going somewhere interesting if some "big name" happens to call John out on this. Otherwise, I think we're in for another day of hate-fueled diatribes.
Click to expand...

Well, in this case the big problem for her is the meltdown she is producing. The fallout probably is nothing devastating for her, but seems is bigger than usual as she gets angry with more people.
 
Is there any un-ironic interest from anyone in Revolution 60?

I know a number of game critique sites have given it very good grades, but this is probably because they thought they had the duty to do so in order to oppose Gamergate. Does this game have any TRUE and HONEST fans?

It seems that much like Gen Z and Nookie Bear's comics, its intended target audience - SJWs - give it the cold shoulder, because it fails even (or especially?) by SJW standards.
 
It had a pretty shit attachment rate on mobiles, if I recall correctly. As in, you only had a 2 percent chance of somebody actually buying the full version if they tried the demo or something, and there was no way that the money they made from it covered their development costs.
 
P.A said:
It had a pretty shit attachment rate on mobiles, if I recall correctly. As in, you only had a 2 percent chance of somebody actually buying the full version if they tried the demo or something, and there was no way that the money they made from it covered their development costs.
Click to expand...
image.png
 
zedkissed60 said:
[MEDIA=twitter]657598088236912641[/MEDIA]"we"
A person who puts a large amount of effort into achieving a certain image, or counter-image, to the point where it is obviously contrived. Rather than achieving an image through genuine personality, the try-hard consciously attempts to fit a certain style through deliberate imitation, forced style, or scripted behavior. That is to say, he/she is trying hard to create an image.
Click to expand...
Thing is, THEY ARE. If they have enough talent and can make a profit, then they get picked for the job! This is just saltiness because you're not ready to release the game and thusly are, a failure at game development.
 
Whoever posts the next Zelda video, please post the good ending, if the game doesn't come out.
 
So, Wu recently was crowing that she'd be on a panel on VR at SXSW this year, as originally posted by Peace and Harmony:

Peace and Harmony said:
Snarling intensifies

View attachment 54773

http://schedule.sxsw.com/2016/events/event_PP53947
Click to expand...

I was reading this article concerning a panel that was recently approved that relates to GamerGate, or at least is populated by speakers who are pro-GG (apparantly they're not actually saying GamerGate, just winking a lot)

https://archive.is/DIVVV

And there's a passage which jumped out at me:

One prospective speaker on a separate panel who has been harassed and stalked by GamerGate notified SXSW organizers that she feels unsafe in light of the panel’s approval and received the following response, which she called “patronizing.”

Hi [name redacted],
We appreciate your thoughts and always welcome feedback from our community. That said, SXSW is a big tent and we strongly believe in showcasing a very diverse range of ideas and opinions, even if we as a staff don't always agree with them. If everyone shared the same viewpoint, that would make for a pretty boring event.
Cheers,
-andrew
Click to expand...

Any bets that "prospective speaker" is Wu? I initially thought so, but going by her previous methodology she'd have gone straight to twitter trying to raise a public outrage rather than sending an email to the organizers first. She has gotten several very visible smackdowns on twitter lately though, so she may be trying a less public route first. I guess we'll find out if (when) she starts playing the victim and threatening to pull out. Any thoughts?
 
Quasar said:
So, Wu recently was crowing that she'd be on a panel on VR at SXSW this year, as originally posted by Peace and Harmony:



I was reading this article concerning a panel that was recently approved that relates to GamerGate, or at least is populated by speakers who are pro-GG (apparantly they're not actually saying GamerGate, just winking a lot)

https://archive.is/DIVVV

And there's a passage which jumped out at me:



Any bets that "prospective speaker" is Wu? I initially thought so, but going by her previous methodology she'd have gone straight to twitter trying to raise a public outrage rather than sending an email to the organizers first. She has gotten several very visible smackdowns on twitter lately though, so she may be trying a less public route first. I guess we'll find out if (when) she starts playing the victim and threatening to pull out. Any thoughts?
Click to expand...
Randi also had a proposed panel but I am not sure if it was voted enough to make it in the final lineup.
 
Quasar said:
So, Wu recently was crowing that she'd be on a panel on VR at SXSW this year, as originally posted by Peace and Harmony:



I was reading this article concerning a panel that was recently approved that relates to GamerGate, or at least is populated by speakers who are pro-GG (apparantly they're not actually saying GamerGate, just winking a lot)

https://archive.is/DIVVV

And there's a passage which jumped out at me:



Any bets that "prospective speaker" is Wu? I initially thought so, but going by her previous methodology she'd have gone straight to twitter trying to raise a public outrage rather than sending an email to the organizers first. She has gotten several very visible smackdowns on twitter lately though, so she may be trying a less public route first. I guess we'll find out if (when) she starts playing the victim and threatening to pull out. Any thoughts?
Click to expand...
It does sound a lot like Wu. It could explain some of her Twitter tardrage of late as well.
 
Francis York Morgan said:
It does sound a lot like Wu. It could explain some of her Twitter tardrage of late as well.
Click to expand...
She can't talk on twitter about that issue publicly. If Wu would make a fuss about such things on Twitter, they would stop inviting her altogether. Her standing is probably bad enough after her stellar performance in that VR interview.
 
DykesDykesChina said:
Is there any un-ironic interest from anyone in Revolution 60?

I know a number of game critique sites have given it very good grades, but this is probably because they thought they had the duty to do so in order to oppose Gamergate. Does this game have any TRUE and HONEST fans?

It seems that much like Gen Z and Nookie Bear's comics, its intended target audience - SJWs - give it the cold shoulder, because it fails even (or especially?) by SJW standards.
Click to expand...

There is Twitter ass patters and imaginary eleven year old girls.
 
Almost like books tend to be more violent and unsettling than their film counterparts. If there were a literature equivalent of the MPAA, a lot of awesome books probably wouldn't exist.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom