Brianna Wu / John Flynt - Original Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

What are you opinions on GamerGate and Brianna Wu / John Flynt?

  • I am of no opinion towards either.

    Votes: 104 8.6%

  • I am neutral on GamerGate, but think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 631 52.1%

  • I am neutral on GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%

  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, but still think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 112 9.2%

  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 37 3.1%

  • I am PRO-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 309 25.5%

  • I am PRO-GamerGate, but still think that and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%
  • Total voters
    1,211
Status
Not open for further replies.
I hate to say it but as much as I would like to see John crash and burn as anyone else here, I doubt this will come to anything. As was said in this topic by several other people, anyone cucked/stupid enough to donate to John isn't going to care, and the rest of us already know that John is a pulsating bag of shit (:alog:). I can only see this going somewhere interesting if some "big name" happens to call John out on this. Otherwise, I think we're in for another day of hate-fueled diatribes.
 
Chan the Wizard said:
It was Natalie's job to upload it. I'm currently out of the office to give a keynote speech, but as soon as I return I'll talk with Natalie to see what happened.

Or he'll kill one of his dogs and blame it on that. Whichever is easier.
Click to expand...
Turns out Natalie is real and she's the one killing all of Wu's pets.

The Colonel said:
It will be released at 11:59 pm.
Click to expand...
I would rate you optimistic but...
 
Peace and Harmony said:
As was said in this topic by several other people, anyone cucked/stupid enough to donate to John isn't going to care
Click to expand...
Pretty much. The donors are likely all flop-sweaty Joss Whedon lookalikes who consider their donation equivalent to buying an indulgence in the Church of Self-Loathing.
 
Well you better start developing the fuck out of your game because you have less than 12 hours left to release that shit

development.png
 
"Simple: I am turning it down because I know more about the situation, and the opinions of many of the people at Relay, than all of the people contacting me can see in the public channels of Twitter. It's unfortunate for these fine folks that a fly on the wall of their Slack channel has befriended me, and perhaps they should instead focus their time looking into that, instead of my 'catfish persona'.

This attempt to bring the conversation back around to being favorable for them, that they are extending a friendly gesture to me, and 'giving me the floor' is far from being the truth. Hey, Brianna, here's a friendly protip for not being a hypocritical ass. Don't refer to my writing as unethical, my choice to use a pseudonym as being a cowardly Gamergate tactic, and 'publicly attacking' Marco as being sleazy, and then invite me on your show. There is nothing even remotely friendly about your two-faced approach. Get in line with all the other people who read my pieces with bias, and cared not to discuss any of my valid points publicly."
 
Last edited:
In my opinion, in order to be included in software development, you first need to develop some software. Clock's ticking, John.

software.png


Literally everyone cares

men1.png

men2.png
 
The number of Tweets John has made in the past 48 hours: Well into the double digits.

The number of games John has released in the past 48 hours: 0
 
OUCH. I just read Samantha's response, and the part that stood out to me the most was:

I am turning it down because I know more about the situation, and the opinions of many of the people at Relay, than all of the people contacting me can see in the public channels of Twitter.

Either someone warned Samantha about what Wu is really like or Blefield refuses to just listen and believe, did some research, and realized Wu is a psychotic bitch.

Either way, props to Ms. Blefield for telling Wu off.....and doesn't this make for respected Apple Journalist #2 who told Wu "All due respect, fuck you."?
 
"we"
A person who puts a large amount of effort into achieving a certain image, or counter-image, to the point where it is obviously contrived. Rather than achieving an image through genuine personality, the try-hard consciously attempts to fit a certain style through deliberate imitation, forced style, or scripted behavior. That is to say, he/she is trying hard to create an image.
 
Cynical said:
Either way, props to Ms. Blefield for telling Wu off.....and doesn't this make for respected Apple Journalist #2 who told Wu "All due respect, fuck you."?
Click to expand...
Who was number one?

I wouldn't call Samantha a respected apple journo, she's been blogging only for about two months (not to say she's not writing good pieces, I quite enjoyed them as she's not afraid of being critical as Gruber or Marco are).
 
Xander said:
Who was number one?

I wouldn't call Samantha a respected apple journo, she's been blogging only for about two months (not to say she's not writing good pieces, I quite enjoyed them as she's not afraid of being critical as Gruber or Marco are).
Click to expand...

Fair, but if Wu is desperately trying to suck up to someone, they are respectable enough.

The first would be this guy:


 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom