Brianna Wu / John Flynt - Original Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

What are you opinions on GamerGate and Brianna Wu / John Flynt?

  • I am of no opinion towards either.

    Votes: 104 8.6%

  • I am neutral on GamerGate, but think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 631 52.1%

  • I am neutral on GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%

  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, but still think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 112 9.2%

  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 37 3.1%

  • I am PRO-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 309 25.5%

  • I am PRO-GamerGate, but still think that and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%
  • Total voters
    1,211
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm curious; is there a lolcow-wiki quality entry on Zoe Quinn anywhere? I've basically ignored everything about GG since it came out, but now that I'm getting into it, I'm finding it really difficult to find decent, well-sourced info on the debacle, especially in regards to her.
 
Peace and Harmony said:
[MEDIA=twitter]656122845676703745[/MEDIA]
Click to expand...
Good job "erasing" a woman and a "man", John. Your own website says Amanda and Frank are co-founders.

Let's review your "strong" "stance" on erasure.


Of course, you have a habit of "erasing" women, people of color, trannies, John Walker Flynt... anyone really. You're possibly the world's most narcissistic human. Who can forget when you chastised people for "erasing" kadybat, your fellow tyranny flamebait author of that Samus nonsense, when you yourself had erased kadybat a dozen times. Good times.
 
Last edited:
zedkissed60 said:
John paid $500 to speak at Grace Hopper.

"If you are a speaker accepted through the formal CFP process, you will receive a discounted rate for registration. Speaker registration for the full conference is $500."
​
Add in the flight, three hotel nights, Oreos and Solylent, emergency tweezer removal surgery, TSA pat-down travel companion monitor, amphetamine and instant coffee budget, 15-person all-tranny anti-GG-death-rape strike team, black-woman-beater-headphone loss insurance, marathon and motorcycle race costs (BriBri does those constantly according to his bio), etc., and it really adds up.

Thank goodness John is the CEO of a hugely successful game development, engineering, and holodeck construction conglomerate, so the cost is peanuts. It's the price a "hero" pays sometimes to help the fragile, defenseless female race. And sandn****rs.
Click to expand...

I have a friend who worked as a booker for things like this. Whilst they would contact a bunch of respected experts in their fields, popular internet celebritys and up coming names and flavour of the months they really went after ego manics and sold the whole thing as getting a chance to play with the big boys, get five minutes of fame and have your name next to someone important and look like u matter by association.
Guess which one Brianna is.

Mostly they end up paying for a timeslot in an overflow room whilst someone really important who is bound to draw crowds speaks and pick up the crumbs that couldnt fit in.
 
Last edited:
ChuckSlaughter said:
I think there is a good reason for this. She's probably not a paying slack customer so the level of support she gets is limited. I have little doubt she wants an inside contact at slack for getting people banned or doxxed. Whatever it is she doesn't want to make a bug report. The fact she's wildly swinging her arms on twitter instead of trying to talk to someone who works at slack... over slack, is a strong indicator her intentions are shady.

Given that slack is a stupid chat site it's highly likely that she found someone saying or doing something she doesn't like and she wants to get them or their channel banned.. with dox if possible. This is social justice, a bunch of blue haired bitches collectively abusing the tiny bit of power they get from their jobs. Is it any wonder they want to control who is put in charge?
Click to expand...
I don't think it's that, slack is not like irc and her team and channels are private and so are other people's. There are a bunch of "open" teams like for angular or front end but I can count them on the fingers of my hand.
 
Not having children is a "choice" for you, John?

How's your womb, buddy? How many eggs do you have left in your holster?
 
MMX said:
Mostly they end up paying for a timeslot in an overflow room whilst someone really important who is bound to draw crowds speaks and pick up the crumbs that couldnt fit in.
Click to expand...

This is why if you're ever at one of these things and you haven't heard of some alternate speaker, you should probably just blow it off and go get a hamburger or something.
 
Xander said:
I don't think it's that, slack is not like irc and her team and channels are private and so are other people's. There are a bunch of "open" teams like for angular or front end but I can count them on the fingers of my hand.
Click to expand...
I thought that's if you'd paid? I was under the impression that it was like irc for free users. Is this not the case? Why does anyone even bother paying for it?
 
zedkissed60 said:
[MEDIA=twitter]656172917483397120[/MEDIA]Not having children is a "choice" for you, John?

How's your womb, buddy? How many eggs do you have left in your holster?
Click to expand...

so now he is preparing his excuse for not having childrens, he has to cover all the possible scenarios INCLUDING not releasing R60 with "i was busy being a idiot on keynotes"
 
I promised myself I would go back to spectating, but every time Wu brings up having children I feel a twinge down my spine. Call it a trigger, call it bittneress, I don't care. She has no right to discuss such matters, and should STFU.

I'm blocked, but I assume posting this will let her know how I feel.


Wu, please use this inflection when reading my tweet. Everything, just as everyone.

 
Forever Sunrise said:
I'm curious; is there a lolcow-wiki quality entry on Zoe Quinn anywhere? I've basically ignored everything about GG since it came out, but now that I'm getting into it, I'm finding it really difficult to find decent, well-sourced info on the debacle, especially in regards to her.
Click to expand...
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/events/quinnspiracy

It's crazy looking back on it how little (as in not at all) it had to do with Sarkeesian and Wu, and yet they still managed to insert themselves in. Especially Wu, who only got involved because she deliberately trolled twitter with antiGG memes and got meme'd back.
britroll.png
 
I'll just leave this here:
John the Revelator put him in an elevator
Take him up to the highest high
Take him up to the top where the mountains stop
Let him tell his book of lies

John the Revelator he's a smooth operator
It's time we cut him down to size
Take him by the hand
And put him on the stand
Let us hear his alibis

By claiming feminism as his holy right
He's stealing feminism from womankind
Stealing feminism from all others, too
There is only one kind of feminism through and through

Seven lies, multiplied by seven
Multiplied by seven again
Seven bigots with seven short tweets
Send them home on the morning train

Well who's that shouting? John the Revelator
All he ever gives us is pain
Well who's that shouting? John the Revelator
He should bow his head in shame

By and by, by and by
By and by, by and by

Seven lies, multiplied by seven
Multiplied by seven again
Seven bigots with seven short tweets
Send them home on the morning train

Well who's that shouting? John the Revelator
All he ever gives us is pain
Well who's that shouting? John the Revelator
He should bow his head in shame

By and by, by and by, John the Revelator
By and by, John the Revelator
By and by, John the Revelator

 
StallChaser said:
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/events/quinnspiracy

It's crazy looking back on it how little (as in not at all) it had to do with Sarkeesian and Wu, and yet they still managed to insert themselves in. Especially Wu, who only got involved because she deliberately trolled twitter with antiGG memes and got meme'd back.
View attachment 54815
Click to expand...
Yeah it had absolutely nothing to do with Wu or Anita. It had to do with a video game that could have been made out of powerpoint, DVD menus, or probably even msword winning lots of awards and accolades. It also could have been argued that it was drawing attention to a serious subject but it was actually trivializing it issue and the gameplay pretty much re-enforced the "Just get over it and stop being a faggot" shit that depressed people have to deal with. So it deserved 0 attention and people were starting to ask why it kept getting press nearby the 5 or more dicks the author had sucked.

Then a bunch of people who wished they were so controversial got in on the action.

We all know fox is bullshit but I think it's interesting that this guy just got busted:
http://boingboing.net/2015/10/19/fox-news-terrorism-expert-indi.html
he was pretty much able to run with his own narrative despite the fact that fox has plenty of intelligence analysts who would be happy to give advice.... they routinely went back to the shithead who told them what they wanted to hear... and then he was able to actually get military contracts.

The whole gamergate thing has made me highly selective who I take news from.
 
ChuckSlaughter said:
I thought that's if you'd paid? I was under the impression that it was like irc for free users. Is this not the case? Why does anyone even bother paying for it?
Click to expand...
No, free teams are still private, but you don't get a proper archive and the integrations with 3rd party services is limited. Paying gets you unlimited message archive, unlimited integrations, guest access, google accounts integration, sso and all sorts of enterprise crap. Also support, so since Bri is asking on Twitter I'm assuming she's using the free version. Which is a shame, it costs 8 bucks per user so it would cost her company... 16 bucks. :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom