Brianna Wu / John Flynt - Original Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

What are you opinions on GamerGate and Brianna Wu / John Flynt?

  • I am of no opinion towards either.

    Votes: 104 8.6%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, but think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 631 52.1%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, but still think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 112 9.2%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 37 3.1%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 309 25.5%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, but still think that and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%

  • Total voters
    1,211
Status
Not open for further replies.
More TSA sperging

[MEDIA=twitter]648672174090420224[/MEDIA]
http://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/648672174090420224

[MEDIA=twitter]648672948866445312[/MEDIA]
http://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/648672948866445312

[MEDIA=twitter]648673252009750528[/MEDIA]
http://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/648673252009750528
Yeah, because the overworked, stressed TSA agents see our buddy Johnny in his spiffy skirt...(why is it that I disbelieve even that small detail? I've only ever seen Wu in pants, other than the Frank / Brianna marriage pic which was in a dress, and for some reason, possibly my remaining sanity, I just can't picture Wu in a mini-skirt)...and think to themselves:

"Woah! That is some hot-looking skeez! Did I see xir on the most recent Victoria's Secret Cover? I ain't never seen nothing what looked better! Tell you what, I'm gonna risk my job and future prosecution to grope this hotness right now; lemme just walk a bit closer and....Awww, sweet! Facial hair and little corn nibblet teeth! Sexxxxaay!"

I think I'll file this story alongside "I was catcalled by 10 men on the way here this morning!".
 
Yeah, because the overworked, stressed TSA agents see our buddy Johnny in his spiffy skirt...(why is it that I disbelieve even that small detail? I've only ever seen Wu in pants, other than the Frank / Brianna marriage pic which was in a dress, and for some reason, possibly my remaining sanity, I just can't picture Wu in a mini-skirt)

I'm guessing you didn't see John with the superbike that Patreon bought for him?
 
He's just mad because they found his dick.
Corrected for ya: "He's just mad because they found his longstanding birth-related urinary tract defect."

I'm guessing you didn't see John with the superbike that Patreon bought for him?
Oh, right, I forgot. *Goes and looks* But isn't that a black, sleeveless dress? If it's a top and bottom, my bad. I guess I avoid looking too closely at le Wu-rdrobe.
 
Just so we're clear, John probably went right through security like most people. Dude lies as a default.
 

Way to cast the first stone, Johnny:

Leviticus 10:6
"Do not let your hair become unkempt and do not tear your clothes, or you will die and the LORD will be angry with the whole community."

Leviticus 18:22
Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable.
 
[MEDIA=twitter]648672174090420224[/MEDIA]
Way to cast the first stone, Johnny:

Leviticus 10:6
"Do not let your hair become unkempt and do not tear your clothes, or you will die and the LORD will be angry with the whole community."

Leviticus 18:22
Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable.
I'm also fairly confident that Brianna has never consulted a rabbi regarding mold or mildew in her house.
 
Looks like the amphetamines are kicking in...

John, you're such a delusional, lying troll. You tweeted your standard "feminist" bilge all day long, from the moment you got up.

You're a dupe, Danny Schryer with 17 followers.
 
Last edited:
[MEDIA=twitter]648735357291352064[/MEDIA]
To be fair, there is some really creepy, fucked up shit on the internet, and there's a lot of disgusting shit online groups get up to.
For example:
If we came out in support of, say, a pedophile, whose actions and words we blindly defended because he or she agreed with our political affiliations, that would be cause for shame.
If we promoted a con artist just because the game they were running on the public paid lip service to a cause we believe in, that would be cause for shame.
If we defended censorship, harassment, corruption, nepotism, fear-mongering, and the continued desecration of free speech because it served our goals, that would be cause for shame.
If we claimed that by virtue of being hated by certain groups, we were victims who were immune to criticism for our own faults and misdeeds, that would be cause for shame.
If we decided that a particular gender or ethnic group was evil, and worked nonstop to publicly shame them, that would be cause for shame.
Thank God they can claim moral high ground on this. Otherwise, they'd be sickening hypocrites.
 
[MEDIA=twitter]648734152372699136[/MEDIA][MEDIA=twitter]648735357291352064[/MEDIA]
image.jpeg
 
[MEDIA=twitter]648730263724425216[/MEDIA]
http://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/648730263724425216

You lie, not to mention suck at spelling
It's ok John I'm sure you'll get invited to Google Ideas 2016 and maybe the UN too, no need to throw all your toys out of the pram just yet.

The fact the only gamedev you did this entire year until this week was Holiday's armour. Then suddenly once you get left out of a conference that your GG peers all got invites for you become a game developing machine and a wank Oculus event is suddenly more important than women in tech.

No use pretending this whole year hasn't been entirely about shifting your career into being a personality and speaker rather than a dev.
 
To be fair, there is some really creepy, fucked up shit on the internet, and there's a lot of disgusting shit online groups get up to.
For example:
If we came out in support of, say, a pedophile, whose actions and words we blindly defended because he or she agreed with our political affiliations, that would be cause for shame.
If we promoted a con artist just because the game they were running on the public paid lip service to a cause we believe in, that would be cause for shame.
If we defended censorship, harassment, corruption, nepotism, fear-mongering, and the continued desecration of free speech because it served our goals, that would be cause for shame.
If we claimed that by virtue of being hated by certain groups, we were victims who were immune to criticism for our own faults and misdeeds, that would be cause for shame.
If we decided that a particular gender or ethnic group was evil, and worked nonstop to publicly shame them, that would be cause for shame.
Thank God they can claim moral high ground on this. Otherwise, they'd be sickening hypocrites.

It's ok John I'm sure you'll get invited to Google Ideas 2016 and maybe the UN too, no need to throw all your toys out of the pram just yet.

The fact the only gamedev you did this entire year until this week was Holiday's armour. Then suddenly once you get left out of a conference that your GG peers all got invites for you become a game developing machine and a wank Oculus event is suddenly more important than women in tech.

No use pretending this whole year hasn't been entirely about shifting your career into being a personality and speaker rather than a dev.

Between you two, Wu's due a visit to this:

getimage.aspx.ID-245340.width-611.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom