🔎 If you see an alert for analytics.usips.org, this is a self-hosted system I am running as a test. It is GDPR compliant and collects no invasive information.
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
Because there's a growing sect of retards who are angry that people aren't just "enjoying the product".
To the point where you have some who openly brag that "oh hey this terrible product made a lot of sales", only for people to then realize later on that the product sucked
Oh sorry, you misunderstand.
Dave Greene is a rightist, he's not as bad some others on the dissident right are.
Egad literally said that if a critic dosen't talk about jews in a movie review that they can't be trusted as a critic. I think he also has a video on VEGY TALES of all things being woke. Don't quote me on that though.
This isn't the Drinker thread, but you're going to need some evidence that he actually predicted the Odyssey would flop. This sort of misrepresentation of his own words for the sake of his reputation is something he does, but breadtubers are also professional liars, so it's foolish to believe anything they say. To give an example, I was watching this video about Birdman, which can best be described as "two retards fighting", where the host tries to defend Drinker from the accusation that he was RACIST when he took issue with the Minecraft movie trailer. Drinker tweets out that a particular frame showcases everything wrong with modern entertainment. https://x.com/TheCriticalDri2/status/1831383360280895926 (Archive)
He then discusses this trailer on his podcast where he never takes issue with the black woman, only Jason Mamoa because he's NOT RACIST.
Later on, when discussing Concord on his podcast, he mentions that the FAT NIGGER reminds him of the Minecraft trailer. Why didn't he mention that when talking about the trailer itself? You will also notice that the second top reply in the archive of his tweet compares the picture he tweeted to a BIPOC WOMAN from Concord.
Obviously the answer is that he did take major issue with the FAT NIGGER WOMAN in the trailer, but he was afraid to mention it because it would make him look racist.
This isn't the Drinker thread, but you're going to need some evidence that he actually predicted the Odyssey would flop. This sort of misrepresentation of his own words for the sake of his reputation is something he does, but breadtubers are also professional liars, so it's foolish to believe anything they say. To give an example, I was watching this video about Birdman, which can best be described as "two retards fighting", where the host tries to defend Drinker from the accusation that he was RACIST when he took issue with the Minecraft movie trailer. Drinker tweets out that a particular frame showcases everything wrong with modern entertainment. https://x.com/TheCriticalDri2/status/1831383360280895926 (Archive) View attachment 9584619
He then discusses this trailer on his podcast where he never takes issue with the black woman, only Jason Mamoa because he's NOT RACIST. https://youtube.com/watch?v=Z0TzPM3_8gg:1619Later on, when discussing Concord on his podcast, he mentions that the FAT NIGGER reminds him of the Minecraft trailer. Why didn't he mention that when talking about the trailer itself? You will also notice that the second top reply in the archive of his tweet compares the picture he tweeted to a BIPOC WOMAN from Concord. https://youtube.com/watch?v=Z0TzPM3_8gg:1825View attachment 9584658
Obviously the answer is that he did take major issue with the FAT NIGGER WOMAN in the trailer, but he was afraid to mention it because it would make him look racist.
This isn't the Drinker thread, but you're going to need some evidence that he actually predicted the Odyssey would flop. This sort of misrepresentation of his own words for the sake of his reputation is something he does, but breadtubers are also professional liars, so it's foolish to believe anything they say. To give an example, I was watching this video about Birdman, which can best be described as "two retards fighting", where the host tries to defend Drinker from the accusation that he was RACIST when he took issue with the Minecraft movie trailer. Drinker tweets out that a particular frame showcases everything wrong with modern entertainment. https://x.com/TheCriticalDri2/status/1831383360280895926 (Archive) View attachment 9584619
He then discusses this trailer on his podcast where he never takes issue with the black woman, only Jason Mamoa because he's NOT RACIST. https://youtube.com/watch?v=Z0TzPM3_8gg:1619Later on, when discussing Concord on his podcast, he mentions that the FAT NIGGER reminds him of the Minecraft trailer. Why didn't he mention that when talking about the trailer itself? You will also notice that the second top reply in the archive of his tweet compares the picture he tweeted to a BIPOC WOMAN from Concord. https://youtube.com/watch?v=Z0TzPM3_8gg:1825View attachment 9584658
Obviously the answer is that he did take major issue with the FAT NIGGER WOMAN in the trailer, but he was afraid to mention it because it would make him look racist.
Dose Birdman have a thread? He's the perfect kind of insufferable, at least in praise of shadows would admit he was gay and a leftist. That nigger is like "I don't really care about politics I only care about the truth, but I will never ever ever ever ever ever ever critique the left" he's also obviously a racially obsessed mediocre nigger that Needs to be the biggest nerd and the blackest nigger.
He even has a clip of him calling Eric July a coon or some shit.
The Maryland Ren Faire has decided to not allow fursuits and fursuit heads into their event. They cited many valid reasons for this in their explanation of the rules change including individuals in fursuits misrepresenting themselves as official performers or faire staff, making child attendees uncomfortable (imagine my shock at the idea of furries making children uncomfortable), and detracting from the theme and character of the event.
Unsurprisingly, this has triggered the mass of shit-smelling gay neckbeards as anything remotely criticizing furries does. Nothing new. It's also spawned something unique (as far as I know) in the form of this doozie of a video. Leftist analysis about how furries are a discriminated class...
With our lovely host "Ethel" -
He makes sure to point out that the Faire administration didn't include any stats and figures about the troubles furries caused in their explanation, just anecdotal cases (are all these people just Reddit incarnate?).
Then went on for 10 minutes about animal costumes being used at carnivals in the middle ages (I'm sure the costumes back then were just like the massive neon-colored mascot costumes furries wear, so they won't break the theme at all).
He then reads a bunch of comments from furries talking about how their "safe and inclusive community at the Ren Faire has been taken away" and how "they went through all stages of grief after hearing the news of the rules change", completely failing to realize that all they have to do is take off their stupid fucking mascot heads for a day and the can go to the faire like anyone else.
The meat of the video concludes with the host saying that it's just secret anti-LGBT discrimination by another name and by bringing up Republicans, Trump, and Epstein (for some reason).
Furries openly admit their "subculture" is overtly sexual. I don't blame the organizers not wanting people walking each other around on leashes with dog masks on or a bunch of freaks in unwashed fursuits taking pictures with unwitting children. Even the presenter's outfit screams "I'm a degenerate" and goes against the point he's trying to make.
Don't furries have their own range of conventions and events? Why don't the fuck off back to those? Do they just feel entitled to everything because of their adjacency to the LGBTQIAXLTORS3+LS3.4 Revision 6.4b community?
These people are still running on 2022 Biden-era gay, green and niggerish socialism, just gussied up with anti-AI hysteria and sprinkled in with hackneyed Israel jokes taken from RW people anyways.
TBF, it's a much better tactic than unironically sperging about trigger warnings. Dont think it really works, but it shows some ability to adapt, even if that adaptation is half-assed and late.
Furry fandom will be open degenerates and obnoxious assholes to everyone but when someone puts their foot down they cry about it online acting like they are the victims.
Listen i don't believe those conspiracies that furries are ran by kikes or something like that. But maybe they could be onto something..
To the point where you have some who openly brag that "oh hey this terrible product made a lot of sales", only for people to then realize later on that the product sucked
Plenty of table products have made hundreds of billions of dollars. Like the iPhone the iPhone is a terrible product. A Harbor freight.
For payday loans. 4 miniature milk. Just because something is popular doesn't mean it's good just because something. It's also pop. Doesn't mean it's bad. Some things are. Both bad and popular. Like 50 Shades of Gray. In The Hunger Games.
The Maryland Ren Faire has decided to not allow fursuits and fursuit heads into their event. They cited many valid reasons for this in their explanation of the rules change including individuals in fursuits misrepresenting themselves as official performers or faire staff, making child attendees uncomfortable (imagine my shock at the idea of furries making children uncomfortable), and detracting from the theme and character of the event.
Unsurprisingly, this has triggered the mass of shit-smelling gay neckbeards as anything remotely criticizing furries does. Nothing new. It's also spawned something unique (as far as I know) in the form of this doozie of a video. Leftist analysis about how furries are a discriminated class...
Plenty of table products have made hundreds of billions of dollars. Like the iPhone the iPhone is a terrible product. A Harbor freight.
For payday loans. 4 miniature milk. Just because something is popular doesn't mean it's good just because something. It's also pop. Doesn't mean it's bad. Some things are. Both bad and popular. Like 50 Shades of Gray. In The Hunger Games.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=TAFswAe9y-Mhttps://youtube.com/watch?v=KurCok9-yhY
i am not a fan of jose or breadtube but he's identified what TCD gets up to in his "pre-release predictions" -- that is, giving air time to negative hype about box office and casting on major films. TCD shrewdly portrays this as coming from the general viewing public, but it's actually cherry-picked from such trustworthy sources as the bald pronouns ranter guy and autistic longman. then OOPS, when odyssey grosses 1.5 billion dollars and makes him seem foolish he can sweep it all up as if he never said it, after all he was Just Reporting The News and is totally impartial.
unlike the breadtube troons and retard a-logs like birdman, i definitely don't think TCD/EFAP are nazi transphobe bigots, nor do i give a shit (all art is inherently political and every perspective should be considered, but this is a digression). their job is to review and analyze media, however they are very, VERY bad at it and entirely kept afloat by their legions of pajeet and SEAmonkey parasocial bros who are overly invested in the collapse of Woke Inc. so we can presumably have a cinema not full of marvel capeshit (which is barely relevant nowadays other than spiderman, check the top 20 of 2026 below -- non-IP originals are actually having a mini-renaissance) but jap vtuber anime garbage instead, and i assume eventually 'oli p... WHAT AN IMPROVEMENT HUH
His criticism is shallow and the bit can get old fairly fast, that being said, how is his format really that much different than the dozen-billion other angry reviewers that ruled the 2010s? He goes into stuff he knows he's going to hate because its easy, easier than organically getting your book picked up apparently.
Just discovered a guy named Shawn Grenier. When I searched "Grenier" in this thread, nothing came up, so I feel compelled to introduce you all to him. Here's his take on the three Animal Farm films:
In this video, he argues that the 2025 Andy Serkis Animal Farm is the "most leftist" of the three adaptations, because it criticizes someone even more nefarious than Stalin: Donald Trump.
Just discovered a guy named Shawn Grenier. When I searched "Grenier" in this thread, nothing came up, so I feel compelled to introduce you all to him. Here's his take on the three Animal Farm films: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ghflj-qQfe8In this video, he argues that the 2025 Andy Serkis Animal Farm is the "most leftist" of the three adaptations, because it criticizes someone even more nefarious than Stalin: Donald Trump.
In this video, he argues that the 2025 Andy Serkis Animal Farm is the "most leftist" of the three adaptations, because it criticizes someone even more nefarious than Stalin: Donald Trump.
.
