DirtyHegel
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2021
uyghur genocideDeny what?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
uyghur genocideDeny what?
Conservative Californians are mostly retards like Mr. Vickers (Ralph’s baby mommas father). Complete and utter tards.I wish they'd fucking stay in their shit hole. Californians ruin every other state they touch. Including the "conservative" Californians.
This nigga hasn’t heard about living within his means, or he took that saying to the extreme and is living exactly on the line of his means.
They're bugnats or fudds or rich neocons who really like waging war for Israel. There are very few CA conservatives who have genuinely novel right-wing values. The only ones that fit that bill are the highly religious ones, but that seems to dispel California's curse just like it does with every shithole.Conservative Californians are mostly retards like Mr. Vickers (Ralph’s baby mommas father). Complete and utter tards.
Oh once again fuck himuyghur genocide
At this point, I am convinced cynical history is just trying to paint himself as some "intellectual" contrarian to stand ut.
They all seem to be directionless gen z who try too hard to meme. You got totally owned by that guy telling you to touch grass.His fans, as usual, are not very intelligent

I wish they'd fucking stay in their shit hole. Californians ruin every other state they touch. Including the "conservative" Californians.
Conservative Californians are mostly retards like Mr. Vickers (Ralph’s baby mommas father). Complete and utter tards.
They're bugnats or fudds or rich neocons who really like waging war for Israel. There are very few CA conservatives who have genuinely novel right-wing values. The only ones that fit that bill are the highly religious ones, but that seems to dispel California's curse just like it does with every shithole.
Being adult actually does mean you can't just spend all your money on weed and toys, adults have responsibilities they have to take care of what world are these retards living in?he can buy whatever he wants he's an adult
His video was posted in March. The article about him was published in June. His video came first. Considering how in vogue articles about YouTube politisperging were back then, it is not at all suspicious that some journo grabbed the opportunity to cover this brave young man opening up about a leftist transvestite teaching him to not pepepost.Has anyone done a deep dive on this sack of potatoes family? Sounds like he would have either a glowie father or a uncle. Since he started with that that mainstream news story about the Alt right pipeline and contrapoints
Alright.And I am expressing your opinions don't line up.
fuck does he deny it here
‘Minimises’, rather, which is usually considered to be a kind of denial when it comes to genocide, but considering which political camp he is from, might as well be an acknowledgement. As mentioned above, he catches flak from his fellow leftists over his position.So he is an atrocity denier then f him
The changes were not incited by the response to the Chappelle video. After the Vaush video, I checked his channel to see if there were any new ones, and there was one discussing the future of his content in which he talked about wanting to do media critique and asking for channel name suggestions. I do not have an archive or a screenshot of it, so the only proof I have is my word, though.He was so mad he decided to quit politisperging all together and renamed all his socials to "doomermedia" from "doomerpolitics".
This is interesting because me and my friends are very open with each other and know when we're joking about things. We shit talk each other pretty hard but in the end we all know it's just jokes.He is a socdem, and, expectedly, in the comments, he has been dispensing takes that are obvious products of a leftoid outlook. For example, he has been arguing that cruelty makes things unfunny and that people should speak to a crowd with the same care and consideration as they would to a friend.
Wait San sedar is important enough in these circles? His videos are boring they are impossible to sit though (even when he has Michael brooks on as cohost instead of the women cohost he has who used to work with sex pest (((Jordan Charitan))).How come nobody’s posted this cringe yet ( https://twitter.com/kingbullyo/status/1452427474063790085 / https://archive.md/lXzRV )?:
![]()
The artist, btw, is here: https://twitter.com/JennaferNyx / https://archive.md/DwzMZ (and her NSFW ALT too: https://twitter.com/nyxxxart / https://archive.md/eacYT )
- Pedovosh
- Smashed-In-Trannyface
- Hasan the Hypocrite Homo
- Anal Assparian
- Some liberal spic I couldn’t care less about
- (((Sam Seder)))
Sam Seder is only popular because he makes Steven crowder seethe. But otherwise, people don't watch him because he is boring and is just your run of the mill liberal.Wait San sedar is important enough in these circles? His videos are boring they are impossible to sit though (even when he has Michael brooks on as cohost instead of the women cohost he has who used to work with sex pest (((Jordan Charitan))).
Thats equally badHow apropos. Haz began his fifty-minute-long raging at BadEmpanada by saying BadEmpanada’s video on the Uyghur genocide was ‘dogshit’, ‘bullshit’, and ‘debunked’.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=FPt1OPbowrI
He has a nearly two-hour-long argument with some woman over puberty blockers, psychiatry, Vaush’s takes on paedophilia, and propagation of contentious media.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=QatxZv-XB-s
But, if you want funny content, listen to two Marxists spending an hour and a half arguing over whether the US was founded on evil, whether Native Americans should get all the US land, and how the revolution will happen. See the Jason Unruhe thread for more information on the other guy.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=2IKJfz9wfhg
Watched a twenty-five-minute-long video from one of the new BreadTubers reassessing the concept of the YouTube radicalisation pipeline. What I got from it was that he ostensibly wishes Ben Shapiro was also banned.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=4Ecnw2Xx01A
His video was posted in March. The article about him was published in June. His video came first. Considering how in vogue articles about YouTube politisperging were back then, it is not at all suspicious that some journo grabbed the opportunity to cover this brave young man opening up about a leftist transvestite teaching him to not pepepost.
The article ends in quite a snarky way, which makes me suspect the journo also found his story rather silly.
View attachment 2659164
Alright.
‘Minimises’, rather, which is usually considered to be a kind of denial when it comes to genocide, but considering which political camp he is from, might as well be an acknowledgement. As mentioned above, he catches flak from his fellow leftists over his position.
not_holocaust.mp4
cultural_genocide.mp4
The changes were not incited by the response to the Chappelle video. After the Vaush video, I checked his channel to see if there were any new ones, and there was one discussing the future of his content in which he talked about wanting to do media critique and asking for channel name suggestions. I do not have an archive or a screenshot of it, so the only proof I have is my word, though.
He could have foreseen all of this. Comment sections are tard pens, and there is more of a pull to express disapproval than approval. There are enough morons commenting as if criticising something implies wanting it banned. These days people usually do think that, unfortunately, but it is not necessary.
He is a socdem, and, expectedly, in the comments, he has been dispensing takes that are obvious products of a leftoid outlook. For example, he has been arguing that cruelty makes things unfunny and that people should speak to a crowd with the same care and consideration as they would to a friend.
I have to confess that I did Vote for McCain in '08. In my defense I was painfully aware at the time that he was the worst Republican I ever did, or ever will, vote for.For all their edginess, they pull the same fucking stunt that GOPe operatives do on people on the right at election time "isn't [Romney, McCain] better than Obama?", except I think Breadtubers are even more easy to convince. Every election is about rejecting FASCISM so you are never allowed to not vote, or heaven forbid, vote Green. That's why Bernie sucked, he was unable or unwilling to attack liberals like Biden or Hillary except in the most hushed and polite tones.
McCain got totally stomped in 2008 (losing Indiana?) not just because of Obama's popularity, but because alot of us on the right knew that the unhinged lunatic McCain would have actually been a worse President than most Democrats. I rarely hear even the most far leftists make the same point about people on their 'side'.
I have to confess that I did Vote for McCain in '08. In my defense I was painfully aware at the time that he was the worst Republican I ever did, or ever will, vote for.
Oh once again fuck him
still bad, fuck this guy. China still wont save you for riding on there small dicks.How apropos. Haz began his fifty-minute-long raging at BadEmpanada by saying BadEmpanada’s video on the Uyghur genocide was ‘dogshit’, ‘bullshit’, and ‘debunked’.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=FPt1OPbowrI
He has a nearly two-hour-long argument with some woman over puberty blockers, psychiatry, Vaush’s takes on paedophilia, and propagation of contentious media.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=QatxZv-XB-s
But, if you want funny content, listen to two Marxists spending an hour and a half arguing over whether the US was founded on evil, whether Native Americans should get all the US land, and how the revolution will happen. See the Jason Unruhe thread for more information on the other guy.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=2IKJfz9wfhg
Watched a twenty-five-minute-long video from one of the new BreadTubers reassessing the concept of the YouTube radicalisation pipeline. What I got from it was that he ostensibly wishes Ben Shapiro was also banned.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=4Ecnw2Xx01A
His video was posted in March. The article about him was published in June. His video came first. Considering how in vogue articles about YouTube politisperging were back then, it is not at all suspicious that some journo grabbed the opportunity to cover this brave young man opening up about a leftist transvestite teaching him to not pepepost.
The article ends in quite a snarky way, which makes me suspect the journo also found his story rather silly.
View attachment 2659164
Alright.
‘Minimises’, rather, which is usually considered to be a kind of denial when it comes to genocide, but considering which political camp he is from, might as well be an acknowledgement. As mentioned above, he catches flak from his fellow leftists over his position.
not_holocaust.mp4
cultural_genocide.mp4
The changes were not incited by the response to the Chappelle video. After the Vaush video, I checked his channel to see if there were any new ones, and there was one discussing the future of his content in which he talked about wanting to do media critique and asking for channel name suggestions. I do not have an archive or a screenshot of it, so the only proof I have is my word, though.
He could have foreseen all of this. Comment sections are tard pens, and there is more of a pull to express disapproval than approval. There are enough morons commenting as if criticising something implies wanting it banned. These days people usually do think that, unfortunately, but it is not necessary.
He is a socdem, and, expectedly, in the comments, he has been dispensing takes that are obvious products of a leftoid outlook. For example, he has been arguing that cruelty makes things unfunny and that people should speak to a crowd with the same care and consideration as they would to a friend.