- Joined
- Jul 28, 2017
I'm confused, I thought radical feminists = intersectional feminists. Unless you're calling radical fem to the group that's against trannies? .
Intersectional feminists recognise gender as an axis of oppression which operates in tandem with other axis of oppression such as race, class or sexuality. Since these axes have interactive effects sexism will be different for black women and white women and you cannot be a feminist without seeking to end other forms of oppression as whilst racism is still alive the black woman is still oppressed even if the white woman is not.
This is where it gets interesting so buckle up. You can be an intersectional-radical feminist or just a radical feminist or just a intersectional feminist. This is because intersectionality is more like the form of approach you take to dealing with the problem whilst radical feminism is more the philosophical understanding of what gender is.
Traditional radical feminists believe gender is an entirely socially constructed thing, that we have different rude bits but all other differences are the result of socialization. This is why they don't like trans people, they see them as larping as gender stereotypes which oppress them. Some hard radical feminists are intersectional in other respects excluding trans women and see woman only as a sex class and do not recognise gender classes.
So basically whether you're a 'radfem' or not comes down to whether on not you think 'gender' as distinct from sex should be abolished and the extent to which you think gender differences are learned vs innate. Whether you're a 'intersectional feminist' or not depends on whether you consider other axis of oppression in your gender analysis/activism.
Oh yes, your girl read a blog on gender once.