Business “Boober Eats” Is a Cute Idea but Highlights a Bigger Problem

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
“Boober Eats” Is a Cute Idea but Highlights a Bigger Problem

By Jessica MasonMar 24th, 2020, 5:36 pm

boober-eats.jpg

When the coronavirus shut down the Lucky Devil Lounge in Portland, Oregon things looked grim. Dancers at the venue had already seen their incomes decline in the weeks prior, so the owners decided to get creative instead of closing completely. Since they had a kitchen and could stay open as long as they delivered, the solution was simple.

For a $30 delivery fee, dancers in pasties, escorted by a security guard, will deliver from the Lucky Devil’s kitchen to Portlanders’ doors. They’re armed with masks and gloves, along with sanitizer, and the strip club rule of “no touching the dancers” applies even more forcefully here while they keep their safe six-foot distance from customers.
“At a certain point we decided we probably shouldn’t be sending topless girls to random people’s houses, so we’re doing it more PC,” Lucky Devil owner Shon Boulden told Rolling Stone. Now they travel to the clients in sweaters and remove them to “bounce around” when they arrive.

“Boober” Eats is a cute idea, and it gained a lot of attention and traction on social media and in the community pretty fast. Portland, it may surprise you to know, has the highest number of strip clubs per capita in the country, and so that means a lot of dancers are currently out of work. So one club getting creative to keep money coming to their dancers is great. And it’s a fun, amusing thing to enjoy in this time of panic and social distancing. It’s also good for other workers at the club, like the cooks and bouncers, who get to keep making income as well.

But note how I said “workers,” not employees. Not everyone who works at a strip club is considered an employee. It’s unclear from all the coverage of “boober eats” how these women are being paid, though one dancer told Rolling Stone her income is down 75%. Most exotic dancers are not paid as employees of their club, but like hair stylists, tattoo artists, and others, they are paid as independent contractors who rent a space from the venue.
This, I might not have to tell you, is BS. There’s a lot–and I mean A LOT–of controversy and wrangling over who gets to be called an independent contractor and why. In general, calling people who are actually employees independent contractors benefits the employer because they save on payroll taxes and benefits, and thus it hurts many ICs (though not all, some people prefer it, but it’s still a minefield).
Because of this, most of the many dancers in Portland won’t be able to get unemployment (unless they elected to pay into the system themselves, which is rare) or access other safety nets. This is not to say there are no options (the new federal stimulus might give them–woohoo–a tax credit), but more so to highlight that the way strippers are paid is often exploitive and unfair; this even more in evidence in regards to sex workers. But not much is done to help them because they aren’t given much respect by lawmakers or society.
Strippers and sex workers in Portland and elsewhere are fighting for more rights and better working conditions and benefits. So while it’s very fun that this one club is finding a way to continue to provide income to these workers, it’s still worth considering that most dancers and sex workers, in general, will be extremely hard hit by social distancing and other measures and won’t have the same support or back up as many other to weather the storm.

 
Well no shit. This is what you get when your only business model is to do something that anyone with working bits can do. Sure, the lady teller at the bank could flash her tits for money but she isn't. You will, so people will give you money. Now they have no money to give and the strippers got nothing else.

Dont even bother with the optimistic ratings. These chicks could use this time to study about something more profitable but of course they won't.
 
I thought that too, but they have thought ahead and brought security with them, smarter than i expected tbh.

If anything that makes them bigger idiots by giving them a false sense of security. I'm sure that guy doing 'security' is totally going to be able to protect them if they get a call to deliver to a place that turns out to be a seedy shithole that has half a dozen crackheads with knives and guns that aren't interested in paying for what they bought or letting the women go yet

Sending out practically nude strippers to deliver food to who the fuck knows where is a textbook scenario of 'this is a stupid as fuck idea that will inevitably end badly for everyone involved sooner or later'

Whoever came up with this idea is asking for trouble
 
I haven't worked for him since 2007, but I was a personal assistant to a rich, drunk asshole and the bulk of my duties were keeping his ass out of jail afterhours. He loved Hooters and nudie bars and shit like that. I followed up in the past years with all his favorite hoes and they are either still selling their body, doing bartending but less hoe-y versions of it or are just really pathetic unemployed trash.
It was pretty satisfying since those cunts acted just like the entitled ethots like Moonstreauxx and ilk have in recent years. They are nothing but wet fuckholes and that's all they're good for
 
Last edited:
This idea seems really dangerous and dumb. And I don't agree with what some of the people here have said about strippers but I would agree that most strippers are pathetic and trashy/awful people.
 
A woman pays stage fee to dance at a strip club. Said strip club provides stages, equipment and DJ'd music; private security; tight client access controls and limits; beverages (and often food service) for clients and workers; semi-private space for high-value performances (with additional security); etc.

She is always free to refuse to perform for (or interact with) any given client for any reason whatsoever, can stop any interaction or performance at any time for any reason, and can walk off the job at any time for any reason. She can never be compelled, coerced or otherwise forced to appear, perform for or interact with any client, staff or other personnel against her wishes. The club's sole recourse is to eject her from the property and/or refuse to allow her to come back to perform again.

Meanwhile, she collects all proceeds from all direct interactions (i.e. tips) and splits proceeds from private dance sales and often on food and beverage sales with the club at a rate explicitly stated up front each day the woman performs.

So please, white knight, explain to me how this arrangement is "exploitative" or "unfair." If you want benefits, go get an office job. Just be prepared for lower income to go with those benefits and job security. Nobody's ever advertised a stripper job that offers a pension and paid time off. Expecting that is just stupid.
99% of the time this.

Devil's Advocate there are the seediest of the seediest joints where immigrant (usually illegal) are working and the whole thing is a front for sex trafficking. Only the women don't get to keep much of their money and Sergei/Jose will beat them silly if they try to escape.
 
Most of them end up dead with a needle in their arm in some shithouse anyways and the rest loiters around some streetcorner waiting to be the next victim of the recent version of the Green River Killer. That's what will happen. End of.
I'm starting to think John Wayne Gacy was right.
 
99% of the time this.

Devil's Advocate there are the seediest of the seediest joints where immigrant (usually illegal) are working and the whole thing is a front for sex trafficking. Only the women don't get to keep much of their money and Sergei/Jose will beat them silly if they try to escape.
If the author of this article meant to refer to sex trafficking, she did a bad job of conveying it.

It's interesting to me how "sex work" is treated as a sort of Schrodinger's tit: depending on the needs of any given conversation, sex work of all kinds is either self-empowering for a woman taking control of her own life or the means by which women are forced into sex trafficking, are systematically abused, injured and killed.

These people will write an article extolling the virtues of the self-empowerment only acting in pornographic films can give a woman one day, then write another calling men rapists for consuming that pornography the next.

It's almost mesmerizing how seamlessly they can flip the switch.
 
So let me get this straight, The Mary Sue is ok with strippers and sex workers but throws a shitfit if a fictional video game or comic book woman shows an inch of cleavage?

How do these dipshits never notice their absurd hypocrisy and double standards? Do they ever have an independent thought in their brains even once?

I guess I should be glad that at least in some contexts they're ok with guys wanting to look at ass 'n titties.
 
So let me get this straight, The Mary Sue is ok with strippers and sex workers but throws a shitfit if a fictional video game or comic book woman shows an inch of cleavage?

How do these dipshits never notice their absurd hypocrisy and double standards? Do they ever have an independent thought in their brains even once?

I guess I should be glad that at least in some contexts they're ok with guys wanting to look at ass 'n titties.
If a woman does it, it's empowering.

If a man enjoys it, it's evil and degrading.

See? Simple.
 
If a woman does it, it's empowering.

If a man enjoys it, it's evil and degrading.

See? Simple.

But what do they think strippers and sex workers are doing it for? The enjoyment of men.

The only real explanation I can think of is it comes down to some deeply bizarre idea of consent, if a flesh and blood woman chooses to be a stripper then it's her choice and her choice alone, but if a fictional female character is designed by a male designer to wear provocative clothing then she is being "forced" to by a man, never mind the fact we're talking fucking fictional characters, but SJWs seem to be believe that fiction is as real as reality, hence saying mean words about someone is literally the same as physical violence for example.

Of course there's also the fact that they simply hate gamers and gaming culture and want to remove sexy women from games solely out of spite, they could give a single shit about hypocrisy, whatever stance on anything they know will piss guys off is what they take.
 
But what do they think strippers and sex workers are doing it for? The enjoyment of men.

The only real explanation I can think of is it comes down to some deeply bizarre idea of consent, if a flesh and blood woman chooses to be a stripper then it's her choice and her choice alone, but if a fictional female character is designed by a male designer to wear provocative clothing then she is being "forced" to by a man, never mind the fact we're talking fucking fictional characters, but SJWs seem to be believe that fiction is as real as reality, hence saying mean words about someone is literally the same as physical violence for example.

Of course there's also the fact that they simply hate gamers and gaming culture and want to remove sexy women from games solely out of spite, they could give a single shit about hypocrisy, whatever stance on anything they know will piss guys off is what they take.
Nah, my explanation encapsulates the people who support porn makers, yet also shame porn consumers. Porn being made= stronk women embracing their sexuality. Porn consoomed= stupid ugly incels who hate women.
 
Nah, my explanation encapsulates the people who support porn makers, yet also shame porn consumers. Porn being made= stronk women embracing their sexuality. Porn consoomed= stupid ugly incels who hate women.

That's still absurdly hypocritical.
 
Look, they're just delivering food to pay for college!

Thats what mundane matt will claim when he inevitably switches over to this instead of just uber eats. Show a little man-tit and get bigger tips right

.....though the thought of oiled up, naked mundane matt showing up with my food order horrifies the shit out of me
 
So let me get this straight, The Mary Sue is ok with strippers and sex workers but throws a shitfit if a fictional video game or comic book woman shows an inch of cleavage?

How do these dipshits never notice their absurd hypocrisy and double standards? Do they ever have an independent thought in their brains even once?

I guess I should be glad that at least in some contexts they're ok with guys wanting to look at ass 'n titties.
SJWs like to destroy things people outside of their circles enjoy. They didnt have a problem with the homely ladies of Mass Effect Andromeda or Mortal Kombat 11.

On the other side of the coin, they dont like attractive women, either. The hookers they wanna see are Boogie2988-sized monstrosities with green hair that smell like dead fish and like to drive their stiletto heels into their customers' testicles.
 
Back
Top Bottom