Bob Iger named Disney CEO in shocking development

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Via CNN Business
Archive

In a move that shocked Hollywood, Bob Iger, one of the most notable CEOs in the history of the Walt Disney company, is returning to once again run the media empire.

Bob Chapek, who replaced Iger in 2020 as CEO, is stepping down immediately.

“We thank Bob Chapek for his service to Disney over his long career, including navigating the company through the unprecedented challenges of the pandemic,” Susan Arnold, Chairman of the Board for Disney, said in a statement on Sunday night. “The Board has concluded that as Disney embarks on an increasingly complex period of industry transformation, Bob Iger is uniquely situated to lead the Company through this pivotal period.”

The announcement, while surprising to the media industry, comes at a time of great evolution for Disney. The company is coming off a lackluster earnings report that showed growth for its streaming endeavors. However, that came at a great cost. Disney’s streaming business lost $1.5 billion in the fourth quarter. That report sent Disney’s stock tumbling after a year of sluggish to bad performance.

Chapek guided the company through the pandemic, one of its most tumultuous periods in its nearly 100-year history, but ultimately Disney decided that its future was in better hands with Iger.

Away from the pandemic, Chapek had a short but bumpy tenure as the head of Disney. Chapek, who served as chairman of Disney Parks, Experiences and Products before taking over for Iger, found himself dealing with issues regarding pay with Scarlett Johansson, one of the company’s biggest stars, as well as Disney’s battles with Florida, and its own employees, regarding the state’s controversial bill restricting certain LGBTQ topics in the classroom.

Disney’s stock has also taken a hit lately. It’s currently down roughly 40% this year.

As for Iger, he has an almost mythical status as the leader of Disney (DIS). He spent 15 years as CEO and was instrumental in acquiring major brands like Pixar, Marvel and Lucasfilm, the home to Star Wars. Iger also closed the $71 billion deal to buy most of 21st Century Fox and kicked off the streaming revolution at Disney (DIS) with the creation of Disney (DIS)+ in November 2019.

Iger stayed on at Disney as executive chairman directing the company’s creative endeavors. He officially left the company after nearly 50 years at the end of last year.

Disney said Sunday that Iger has agreed to serve as CEO for two years with “a mandate from the Board to set the strategic direction for renewed growth and to work closely with the Board in developing a successor to lead the Company at the completion of his term.”

The move is also surprising since Chapek just renewed his contract. The company’s board of directors unanimously voted to extend Chapek’s contract as CEO for another three years, the company said in June. Chapek’s new contract began in July and was set to run until 2025.

Also, it appeared that Iger was set in retirement with his legacy as one of Disney’s most notable and successful CEOs. Now, he’s back.

“I am extremely optimistic for the future of this great company and thrilled to be asked by the Board to return as its CEO,” Iger said in a statement Sunday. “Disney and its incomparable brands and franchises hold a special place in the hearts of so many people around the globe—most especially in the hearts of our employees, whose dedication to this company and its mission is an inspiration.”

Iger added that he is “deeply honored to be asked to again lead this remarkable team, with a clear mission focused on creative excellence to inspire generations through unrivaled, bold storytelling.”
 
I see this as basically like replacing a small turd with a huge anus. The very same anus that shit up the company in the first place.
It sure is fun watching the big D burn in it's own excrements!
 
They lost 2+ billion in 2 years from disney+ ALONE? How can that even be possible? Where is all that money going to???
So here's some fun facts for you.
Disney does deals to make their Disney+ numbers appear higher than they actually are.

If someone buys a phone contract through verizon, they get a subscription to Disney+. I don't know how long, and I've heard when the deal started it was a year plus. Last I heard it can be as short as six months. Either way, that's an easy number of "subscriptions" they can add to their total to seem more impressive. There are also products you can buy that come with free Disney+ offers.

Now let's look overseas. Oftentimes, there will be special deals given to phone carriers and the like to tack on shit like Disney+ for literal pennies. In addition, Disney had the streaming rights to IPL, Indian Premiere League. They're the ones who do cricket. Many people in India only signed up for their garbo service so they could stream the cricket games, so when Disney lost the rights to STREAMING these games earlier this year, they lost a shit ton of subscribers. This alone cause Disney to lower their projections for subscribers. They also weren't paying the premium for the service that we do. (We as in first world countries.)

A lot of Disney+ subscriptions are nothing more than fluff. Fake. They only exist to cook numbers so it can look more successful than it actually is. That's why having a ton of subscribers isn't equating to profit.
 
Almost all of the problems Disney is facing can be directly traced back to Iger. Kathleen Kennedy, the woke writers, Marvel phase 4, the parks pricing most people out, the sad Star Wars hotel, the even sadder Star Wars land at the parks, and the relegation of Pixar to sequels/straight to  dvd Disney +. Why would you bring back the guy who drew the map for your coming bankruptcy?
📣 THEY'RE PULLING AN ELLEN PAO.
Bring in a new guy to make unpopular changes, then bring back the old guy who doesn't reverse any of those changes.
 
BlackRock is ALWAYS a problem. BlackRock is heavily distorting markets by divorcing companies from actual profit and consumption, and they do this on purpose so as long as a company is not being profitable due to sales or performance but BlackRock life support, companies are heavily dependent on BlackRock.
Conspiracy time: Blackrock knows that putting niggerfaggots everywhere is financial cancer, the reason they're encouraging it by giving bribes is to make companies go bankrupt so they can be taken over once they actually do fall appart.

i.e. Bribe someone to commit suicide so you can repossess their house. Short term loss for long term profit.
 
Mean he also turned Disney around so they could afford buying both Marvel and Star Wars. He really turned the business around he replaced Michael Eisner.

Pixar was ready to leave Disney before he took over due to Eisner, but Iger was not only able to mend that relationship but made a deal to purchase Pixar, he also saved the failing Disney animation department getting them to start making hits again.

Business wise he made a lot of good moves, mean just look at Disney stock before he became CEO and when he left for the first time. However I'm doubtful he has it in it to fix all the issues Disney currently has (not quality issues but issues losing them money). Mean I still question why he did the buy out of Fox, it truly feels like they had no ideas for them outside using content for Disney+ and just let one of the biggest movie studios die when it came to cinematic efforts.
they drastically overestimated how many people would subscribe to Disney+ which is why they bought out Fox
 
So I was about to say "Guys, I hate disney as much as the next guy, but they made like 4 billion from aladin, lion king and beauty and the beast, yeah they're burning IPs but at least they're making money how bad can they possibly be-"



what

They lost 2+ billion in 2 years from disney+ ALONE? How can that even be possible? Where is all that money going to???

Also, looking at the average cost of their movies and how many of them are just tossed into disney plus with no theatrical release is starting to make those 4 billion seem like nothing compared to what they're burning.
Well, for a start they can bring back Gina Carano and Pablo Pascal and have the two of them travel around the galaxy bringing people in warm or cold... Not sure how much that would actually help, but when you've got arterial bleeding a band-aid is better than nothing.
 
Conspiracy time: Blackrock knows that putting niggerfaggots everywhere is financial cancer, the reason they're encouraging it by giving bribes is to make companies go bankrupt so they can be taken over once they actually do fall appart.

i.e. Bribe someone to commit suicide so you can repossess their house. Short term loss for long term profit.
But what happens if blackrock goes bankrupt before that happens? How many businesses will they drag down with em?
 
Chapek was too weak to be CEO. He saw the problems and did nothing. Iger at least had alot of media allies that would hide the bullshit. Chapek had no allies, and was too weak to get rid of his enemies. Bending the knee on the groomer shit guaranteed he was gonna get a palace coup. Remember that eunuchs spend all the energy they used to use on sex towards autism. There is a reasom why eunuch scheming vizier is an archtype. He displayed weakness. The idea that he was a fall guy might be true but Chapek probably didnt know it.

Iger cant fix the mess he made. But he can make their be less noise about it and get the media machine to stop mentioning it. That will create illusion of stopping the bleeding. Im guessing the dems told Iger to fuck off and be their pay pig again and hes doing what hes told.
 
People really need to unsubscribe from Doomcock and Midnights Edge
What it comes down to (Re-Lucasfilm)

What list of people are out there with the skill set to run a studio?
[ its a very small list of people]

Who would want to leave their current position, go to Disney, and then get shanked on social media by Lucasfilm employees.

Thats why KK still has a job

Does that mean more or less child grooming?
More
 
Oh man, Iger played Chapek bad.

Iger's the one who set Disney on it's current "men bad/ queer PoC pedos good" course, then whistled a little tune as he stepped away during COVID and all the fallout. Now he gets to blame Chapek and return like some kind of savior, lmfao.
 
they had huge money loser with Lightyear this year, with Strange World looking to be their next flop.
Well, that's a shame. They probably should've made those movies good instead of either a bland, boring, memberberry mess (Lightyear) or a DIVUHRSE ripoff of Wayne Barlowe's art (Strange World).
 
how is voting to change a law to dissolve all 5 or so super special districts not a repeal of the reedy creek improvement act?
You were saying there’s nothing in the act about transferring the bond debt, but the act didn’t matter in that regard. There are the regular laws about special districts that’d come into play and say Disney would be getting off the hook for the bond debt. You were saying that because the Creek act was done and didn’t say something on the bond debt that somehow Disney would still be stuck with the debt, in spite of the laws that state what happens with for special districts and their bond debt.

That the laws on special districts were the ones changed to end Disney’s special district would suggest those same laws that describe transferring the debt to the government would kick in. So the argument that this wasn’t a special district where those laws apply because of the existence of the Creek Act doesn’t make sense.





there is no way the state of flroida or even other parts of the counties being on the hook for the debt.

the Disney one was very special, they could do pretty much everything they wanted in it. thats why the Florida government could take it away at all, its not a normal special district.
 
So here's some fun facts for you.
Disney does deals to make their Disney+ numbers appear higher than they actually are.

If someone buys a phone contract through verizon, they get a subscription to Disney+. I don't know how long, and I've heard when the deal started it was a year plus. Last I heard it can be as short as six months. Either way, that's an easy number of "subscriptions" they can add to their total to seem more impressive. There are also products you can buy that come with free Disney+ offers.

Now let's look overseas. Oftentimes, there will be special deals given to phone carriers and the like to tack on shit like Disney+ for literal pennies. In addition, Disney had the streaming rights to IPL, Indian Premiere League. They're the ones who do cricket. Many people in India only signed up for their garbo service so they could stream the cricket games, so when Disney lost the rights to STREAMING these games earlier this year, they lost a shit ton of subscribers. This alone cause Disney to lower their projections for subscribers. They also weren't paying the premium for the service that we do. (We as in first world countries.)

A lot of Disney+ subscriptions are nothing more than fluff. Fake. They only exist to cook numbers so it can look more successful than it actually is. That's why having a ton of subscribers isn't equating to profit.
Hrm, this may explain why you get HBO Max from ATT and Hulu with Spotify.

I love that this is 'jews getting jewed by their own jewry". They've basically made pirating boom again by turning streaming into cable. Netflix blew up like it did because it was first and the selection wasn't diluted.
 
Hrm, this may explain why you get HBO Max from ATT and Hulu with Spotify.

I love that this is 'jews getting jewed by their own jewry". They've basically made pirating boom again by turning streaming into cable. Netflix blew up like it did because it was first and the selection wasn't diluted.

It's even worse than simply cable 2.0 since all these services cost a LOT more together than the most costly cable plan. Normies have dropped cable over not wanting to pay for things they don't watch and walking right into an insta nightmare scenario that anyone with a functioning brain could see coming. I've been trying to point this out for years now. And this isn't even factoring in all the other issues like total media control, censorship and media availability.
 
Ok, but even with the fake subscriptions, why is the operating cost a billion per year? Do servers cost THAT much to run?
, with Strange World looking to be their next flop.
They're already bragging that one of the characters is a niggerfaggot, so yeah. At this point you can tell how well these movies will do based on what the marketing focuses on.

I'm starting to wonder if they proudly brag about all the degeneracy in their new films in order to intentionally keep parents away.
 
So I was about to say "Guys, I hate disney as much as the next guy, but they made like 4 billion from aladin, lion king and beauty and the beast, yeah they're burning IPs but at least they're making money how bad can they possibly be-"



what

They lost 2+ billion in 2 years from disney+ ALONE? How can that even be possible? Where is all that money going to???

Also, looking at the average cost of their movies and how many of them are just tossed into disney plus with no theatrical release is starting to make those 4 billion seem like nothing compared to what they're burning.
Shared this back in the disney thread but they've been subsidizing disney+ and their studios with profits from the parks for a long time with hopes that in the near future that both will be able to start generating income on their own (Chapek was telling investors to expect Disney+ to achieve profitability in 2024) , and this quarter was probably the biggest example of it yet.

726fbe30-ecc7-47d5-988c-eabf2273d478_2458x1380.png

The reason why they've been doing this is because there's a decently hard limit to how much the parks can make due to things like capacity, upkeep, and staffing. and they somehow got it in there heads that DTC market could be more profitable so long as they lay the infrastructure, establish a growing userbase, strangle out some of the competition with lower prices and more content, and slowly raise the price once they become the staple.

Problem is there kinda failing at all of it. The fox buyout was one part getting their library of IPs one part getting sky tv for streaming in the EU but they haven't really used any of fox's stuff and they actually failed to get sky because of comcast. Their userbase isn't growing as fast as they projected since the content they've been making is dog shit that's not attracting anyone besides Indians who are literally paying 58 cents a month for it so they have to fudge the numbers to including ESPN and HULU subscribers to claim they have more then Netflix.
b30cb0c7-d471-4426-a68b-847bb0bfbef2_2458x1380.png

All the while investing the bare minimum into the parks, overcharging guests with a god awful app, and +$100 popcorn buckets as well as firing most of their imagineers and letting their competitors take them in.


I'm actually willing to bet the furloughs Chapek was hinting at (and probably got fired over) where aimed at the parks rather then the movies as people like doomcock will probably claim since Chapek did double down on the studios in his last earning call a few days prior saying that the company would be aiming to spend 30 billion on content alone in 2023 and he has all but stated in the past the only reason why he thinks people go to the parks is because of IP and IP alone so it really doesn't make sense to invest in them.

TLDR: fat retard was using something profitable to fund something that isn't, and was probably shit canned because he was doing stuff to the profitable thing that got enough people worried it wouldn't be able to fund the unprofitable stuff anymore.
 
It seems like Disney+ was managed the same way Lucasfilm was: just dish out content without any real plan or vision and hope it makes money somehow.
 
Back
Top Bottom