Bob Iger named Disney CEO in shocking development

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Via CNN Business
Archive

In a move that shocked Hollywood, Bob Iger, one of the most notable CEOs in the history of the Walt Disney company, is returning to once again run the media empire.

Bob Chapek, who replaced Iger in 2020 as CEO, is stepping down immediately.

“We thank Bob Chapek for his service to Disney over his long career, including navigating the company through the unprecedented challenges of the pandemic,” Susan Arnold, Chairman of the Board for Disney, said in a statement on Sunday night. “The Board has concluded that as Disney embarks on an increasingly complex period of industry transformation, Bob Iger is uniquely situated to lead the Company through this pivotal period.”

The announcement, while surprising to the media industry, comes at a time of great evolution for Disney. The company is coming off a lackluster earnings report that showed growth for its streaming endeavors. However, that came at a great cost. Disney’s streaming business lost $1.5 billion in the fourth quarter. That report sent Disney’s stock tumbling after a year of sluggish to bad performance.

Chapek guided the company through the pandemic, one of its most tumultuous periods in its nearly 100-year history, but ultimately Disney decided that its future was in better hands with Iger.

Away from the pandemic, Chapek had a short but bumpy tenure as the head of Disney. Chapek, who served as chairman of Disney Parks, Experiences and Products before taking over for Iger, found himself dealing with issues regarding pay with Scarlett Johansson, one of the company’s biggest stars, as well as Disney’s battles with Florida, and its own employees, regarding the state’s controversial bill restricting certain LGBTQ topics in the classroom.

Disney’s stock has also taken a hit lately. It’s currently down roughly 40% this year.

As for Iger, he has an almost mythical status as the leader of Disney (DIS). He spent 15 years as CEO and was instrumental in acquiring major brands like Pixar, Marvel and Lucasfilm, the home to Star Wars. Iger also closed the $71 billion deal to buy most of 21st Century Fox and kicked off the streaming revolution at Disney (DIS) with the creation of Disney (DIS)+ in November 2019.

Iger stayed on at Disney as executive chairman directing the company’s creative endeavors. He officially left the company after nearly 50 years at the end of last year.

Disney said Sunday that Iger has agreed to serve as CEO for two years with “a mandate from the Board to set the strategic direction for renewed growth and to work closely with the Board in developing a successor to lead the Company at the completion of his term.”

The move is also surprising since Chapek just renewed his contract. The company’s board of directors unanimously voted to extend Chapek’s contract as CEO for another three years, the company said in June. Chapek’s new contract began in July and was set to run until 2025.

Also, it appeared that Iger was set in retirement with his legacy as one of Disney’s most notable and successful CEOs. Now, he’s back.

“I am extremely optimistic for the future of this great company and thrilled to be asked by the Board to return as its CEO,” Iger said in a statement Sunday. “Disney and its incomparable brands and franchises hold a special place in the hearts of so many people around the globe—most especially in the hearts of our employees, whose dedication to this company and its mission is an inspiration.”

Iger added that he is “deeply honored to be asked to again lead this remarkable team, with a clear mission focused on creative excellence to inspire generations through unrivaled, bold storytelling.”
 
So they voted to change a statute that doesn’t exist and won’t have to take on the debt because DeSantis went “nuh uh”.
They voted to repeal the Reedy Creek improvement act, the law that was put in place to create the special district.
there is no part in that bill that regulates the dissolvement of the District so more basic laws regulate it.
 
midnights edge did a short video the norway dude says disney shareholders vanguard and blackrock want the wokeness and the only way you could fire the wokies would be to let them fail.
 
Don’t they still make a solid chunk of their revenue from the parks? It would probably take a LOT more degradation before enough Disney consoomers boycott the park to make shutting it down to be the most economic option. It’s true that the parks have a worse profit margin than movies, but as far as I’m aware they still make up the bulk of Disney’s revenue stream.

Also, Universal has always been better than Disney. I went to both on a school trip maybe around 2012-2013ish (right when Harry Potter world opened) and the amount of stuff to do between the two parks were night and day. Disney felt like it was mostly just trying to get you to buy food/merch, whereas Universal felt like it actually wanted you to have a good time. Maybe it’s because Universal knows that a lot of their IP just doesn’t have the same inherent draw as Disney, so they need to compensate by actually making that shit good.
When I made that earlier post mentioning them shuttering a park, I was thinking strictly of Disney's ongoing staffing problems (allegedly they sent out emails asking for college program interns that used lists going as far back as the 1990s, because people entering middle age with decent jobs are totally going to want to quit those to work part time for the opressive mouse). I've since realized they're not going to shutter EPCOT since I forgot their big ticket Guardians of the Galaxy coaster is there, if nothing else.

And yeah, Universal clearly has had its shit together far more than Disney has in the past few years, it just wasn't as obvious since Disney was the bigger of the two and successful on the surface. But now that the foundations are crumbling, Disney's not able to make anybody happy while Universal ended up hiring a lot of their fed-up imagineers and evidently letting them do more of what they want instead of just variations of 'people in front of Screens' - just look at Hagrid's Motobike coaster, it had extreme teething issues being a multi-launch coaster with a drop track, but it sounds like it's finally worked itself out and is a unique addition to IoA. Meanwhile, Rise of the Resistance isn't even completely functional on a good day anymore and while the trackless vehicles might be unique, it's not necessarily actually that unique an experience since on a conceptual level, it's not that different from the trackless Pooh ride beyond the drop gimmick finale.

I'm actually starting to get a little convinced that Frank Wells death was an inside job, it lined up a little too well for the globalhomos to fully take over
-Let Eisner go full retard with no one to wrangle him
-Caused Katzenberg, the most likely person the board would replace him to quit
-Removed the last remaining Disney working in the company along with any influence they had.
Nah, I wouldn't say inside job so much as it is the globohomos are such opportunists that they're always ready to jump on any possible advantage they could get, worming their way into pop culture because they typically have sociopathic sex freaks in their midst.

It's how we got Gamergate, after all - that whole shitshow took less than a day to trigger after the Zoe Post, because those fuckers were so interwoven into the indie gaming scene that they had a 'circle the wagon' plan in motion in less than a day or two.
 
They voted to repeal the Reedy Creek improvement act, the law that was put in place to create the special district.
there is no part in that bill that regulates the dissolvement of the District so more basic laws regulate it.
No they didn't, they voted on a bill that affects all special districts. How they targeted Disney was by saying they were targeting just those from before 1968.

This does affect the Reedy Creek Improvement Act, seeing as they voted to change the laws that affect all special districts before 1968, but no they did not vote to repeal that.



2022-11-21.png
 
Maybe he was but he left Disney in such a shit state that being the ex CEO of it holds little to no water with voters, maybe even actively damaging his rep.
When he left, the full effects of his actions were not visible. Their stock price was sitting around 155, they had just purchased fox and the like, the MCU had their last big hurrah with endgame april of that year with little to no sign that the upcoming movies would be utter garbage that even soyfags would clutch their money for, Disney+ numbers were high, and to the average person, they looked to be in good shape since they acquired so many properties.

With Chapek, all of those chickens had fully had a chance to come home to roost and shit everywhere. The stock price is hovering at around 92, the mcu is a bunch of shit-tier tv shows that capefags turn their nose up at, and the parks are pricing out their regular guests.

People like us? We're not normies. We know that Iger started this ball down the hill. We pay attention to things they don't. Those idiots probably don't even know that Disney took on so much debt, cause they think they have infinite money coffers. Your average, everyday voter would have no clue how bad things really are, or when the ball started rolling.


midnights edge did a short video the norway dude says disney shareholders vanguard and blackrock want the wokeness and the only way you could fire the wokies would be to let them fail.
Disney shareholders have been vocal about how they don't want to keep going down this road. The problem is Disney's board, and the companies like Blackrock. Chapek tried to grow a tiny bit of a spine and say they were going to move to be apolitical, but the board set his ass straight and around 24 hours later he put out a statement doubling down on politics. That's right when Desantis said "Fine, guess reedy creak can go!"
 
No they didn't, they voted on a bill that affects all special districts. How they targeted Disney was by saying they were targeting just those from before 1968.

This does affect the Reedy Creek Improvement Act, seeing as they voted to change the laws that affect all special districts before 1968, but no they did not vote to repeal that.
how is voting to change a law to dissolve all 5 or so super special districts not a repeal of the reedy creek improvement act?
 
"""SHOCKING DEVELOPMENT"""
Seriously fuck off, it's the least shocking development imaginable.

Now if it were like

"Brendan Fraser named Disney CEO"
"Barron Trump named Disney CEO"
Joshua Conner Moon named Disney CEO
then yes, I admit I'd be fairly surprised.
 
The problem is Disney's board, and the companies like Blackrock

BlackRock is ALWAYS a problem. BlackRock is heavily distorting markets by divorcing companies from actual profit and consumption, and they do this on purpose so as long as a company is not being profitable due to sales or performance but BlackRock life support, companies are heavily dependent on BlackRock.

I would even say that taking over companies and having them hostage on ESG funds is not even a means to promote ESG goals and that this is a smokescreen. We all know Hedge Funds have no heart and therefore are incapable of humanitarian pursuits. LGBT, Diversity, Environment and all that, even with conducted properly and with genuinely humanitarian intentions and not in the abismally cynical manner they are usually handled, couldn't matter less to the heartless board suits.

The purpose of taking over companies is taking over companies for the sake of taking over companies.

"The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power"

"Brendan Fraser named Disney CEO"

I'm looking forward to Mary Lee Walsh taking over the House of Mouse
 
Replacing one form of cancer with another. Iger largely set the stage for all the bullshit Disney's been doing the last few years and allowed abominations such as the Sequel Trilogy to happen. Chapek just continued it and now it seems like he's the fall guy.

Nothing is going to change. In fact expect them to double down in the next few years. The only way this company gets "fixed" is through complete obliteration, it's simply too far gone.
 
Chapek is just the fall goy. Many of these Jew-infused businesses will set up these goy puppets to be a figurehead who can be discarded at will. Chapek never had any real authority but he’ll get paid off with tens of millions of dollars so he will be okay. Iger set this guy up to fail and not a surprise that things fell apart. It’s a lot like Bob Welch and Jeff Immelt: Immelt didn’t keep things from falling apart but the setup all happened on Welch’s watch.
 
So I was about to say "Guys, I hate disney as much as the next guy, but they made like 4 billion from aladin, lion king and beauty and the beast, yeah they're burning IPs but at least they're making money how bad can they possibly be-"

Even the hugely popular Disney+, which continues to gain in subscribers, made an operating loss of $1.47 billion – more than double its loss last year.

what

They lost 2+ billion in 2 years from disney+ ALONE? How can that even be possible? Where is all that money going to???

Also, looking at the average cost of their movies and how many of them are just tossed into disney plus with no theatrical release is starting to make those 4 billion seem like nothing compared to what they're burning.
 
Disney stock has went up, so seem stock market least likes this move. Doubt Iger will say for longer than 2 year, mostly about having someone with a proven track record and who the shareholders like until they find a better replacement.

But Disney have a lot of issues right now.
1. Unable to create new ips, and are over reliant on old ones
2. Disney+ is still bleeding billions
3. Hulu issue, Disney have to buy Comcast's 33% stake in Hulu in 2024 which isn't cheap and will add billions to Disney debt.
4. Total mismanagement of 20th century studios, with no idea on how to market titles, what titles to even greenlight and the total gutting of the amount of movies they make.
5. Disney+ growth as slow down considerably

After the Fox buyout, Disney can't afford losing billion a year like the $4 billion they did this year.
Sounds like a dead cat bounce to me.
 
I’ve always felt like she was a puppet with little power. A fall woman or a face. The rot in Lucasfilm goes much deeper than her imo. It’s a cultural issue now and one that can be laid at the feet of the mouse.

Nah, she tanked SW you can see the self insert and her politics all over it. The planning of the trilogy was abysmal regardless of the politics as well and that is squarely at her feet. She is also reportedly the reason the SW Hotel and the MGM SW land are not themed off the classic movies.

Doomcock sucks

The midnights edge channel had a few good editorials but they make more money just bitching about nerd shit

Midnight's Edge is okay even if it is just the same click bait story over and over again for years. Doomcock however... Who goes through all of the effort to include a fucking puppet only to have it agree with you constantly in a lazy/generic falsetto? Such highly distilled cringe. Look at Itsagundam and what he did with Billy, that man understands how to be entertaining.
 
Last edited:
Don't forget the fact the Parks are a total shitshow right now.
  • Even Disney loyalists called them out on their bullshit when the D23 parks panel reveals amounted to a bunch of Blue Sky wishlisting and nothing actually concrete.
  • Epcot is still a giant construction zone that focused on stuff that wasn't rebuilding the proper Journey into Imagination that people have been demanding for decades at this point. Sure, they'll shit out those stupid Figment popcorn buckets, but they won't fix his fucking ride when it would be possibly the single biggest thing they could do in an entire year and it would keep people happy
  • Monorails continue to fall apart with no replacement in sight, despite being an iconic asset of the park
  • Star Wars Hotel is rumored to be only operating at 25% capacity and it's been less than a year since opening
  • Rise of the Resistance is turning into the worst mechanical nightmare Disney has had in over a decade to the point it rarely works as intended even in B mode.
  • They're still going ahead with that dumbass Splash Mountain retheme project
  • The TRON Lightcycle coaster, a clone of the original in Tokyo, has been under construction for the better part of a decade and still isn't fucking open!
But most of all...they have fucking nothing up their sleeve to combat Universal in Orlando when Epic Worlds opens in two years. Super Mario Nintendo Land alone, which is 75% a copy of one already built in Japan (the new 25% being the DK Jungle sub-land with that sick looking DK coaster), beats the shit out of anything Disney's done in the last decade.

It wouldn't surprise me if Disney temporarily shutters one of the parks entirely to cut operating costs in the near future, probably EPCOT.
It’s ironic that Universal was once the giant company that sued the growing Nintendo for Donkey Kong (and lost the case; read about it) and now is relying on Nintendo’s IP to make revenue.
 
The 2010's spending spree and especially the Fox deal (which they horrifically overpaid for) left them with effectively nothing in the tank.
I have no idea how Comcast is doing nowadays but I imagine they must be giddy their last minute bid on Fox got Disney to throw in another 20 billion dollars on the deal that came back to bite them in the ass.
Mean I still question why he did the buy out of Fox, it truly feels like they had no ideas for them outside using content for Disney+ and just let one of the biggest movie studios die when it came to cinematic efforts.
I've heard people theorizing that this was because they also wanted to get a hold of Fox's ownership of Star TV (and their corresponding streaming service) in India. Probably under the thought process that if they got a hold of the largest media company in a country of 1 Billion+ people, it would pay off in the long run since they don't have the same ability with the Chinese market.
They lost 2+ billion in 2 years from disney+ ALONE? How can that even be possible? Where is all that money going to???
Cloud servers probably. Operations costs stack up pretty quick when they nickle and dime you for every little thing.
 
So I was about to say "Guys, I hate disney as much as the next guy, but they made like 4 billion from aladin, lion king and beauty and the beast, yeah they're burning IPs but at least they're making money how bad can they possibly be-"



what

They lost 2+ billion in 2 years from disney+ ALONE? How can that even be possible? Where is all that money going to???

Also, looking at the average cost of their movies and how many of them are just tossed into disney plus with no theatrical release is starting to make those 4 billion seem like nothing compared to what they're burning.
Most streamers lose money in the few years of their existence with the start up costsand building a subscription base up. If Disney budgeted Disney+ content to be profitable at this point, they would have far less content and would dramatic slow down growth and the potential future profit they could get.

Disney+ it's self was never expect to make a profit til 2024, however the issue the losses are getting bigger not smaller. Nor is Disney+ still showing the strong growth it saw in 2021, it's still growing but not nearly as fast.

Disney’s direct-to-consumer division, which also includes Hulu and ESPN+, on Tuesday reported an operating loss of nearly $1.5 billion, more than doubling its loss of $630 million during the same quarter a year earlier.

But onto your first point, Disney has had a lot of box office bombs, pretty much anything from 20th century studios flops now due to Disney mismanagement and they had huge money loser with Lightyear this year, with Strange World looking to be their next flop.
 
Back
Top Bottom