BLM co-founder: Charity transparency laws are 'triggering' - Where's the money Patrisse?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1649861074726.png
Laws that require charities to disclose their finances and activities to the public endanger the lives of activists, Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Cullors said at a recent event.


The embattled activist, who is facing renewed criticism following reports BLM Global Network Foundation, while under her control, purchased a $6 million Los Angeles mansion, said she gets triggered whenever she hears the term IRS Form 990, the document charities are required to file to the public every year disclosing their financial activities.






"It is such a trip now to hear the term '990,'" Cullors said Friday during an event at the Vashon Center for the Arts. "I'm, like, ugh. It's, like, triggering."


BLM MIDDLEMAN STONEWALLS ON $6M MANSION PURCHASE: 'I DON'T OWE YOU AN EXPLANATION'


"I actually did not know what 990s were before all of this happened," Cullors said, an apparent reference to the Washington Examiner's reporting in January about BLM's lack of financial and leadership transparency that led multiple states, including California, to order the charity to cease raising funds until it discloses what it did with the $90 million it raised in 2020.


Cullors said activists suffer trauma and that their lives are put at risk when charities under their control are required to disclose publicly what they did with their tax-deductible donations.


"This doesn't seem safe for us, this 990 structure — this nonprofit system structure," Cullors said. "This is, like, deeply unsafe. This is being literally weaponized against us, against the people we work with."




Cullors said she's been approached by countless activists who are worried that they too will soon field requests from reporters demanding copies of their 990 forms, which charities are required by law to disclose to the public upon request.


"People's morale in an organization is so important. But if their organization and the people in it are being attacked and scrutinized at everything they do, that leads to deep burnout. that leads to deep, like, resistance and trauma," Cullors said.


Cullors, who left BLM without a leader after she resigned in May 2021 amid scrutiny of her personal real estate purchases, said media scrutiny of the charity is an "experiment," that, if successful, will be used to take down other black-led activist groups.


BLM ACCOUNTING GIMMICK FURTHER DELAYS DISCLOSURE IF ITS $60M BANKROLL


"They know what they're doing: how to create the infighting, how to create the distrust," she said. "We have to stop it before they do it. We have to shut it down. We have to be showing up against it."


Cullors did not return a request for comment.


The $6 million LA mansion BLM purchased in October 2020, just two weeks after the charity received a $66.5 million cash infusion from its former fiscal sponsor, was used in multiple videos on Cullors's personal YouTube channel, raising concerns from watchdog groups that BLM used nonprofit assets for the private benefit of its leaders.


Cullors disclosed in a phone call with reporters Monday that BLM's mansion was used as a "safe place" for her to stay for at least four nights amid an FBI investigation into a death threat made against her, NBC News reported.


BLM'S MILLIONS UNACCOUNTED FOR AFTER LEADERS QUIETLY JUMPED SHIP


“So we did use the campus as a haven, as a safe place. That derailed an announcement strategy," Cullors said in reference to the death threats. "Conditions changed, and that’s it.”

 
First; what scares a black grifter more; W-2, 1099, or 990?
According to Uncle Ruckus (no relation), a mere job application.
Sixty million bucks and they don’t even got no accountants.
If you want the best accountants, you hire dudes with small hats and poor eyesight from constantly peering at tiny little things up close, not black men. And we all know how blacks feel about the Jews...
all that money and she couldn't be arsed to get that lump off her forehead?
More like a fivehead.
 
Sadly I think Cullors is going to not only skate on this but will continue to be a successful grifter. Even if she does get in some trouble it won't affect her in the long run.

We're living in the age of the black woman. There will be no accountability for her or her ilk.
Yeah she will get handled with kid gloves but that will still be triggering because she expects absolutely no oversight or accountability whatsoever. Nobody ever told her that she couldn’t use it as their own piggy bank so it’s rayciss n’ shit to expect her to account for billions of dollars guilty whites and corporations gave her. If the IRS ever actually takes action, it’ll be a small fine that will likely get covered by a (((NGO))).
 
If the IRS ever actually takes action, it’ll be a small fine that will likely get covered by a (((NGO))).
nahm they will drop the hammer hard. she stole money more connected people were banking on. The dems have lost all hold of the grift and infighting will ramp up in the next months,
 
Yeah she will get handled with kid gloves but that will still be triggering because she expects absolutely no oversight or accountability whatsoever. Nobody ever told her that she couldn’t use it as their own piggy bank so it’s rayciss n’ shit to expect her to account for billions of dollars guilty whites and corporations gave her. If the IRS ever actually takes action, it’ll be a small fine that will likely get covered by a (((NGO))).
nahm they will drop the hammer hard. she stole money more connected people were banking on. The dems have lost all hold of the grift and infighting will ramp up in the next months,
It doesn't really matter if they prosecute Cullors and her compatriots or not; there is a huge portion of the population that will support her anyway, either because of idiotic race loyalty or fear of reprisals from those who hold said race loyalty.

The race hustle, like the transgender crazy and climate change, has a fervor that approaches a religious crusade. Multiple people I thought were very rational are repeating straight up propaganda without questioning the very obvious contradictions or outright nonsense they've glommed onto. You can't have a rational discussion with a fanatic.

Despite it being incredibly obvious this ho and her organization were not really doing anything but pocketing the money they still have insane amounts of support from people because of her skin color and the cause they're championing. She's a liability to the Dems either way but the safe money is on them surreptitiously bailing her out as that will cause fewer problems for them.
 
I'm just bemused that Patrice hasn't quietly left the country and disappeared into the Solomon Islands with several pallets of gold bullion by now. She's really missed the mark on that one.
 
I don't understand why she bought so many large homes when the upkeep costs and taxes will burn through any money she has accumulated. Does she plan to continue the grift and if so how?
Black people are notorious for their inability to think of the long term.
 
My man, we got a rich tradition of that shit. Al Capone was nabbed for tax evasion, and Al Sharptin was brought to heel for financial chicanery.
That is why Capone was a txt book example of on how to bring down someone who committed a tax crime.
I'm just bemused that Patrice hasn't quietly left the country and disappeared into the Solomon Islands with several pallets of gold bullion by now. She's really missed the mark on that one.
I think the reason why she didn’t do that was it would raise more flags and more people would find out the grift is collapsing. It would lead to the rapid downfall of the organization.
 
That is why Capone was a txt book example of on how to bring down someone who committed a tax crime.

I think the reason why she didn’t do that was it would raise more flags and more people would find out the grift is collapsing. It would lead to the rapid downfall of the organization.
She didn't think she would ever have anyone looking at her that she couldn't find off with a screech of 'rayciss!'
 
Let’s say:

- BLM is a DNC fundraising cover operation
- Cullors and Khan have already burned through the cash
- The government has a long, expensive fight ahead of them to (legally) sort this all out

If you’re the DNC in this situation, wouldn’t it be far easier to quietly take care of the individuals involved and “Eminent Domain” their way into ownership of the properties?

Also, at this point, if you’re asking “Can they quietly make this go away?” I’d say I’m sure the DNC has enough friends in MSM and Social Media to bury the story and ban anyone who ever mentions it. The issue, if they do, what happens if the Republicans come into power and decide they’re getting their payback for killing the Hunter Biden Laptop story?

This is a case where I think the only safe resolution is to let Cullors and Khan see what happens when you fuck around and give them a Clinton Suicide if the DNC even suspects they’re willing to talk.
 
I remember back in 2020, there was a donation thing for BLM that was set up, Share Blue or something? People noticed that if the money wasn't sent on to charities within a certain period it would automatically dump into the DNC's funds.

I wonder if those pages were set up with the expectation that the grifters in BLM would get some of the money, but it was expected that the lions share would go to the DNC. Only the grifters were cagier than they expected and drained the shit out of the slush fund as fast as it came in, leaving nothing to flow on to the DNC.

If so, I can see her getting stuck with the charges, as a bunch of various shadowy bureaucrats and such getting pissy "their" money was taken and used by such a crass grifter, rather than their upperclass grifting.
 
I remember back in 2020, there was a donation thing for BLM that was set up, Share Blue or something? People noticed that if the money wasn't sent on to charities within a certain period it would automatically dump into the DNC's funds.

I wonder if those pages were set up with the expectation that the grifters in BLM would get some of the money, but it was expected that the lions share would go to the DNC. Only the grifters were cagier than they expected and drained the shit out of the slush fund as fast as it came in, leaving nothing to flow on to the DNC.

If so, I can see her getting stuck with the charges, as a bunch of various shadowy bureaucrats and such getting pissy "their" money was taken and used by such a crass grifter, rather than their upperclass grifting.
Maybe even "this wasn't the REAL BLM!"
 
Let’s say:

- BLM is a DNC fundraising cover operation
- Cullors and Khan have already burned through the cash
- The government has a long, expensive fight ahead of them to (legally) sort this all out

If you’re the DNC in this situation, wouldn’t it be far easier to quietly take care of the individuals involved and “Eminent Domain” their way into ownership of the properties?

Also, at this point, if you’re asking “Can they quietly make this go away?” I’d say I’m sure the DNC has enough friends in MSM and Social Media to bury the story and ban anyone who ever mentions it. The issue, if they do, what happens if the Republicans come into power and decide they’re getting their payback for killing the Hunter Biden Laptop story?

This is a case where I think the only safe resolution is to let Cullors and Khan see what happens when you fuck around and give them a Clinton Suicide if the DNC even suspects they’re willing to talk.
I say the republicans and the populist need to play this to their advantage. Both the laptop story and this need to be at the forefront
 
I say the republicans and the populist need to play this to their advantage. Both the laptop story and this need to be at the forefront
They need to, but they won't. Either they're still stuck on the idea of Losing with Dignity™️ or they're just uniparty members with an (R) next to their name.
 
Cullors said activists suffer trauma and that their lives are put at risk when charities under their control are required to disclose publicly what they did with their tax-deductible donations.

"This doesn't seem safe for us, this 990 structure — this nonprofit system structure," Cullors said. "This is, like, deeply unsafe. This is being literally weaponized against us, against the people we work with."
Woah, hey, I agree. Also, let's think about the trauma and risk of the IRS or anybody else determining what counts as a charity or not. I like where this is going! The IRS shouldn't be able to know anything about any charity or anyone who runs a charity or what is or is not a charity at all. Don't let them weaponize the tax code against all 340 million of us charity operators!
 
They need to, but they won't. Either they're still stuck on the idea of Losing with Dignity™️ or they're just uniparty members with an (R) next to their name.
That is why people should just vote for the populist candidate
 
Back
Top Bottom